|
Title: TIBET Post by: Callum on March 17, 2008, 01:03:36 PM I have scanned all sections in the political discussions - I seem to have missed the thread that condemns the Chinese suppression of the Tibetans culture, that denies their basic human rights and kills non-violent protesters.
If I've overlooked, please point me in the right direction. If not, where is the righteous indignation of the right? Hiding behind Olympic profits? Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Fredledingue on March 17, 2008, 01:18:29 PM Well, someone had to start a thread to begin with, don't you think. So why not you?
IAP supports FREE TIBET! (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/Flag_of_Tibet.svg/240px-Flag_of_Tibet.svg.png) Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Callum on March 17, 2008, 01:44:04 PM Well, someone had to start a thread to begin with, don't you think. So why not you? IAP supports FREE TIBET! (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/Flag_of_Tibet.svg/240px-Flag_of_Tibet.svg.png) Sure Fred. Like it only started happening an hour ago..... Problem is that China wants the land, has invaded, is slowly strangling the native population, is 'importing' millions to takeover, and shoots demonstrators.... where have we heard that before? No doubt, when the demonstrators start arming themselves, we'll hear all about 'for the defence of China', and 'they are themselves to blame'. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: OswaldTheOsprey on March 17, 2008, 02:04:02 PM Berlin 1936 all over again?
OswaldTheOsprey Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Callum on March 17, 2008, 02:17:46 PM Berlin 1936 all over again? OswaldTheOsprey Yup. Some people learn their lessons well, don't they. Fail to see your analogy applying to Tibet, but it holds well elsewhere.... Title: Re: TIBET Post by: OswaldTheOsprey on March 17, 2008, 02:33:31 PM Berlin 1936 all over again? OswaldTheOsprey Yup. Some people learn their lessons well, don't they. Fail to see your analogy applying to Tibet, but it holds well elsewhere.... Yes, I was referring to the Olympics. In a sense, one could possibly compare Tibetans to Jews in Germany-a repressed and mistreated group. OswaldTheOsprey Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Callum on March 17, 2008, 02:46:28 PM Berlin 1936 all over again? OswaldTheOsprey Yup. Some people learn their lessons well, don't they. Fail to see your analogy applying to Tibet, but it holds well elsewhere.... Yes, I was referring to the Olympics. In a sense, one could possibly compare Tibetans to Jews in Germany-a repressed and mistreated group. OswaldTheOsprey Ahhhh yes. Sorry I didn't get the connection... but the "wants the land, has invaded, is slowly strangling the native population, is 'importing' millions to takeover, and shoots demonstrators" bit seems a bit out of place, don't you think? Try and think of a more up to date analogy, hein? Start in 1948 (mm of course. One has violent resistance, the other non-violent. Both of course are farting in the face of thunder) Title: Re: TIBET Post by: OswaldTheOsprey on March 17, 2008, 02:51:41 PM Berlin 1936 all over again? OswaldTheOsprey Yup. Some people learn their lessons well, don't they. Fail to see your analogy applying to Tibet, but it holds well elsewhere.... Yes, I was referring to the Olympics. In a sense, one could possibly compare Tibetans to Jews in Germany-a repressed and mistreated group. OswaldTheOsprey Ahhhh yes. Sorry I didn't get the connection... but the "wants the land, has invaded, is slowly strangling the native population, is 'importing' millions to takeover, and shoots demonstrators" bit seems a bit out of place, don't you think? Try and think of a more up to date analogy, hein? Start in 1948 (mm of course. One has violent resistance, the other non-violent. Both of course are farting in the face of thunder) Yes I see your point. Neither Tibetans or Palestinians have high powered Washington lobbyists. Nor is the world eager for their trade. OswaldTheOsprey Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Callum on March 17, 2008, 03:50:37 PM Yes I see your point. Neither Tibetans or Palestinians have high powered Washington lobbyists. Nor is the world eager for their trade. OswaldTheOsprey Bingo! However, the palestinian analogy isnt what I REALLY wanted to express here. The mark of a democracy is how it treats its minorities: there aren't many pure democracies, but its fairly certain that China aint even an impure one! Title: Re: TIBET Post by: OswaldTheOsprey on March 17, 2008, 04:03:13 PM Yes I see your point. Neither Tibetans or Palestinians have high powered Washington lobbyists. Nor is the world eager for their trade. OswaldTheOsprey Bingo! However, the palestinian analogy isnt what I REALLY wanted to express here. The mark of a democracy is how it treats its minorities: there aren't many pure democracies, but its fairly certain that China aint even an impure one! It certain is not. The People's Republic of China-ha ha! OswaldTheOsprey Title: Re: TIBET Post by: PinkTickingClocks on March 17, 2008, 09:17:38 PM The fact of the matter is China thinks they own everything, everyone in Asia is Chinese, whether they deny it or not. Doesn't matter where you go there is always going to be a considerable percentage of the population that is ethnically Chinese. Take for example Singapore i believe 75% of the people are ethnically Chinese and Mandarin is shoved down their throats in school? One way you can look at is that they're like a bad ass religious group that believes in bombastic self-righteousness. They're probably going to just take over, and worst case scenario is that we're all going to be a variation on the shades of yellow and red. Which is fine we'll be better off with our new Confucian values!
As for Tibet, the roots and history goes back for centuries. I guess you can blame the Mongols. Anyway, I'm all for Tibet being a separate state, nothing is worth bloodshed to unarmed peoples. Hell if the Vatican can exist in Rome as a separate state. Tibet better as well be free! Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Abraxas on March 21, 2008, 07:29:22 AM Far be it from the US to actively protest against China...
"Please sir, don't take your $800 Billion in US bonds..." Tibet, Myanmar, Iran... how many times does the US have to watch true Democracy spreading before it starts actually DOING anything about it? I'm not talking about military support... but vociferous condemnation of China wouldn't be a bad start. Perhaps giving Tibet greater leverage in discussions? C'mon America... we're waiting... I'm reminded of a quote, though: "The strong will do what they please. The weak will suffer what they must." - unknown Title: Re: TIBET Post by: OswaldTheOsprey on March 21, 2008, 07:43:54 AM Far be it from the US to actively protest against China... "Please sir, don't take your $800 Billion in US bonds..." Tibet, Myanmar, Iran... how many times does the US have to watch true Democracy spreading before it starts actually DOING anything about it? I'm not talking about military support... but vociferous condemnation of China wouldn't be a bad start. Perhaps giving Tibet greater leverage in discussions? C'mon America... we're waiting... I'm reminded of a quote, though: "The strong will do what they please. The weak will suffer what they must." - unknown Excellent quote-unfortunately very, very true all throughout history. OswaldTheOsprey Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Abraxas on March 21, 2008, 07:59:30 AM Well, I would have preferred something a little more bipartisan... but it's a start:
Quote from: ABC News Pelosi Meets with Dalai Llama, Offers Support ABC New's Nick Schifrin reports from Dharamsala: US Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi made one of the highest-ranking U.S. official visits ever to Dharamsala, India, the exile home of the Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Llama, today. While standing next to the Dalai Llama, she denounced "China's oppression of people in Tibet." The rest... (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/03/pelosi-meets-wi.html) Now if I can get, say, Bush, Cheney (who's too busy wooing the Saudis at the moment (http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080321/D8VHSTO01.html) ::) ) and Rice to say the same thing, then I'm square. Next is giving Tibet something to negotiate with. Personally, I don't know the region or situation well, but there has to be something that the US can do to snub China on behalf of Tibet. And the Dali Lama seems ready to negotiate: Quote from: The Independent Dalai Lama: 'I am prepared to face China. I will go to Beijing' As crisis over Tibet deepens, Dalai Lama makes extraordinary offer to negotiate directly with President Hu Jintao Almost half a century after he fled to India, the Dalai Lama has raised the extraordinary prospect of travelling to Beijing and holding face-to-talks with the Chinese regime in an effort to resolve Tibet's most serious crisis for two decades. Having watched helplessly from exile as his Tibetan homeland has suffered under Chinese rule, the man regarded as a living god by millions of his followers said yesterday that he was ready to negotiate personally with the Chinese leadership. The Dalai Lama, 73, acknowledged the difficulty associated with a face-to-face summit, but said he was even ready to meet President Hu Jintao, notorious in Tibet for his hardline approach when he served as Tibet's local Communist leader. "I am always ready to meet the Chinese leaders, and particularly Hu Jintao. I am very happy to meet," he told a small group of journalists at his office in Dharamsala. "But as I mentioned earlier, to go to Beijing and meet leaders... that would be big news. Many Tibetans would think... may develop some unrealistic expectations. I have to think very carefully." China has an oppurtunity to offer an olive branch... or a gun muzzle. Let's hope they choose the former... Title: Re: TIBET Post by: yasho on April 05, 2008, 07:56:27 AM While I certainly support the Tibet cause, I fail to understand why are we unable to see the plight of other groups of people:
