|
46
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: A Terrorist's perspective on the "ceasefire"
|
on: December 31, 2008, 09:00:29 AM
|
Sounds like Israel. What Israel is doing can in long term prove sort of suicidal. Let me tell you what’s it about, - it’s about a colonist state imposed by aliens over the natives, a state that doesn’t wish to return even the bloody 20% of what used to be Palestine (the remnants of Palestine within the Greenline make about 20% of historic Palestine). Not aliens over natives, sorry. The mutual history is there for all to see. I can't see either side claiming more right to the area. Palestinians and arabs as a whole were willing to risk it all in war and lost. That they get anything at all is a parting of historical war outcomes. You can claim all day and night Isreal has no right to exist and Im just going to laugh at you. They are both there and they both need to get along. It really shouldn't be that hard and if you only see Isreal in the wrong then I can't help ya. So…resistance to all that is unnatural, illegitimate, … indiscriminate.. or what? What kinds of resistance? pathetic uselesss rocket-throwing in sincere hope that it will provoke the conflict and cause the death of your own? Arrainge it however you want Peis, Hamas screwed up royal here because these are the kind of actions that make the rest of the world just stop listening. They spat on continuing the cease fire brokered by Egypt - mostly because the previous ceasefire only served them insomuch as to give them a chance to re-arm - then they they couldn't wait to start it up again. Even then did Isreal just start bombing? No. They put up with it for quite a while. Did Hamas stop? No. They didn't get the reaction they were hoping for so they stepped up the rocket campaign. They were warned, an emotional appeal to please stop "we don't want this, we will retaliate". Did they stop? no. You can try and rearrange it all day....you can try and go back to this deal or that action -- use "snapshots" of history without getting into the nasty details of what happened right before, or right after, but you simply cannot effectively counter argue this point: Hamas provoked this purposely and after appeals and warnings. No matter what happened before the road to peace starts with what happens now and their intent is as obvious as it is absent of sense. Compared to Israel, that’s almost Kiwi. Yeah keep telling yourself that. The truth is that Israel is far more comfortable with her neighbours than the Palestinians. Your claim about the claims of demise is just too much off the mark; Egypt, for instance, is practically taking orders from Israel while SHOOTING the Palestinians refugees at the Gaza wall. After this war is done, there will be a separate list of victims, - Palestinians killed by Egyptians soldiers on the border. Don’t tell me Israel is scared to have such neighbors as Mubarak and Abdullah of Jordan. No but they do have to contend with Iranian interferrence as well and the nation itself. Tell me Syria is not a threat (and telling me they aren't a threat simply because Isreal out-arms them is only confiming they are a threat). Is this just another of a string of replies I can expect from you featuring quoted half sentances, ambiguous answers and points irrelevant all in the strenuous effort to dance around the base point: Hamas is responsible for this? Ahk
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: A Terrorist's perspective on the "ceasefire"
|
on: December 31, 2008, 08:46:59 AM
|
An article here form the Economist that I believe sums it up well and without bias: THE scale and ferocity of the onslaught on Gaza have been shocking, and the television images of civilian suffering wrench the heart. But however deplorable, Israel’s resort to military means to silence the rockets of Hamas should have been no surprise. This war has been a long time in the making.
Since Israel evacuated its soldiers and settlers from the Gaza Strip three years ago, Palestinian groups in Gaza have fired thousands of rudimentary rockets and mortar bombs across the border, killing very few people but disrupting normal life in a swathe of southern Israel. They fired almost 300 between December 19th, when Hamas ignored Egypt’s entreaties and decided not to renew a six-month truce, and December 27th, when Israel started its bombing campaign (see article). To that extent, Israel is right to say it was provoked.
