|
Title: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Reaganite on August 08, 2008, 12:56:33 PM What do you guys think?
That would be a great team!! Just imagine the thrashing they could lay on McCain/whoever Edwards is a pillar of integritty and his two america's speach can be dusted off!! Obama needs someone like Edwards to speak about Integrity and being kind to our neighbors! Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: freethinker on August 08, 2008, 04:01:34 PM I still think Edwards would make a fantastic AG.
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Patton on August 08, 2008, 04:20:49 PM You're right......honesty and integrity is something we just don't need in an Attorney General.
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Reaganite on August 08, 2008, 04:37:07 PM I still think Edwards would make a fantastic AG. LOL... he can channel voices... Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: And Justice For All on August 08, 2008, 09:32:37 PM Not now, Edwards just got some serious dirt dug up on him on a extra martial affair he had in the past. He might as well just choose Hillary or Gore.
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: trench2k on August 09, 2008, 05:40:42 AM What do you guys think? That would be a great team!! Just imagine the thrashing they could lay on McCain/whoever Edwards is a pillar of integritty and his two america's speach can be dusted off!! Obama needs someone like Edwards to speak about Integrity and being kind to our neighbors! I like it. I still think they'd have a better chance than a McCain/Bush run Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Cass on August 09, 2008, 11:12:26 AM How far behind are those who are supporting Edwards for Veep with the news? Any aspirations Edwards must have still had are dead as the proverbial door nail with his confession to the affair after he has been dogged for months/years by the smut merchant, National Inquirer.
It's all over the MSM and the blogs ad infinitum. I don't not a specific post other than this one. How could it have been that Reaganite might have missed this opportunity? Or maybe it's available I missed it. One problem he may have is in the Woodruff interview, Edwards brought up McCain's adulery too. This long and a bit old by todays speedy MSM is interesting related to McCain's dumping his former wife to acquire the new beer heiress. At least Edwards didn't act as McCain did toward his seriously ill wife. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html# Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Retro Fit on August 09, 2008, 11:28:37 AM I'm not so sure that infidelity will hinder their prospects for the white house all that much. Then when Obama gets whacked by the Klan, Edwards would be King. :angel:
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: machioveli on August 09, 2008, 12:20:38 PM He is a dirtbag. Now he says the child is not his, three letters you stupid moron DNA. I heard he did it after he ran for president in 2006. Yeah, nobodies watching this guy! Then decided to run for president again as though this wouldn't come up? No wonder he dropped out early. What an idiot.
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: neorealist on August 09, 2008, 12:48:24 PM Edwards screwed up royal...his career is shot
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Retro Fit on August 09, 2008, 06:41:11 PM Quote Edwards screwed up royal...his career is shot So, are you saying that if it is an Obama/Edwards ticket, that you would vote for McCain because of Edwards infidelity? Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Abraxas on August 09, 2008, 08:04:19 PM I still think Edwards would make a fantastic AG. For the love of God, take that back, admit you were joking or say it was a typo... or I can never consider you credable again... Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: freethinker on August 10, 2008, 04:18:51 PM I still think Edwards would make a fantastic AG. For the love of God, take that back, admit you were joking or say it was a typo... or I can never consider you credable again... I believe his track record of going after illegal activities in large corperations would serve the country well. Its time the AG looked out for the American PEOPLES interest . He would do that, I'm sure. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Abraxas on August 10, 2008, 06:19:32 PM Even though he couldn't even look after his family's best intrests?
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: neorealist on August 10, 2008, 06:52:48 PM Quote Edwards screwed up royal...his career is shot So, are you saying that if it is an Obama/Edwards ticket, that you would vote for McCain because of Edwards infidelity? How did you deduce you that from my post?...eh, I guess it is an election year. People are all about deducing out on a limb stuff. I don't post who I vote for and why on any forum. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: freethinker on August 10, 2008, 07:04:33 PM So its OK to have an affair while married to an ailing wife as long as you divorce the wife and marry the mistress, as did J Sydney McCain?
If McShame stayed married to his ailing wife after the adultery, he would be a cad as well? Does that make any sense to you Abraxas? Quote McCain likes to illustrate his moral fibre by referring to his five years as a prisoner-of-war in Vietnam. And to demonstrate his commitment to family values, the 71-year-old former US Navy pilot pays warm tribute to his beautiful blonde wife, Cindy, with whom he has four children. But there is another Mrs McCain who casts a ghostly shadow over the Senator’s presidential campaign. She is seldom seen and rarely written about, despite being mother to McCain’s three eldest children.... [W]hen McCain returned to America in 1973 to a fanfare of publicity and a handshake from Richard Nixon, he discovered his wife had been disfigured in a terrible car crash three years earlier. Her car had skidded on icy roads into a telegraph pole on Christmas Eve, 1969. Her pelvis and one arm were shattered by the impact and she suffered massive internal injuries. When Carol was discharged from hospital after six months of life-saving surgery, the prognosis was bleak. In order to save her legs, surgeons had been forced to cut away huge sections of shattered bone, taking with it her tall, willowy figure. She was confined to a wheelchair and was forced to use a catheter. Through sheer hard work, Carol learned to walk again. But when John McCain came home from Vietnam, she had gained a lot of weight and bore little resemblance to her old self. Today, she stands at just 5ft4in and still walks awkwardly, with a pronounced limp. Her body is held together by screws and metal plates and, at 70, her face is worn by wrinkles that speak of decades of silent suffering.... McCain divorced her in 1980 and married Cindy, 18 years his junior and the heir to an Arizona brewing fortune, just one month later.... Quote But it wasn't until 2000 that McCain, possibly emboldened by Clinton's survival of his scandals, became the first confessed adulterer to have the nerve to run. Now, just a few years after infidelity was considered a dealbreaker for a presidential candidate, the party that presents itself as the arbiter of virtue may field an unprecedented two-timing trifecta. McCain was still married and living with his wife in 1979 while, according to The New York Times' Nicholas Kristof, "aggressively courting a 25-year-old woman who was as beautiful as she was rich." McCain divorced his wife, who had raised their three children while he was imprisoned in Vietnam, then launched his political career with his new wife's family money. In 2000, McCain managed to deflect media questioning about his first marriage with a deft admission of responsibility for its failure. It's possible that the age of the offense and McCain's charmed relationship with the press will pull him through again, but Giuliani and Gingrich may face a more difficult challenge. Both conducted well-documented affairs in the last decade--while still in public office. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0607.benen.html Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Abraxas on August 10, 2008, 08:17:53 PM So its OK to have an affair while married to an ailing wife as long as you divorce the wife and marry the mistress, as did J Sydney McCain? If McShame stayed married to his ailing wife after the adultery, he would be a cad as well? Does that make any sense to you Abraxas? You seem to be under the misguided notion that I'll change my opinion because someone from the other side of the political spectrum did it. As far as I'm concerned they're both horrible people and I wouldn't want either of them my Attorney General. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: jpn of Seattle on August 10, 2008, 08:55:38 PM Alberto Gonzalez has set a really low bar.