1. the Kurds in Turkey 2. the Chechens in Russia 3. the Palestinians Title: Re: TIBET Post by: OswaldTheOsprey on April 05, 2008, 08:17:12 AM Abraxas:
Let's hope the Chinese switch from the gun muzzle to the olive branch. One would think that they would exercise a little tact with the Olympics coming up but apparently not. OswaldTheOsprey Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on April 07, 2008, 04:03:21 PM Stop talking about China and start acting, until is not too late, or you'll all end up eating low calories rice for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
Start looking for the label when you go shopping for a DVD player, you cheapo. Personally, I cannot understand how somebody can be happy with let's say a 50$ cheap discount, no name machine, that will go bust in less than 2 years. I prefer to buy a 100-200$ top of the line, longer lasting and with a piece of mind. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: dolphin123 on April 07, 2008, 07:27:35 PM I have scanned all sections in the political discussions - I seem to have missed the thread that condemns the Chinese suppression of the Tibetans culture, that denies their basic human rights and kills non-violent protesters. If I've overlooked, please point me in the right direction. If not, where is the righteous indignation of the right? Hiding behind Olympic profits? Serfdom is a major part of Tibetan culture. If you were indicating that "culture " that China deprived from those slave-owner, I will tell you, we are proud of that. And you , you do not know what you are talking about, do you? Title: Re: TIBET Post by: dolphin123 on April 07, 2008, 07:29:22 PM Well, someone had to start a thread to begin with, don't you think. So why not you? IAP supports FREE TIBET! (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/Flag_of_Tibet.svg/240px-Flag_of_Tibet.svg.png) I strongly ask for a resign of your moderator title because you are not suitable for that. Jail yourslef. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: dolphin123 on April 07, 2008, 07:31:20 PM Berlin 1936 all over again? OswaldTheOsprey No, but London's host will be. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: dolphin123 on April 07, 2008, 07:34:45 PM Berlin 1936 all over again? OswaldTheOsprey Yup. Some people learn their lessons well, don't they. Fail to see your analogy applying to Tibet, but it holds well elsewhere.... Yes, I was referring to the Olympics. In a sense, one could possibly compare Tibetans to Jews in Germany-a repressed and mistreated group. OswaldTheOsprey Too bad you are ignorance but this time it is not bliss. We all see you make fool of yourself without being alerted except I, your Godfather. You are backing up a political regime which was defined as "Slavery", you SOB! Get your own life elsewhere! Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Abraxas on April 07, 2008, 07:43:02 PM dolphin123, please refrain from:
A) Serial posting. We'd like to keep all posts and opinions in one post if possible. You can edit your posts or multi-quote if you need to. It saves banswidth. B) Questioning the decisions of mods on the forum. If you have a problem with a member of the staff, send a courteous PM to either that person or another member of the staff. Thank you. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on April 08, 2008, 05:28:57 AM Don't worry about it Abraxas. Dolphin's just on his high horse because he's one of the special ones allowed to post on internet forums. Probably all he had to do for the privilege is get sterilized. Considering the Chinese who have been sentenced to years in prison for saying what they think on international Internet forums, we can understand Dophin for the party puppet he is by proxy of his presence. It's obvious he's going to tow any line handed to him. His mind is not his own, it belongs to the "People".
Quote Serfdom is a major part of Tibetan culture. No, surfdom is a major part of Chinese culture. You have it confused. Now go build my railway. Quote I strongly ask for a resign of your moderator title because you are not suitable for that. Jail yourslef. 3 posts in and already he figures people should be put in jail for what they say. Oh....AND FREE FUCKING TIBET! Ahk Title: Re: TIBET Post by: dolphin123 on April 08, 2008, 07:00:27 PM skull, take a look at this, will you?
http://vhead.blog.sina.com.cn/player/outer_player.swf?auto=0&vid=11982396&uid=1290700371 http://vhead.blog.sina.com.cn/player/outer_player.swf?auto=0&vid=11982396&uid=1290700371 (http://vhead.blog.sina.com.cn/player/outer_player.swf?auto=0&vid=11982396&uid=1290700371) Title: Re: TIBET Post by: OswaldTheOsprey on April 08, 2008, 07:05:54 PM Berlin 1936 all over again? OswaldTheOsprey Yup. Some people learn their lessons well, don't they. Fail to see your analogy applying to Tibet, but it holds well elsewhere.... Yes, I was referring to the Olympics. In a sense, one could possibly compare Tibetans to Jews in Germany-a repressed and mistreated group. OswaldTheOsprey Too bad you are ignorance but this time it is not bliss. We all see you make fool of yourself without being alerted except I, your Godfather. You are backing up a political regime which was defined as "Slavery", you SOB! Get your own life elsewhere! :sleepy: :sleepy: :sleepy: :sleepy: :sleepy:Someone say something? :sleepy: :sleepy: :sleepy: :sleepy: :sleepy: OswaldTheOsprey Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Dormouse on April 09, 2008, 06:14:51 AM I believe China's soveriegn claim over Tibet is substantially equal to the US claim over California.
Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Abraxas on April 09, 2008, 08:09:20 AM Not entirely accurate.
As I understand it, "The Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet" in Simla in 1914 is still the document that defines Tibet's autonomy - thus making China's claim on the region null and void. "Article 2. The Governments of Great Britain and China recognizing that Tibet is under the suzerainty of China, and recognizing also the autonomy of Outer Tibet, engage to respect the territorial integrity of the country, and to abstain from interference in the administration of Outer Tibet (including the selection and installation of the Dalai Lama), which shall remain in the hands of the Tibetan Government at Lhasa. The Government of China engages not to convert Tibet into a Chinese province. The Government of Great Britain engages not to annex Tibet or any portion of it." - LINK (http://www.tibetjustice.org/materials/treaties/treaties16.html) China violated this agreement in the '50s when they invaded Tibet, crushed what little military resistence Tibet offered and forced them to sign the "Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet". But even this agreement allowed Tibet "the right of exercising national regional autonomy," though "under the unified leadership of the Central People's Government" LINK (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventeen_Point_Agreement_for_the_Peaceful_Liberation_of_Tibet) (yes, it's Wikipedia... so sue me. It's just the translation, anyway). Basically, I think it's more approrpriate to say China has as much right to Tibet as we do to Peurto Rico... I'm not afraid to admit that my knowledge on the subject doesn't go beyond what little I've read around the internet. I'm not asserting that I'm right, just that given what I've read, I disagree. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Dormouse on April 09, 2008, 02:05:32 PM Not entirely accurate. An excellent post as an argument against an alleged Chinese claim to a long-standing legal claim upon Tibet.As I understand it, "The Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet" in Simla in 1914 is still the document that defines Tibet's autonomy - thus making China's claim on the region null and void. ... However, I didn't make that argument or assertion. I'm no Chinese partisan. :) As far as I'm concerned, China's sovereign right over Tibet is indeed similar to the US right over Spanish California, which is very similar to Britain's right over Quebec, which is very similar to England's right over Wales, and France's right over Brittainy and Provencal (I'm too lazy and English arrogant to put proper accent-thingies on foreign words). That is to say, they exist by 'right of conquest' and subsequent occupation. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on April 09, 2008, 02:32:39 PM ^^^
I'll trade 'em Quebec for Tibet in a heartbeat. >:-> Ahk Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Abraxas on April 11, 2008, 07:46:42 AM This is what I mean:
China rages over attack on disabled torch bearer (http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20080411/tpl-uk-china-olympics-rage-43a8d4f.html) How is this rational? How does this make you look better? You hit a person in a WHEEL CHAIR, for God's sake! This just makes China look that much better by comparison... And a new twist to the whole thing? Japan says no to Chinese torch guards: reports (http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersComService_2_MOLT/idUST21452620080411) Curious to see how this goes... Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Dormouse on April 11, 2008, 07:59:30 AM ^^^ You a Canuck Ahkenaten? I'll trade 'em Quebec for Tibet in a heartbeat. >:-> Ahk I'd certainly love to trade Quebec away (a 3rd round draft pick looks good) but this particular trade don't look so good. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on April 11, 2008, 08:24:09 AM Yes. Edmonton Alberta.
edit. split the rest to lobby Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Fredledingue on April 16, 2008, 12:27:23 PM Did you see? China says that they have found weapons in Tibetian monasteries.
Pure forgery IMO. Link (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080416/wl_nm/china_tibet_monasteries_dc;_ylt=AibcOXyEYBZ_g1q.nEbgD_Vm.3QA) Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 17, 2008, 08:05:00 PM Don't you hear of the saying that you don't have say-so if you don't investigate the true facts ?