It is easy to point out from afar that barely a dozen Israelis had been killed by Palestinian rockets since the Gaza withdrawal. But few governments facing an election, as Israel’s is, would let their towns be peppered every day with rockets, no matter how ineffective. As Barack Obama said on a visit to one Israeli town in July, “If somebody was sending rockets into my house where my two daughters sleep at night, I’m going to do everything in my power to stop that. And I would expect Israelis to do the same thing.” In recent months, moreover, Hamas has smuggled far more lethal rockets into its Gaza enclave, some of which are now landing in Israeli cities that were previously out of range. On its border with Lebanon, Israel already faces one radical non-state actor, Hizbullah, that is formally dedicated to Israel’s destruction and has a powerful arsenal of Iranian-supplied missiles at its disposal. The Israelis are understandably reluctant to let a similar danger grow in Gaza.
And yet Israel should not be surprised by the torrent of indignation it has aroused from around the world. This is not just because people seldom back the side with the F-16s. In general, a war must pass three tests to be justified. A country must first have exhausted all other means of defending itself. The attack should be proportionate to the objective. And it must stand a reasonable chance of achieving its goal. On all three of these tests Israel is on shakier ground than it cares to admit.
It is true that Israel has put up with the rockets from Gaza for a long time. But it may have been able to stop the rockets another way. For it is not quite true that Israel’s only demand in respect of Gaza has been for quiet along the border. Israel has also been trying to undermine Hamas by clamping an economic blockade on Gaza, while boosting the economy of the West Bank, where the Palestinians’ more pliant secular movement, Fatah, holds sway. Even during the now-lapsed truce, Israel prevented all but a trickle of humanitarian aid from entering the strip. So although Israel was provoked, Hamas can claim that it was provoked too. If Israel had ended the blockade, Hamas may have renewed the truce. Indeed, on one reading of its motives, Hamas resumed fire to force Israel into a new truce on terms that would include opening the border.
On proportionality, the numbers speak for themselves—up to a point. After the first three days, some 350 Palestinians had been killed and only four Israelis. Neither common sense nor the laws of war require Israel to deviate from the usual rule, which is to kill as many enemies as you can and avoid casualties on your own side. Hamas was foolish to pick this uneven fight. But of the Palestinian dead, several score were civilians, and many others were policemen rather than combatants. Although both Western armies and their foes have killed far more civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq, Israel’s interest should be to minimise the killing. The Palestinians it is bombing today will be its neighbours for ever.
This last point speaks to the test of effectiveness. Israel said at first that, much as it would like to topple Hamas, its present operation has the more limited aim of “changing reality” so that Hamas stops firing across the border. But as Israel learnt in Lebanon in 2006, this is far from easy. As with Hizbullah, Hamas’s “resistance” to Israel has made it popular and delivered it to power. It is most unlikely to bend the knee. Like Hizbullah, it will probably prefer to keep on firing no matter how hard it is hit, daring Israel to send its ground forces into a messy street fight in Gaza’s congested cities and refugee camps.
Can Israel have forgotten the lesson of Lebanon so soon? Hardly. If anything, its campaign against Hamas now is intended to compensate for its relative failure against Hizbullah then. With Iran’s nuclear threat on the horizon, and Iranian influence growing in both Lebanon and Gaza, Israel is keen to remind its enemies that the Jewish state can still fight and still win. Precisely for that reason, despite its talk of a long campaign, it may be more receptive than it is letting on to an immediate ceasefire. Its aircraft have already pummelled almost every target in Gaza. Further military gains will be harder. A truce now, if Hamas really did stop its fire, could be presented to voters as the successful rehabilitation of Israeli deterrence.
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12853965&source=hptextfeatureA weak and pathetic tactic enveloped in a weak and pathetic strategy.
Yes and infuriating. You have ot ask, "just what is it you think you're going to accomplish besides the death of your own?"Ahk
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: war crimes: 350 dead in Gaza!
|
on: December 31, 2008, 08:13:40 AM
|
thinks there is a pre-history to that, no? yeah yeah yeah. And before that "pre-history" was another history. What's your point? History is like an onion with skin after skin that is connected but can still be looked at seperately as it's own snapshot in time....and that it is inaccurate, sometimes even dishonest to do that? Yes I agree.
