|
Title: In case you were wondering, feel free to have sex with that mannequin. Post by: Stephen Hero on November 14, 2007, 01:37:23 PM http://www.sdjudicial.com/opinions/downloads/y2007/24370.pdf
The South Dakota Supreme Court has ruled that having attempting to engage in sex with a mannequin in a public building does not constitute "indecent exposure", as that is a specific intent crime requiring the defendant to formulate the specific intent of exposing his genitals for the sexual gratification of others or to shock or alarm others. The court suggests that a charge of public indecency could be sustained, a misdemeanor. Indecent exposure would require registration with the state as a sex offender, a charge of public indecency would not require such registration. So feel free to knock yourself out, and mannequins, beware! Title: Re: In case you were wondering, feel free to have sex with that mannequin. Post by: tadpol on November 14, 2007, 04:10:59 PM God Bless America. <:waves flag:>
I guess wont put up a manger display this year... Title: Re: In case you were wondering, feel free to have sex with that mannequin. Post by: Opmod on November 15, 2007, 07:14:46 AM Oh, comon, that Mary is one hot peice,,,and,,,,virgin you know
Title: Re: In case you were wondering, feel free to have sex with that mannequin. Post by: bringbackwigs on November 15, 2007, 07:15:16 AM Andrew McCarthy would be proud.
Title: Re: In case you were wondering, feel free to have sex with that mannequin. Post by: bringbackwigs on November 15, 2007, 07:15:50 AM Oh, comon, that Mary is one hot peice,,,and,,,,virgin you know Haha. Funny and offensive. Applaud. Title: Re: In case you were wondering, feel free to have sex with that mannequin. Post by: daedalus 2.0 on December 28, 2007, 11:19:33 AM I was wondering, Hero... Thank you for that useful information!
(And, yes, 1 applaud to OpMod :-))
Powered by SMF 1.1.4 |
SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com |