Most of you haven't gone to China and the message you get are almost wrong. I hope you realize that all of you are cheated by DaLai LaMa and your media such as CNN. I restate the truth that Tibet was,is and will be a part of China forever. I suggest and welcome all of you to come to China for finding out the facts using your own eyes. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on April 18, 2008, 05:47:14 AM ^^ Brought to you by the Chinese politburo.
Unfortunately solvay since we know how much effort China puts into subduing free speech and halting their citizens from posting their true opinions online -- with penalties of up to 30 years in prison for criticizing the gov't -- well, that kinda makes your opinion worth all the snot in my nose. Tell me if it was "always part of China" then why did you have to kill so many when you sent your army in? In fact why did you have to kill so many at all? Why did you have to banish the priests if it was "always part of China"? Where did they come from? Why did you have to destroy their monistaries? Where did they come from? Maybe the Japanese taught you well at Nanking? Oh and welcome to the forum. Ahk Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Fredledingue on April 18, 2008, 09:45:38 AM The problem is not that Tibet is part of China. The problem is that China was communist and still led by the communist party. Something that Tibetian cannot accept and we understand why.
Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Wiglaf on April 21, 2008, 04:36:27 PM I believe China's soveriegn claim over Tibet is substantially equal to the US claim over California. Bully for you! Prove it. Not entirely accurate. An excellent post as an argument against an alleged Chinese claim to a long-standing legal claim upon Tibet.As I understand it, "The Convention Between Great Britain, China, and Tibet" in Simla in 1914 is still the document that defines Tibet's autonomy - thus making China's claim on the region null and void. ... However, I didn't make that argument or assertion. I'm no Chinese partisan. :) As far as I'm concerned, China's sovereign right over Tibet is indeed similar to the US right over Spanish California, which is very similar to Britain's right over Quebec, which is very similar to England's right over Wales, and France's right over Brittainy and Provencal (I'm too lazy and English arrogant to put proper accent-thingies on foreign words). That is to say, they exist by 'right of conquest' and subsequent occupation. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Dormouse on April 26, 2008, 04:59:56 AM Well, someone had to start a thread to begin with, don't you think. So why not you? IAP supports war against China? Count me out please.IAP supports FREE TIBET! (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/Flag_of_Tibet.svg/240px-Flag_of_Tibet.svg.png) Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Fredledingue on April 26, 2008, 08:50:42 AM Free tibet doesn't mean war against China.
And the Dalai Lama doesn't want war. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Peisithanatos on April 28, 2008, 08:49:56 AM free Tibet may well mean war. Freedom tends to come through wars pretty often.
Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Dormouse on April 28, 2008, 09:26:29 AM Free tibet doesn't mean war against China. I don't give a crap what the Dalai Lama wants or doesn't want. And the Dalai Lama doesn't want war. To "free Tibet" requires war with China. I see no other available option. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on April 28, 2008, 09:44:56 AM Quote Freedom tends to come through wars pretty often. Eww! Eww! Bookmarked. Gonna remember that quote. There we go. Right beside, "you can't bring freedom at the end of a rifle". Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Fredledingue on April 28, 2008, 01:57:02 PM Free tibet doesn't mean war against China. I don't give a crap what the Dalai Lama wants or doesn't want. And the Dalai Lama doesn't want war. To "free Tibet" requires war with China. I see no other available option. I do seeone however: China gives tibetians what they want. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Peisithanatos on April 29, 2008, 05:30:48 AM Quote "you can't bring freedom at the end of a rifle". watch "Braveheart" again. That was a spear, not a rifle, though. I know you like another quote better: Freedom comes on the wings of the court room papers. Alas, there are not enough competent juries and judges to awards freedom to everyone. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Dormouse on April 29, 2008, 06:30:27 AM Free tibet doesn't mean war against China. I don't give a crap what the Dalai Lama wants or doesn't want. And the Dalai Lama doesn't want war. To "free Tibet" requires war with China. I see no other available option. I do seeone however: China gives tibetians what they want. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 29, 2008, 06:39:58 AM ^^ Brought to you by the Chinese politburo. Unfortunately solvay since we know how much effort China puts into subduing free speech and halting their citizens from posting their true opinions online -- with penalties of up to 30 years in prison for criticizing the gov't Ahk AHK, how do you know "Unfortunately solvay since we know how much effort China puts into subduing free speech and halting their citizens from posting their true opinions online "? Nowadays every chinese people can express their ideas and thougts freely online.I don't know where are the messages you show from but I hope that you can provide necessary prooves. I don't know if you can write and say chinese, if you can I welcome you to the websites of China to comprehend the real China and Tibet.At the same time Welcome everyone to come to China. Just now I login the forum and find that the ban for me is cancelled. Now I can talk freely. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 29, 2008, 07:25:14 AM well, that kinda makes your opinion worth all the snot in my nose. Well, please advert your culture when express your opinions.Ahk Tell me if it was "always part of China" then why did you have to kill so many when you sent your army in? In fact why did you have to kill so many at all? Why did you have to banish the priests if it was "always part of China"? Where did they come from? Why did you have to destroy their monistaries? Where did they come from? Maybe the Japanese taught you well at Nanking? Ahk Does your country allow any actions that split one or several states such as Alaska from US ? You will take what measures when it happens. In the 3.14 event of Tibet there are many people who are killed by Dalai Lama are populace. Motherland never banish Dalai Lama.Otherwise Dalai Lama is a monk but not a priest.I hope you can correctly understand the differentia of monk and priest. Dalai Lama comes from Pingan county Qinghai province of China and he borned in a ordinary farmer family and his old name is Xiangba Pingcuo.when he was three years old he was elected as a Lingtong. laterly he become Dalai Lama.He betrayed motherland on march 17,1959 and escape to India.He is a traitor. Maybe the Japanese taught you well at Nanking? AHKAhk Your attitude for treating history is bloodcurdling and displeasing.maybe you are a militarist.You are thirsting for becoming a fuck Japanese. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on April 29, 2008, 02:13:15 PM Solvay,
When you say Dalai Lama is a traitor, you mean he should have stayed put and be brainwashed by the Godless communists ? Treason, btw, doesn't mean running away. Running away, in the worst case, could be equal to cowardice, but for sure doesn't mean treason at all. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 29, 2008, 04:16:15 PM Solvay, what you understand about the meaning of "traitor" and "treason" indicates that you don't know the definition about the two words and meanwhile it shows that you are ignorant about the history and that you still don't see clearly the inbeing of Dalai Lama who is trying to split motherland.Hereon I consumingly condemn him.He is a scum of a community.When you say Dalai Lama is a traitor, you mean he should have stayed put and be brainwashed by the Godless communists ? Treason, btw, doesn't mean running away. Running away, in the worst case, could be equal to cowardice, but for sure doesn't mean treason at all. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on April 29, 2008, 05:07:34 PM Quote Nowadays every chinese people can express their ideas and thougts freely online Uhh no. Their national firewall and prosecution of people who protest or post disparaging views of China online is well documented. Nice try though spook. Quote In the 3.14 event of Tibet there are many people who are killed by Dalai Lama are populace. HAHAHAHA. Quote Motherland never banish Dalai Lama.Otherwise Dalai Lama is a monk but not a priest no. "Mother" would never do that. How much 'medication' are you on? Quote Your attitude for treating history is bloodcurdling and displeasing.maybe you are a militarist.You are thirsting for becoming a fuck Japanese. now now. No point crying. You are killing them. You are destroying them. You are raping them and you call it "your right". This is what the Japanese did so if you figure that's a nasty word then look in the mirror because it's you. Ahk Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 29, 2008, 09:08:06 PM AHK
I am very angry for your ignoring the facts and your wicked wordages.You should examine your heart because it could have become black.It's sick and only justice and conscience can rescue it. withal I consumingly comdemn you and you must apologize to me. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on April 29, 2008, 09:17:02 PM AHK ;) Good one!I am very angry for your ignoring the facts and your wicked wordages.You should examine your heart because it could have become black.It's sick and only justice and conscience can rescue it. withal I consumingly comdemn you and you must apologize to me. By the way solvay, read your PM's and respond to the one I sent about your spamming the forum. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Wiglaf on April 29, 2008, 09:27:06 PM What are wicked wordages?
Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 29, 2008, 09:56:22 PM Biker Dude,
Hello, nice to meet you here.I just say out the fact and I never have done the spamming the forum. Wiglaf, hello,"wicked wordages" means that disregarding of the truth but go one's own way. I want to quote a sentence from an article published on Sunday Telegraph of April 13, 2008 which is written by Fu Ying who is an Chinese Ambassador to Britain. She said,"The world has waited for China to join it, now China has to have the patience to wait for the world to understand China." Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on April 30, 2008, 04:22:48 AM Biker Dude, Yes you did. You posted the exact same thread in multiple forums. THAT is spamming. And that call is mine and Ahk's to make. Not yours or some fat cat party member. Hello, nice to meet you here.I just say out the fact and I never have done the spamming the forum. Wiglaf, Then you are guilty of 'wicked wordages' in regard to your spamming. You must apologize to me for this.hello,"wicked wordages" means that disregarding of the truth but go one's own way. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on April 30, 2008, 05:05:57 AM I consumingly comdemn you and you must apologize to me. That's wicked :D Solvay, may I ask you, who the f&$# you think you are ? You have to raise up, at least above kinder-garden level, to be taken a bit seriously. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on April 30, 2008, 06:31:52 AM Quote AHK I am very angry for your ignoring the facts and your wicked wordages.You should examine your heart because it could have become black.It's sick and only justice and conscience can rescue it. withal I consumingly comdemn you and you must apologize to me. We have a saying in the West: the truth hurts. Ahk Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 30, 2008, 04:56:05 PM Yes you did. You posted the exact same thread in multiple forums. THAT is spamming. And that call is mine and Ahk's to make. Not yours or some fat cat party member. There are two same subjects "Tibet" and "a chinese wanna say something about tibet" in the "Europe and Asia". In addition "cauboi" and "AHK" have done the same thing as I did.Why don't you warn them? That is not my fault but yours.Why don't you delete one of them? ps: I am not a party member but just a ordinary student who love my country and my people. Maybe some fat cat are Dlemocrat or Republican who push power politics all over the world. I think easterners and westerners have different viewpoints about some problems sometimes.That's reasons as follows: first:the background of culture is different; second:the ideology is different; third:the information and knowledge we obtain is different.etc. sometimes we need learn the philosophy which help us know the world more exactly and form the right world view. we should listen to the sound from heart each other.Then our lives will become better and we will live in a harmonious world. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 30, 2008, 05:06:17 PM That's wicked :D Solvay, may I ask you, who the f&$# you think you are ? You have to raise up, at least above kinder-garden level, to be taken a bit seriously. Maybe my English is poor therefor I made some mistakes. How can you call names that shows you are underbred and you are equal junk. However who the f*** you think you are ? Can you say mandarin of chinese ? Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on April 30, 2008, 06:15:19 PM Yes you did. You posted the exact same thread in multiple forums. THAT is spamming. And that call is mine and Ahk's to make. Not yours or some fat cat party member. There are two same subjects "Tibet" and "a chinese wanna say something about tibet" in the "Europe and Asia". In addition "cauboi" and "AHK" have done the same thing as I did.Why don't you warn them? That is not my fault but yours.Why don't you delete one of them? ps: I am not a party member but just a ordinary student who love my country and my people. Maybe some fat cat are Dlemocrat or Republican who push power politics all over the world. I think easterners and westerners have different viewpoints about some problems sometimes.That's reasons as follows: first:the background of culture is different; second:the ideology is different; third:the information and knowledge we obtain is different.etc. sometimes we need learn the philosophy which help us know the world more exactly and form the right world view. we should listen to the sound from heart each other.Then our lives will become better and we will live in a harmonious world. And while I don't think you are some poor student who just happens to have free and clear internet access, bottom line is I really don't give a shit. You spammed. You got suspended. Do it again and you will be suspended again. Longer. End of discussion. This is not a debate. This is me informing you. For the last time. Understand? Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on April 30, 2008, 07:59:22 PM Solvay,
we needn't argue with them.Obviously,we have different viewpoints on many problems.This is not our faults and their faults.It's all because the environment we live in.We've been told too many different stories on history and some issues as I said. But please ingore their rude words. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on April 30, 2008, 08:12:43 PM http://vhead.blog.sina.com.cn/player/outer_player.swf?auto=1&vid=12417440&uid=
This is a hot video on Chinese website.If you can watch it,Please think about it deeply.Thanks!! Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on April 30, 2008, 08:40:50 PM Beyond the blatant propaganda, and convenient forgetting of basic facts, I couldn't stomach more than two minutes of it. I mean give me a fucking break, it starts with Mao's portrait? Do you people really fall for this mindless drivel over there?
Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Wiglaf on April 30, 2008, 08:41:18 PM http://vhead.blog.sina.com.cn/player/outer_player.swf?auto=1&vid=12417440&uid= Great comedy piece. If you want to end the exploitation of Chinese workers(I certainly don't deny that Western companies and Chinese contractors exploit them), remove the most important government which colludes with them(China's). That would be standing up for China, not defending its thuggish government .This is a hot video on Chinese website.If you can watch it,Please think about it deeply.Thanks!! Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on April 30, 2008, 08:46:21 PM http://vhead.blog.sina.com.cn/player/outer_player.swf?auto=1&vid=12417440&uid= This is a hot video on Chinese website.If you can watch it,Please think about it deeply.Thanks!! Great piece of communist propaganda! Comrade Zhr, Zieg Hail to your fucking government! Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on April 30, 2008, 08:51:16 PM Beyond the blatant propaganda, and convenient forgetting of basic facts, I couldn't stomach more than two minutes of it. I mean give me a fucking break, it starts with Mao's portrait? Do you people really fall for this mindless drivel over there? Do you watch the whole video??????????????? Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on April 30, 2008, 08:52:37 PM Beyond the blatant propaganda, and convenient forgetting of basic facts, I couldn't stomach more than two minutes of it. I mean give me a fucking break, it starts with Mao's portrait? Do you people really fall for this mindless drivel over there? Do you watch the whole video??????????????? I couldn't stand more than 1 minute Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on April 30, 2008, 08:56:12 PM OH you didn't watch it!!So please watch the whole video,before you express your "right "opinion.
You just watch a seconds than you say this is a bad video just like you just know a little thing about Tibet ,then you said come here to say a lot of "right "opinion!!! Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on April 30, 2008, 09:02:41 PM OH you didn't watch it!!So please watch the whole video,before you express your "right "opinion. You just watch a seconds than you say this is a bad video just like you just know a little thing about Tibet ,then you said come here to say a lot of "right "opinion!!! I already told you once: you cannot brainwash me. That is cheap propaganda which makes me puke. Try to grow up. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on April 30, 2008, 09:09:51 PM I've said so many times MR "MOTHER FUCKERS" I don't wanna brainwash anybody.I just wanna the world listen our voice.But as I said I don't care your opinion on China and Chinese.
Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Wiglaf on April 30, 2008, 09:16:53 PM Do you watch the whole video??????????????? Yep. I'd say it's a case of wrapping yourself in the flag because otherwise your naked shame would be displayed for all to see.Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on April 30, 2008, 09:21:11 PM Do you watch the whole video??????????????? Yep. I'd say it's a case of wrapping yourself in the flag because otherwise your naked shame would be displayed for all to see.What's you mean??? Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on April 30, 2008, 09:23:23 PM I've said so many times MR "MOTHER FUCKERS" I don't wanna brainwash anybody.I just wanna the world listen our voice.But as I said I don't care your opinion on China and Chinese. Well, if you want your voice heard, you should try to speak a little more truthfully, and leave the propaganda out, MR. MOTHER FUCKER. And if it is the propaganda that you want us to hear, your cause is lost already. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on April 30, 2008, 09:32:08 PM I've said so many times MR "MOTHER FUCKERS" I don't wanna brainwash anybody.I just wanna the world listen our voice.But as I said I don't care your opinion on China and Chinese. Well, if you want your voice heard, you should try to speak a little more truthfully, and leave the propaganda out, MR. MOTHER FUCKER. And if it is the propaganda that you want us to hear, your cause is lost already. Thank you for your advice.But I guess you don't know why I call Mr Cauboi Mr "MOTHER FUCKER" You'd best watch the thread "a chinese wanna say something about Tibet". So you called these are propaganda,but first all of things showed in the viedo are the truth,all of us can see it.The voice we wanna you hear is that some westerner media they are telling lies.Some evdiences are showed in this video too.I don't wanna say How great China and Chinese are,I just wanna let you know our opinions on Tibet and the western media are liars.And I also wanna say maybe the way we express our opinion are not right,but this is our most Chinese heart voice. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on April 30, 2008, 09:33:37 PM zhr,
Yes, you are right.We needn't argue with them who are haughty and have prejudice congesting their ugly heart. Biker Dude, You are a adult and as an administrator who should equitably manage the forum.However you bully me again and again for banning me. Meanwhile you are vulgar and you must apologize to me. cauboi, Supervising youself firstly then rebuke others. In the end I don't want to say anything to those mindless and inequitable junks again. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on May 01, 2008, 05:05:52 AM Thank you for your advice.But I guess you don't know why I call Mr Cauboi Mr "MOTHER FUCKER" You'd best watch the thread "a chinese wanna say something about Tibet". I don't care why you call him that. It is something you feel free to use, so you should be fine with it being used on you. Do you knot know the Golden Rule? Is that taught to you by your communist overlords?So you called these are propaganda,but first all of things showed in the viedo are the truth,all of us can see it.The voice we wanna you hear is that some westerner media they are telling lies.Some evdiences are showed in this video too.I don't wanna say How great China and Chinese are,I just wanna let you know our opinions on Tibet and the western media are liars.And I also wanna say maybe the way we express our opinion are not right,but this is our most Chinese heart voice. If you think it is all truth, then you are stupid. Or incapable of thinking for yourself. I'll cover just one quick point in it. You do not deserve more than that. Your propaganda film says that the chinese people were caused to rush to invest in your stock market by the surging prices before it fell. This is the worst sort of blame shifting ever. Did anyone use force to make them invest? NO, of course not. They rushed to do so because they thought they could make a buck in the rising market. Then it went south. That happens all over the world. They gambled. They lost. Oh well. You show how immature your mentality is by attempting to find someone else to blame for YOUR own actions. That is what small children do. Adults take responsibility for their actions. Grow up and join the rest of the world. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on May 01, 2008, 05:50:43 AM Thank you for your advice.But I guess you don't know why I call Mr Cauboi Mr "MOTHER FUCKER" You'd best watch the thread "a chinese wanna say something about Tibet". I don't care why you call him that. It is something you feel free to use, so you should be fine with it being used on you. Do you knot know the Golden Rule? Is that taught to you by your communist overlords?So you called these are propaganda,but first all of things showed in the viedo are the truth,all of us can see it.The voice we wanna you hear is that some westerner media they are telling lies.Some evdiences are showed in this video too.I don't wanna say How great China and Chinese are,I just wanna let you know our opinions on Tibet and the western media are liars.And I also wanna say maybe the way we express our opinion are not right,but this is our most Chinese heart voice. If you think it is all truth, then you are stupid. Or incapable of thinking for yourself. I'll cover just one quick point in it. You do not deserve more than that. Your propaganda film says that the chinese people were caused to rush to invest in your stock market by the surging prices before it fell. This is the worst sort of blame shifting ever. Did anyone use force to make them invest? NO, of course not. They rushed to do so because they thought they could make a buck in the rising market. Then it went south. That happens all over the world. They gambled. They lost. Oh well. You show how immature your mentality is by attempting to find someone else to blame for YOUR own actions. That is what small children do. Adults take responsibility for their actions. Grow up and join the rest of the world. hehe...first,I didn't say any rude words about you call me "MOTHER FUCKER",right?I just wanna explain about it. Western media didn't tell the truth,you still don't believe it???They can take an ambulance as an army car,they can take an Indian as an Chinese.We can go to their offical website,and we can see the pictures and articles with our own eyes.Besides,this video is not made by government this video is made by a common Chinese. You think the video are not the truth.Then I would like to ask you,for the same reason,are you sure what's your government said are all the truth??? In this video,can't you see some "kind" monks in your eyes attacked people on the road in Tibet??Can't you see the pictures that some monks attacked a people??(I think the picture are very clearly).These are evidence to show the truth,right?? What about the stock market,this is not the main problem we are talking about. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Wiglaf on May 01, 2008, 05:50:56 AM Do you watch the whole video??????????????? Yep. I'd say it's a case of wrapping yourself in the flag because otherwise your naked shame would be displayed for all to see.What's you mean??? Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on May 01, 2008, 06:03:14 AM [/quote]You have no leg to stand on in your argument so you're resorting to xenophobic nationalism rather than making a reasoned case for your opinion. [/quote] What is my argument??For me,I just wanna let you know the western media are liars and the real face of Dalai Lama. I think there are so many evidences are showed in these video.And I just wanna let you can watch the hot video in China!That's it. And I don't love my country blindly.I know the shortages of the government and the country.I was always critized my government as many Chinese people.But when my motherland are faceing a tough time,I'll support her without any hesitation as many Chinese people. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on May 01, 2008, 06:06:13 AM hehe...first,I didn't say any rude words about you call me "MOTHER FUCKER",right?I just wanna explain about it. Western media didn't tell the truth,you still don't believe it???They can take an ambulance as an army car,they can take an Indian as an Chinese.We can go to their offical website,and we can see the pictures and articles with our own eyes.Besides,this video is not made by government this video is made by a common Chinese. You think the video are not the truth.Then I would like to ask you,for the same reason,are you sure what's your government said are all the truth??? In this video,can't you see some "kind" monks in your eyes attacked people on the road in Tibet??Can't you see the pictures that some monks attacked a people??(I think the picture are very clearly).These are evidence to show the truth,right?? What about the stock market,this is not the main problem we are talking about. 1. You used rude words. So you should be fine with them used on you. Period. If it bothers you, then you shouldn't use them. B. Knowing your video is full of lies and saying it does not imply that I buy what western media says. This is a lie by you. It is possible they both lie. Please attempt to use at least a little logic in your responses. Or point out where I said western media doesn't lie. If you can't do that, shut the fuck up with that lie. III. I said I was going to cover one point in your propaganda movie. Not all of them. What I did was show you one part where your movie lies. The implication being that if it lies there, it is possible it lies in other points. Understand? The honesty of the makes of your movie is shown to be suspect. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on May 01, 2008, 06:33:11 AM hehe...first,I didn't say any rude words about you call me "MOTHER FUCKER",right?I just wanna explain about it. Western media didn't tell the truth,you still don't believe it???They can take an ambulance as an army car,they can take an Indian as an Chinese.We can go to their offical website,and we can see the pictures and articles with our own eyes.Besides,this video is not made by government this video is made by a common Chinese. You think the video are not the truth.Then I would like to ask you,for the same reason,are you sure what's your government said are all the truth??? In this video,can't you see some "kind" monks in your eyes attacked people on the road in Tibet??Can't you see the pictures that some monks attacked a people??(I think the picture are very clearly).These are evidence to show the truth,right?? What about the stock market,this is not the main problem we are talking about. 1. You used rude words. So you should be fine with them used on you. Period. If it bothers you, then you shouldn't use them. B. Knowing your video is full of lies and saying it does not imply that I buy what western media says. This is a lie by you. It is possible they both lie. Please attempt to use at least a little logic in your responses. Or point out where I said western media doesn't lie. If you can't do that, shut the fuck up with that lie. III. I said I was going to cover one point in your propaganda movie. Not all of them. What I did was show you one part where your movie lies. The implication being that if it lies there, it is possible it lies in other points. Understand? The honesty of the makes of your movie is shown to be suspect. 1.Yes,I used the rude words.But not for you as you call me with rude words.You don't know the reason why I use rude words.So I think "You should shut the fuck up!!!!!" B.Obviously.What I said is the truth (only for western media are liars),if you wanna find some excuses I don't care.And I didn't say all of my country said are the truth. III. The part you think are lies of the video ,I just wanna ask you a question,Do you wanna make money??Becoming richer is a native for most people in every country,right??Yes, nobody forced them,but western country know the native of human beings,right. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on May 01, 2008, 07:04:47 AM You are waste. Discussing with you is a waste. You ignore your issues and focus on everyone else. You are completely brainwashed and are unable to think for yourself. Maybe you should talk to our 9/11 truthers. You and them are the same. Facts mean nothing to either of you.
Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on May 01, 2008, 07:14:17 AM Talking to me is a waste??!!What a coincidence!!!I have the same feeling with you!!!! ;)
I am brainwashed???Maybe!!But I think you are brainwashed by your country too.Even when you are facing the evdience,you still insist your wrong idea. I respect the truth,but none of us can say all of we know are the truth!!! But the people under the Dalai Lama killed Han Chinese on the road is the truth.Those people want to rob the Olympic torch is the truth.The western media are liars is the truth. What's the truth on Tibet in you opinion??Can you show me some evdience??? Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Dormouse on May 01, 2008, 07:25:56 AM Talking to me is a waste??!!What a coincidence!!!I have the same feeling with you!!!! ;) The evidence of Chinese government brutality in Tibet, Chinese government disregard for human rights in Tibet and Chinese cultural imperialism in Tibet are plainly obvious for the world to witness on a daily basis.I am brainwashed???Maybe!!But I think you are brainwashed by your country too.Even when you are facing the evdience,you still insist your wrong idea. I respect the truth,but none of us can say all of we know are the truth!!! But the people under the Dalai Lama killed Han Chinese on the road is the truth.Those people want to rob the Olympic torch is the truth.The western media are liars is the truth. What's the truth on Tibet in you opinion??Can you show me some evdience??? That being said, the Chinese government is just as brutal and just as reckless with human rights with their own Chinese people too. Chinese apologists aren't likely to make any sales around here. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on May 01, 2008, 02:29:03 PM When I see shit like this, I'm loosing my liberal mind. I start wondering if I can ever vote for the Liberal party again, for fear of the Reds taking over the world.