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: A Terrorist's perspective on the "ceasefire"
|
on: December 31, 2008, 08:00:35 AM
|
Death brings us together, I mean the new bloodshed has agitated our debative vigour and called the IAP birdies back to the nest. There actually wasn't much of a debate until the propaganda-bots started showing up telling us "375 children have been killed by the war criminals". You get sick of people lying and claiming victim after they were begging to get hit. They play on those "ichy" emotions. They work hard to create them. Some people just grow up and stop listening. Yes, but most of us don’t matter a slice of a donkey’s waste. Among those who matter, emotional opinions are extinct specie. Among those who matter, Israel’s lobbies are more important than noisy crowds. Please don’t portray Israel as a wretched pariah among nations, deprived of money, weapons, and public relations capabilities.
lol. It's funny how you never have a leg to stand on in an argument with me without telling me what I'm saying, instead of arguing what I'm saying. I mean why do you think they have such a large armed forces? You only enforce my point by dancing around it. Frankly, by propping up Isreal as impervious and trying to sell the idea they have no reason to feel paranoid you only enforce my contention that people base their sympathetic feeling towards Hamas on the mere idea that they are "underdogs" rather than substantial reality. So what? Possibly quotes ? Nations claiming desire for Israel’s demise..let’s start with Turkey. Or Jordan. lol...I did say "practically". You survive a war with 3 nations attacking you at once and see how comfortable you feel about it. They’re poor and they’re native. Why citation marks? Because Im dismissing the idea that a; both aren't "native" and b; that someone is innocent of reprisal simply because they're less efficient than they wish they could be with their attacks. These aren't aboriginals armed with kiwi who had no notion or hand in, a pending attack. This about a bloody minded suicidal organization who pretends to be protecting their people when all they do is cause more and more death for their own. They cry and claim they only want peace when in front of western cameras, meanwhile they brag to eachother about how well they are raising their children to be 'jewkillers". You can cut my quotes and insert all the impications and extrapulations you like it only enforces the idea that you can't tackle the bottom line. The bottom line is Hamas knew that if they set up and fire their rockets from neighborhoods they knew those neighborhoods would be in danger from the counter attack. They count on it, it's part of the strategy. The bottom line is they were lobbing the rockets long before the airstrikes and they were lobbing the rockets all the way through the warnings of impending airstrikes if they didn't stop, thusly Hamas killed the innocent here. And you can stamp your feet and wail about nazi's and dead children until you're blue in the face it dosn't change Hamas responsibility here, nor the fact that it is Hamas who, by the letter, is the entity who is guilty of "war crimes" if either side is.
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: war crimes: 350 dead in Gaza!
|
on: December 31, 2008, 06:18:47 AM
|
you Mr genius, you don't making sense; lol. if someone will attack you in road and take your money...I bet that you wouldn't come to rape all his family ...I won't be crying about what happens to him. I won't claim that the robber was the victim like you do, and when those two people show up in court they're not going to ignore the original robbery and give the guy a medal. Besides your analogy is incorrect. Hamas throws rockets at Israel for the sole purpose of trying to kill civilians. That's a war crime no matter how many baloney analogies you need to make in order to avoid facing that. Bottom line: Hamas sets up the rockets in places where they know they will be counter-struck and they know innocent people will die. That means Hamas is to blame. No two ways about it. Hamas killed those people. And just because Hamas ends up killing more of their own than Isrealis is no reason to feel "sorry" for Hamas. And if you're not going to recognize hurling rockets into Israel for the sole purpose of terrorizing/killing the population as a war crime, then there's no use calling Israeli counter attacks war crimes. When a heavy weapons section is set up by the Coalition in Afghanistan, do you think we set it up in front of a school? Of course not. Because we know what will happen. Well it's actually because we know what will happen and we're men, whereas Hamas....well not so much. Good to know you're making as much sense as ever Untouchables. Ahk
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: war crimes: 350 dead in Gaza!
|
on: December 30, 2008, 04:21:27 PM
|
You have to be careful when talking about war crimes. You have to be able yo back it up. No just talk out of frustration and anger. I believe Israel had a chance to handle this situation better but squandered this chance. Please read this article which I wrote earlier.
