IAP Political Forum
September 07, 2008, 02:06:05 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the new "IAP 2.0" -- please re-register before continuing to post.
 
  Home Blog Forum Help Search Chat Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Social Discussions / Business and Economics / Re: Wal-Mart and the economy on: October 10, 2007, 05:15:18 AM
This article had nothing to do with Wal-Mart.  This is based on the general political issue of whether Free Trade is good for the economy or not. 

This was all started from the many practicing Economists who started re-evaluating the effects of globalization and the cost/benefits of comparative advantage that have again been put in debate.  (But it always is)

Many Americans feel that the Republican platform of free trade is failing America so of course the politicians trying to get into office start to change their views...  Roll Eyes

Wal-Mart however has got a lot more challenges to face than just an attack on free-trade, like employee benefits, wages, and environmental management.

However, management is cleaning up and after years of Wal-Mart bashing by filmmakers, critics, politicians and the people alike, Wal-Mart is changing their ways, and hopefully, especially with moves toward Natural Capitalism, will have a profound effect on our economy and the rest of the world. 

The article points out that product safety is a concern among voters.

Wal-Mart does have a lot of problems to fix it but I don't see any evidence they're cleaning up their act. Sure, they have a PR campaign but that doesn't change the fact the company puts pressure on it's vendors/suppliers to cut costs. The American consumer suffers the consequences as a result of the unsafe products while Wal-Mart gets away with passing the buck? Not good.
2  Social Discussions / Business and Economics / Wal-Mart and the economy on: October 04, 2007, 05:56:53 AM
I recently saw an ad on Wal-Mart's joint venture with China. Then I read a Wall Street Journal article this morning on how more Americans are concerned about free trade and foreign economies.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Nx2ltoqyrEw

Quote
The new poll asked a broader but similar question. It posed two statements to voters. The first was, "Foreign trade has been good for the U.S. economy, because demand for U.S. products abroad has resulted in economic growth and jobs for Americans here at home and provided more choices for consumers."

The second was, "Foreign trade has been bad for the U.S. economy, because imports from abroad have reduced demand for American-made goods, cost jobs here at home, and produced potentially unsafe products.

Asked which statement came closer to their own view, 59% of Republicans named the second statement, while 32% pointed to the first.
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119144942897748150.html?mod=blog

With the whole recall thing, I think the larger, influential companies like Wal-Mart should be pressured to tell their suppliers to clean up their act. I'd much prefer that approach than government regulation.
3  High Society / Open Debate / Prison Overcrowding or Michael Moore on: September 27, 2007, 05:27:43 AM
Luv the new look and feel to the site. I didn't see any topics in here so let's start something. I saw a preview for the Breaking Point special on discovery on Oct. 7. Also saw that Michael Moore will be on Oprah again today. So...

1. Should the three strikes you're out law be thrown out the window? I think Connecticut is considering it yet its seen troubling consequences in California.

2. You either love or hate Michael Moore, but don't you think our health care system needs changed in some way? 
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.116 seconds with 25 queries.