As much as I don't like Bush and his gang, I believe, for as long there communists still exist anywhere in this world, I will give my vote to Conservatives from now on. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on May 01, 2008, 02:39:33 PM ....and Zhr,
bro, my name is not Mr. Cauboi, just Cauboi and I never called YOU a mother-fucker, I used the word to describe your government. If you cannot accept that insult made to your government, it proves you are a total brainwashed idiot. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Wiglaf on May 01, 2008, 04:49:19 PM What is my argument??For me,I just wanna let you know the western media are liars and the real face of Dalai Lama. "My country, right or wrong," is a thing that no patriot would think of saying except in a desperate case. It is like saying, "My mother, drunk or sober". G.K. ChestertonI think there are so many evidences are showed in these video.And I just wanna let you can watch the hot video in China!That's it. And I don't love my country blindly.I know the shortages of the government and the country.I was always critized my government as many Chinese people.But when my motherland are faceing a tough time,I'll support her without any hesitation as many Chinese people. This is hardly a desperate case. So the Chinese government got a little egg on its face and some foolish investors lost their shirts. . . so what! Does this Tibet flap substantially threaten the Chinese people's lives or livelihoods? Hardly. Much ado about a grievance which amounts to nothing substantial. The evidence of Chinese government brutality in Tibet, Chinese government disregard for human rights in Tibet and Chinese cultural imperialism in Tibet are plainly obvious for the world to witness on a daily basis. Hear! Hear! That being said, the Chinese government is just as brutal and just as reckless with human rights with their own Chinese people too. Chinese apologists aren't likely to make any sales around here. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on May 01, 2008, 05:09:01 PM If you cannot accept that insult made to your government, it proves you are a total brainwashed idiot. You think every government is same or similar for treating their people.If you think so it shows that you are ignorant.Your great US government push power politics all over the world.You forget the bloody history that you country invade the China.For you great country and other western countrys the chinese people suffer from the gone disasters. Looking the report from the New York Times last sunday.April 20.2008 Quote The US government has used military analysts to generate favorable news coverage of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.Most of these analysts have ties to defense contractors who make a big fortune from the wars and they admit that they suppressed doubts about the Bush administration's misinformation out of fear of jeopardizing their access or contracts.Hidden behind that appearance, though, they gave ideological and military allegiances to the government.the analysts have been wooed in hundreds of private briefings with senior military leaders, including officials with significant influence over contracting and budget matters."It was them saying, 'We need to stick our hands up your back and move your mouth for you,'" said Robert S. Bevelacqua, a retired Green Beret and former Fox News analyst. The findings of the New York Times were based on 8,000 pages of e-mail messages, transcripts and records describing years of private briefings, trips to Iraq and an extensive Pentagon talking points operation.These records "reveal a symbiotic relationship where the usual dividing lines between government and journalism have been obliterated". Some datas shows the Tibet event occured on March 14 has to do with the CIA.The Democratic Fund of Country as a underling institution of CIA imburses Dalai Lama at all times. Is the US gov really care the Tibetans ? NO,they just take Dalai Lama as a tool to disturb China and try to make another the colorful revolution to achieve their irremissible purpose.Some Western politicians and media entities are in fact representatives of business interests and usually base their opinions on foreign relations on this fact, says a signed commentary in Hong Kong-based Wen Wei Po. The following is an excerpt: They may claim they care about "human rights" and "freedom of religion" in other countries, but they actually support or ignore the same things at different times, depending on whether they believe it will benefit their countries or not. Over the recent riots in Tibet many Western politicians and media outlets again teamed up to blame China. This reflects a significant change in international strategic plan, by which the Western alliance of interests has reached a sort of consensus that it is time to suppress China's development and isolate it. There is no better example than the United States to illustrate this greed-based hypocrisy. The US government supported the Tibetan separatists financially, militarily as well morally throughout the 1950s and the 1960s but stopped abruptly when President Richard Nixon's administration decided to enlist China in order to pursue its rivalry against the Soviet Union in the early 1970s. It was also the time when Tibet was suffering from the ravages of the "cultural revolution" like the rest of China. In the early 1980s when monasteries were restored, and people's freedom and living standards were improved substantially, the US began to play up the "human rights" issue. The fundamental reason is that great changes had by then taken place in the Soviet Union and East Europe. For its own interest, the US resumed its financial support to the Dalai group. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on May 01, 2008, 06:34:33 PM Of course the CIA loves to stir up trouble in China if it can. But you need to actually back up a claim like 'Some datas shows the Tibet event occured on March 14 has to do with the CIA.' and by back it up I mean show actual proof. Not your usual 'we all know' bullshit. Back up what you say, or STFU.
Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on May 01, 2008, 06:43:36 PM By trying to criticize the U.S. government (which for sure can be blamed for many bad things happening around the world, I don't deny that) you try to shift the focus from the bad reputation China has got throughout the world as one of the few most oppressive regimes.
What is even worse for China, (if you want to compare with U.S.) is that China is killing it's own people, unlike U.S. that might be killing someone else, overseas. Seems like Chinese hate each other for I don't see any reason other than some are communists and the others not. Some believe in beloved Mao, others don't like him. Same thing happens in America right now: some folks love Bush, some not. But if I get up and shout my anti-Bush slogans in a public place, after that can I go eat a hamburger and drink a beer. In China if you try to shout anti-Mao slogans, after that you go to hell, eat shit and drink pee....and of course you disappear from the face of the Earth after that. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: cauboi on May 01, 2008, 06:53:11 PM Solvay and Zhr,
you never explained how you went through the government's firewall to freely access this web site. ;) first explain that before you plunge into criticizing the West. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: zhr on May 01, 2008, 07:42:17 PM Solvay and Zhr, you never explained how you went through the government's firewall to freely access this web site. ;) first explain that before you plunge into criticizing the West. use google of course ;)so you think our government will use firewall to stop us???hahahahaha ;D ;D ;DHow stupid you are!!!hahahaha Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Biker Dude on May 01, 2008, 09:05:13 PM Solvay and Zhr, you never explained how you went through the government's firewall to freely access this web site. ;) first explain that before you plunge into criticizing the West. use google of course ;)so you think our government will use firewall to stop us???hahahahaha ;D ;D ;DHow stupid you are!!!hahahaha Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on May 02, 2008, 06:11:25 AM Quote so you think our government will use firewall to stop us???hahahahaha Oh. You think your own disgusting ignorance is funny eh? Quote The “Great Firewall of China”: Censorship at the Internet backbone and ISP level Political censorship is built into all layers of China’s Internet infrastructure. Known widely in the media as the “Great Firewall of China,” this aspect of Chinese official censorship primarily targets the movement of information between the global Internet and the Chinese Internet. Internet censorship in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is overseen technically by the Ministry of Information Industry (MII). Policy about what substantive content is to be censored is largely directed by the State Council Information Office and the Chinese Communist Party’s Propaganda Department, with input from other government and public security organs.2 Physical access to the Internet is provided by nine state-licensed Internet Access Providers (IAP), each of which has at least one connection to a foreign Internet backbone, and it is through these connections that Chinese Internet users access Internet websites hosted outside of China.3 The individual Chinese Internet user buys Internet access from one of several thousand Internet Service Providers (ISPs), who are in effect retail sellers of Internet access that is in turn purchased wholesale from the nine IAPs. Internet routers, devices that deliver and direct packets of data back and forth between networks, are an essential part of Internet networks. Most of today’s routers also allow network administrators to censor or block—or, as the industry calls it, “filter”—the data going through them, programming the router to block certain kinds of data from passing in or out of a network. This filtering capability was initially intended so that Internet Service Providers could control viruses, worms, and spam. The same technology, however, can also be easily employed to block political, religious, or any other category of content that the person programming the router seeks to block. The first layer of Chinese Internet censorship takes place at this router level. According to the 2005 technical analysis of Chinese Internet filtering conducted by the Open Net Initiative, IAP administrators have entered thousands of URLs (Internet website addresses) and keywords into the Internet routers that enable data to flow back and forth between ISPs in China and Internet servers around the world. Forbidden keywords and URLs are also plugged into Internet routers at the ISP level, thus controlling data flows between the user and the IAP. