IAP Political Forum
January 08, 2009, 01:27:40 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Default theme has been changed, and everyone reset due to some problems with posts disappearing after submitting.
 
  Home Blog Forum Help Search Chat Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 101
1126  Political Discussions / United States / Re: Video and Audio of "I have a Dream Speech" on: January 21, 2008, 11:23:59 AM
F.T., it was tit-for-tat on the other thread let's please not drag the fight on. Especially on a new thread.
1127  Political Discussions / United States / Re: Video and Audio of "I have a Dream Speech" on: January 21, 2008, 10:59:52 AM
Regardless of whether or not they are it's easy to get high and mighty about the family "profiting from his death" but no one raises an eyebrow if a hundred TV stations make money from him.
1128  Political Discussions / United States / Re: Video and Audio of "I have a Dream Speech" on: January 21, 2008, 10:49:41 AM
Quote
What bothers you about the King family?

They aren't white. Otherwise Im sure the rights of King's estate would be unquestionable.




Ahk
1129  Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: The Other Side Of The Occupation Of Iraq And/Or Afghanistan on: January 21, 2008, 09:50:36 AM
Quote
This thread has nothing to do with the other side of the occupation of Iraq or Afghanistan. The other side of the occupation would be what the Iraqis or Afghans have to endure day in and day out. In both instances there is a foreign occupation and a resistance to that occupation with millions of ordinary people stuck in the fighting.

Yeah except that, you know, the Afghans aren't "resisting"....least of all because most of the 'resisters' are form Pakistan. Your average Afghan is resisting being caught in the middle and the rest are resiting the Taliban, which most of them consider a cult. i suppose when you speak of foriegn occupations a clandestine one by the ISI or one made through brutality by a cult doesn't count.


But Im sure you know better because youre a Muslim or whatever your excuse is to not listen.

Ahk
1130  Assistance and Feedback / The Inferno / Re: Re: Religious scams on: January 21, 2008, 09:31:30 AM
And another thing 2DOH:

You seem to be offended I referred to NPBoards as a little boys club clique. Maybe you should've employed that sense of understanding while JIMP and Zuk come over here daily to imply that small simple descisions they can't deal with are going to 'ruin this forum' and 'golly it sure is better over at NPBoards, blah blah blah".

Never heard so much bullshit in my life, and while we're dispelling bullshit JIMP is not an even-keeled poster he's a non-stop douche and Im not the first to call him that.

Quote
Only spammers. That's one simple rule we follow.

Oh, that Danish pedophile showed up too. He didn't last.

There -have- been maybe two or three exceptions in NPBoards ~ 5yr history where a matter was taken to vote.

....and that's all we do to. Our ban list is a lot smaller than you would like to imagine. And we discuss/vote on it continously....but don't let that stop you from assuming you know somethign you've never been privy to.

Kinda a stupid, insincere argument (less bans = better admin) anyways if you consider this latest drama started because y'all just couldn't stop pelting us with demands that barney get banned simply because Baldar was.

Quote
Enjoy the athiest echo-chamber the "religion & philosophy" forum becomes.

Im sorry you're mad we didn't let it become the pointless 'theists rule' echo-chamber like the one at npboards.

Quote
I like how this rant is posted then the thread is promptly locked.

I like how you sit there trying to act like there wasn't a rant going on already long before it was locked. Your dishonesty is showing 2DOH



Ahk
1131  Assistance and Feedback / The Inferno / Re: Re: Religious scams on: January 21, 2008, 09:05:45 AM
Quote
Sorry, but this needs addressed...
.....I know, I know...it's such a difficult job. Boo fucking hoo.

Well that's the problem. There's no boo-fucking hoo about it, just straight descision making and a complete absence of hollow-threat making which can be confusing to those who are used to that. The only non-stop fucking boo-hoo-hoo was coming from: JIMP and Zuk. If you are not willing to address that then you're not really sincere about addressing anything at all. Shower JIMP with all the clique-based flatterings you want, the bottom line is he wasn't banned for his "thoughtful and often even keeled" posting. He was banned for non-stop crying and stubbornly refusing to accept a simple ruling.

I say again: Admin moderator calls are not a debate. They do not qualify. 

Quote
I'll be at the close-minded, tiny boys club, not banning people.

Yeah well you do that. Sorry to see you go I really am but there are two sides here; the Admin side who will not waste their daddy-time on people playing stupid clique-ish games, and the other side who seem to think we should take every suggestion verbatum but take none of the responsibility for those suggestions should they be implimented.
 We have spoken, quite "even keeled' already about this explaining ourside but yourside coninually decides to suck it's thumb about this. JIMP and Zuk and apparently yourself seem to childishly refuse to hear what we're saying, even attempt to honestly understand the balance we are trying to maintain or any thing else we talk to you about. Zuk and JIMP are not willing to listen or see our side of it at all. All we're getting is a loud non-stop stream of demands lest this forum 'slide' into whatever ridiculious depravity you choose to imagine.

Non-stop like this:

ZUK or JIMP: "If you don't see and do things the way you say you're in danger of becoming even less cool (in our opinion) compared with NPBoards -- the greatest thing to ever happen to the Internet".
Like I care. Get over yourselves. We impliment the rules not you and JIMP/Zuk hardly qualify as 'members of the IAP community' so quit acting like they were. I could've just suspended them but they've already been suspended once for the very same crap. Get over yourselves and learn that you're not always going to be in control. This would be an easier lesson if you didn't spend all your time in a fishbowl clique.