I thought there'd never be a worse AG than Edwin Meese. It took George W Bush to find someone worse. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: neue regel on August 11, 2008, 04:24:26 AM Quote I thought there'd never be a worse AG than Edwin Meese. It took George W Bush to find someone worse. You weren't sleeping through the Janet Reno disaster, were you? Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: micfranklin on August 11, 2008, 05:20:55 AM Obama-Edwards would've been a nice ticket if Edwards didn't get busted just a few days ago.
How you get taken down by the National Enquirer, of all sources, is beyond me :-\ Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: neue regel on August 11, 2008, 05:32:43 AM I don't know which states Edwards could help Obama carry. I think he has better options.
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: freethinker on August 11, 2008, 06:20:49 AM How is it then that in the MSM Edwards is washed up but McSame gets a free pass??
Is it because he married his mistress? Is it because she is obscenely wealthy?? Is it because it was a while ago?? Should any of the above reasons excuse what was the identical behavior only worse? Remember Edwards is staying with his ailing wife after an indiscretion ...McShame dumped his. Oh yeah Edwards isn't running for anything, McShame still is, in case no one noticed. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: neue regel on August 11, 2008, 06:32:38 AM Quote How is it then that in the MSM Edwards is washed up but McSame gets a free pass?? The fact the story has no legs in the media tells me that semi-reputable news divisions aren't going to pin their names to it because of some shaky facts. I don't personally know the story so I can't speak to it but it seems to me that there are plenty of reports who'd love to take a shot, if given the chance. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: freethinker on August 11, 2008, 08:03:00 AM Quote How is it then that in the MSM Edwards is washed up but McSame gets a free pass?? The fact the story has no legs in the media tells me that semi-reputable news divisions aren't going to pin their names to it because of some shaky facts. I don't personally know the story so I can't speak to it but it seems to me that there are plenty of reports who'd love to take a shot, if given the chance. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: neue regel on August 11, 2008, 08:07:48 AM Quote The facts are out ther Neue ...they are not "shaky" but are well documented for anyone willing to investigate. That very well might be true but it's a bit cumbersome swimming through the murk. Then one is left to fact-check some of these shaddy looking web sites. Quote Fact is its just not the scandel D'Jour. No question. No one seems to care too much about it. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Abraxas on August 11, 2008, 11:31:52 AM How you get taken down by the National Enquirer, of all sources, is beyond me :-\ LOL The irnoic thing is when I saw that Enquirer was the source that broke the story I thought, "well, it's gotta be false then". I guess I'll take the Enquirer a little more seriously now... P.S. mic, where have you been? Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: neue regel on August 11, 2008, 11:51:05 AM Quote I guess I'll take the Enquirer a little more seriously now... I'm tempted to take the MSM a little less seriously...if that's possible...for missing it. Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: jpn of Seattle on August 12, 2008, 07:29:02 PM Quote The Hill Mukasey will not prosecute in DoJ hiring scandal By Joey Michalakes Posted: 08/12/08 12:17 PM [ET] Attorney General Michael Mukasey said Tuesday that the Department of Justice would not pursue criminal charges against former employees implicated in an internal investigation on politicized hiring practices. “Where there is evidence of criminal wrongdoing, we vigorously investigate it,” Mukasey said in a speech at the American Bar Association. “And where there is enough evidence to charge someone with a crime, we vigorously prosecute. But not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime.” One more item for the "Bush's Legacy" thread. Such leadership. Such noble sentiments. Perhaps we should get that last sentence engraved on our currency? Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Abraxas on August 12, 2008, 07:53:42 PM Is it just habit to go off topic with a "well this other guy from the other party is worse"... or is really accidental?
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: Patton on August 13, 2008, 09:14:07 AM I guess it would depend on if the one doing it has a history of spamming partisan propoganda....
Title: Re: Obama/Edwards.... Post by: jpn of Seattle on August 13, 2008, 07:31:51 PM I guess it would depend on if the one doing it has a history of spamming partisan propoganda.... Gee Patton, you have time to make substance-free, meaningless cheap shots like this, but apparently no time to dig up ALL those "lies" that you claim Obama has made? www.itsallpolitics.com/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,26/topic,2591.msg61887/#msg61887 Hmmm.
Powered by SMF 1.1.5 |
SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com |