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2006/china0806/3.htm#_Toc142395817 Quote Around 30 journalists and 50 Internet users are currently detained in China. Some of them since the 1980s. The government blocks access to thousands for news websites. It jams the Chinese, Tibetan and Uyghur-language programmes of 10 international radio stations. After focusing on websites and chat forums, the authorities are now concentrating on blogs and video-sharing sites. China’s blog services incorporate all the filters that block keywords considered “subversive” by the censors. The law severely punishes “divulging state secrets,” “subversion” and “defamation” - charges that are regularly used to silence the most outspoken critics. Although the rules for foreign journalists have been relaxed, it is still impossible for the international media to employ Chinese journalists or to move about freely in Tibet and Xinjiang. http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=174 Quote Yahoo on Monday said China should stop throwing people in prison for exercising free speech and expressing political views over the internet, the AP reports. Yahoo has helped the Chinese government jail several cyber-dissidents by handing over personally identifiable user information to authorities. But now that the Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company has been targeted in a human rights lawsuit, the internet giant's PR machine appears to be lurching into gear. Yesterday, Yahoo sent a letter to the AP bemoaning the fact that in China innocent people have been tossed in the clink simply for voicing their opinions: "Yahoo is dismayed that citizens in China have been imprisoned for expressing their political views on the Internet," the letter said. Yahoo might also be dismayed that it helped put many of those people -- the plaintiffs allege the number could be as high as 60 -- behind bars by giving Chinese authorities information about anonymous Yahoo accounts. But Yahoo's not. The letter to the AP continues with some hand washing and states that companies operating in China must comply with Chinese law or risk having their own employees thrown in prison. Guess someone's gotta get chucked under the bus. http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/06/yahoo_says_chin.html What do you have to say now you ignorant peon? Still laughing? Don't be surprised if some of those links don't work for you :) Is this just western media lying? No I think it's your glorious party whose lying. I think it's YOU whose lying. You're a spook or you wouldnt be here, simple as that. And what do you spooks do with that firewall and surveillance? Quote Businessman Cai Lujun, 35, will be in jail for the next two years because he posted essays discussing problems affecting Chinese farmers on the internet. Zhao Chunying, 57, from Heilongjiang was found beaten to death in a Chinese jail after being arrested for writing an account of how she was tortured during a previous detention. Computer engineer Yang Zili, 31, and freelance writer Zhang Honghai, 30, were sent to jail for eight years each for subverting state power. They had sent articles of political and social concerns via e-mail. http://www.asianpacificpost.com/portal2/402881910674ebab010674f4c4ed13dd.do.html Yeah laugh it up. Ahk Title: Re: TIBET Post by: Ahkenaten on May 02, 2008, 06:20:40 AM Quote from: zhr so you think our government will use firewall to stop us???hahahahaha Oh. You think your own ignorance is funny eh? Quote The “Great Firewall of China”: Censorship at the Internet backbone and ISP level http://www.hrw.org/reports/2006/china0806/3.htm#_Toc142395817Political censorship is built into all layers of China’s Internet infrastructure. Known widely in the media as the “Great Firewall of China,” this aspect of Chinese official censorship primarily targets the movement of information between the global Internet and the Chinese Internet. Internet censorship in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is overseen technically by the Ministry of Information Industry (MII). Policy about what substantive content is to be censored is largely directed by the State Council Information Office and the Chinese Communist Party’s Propaganda Department, with input from other government and public security organs.2 Physical access to the Internet is provided by nine state-licensed Internet Access Providers (IAP), each of which has at least one connection to a foreign Internet backbone, and it is through these connections that Chinese Internet users access Internet websites hosted outside of China.3 The individual Chinese Internet user buys Internet access from one of several thousand Internet Service Providers (ISPs), who are in effect retail sellers of Internet access that is in turn purchased wholesale from the nine IAPs. Internet routers, devices that deliver and direct packets of data back and forth between networks, are an essential part of Internet networks. Most of today’s routers also allow network administrators to censor or block—or, as the industry calls it, “filter”—the data going through them, programming the router to block certain kinds of data from passing in or out of a network. This filtering capability was initially intended so that Internet Service Providers could control viruses, worms, and spam. The same technology, however, can also be easily employed to block political, religious, or any other category of content that the person programming the router seeks to block. The first layer of Chinese Internet censorship takes place at this router level. According to the 2005 technical analysis of Chinese Internet filtering conducted by the Open Net Initiative, IAP administrators have entered thousands of URLs (Internet website addresses) and keywords into the Internet routers that enable data to flow back and forth between ISPs in China and Internet servers around the world. Forbidden keywords and URLs are also plugged into Internet routers at the ISP level, thus controlling data flows between the user and the IAP. Quote Around 30 journalists and 50 Internet users are currently detained in China. Some of them since the 1980s. The government blocks access to thousands for news websites. It jams the Chinese, Tibetan and Uyghur-language programmes of 10 international radio stations. After focusing on websites and chat forums, the authorities are now concentrating on blogs and video-sharing sites. China’s blog services incorporate all the filters that block keywords considered “subversive” by the censors. The law severely punishes “divulging state secrets,” “subversion” and “defamation” - charges that are regularly used to silence the most outspoken critics. Although the rules for foreign journalists have been relaxed, it is still impossible for the international media to employ Chinese journalists or to move about freely in Tibet and Xinjiang. http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=174 Quote Yahoo on Monday said China should stop throwing people in prison for exercising free speech and expressing political views over the internet, the AP reports. Yahoo has helped the Chinese government jail several cyber-dissidents by handing over personally identifiable user information to authorities. But now that the Sunnyvale, Calif.-based company has been targeted in a human rights lawsuit, the internet giant's PR machine appears to be lurching into gear. Yesterday, Yahoo sent a letter to the AP bemoaning the fact that in China innocent people have been tossed in the clink simply for voicing their opinions: "Yahoo is dismayed that citizens in China have been imprisoned for expressing their political views on the Internet," the letter said. Yahoo might also be dismayed that it helped put many of those people -- the plaintiffs allege the number could be as high as 60 -- behind bars by giving Chinese authorities information about anonymous Yahoo accounts. But Yahoo's not. The letter to the AP continues with some hand washing and states that companies operating in China must comply with Chinese law or risk having their own employees thrown in prison. Guess someone's gotta get chucked under the bus. http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/06/yahoo_says_chin.html What do you have to say now? Still laughing? Don't be surprised if some of those links don't work for you :) Is this just western media lying? No I think it's your glorious party whose lying. I think it's YOU whose lying. You're a spook or you wouldnt be here, simple as that. And what do you spooks do with that firewall and surveillance? Quote Businessman Cai Lujun, 35, will be in jail for the next two years because he posted essays discussing problems affecting Chinese farmers on the internet. Zhao Chunying, 57, from Heilongjiang was found beaten to death in a Chinese jail after being arrested for writing an account of how she was tortured during a previous detention. Computer engineer Yang Zili, 31, and freelance writer Zhang Honghai, 30, were sent to jail for eight years each for subverting state power. They had sent articles of political and social concerns via e-mail. http://www.asianpacificpost.com/portal2/402881910674ebab010674f4c4ed13dd.do.html So your glorious "People's Party" likes to beat old women to death eh? You must be so proud. Yeah laugh it up. Ahk Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on May 02, 2008, 04:53:53 PM Of course the CIA loves to stir up trouble in China if it can. But you need to actually back up a claim like 'Some datas shows the Tibet event occured on March 14 has to do with the CIA.' and by back it up I mean show actual proof. Not your usual 'we all know' bullshit. Back up what you say, or STFU. Look the followinghttp://www.takhli.org/rjw/tibet.htm Quote From jpoplar@my-dejanews.com Organization Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion Date Sun, 26 Jul 1998 21:03:51 GMT Newsgroups talk.politics.tibet http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CEFD61538F931A35753C1A96E958260&scp=4&sq=tibet+cia&st=nyt Quote World News Briefs; Dalai Lama Group Says It Got Money From C.I.A. Published: October 2, 1998 The Dalai Lama's administration acknowledged today that it received $1.7 million a year in the 1960's from the Central Intelligence Agency, but denied reports that the Tibetan leader benefited personally from an annual subsidy of $180,000. The money allocated for the resistance movement was spent on training volunteers and paying for guerrilla operations against the Chinese, the Tibetan government-in-exile said in a statement. It added that the subsidy earmarked for the Dalai Lama was spent on setting up offices in Geneva and New York and on international lobbying. The Dalai Lama, 63, a revered spiritual leader both in his Himalayan homeland and in Western nations, fled Tibet in 1959 after a failed uprising against a Chinese military occupation, which began in 1950. The decade-long covert program to support the Tibetan independence movement was part of the C.I.A.'s worldwide effort to undermine Communist governments, particularly in the Soviet Union and China. CIA's involvement in Tibet during the cold war was well known to knowledgable readers in this group, although the inside stories were