2DOH what Zuk and JIMP were doing was non-stop insincere crap and Im not going to deal with it. i have two kids already.
I'm sick of it and I don't particularily care if im the last one here, or the next one to go, we're not going to deal with pointless crap all the time. Don't like it? Then don't even bother telling us yopu're leaving just go. i like you 2DOH but im not going to be held hostage. We're the ones applying the rules and that's just all there is to it. No point telling us you're going to leave...just leave.
We reasoned with you guys quite beyond the point of reason and I really don't care if you don't like it. Why would i? The decision was made and they just couldn't shut up about it and weren't willing to see it from our view.
Baldar came here to be purposely disruptive and when we spoke about it with him by PM he told us essentially to go screw ourselves he'll do whatever he wants. We had no choice. Immediately after that Zuk and JIMP showed up with the non-stop crap and cry-baby shit. WHY 2DOH? Why? Because you're all in the same boys-club clique. No sense pouting about it or faking offense if it's true. If you guys are going to bullshit me then why should I care what you think? Later.

2DOH I know that's the case and so do you so if you can't accept it, welp sorry to see you go but I'd have to estimate that truely you know exactly why this ended up happening but see no alteranative but to side with your clique. Ok. Cya.



Ahk


1132  Assistance and Feedback / Forum Announcements / Re: Suspensions and Bannings on: January 19, 2008, 01:29:10 PM
zukiphile and JIMP are banned for continual harassment of moderators, namely Patton, admin and the board in general. We're not going to entertain your childish little game.  I told you before if you dont like it, then leave. Now you dont have a choice.


General reminder
Problems with the moderation or administration of this forum are to be taken up OFF THE FORUM through private messaging. Forum rules, moderator/administrator calls ARE NOT A "DEBATE" and we're not going to engage in it beyond the point of first explanation. I repeat: there is NO DEBATE ABOUT IT. Continual harassment beyond the point will result in suspension banning.



Ahk
1133  Assistance and Feedback / The Inferno / Re: Re: Accounting for things Part 2 on: January 19, 2008, 01:17:53 PM
It beats a small close minded clique...npboards is a tiny little boys club. This is a discussion forum.


JIMP you're just a dishonest cheer leader and rabble rouser describes the majority of your post. Here you are again with a post that really says absolutely nothing like most of them but all it is is another attempt to keep a fight going. Stop acting like you have a thought in your head most of us couldn't crush with our thumb. You're just here to start flame so, like, go fuck yourself.



Ahk


1134  Assistance and Feedback / The Inferno / Re: Re: Accounting for things Part 2 on: January 19, 2008, 09:23:11 AM
Yeah. I did. What I said stands. The question you asked him should've been done by PM instead as a general mating call to the rabble rousers.

I'm sick of it RF. 3 years now we've been in the back room debating "RF and Barney...RF and Barney". I just don't care anymore. THREE YEARS.

Get over him, get over the "debate" (which it isn't -- it's just a never ending convoluted stream of "is so", "is not"), and get over yourself. It's not Barney's fault alone that the P&R is a joke since not a single religion is talked about except in cheer leading terms and as to philosophy? Please...there's not an ounce to be found between you two. Why don't you talk about something else for once? If Barney follows to pester maybe we'll do something about it. If not, then just like Zuk and JIMP you should step up and make a decision as to whether or not to stay here or take up exclusive  residence at the bastion of intellectualism and spectrum of perspectives that is the npboards.


Reasoned I value your presence here but we can't have this open-ended, go nowhere argument with all the cheerleaders involved taking up space out here every time you have a moderating concern. Use PM.



Ahk
1135  Social Discussions / Philosophy and Religion / Re: Christianity and happiness! Is there a link? on: January 18, 2008, 02:26:20 PM
Don't forget Buddha.

"There are 700 million of us you know!"






Nice to see you posting Jericoacoara
Ahk
1136  Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: U.S. will train the Mauritanian Camel Corps on: January 18, 2008, 02:21:16 PM
Quote
In the Cold War days the US allied with anyone against the USSR.

And the Russians did likewise. But how would that affect anything? Little things like that are barely worth mention when 'analyzing' history.



Ahk
1137  Political Discussions / Middle East / MOVED: Anti War Republicans on: January 18, 2008, 02:14:06 PM
This topic has been moved to United States.

http://www.itsallpolitics.com/forum/index.php?topic=1465.0
1138  Assistance and Feedback / The Inferno / Re: Re: Accounting for things Part 2 on: January 18, 2008, 01:55:23 PM
Quote
We've already covered Barney's suspension, it had nothing to do with his incivility in P&R.


Then you weren't fucking listening and you don't fucking know anyhow. Yeah, incivility is going to be the moderators call....WE'VE COVERED THAT and if you don't fucking like it then beat it.

Reasoned Faith Im not going to fucking deal with this cry baby shit any longer. YOU  moderated the P&R and quit. So suck it up. Patton's making the calls now and if you have a problem with it cover it in a PM or get lost. I mean what's the problem? You got nothing to do now that Barney's gone except argue about Barney? Gezziz.

Shit every time Baldar gets exactly what he asked for we gotta put up with this crap. What fantasy world do you live in where the scenario plays out that Biker and I give into it instead of kick it to the curb? We're not going to be held hostage by a concentrated mass attack of terrorist-whining.


Ahk
1139  Political Discussions / United States / Re: When is rape okay? on: January 17, 2008, 09:47:05 AM
Quote
I have a hard time putting myself in the man's shoes and not reacting as abysmally.

I can relate. Workin up a boner and laying wood on some dude isnt what comes to mind though.

Unless the 'wood' is a 2x4.



Ahk
1140  Political Discussions / United States / Re: The sickening liberal PC media on: January 16, 2008, 10:22:59 AM
Quote
It was meant to be an ironic joke.


oh. i'll put my rightious indignation back in my pants then.



Ahk
Pages: 1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 101
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.403 seconds with 26 queries.