scarce. Since Dalai Lama started so-called "non-violent" approach, he and his followers don't want people to know their dirty laundry. However, those who were involved started to talk, for variuos reasons. Following story tells us the deep involvement of CIA and cooperation between Taiwan, India, and Tibetans. Now, "non-violent" approach has got them to nowhere, except a Nobel Peace Prize that fell on Dalai Lama's lap and two Hollywood box-office bombs, they are longing once again for those good old violence. Well, could Hollywood + violence achieve what CIA + violence couldn't achieve? ****************************************************************************** Copyright 1997 The American Spectator The American Spectator December, 1997 SECTION: FEATURE The Secret War Over Tibet A story of Cold War heroism -- and Kennedy administration cowardice and betrayal. John B. Roberts II John B. Roberts II is a television producer and freelance journalist. The Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, doesn't want his secrets revealed. He has given his blessing to a new Hollywood film, Kundun, enshrining the officially sanctioned and sanitized history of his country's battle for independence against Communist China. And in another Hollywood Tibetan epic, based on the memoirs of German mountaineer Heinrich Harrer, actor Brad Pitt re-enacts a spiritual odyssey with the Dalai Lama in Tibet's remote and mysterious mountain kingdom. What neither film portrays are facts about the true adventures -- and tragedy -- of Tibetan freedom fighters that have remained secret for decades. But thanks to the willingness of a handful of former diplomats, military special operations personnel, and intelligence officials, the real story of America's secret war in Tibet can now be told. Officials at the Central Intelligence Agency were unusually helpful in the research for this article, although it reports events that are still classified today. Perhaps they were motivated by the desire to prevent Hollywood's propagation of revisionist histories about what really happened in Tibet. Or perhaps this is one of those rare occasions when the Central Intelligence Agency decides to take some well-deserved credit for one of its successes by revealing tidbits from its secret history. But don't expect the Clinton administration to declassify the Tibetan operation files anytime soon. The secret archives include a shameful episode involving Clinton's favorite presidency, the Kennedy administration, and Democratic icon John Kenneth Galbraith. One of the best-kept secrets of the Tibetan War is Ambassador Galbraith's role in the abandonment of an army of Tibetan guerrillas caught in a pitched battle. While special operations Air Force planes stood by to parachute ammunition and supplies to the Tibetan freedom fighters, Galbraith refused to give permission for the CIA to resupply its covert Tibetan army. Cut off and surrounded, between six and eight thousand Tibetans were annihilated by the Chinese in a massacre that has been shrouded in secrecy for more than thirty years. The parallels to the Cuban Bay of Pigs fiasco are eerie. In both cases the Eisenhower administration originally launched the covert programs to train freedom fighters to resist Communist domination. In both the guerrillas depended on U.S. support for arms and ammunition. In Tibet, as in Cuba, only air support and airdrops of supplies could help trapped men fight their way out of desperate situations. In both cases, when the freedom fighters were at their moment of greatest peril, the Kennedy administration chose to abandon them. This is the true story of how the Tibetan operation began in glory, and ended in shame. After Mao Tse-tung and the Peoples Liberation Army pushed the Nationalist Chinese off the mainland in the late 1940's, Peking turned its attention to consolidating its territory. In the summer of 1950, skirmishing at border posts broke out between China and Tibet. Using this fighting as a pretext, China invaded Tibet with more than 80,000 troops. Tibet's army was tiny and poorly equipped. Efforts to resist the Chinese alone would have been futile. Tibet needed allies, it needed to buy time, and most of all it needed arms. It is hard to imagine today, in an age of satellites and the Internet, how remote Tibet was in the fifties. Communications had to be relayed by messenger over mountain passes. In desperation, Tibet sent emissaries abroad to negotiate on three separate tracks. Some delegations sought an accommodation with China, on terms that would maintain some autonomy for Tibet. Others explored the possibility of asylum and financial support for the Dalai Lama and his retinue. Still others sought diplomatic support for Tibet's independence, and military weapons for armed resistance. Today, with our emphasis on Tibet's human rights situation, it may surprise many to think of the Buddhist kingdom seeking arms to fight China. Owing largely to the Vietnam war era television images of self- immolating Buddhist monks, many Americans mistakenly believe that all Buddhists practice non-violence and passive resistance. But Tibetan Buddhism, as practiced by its monks and the people of Tibet, did not shy from violence. By early 1951, Tibet's emissaries had made contact with American diplomats in neighboring India. A delegation speaking in the name of the Dalai Lama asked for support for Tibet's independence, and inquired whether the U.S. would shoulder the costs of the Dalai Lama and several hundred followers in exile. Tibet's request was handled at the top levels of the U.S. government. Secretary of State Dean Acheson sent top-secret cables to embassies in Ceylon, Thailand, and India, instructing ambassadors to sound out the prospects for asylum for the Dalai Lama. America's support for Chiang Kai-Shek's Chinese Nationalists on Formosa complicated matters. Like Communist China, the Nationalists also viewed Tibet as a historic part of the Chinese empire. Stopping the Communist conquest of Tibet was attractive to the U.S., but not if it would alienate Chiang Kai-shek, who opposed Tibetan independence. But one thing was clear from the beginning. The U.S. wanted the Dalai Lama to lead his country's resistance against the Chinese. A secret cable from 1951 reveals that Washington encouraged the Dalai Lama to "remain in (a) country near Tibet for purpose of mounting resistance to Chinese Communists within Tibet." The more immediate problem was how to support Tibet's resistance war. In the early 1950's, there were no secure channels of communication between the U.S. and Tibet. American diplomats had little knowledge of the Dalai Lama's retinue. They didn't know who could be trusted to safely and accurately convey messages, and who might be a Chinese agent. Sending written notes the Chinese might intercept was risky. As a result, it took months to relay oral messages back and forth to the Dalai Lama over the mountainous reaches of Tibet. A top secret telegram from Secretary of State Acheson to the U. S. Embassy in India gives a sense of this difficulty: "Info Contel 91 July 31 and Embtel 440 (rptd Cal unnumbered) Aug 1 suggests unreliable intermediaries figured critically in failure effort persuade DL leave Yatung....Believe it unwise advise any Tibetan to receive this msg prior actual communication." The message Acheson referred to in his cable confirmed America's standing offer to the Dalai Lama: "our original position -- full aid and assistance to you when you come out." Acheson wanted U.S. aid conditioned on the Dalai Lama's agreement to leave Tibet. The Dalai Lama was told that while American planes couldn't fly into Lhasa to take him into exile, the U.S. would do all it could to aid him in fleeing Tibet. The Tibetan emissaries wanted arms. A secret cable from November 15, 1951, reports the U.S. reply: "...suggestions for overt US provision of planes, arms, supplies and leadership are practically impossible and politically undesirable at this time....US shld make at least one final effort by letter or oral messages to encourage DL to resist in ways best known to Tib Govt....Although it may not be feasible, DL might for example make pilgrimage to Buddhist shrines in Tib from one of which he might escape southward to Ind." Where others saw diplomatic quandaries, CIA deputy director Allen Dulles recognized opportunity. A veteran of "Wild Bill" Donovan's Office of Strategic Services, America's clandestine predecessor to the CIA, Dulles gained field experience during World War II as the OSS hustled to organize U.S. spying and sabotage operations. OSS specialized in behind-the-lines support to resistance movements across Nazi-occupied Europe, parachuting agents, supplies, and officers deep behind enemy lines. Some OSS officers were old China hands, and had fought alongside Mao Tse-tung's forces against the Japanese. OSS veterans like Dulles had the mindset and experience to run guerrilla operations behind Chinese lines. At the time of Tibet's invasion, Allen Dulles was CIA's Deputy Director of Plans, with responsibilities that included overseeing all CIA covert operations. While the State Department temporized about how much aid to give the Dalai Lama before he left Tibet, Dulles began to explore arming and training the Tibetan resistance. Weapons were a problem. Covert aid required arms that could not be traced to the United States. To cloak their origin, guns had to be compatible with Chinese military stocks. As a bonus, compatible guns meant Tibetan rebels could use captured Chinese ammunition. Thirty years later in Nicaragua, CIA planners faced the same challenge when they had to find Soviet weapons to supply the contras. When Israel invaded Lebanon and seized PLO warehouses full of Soviet-supplied weapons, the CIA rapidly transported the captured arms to Nicaragua's freedom fighters. But in the early 1950's, the weapons Dulles needed were German. During the decades of war-lordism that befell China in the twenties and thirties, German guns were widely used throughout the country. CIA cabled U.S. military attach s across Europe, asking them to report back on inventories of captured Nazi arms. But the CIA had little bureaucratic clout in the early days of its existence, and the Defense Department was unresponsive. Sam Cummings, now an internationally known arms dealer, was then a young weapons expert in CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence. His office received a routine copy of the Defense Department report, and he knew immediately that it was wrong. Cummings had been in Europe shortly after World War II, and had seen stockpiles of Nazi arms himself. He sent his superiors a memo that claimed there were plenty of surplus guns stashed in Europe. Title: Re: TIBET Post by: solvay on May 02, 2008, 04:58:36 PM The article so long and I have to post it dividually. http://www.takhli.org/rjw/tibet.htm Quote From jpoplar@my-dejanews.com Organization Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion Date Sun, 26 Jul 1998 21:03:51 GMT Newsgroups talk.politics.tibet Quote A few weeks later, th |