As for the present confilict, I feel that Israel handled this senario wrong right from the start. I believe that special commando, which Israel has, units should have been hunting these rocket launchers night and day over the eight year period over which this problem has been continued. Applaud! A rational understanding of the emotional foundation of the war crimes charge and it's place in the propaganda war, coupled with a rational alternative to the "use of disproportional force" to boot. Well done. Personally I think it serves Israels interest at the moment to be harsh because it prompts international calls for a cease fire without looking like they can't be brutal if they want to. Not saying I condone this, but I understand it. I believe it was the same rational behind their less-than-stellar incursion into Lebanon a while back and it worked then too. Welcome to the forum Skyboy.
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: war crimes: 350 dead in Gaza!
|
on: December 30, 2008, 02:15:30 PM
|
By the way -- back to the original post: war crimes of last few days reached the level of 350 victims!! "Victims"? I'm hearing reports from everywhere now that it's 63 civilians and the rest are Hamas militants. If that's true then actually it would appear there's a major effort keep civilian casulaties low. im not sure Western nations could do it any better. ...and Hamas militants aren't "victims".
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: war crimes: 350 dead in Gaza!
|
on: December 30, 2008, 02:06:50 PM
|
International law forbids collective punishment Im not listening to another word about warcrimes until it is with someone who can recognize that Hamas rocket attacks on civilians is also a "warcrime". Says a person who doesn't have to live with air strikes, no health care, dependence on humanitarian aid...
Hey if you wanna get into the reasons why they got here no problem. I have a few days to kill This is just pure racism, the equivalent of saying every Israeli thinks the Palestinians should be wiped out, or something.
Nope. It's a direct quote from more than a few sources. If you would like to deny this overwelming mentality be my guest. Have you seens their kiddie TV shows? Have you seen the children brought up to kill themselves? Or do you just conveniently ignore it? Whatever. I would usually feel a need to defend myself against a charge of racism but since it's so completely shallow and ignoring the reality of the situation I can only laugh to myself. It isnt the least bit racist IAME, it's the brutal reality of their mindset. It is indeed the proudest a mother can be and many will leap to the front of the line to admit it. Ignore this...call it "propaganda": Asked if she hoped to become a martyr herself, Saraa – a beautiful child in a flowered hijab – vigorously nodded her head. “Of course,” she said. “It’s something to be proud of. Every Palestinian citizen hopes to be a martyr.” http://michaelmedved.townhall.com/blog/g/6c20e178-4da4-4d20-a93e-f70afcead1e4&comments=true#commentAnchorThe mother of Muhammad Faisal Saksak, the 21-year-old suicide bomber who carried out Monday’s attack in Eilat, said she was aware of her son’s plan to blow himself up and that she had wished him “good luck.” … The mother of nine said she was proud of her son for carrying out the suicide attack.
http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/01/30/a-mothers-pride/Ignoring/refusing to deal with the truth and calling me racist because you don't like to hear it is weak.Its quite a Neanderthal view of the world, actually. I mean, I know this is the way the US/Israeli leaders think, but I'm surprised you put it so bluntly.
Ignoring that this mentality rules the Palestinians doesn't help you. Instead of acting above it, what exactly do you think Isreal should do? Retaliate with one rocket as well? Since when is that how war works? They don't want the strikes, then don't fire the rockets. Just because its simple and easy to understand doesnt actually make it "Neanderthal" (by the way they were wiped out by genocide right?) I'm not saying the Kassam rockets are justified (mostly because they seem to be achieving nothing), but I'm saying, why not look at it from the Palestinian side as well?
Whatever. I have. For years. I'm strong enough to call the weaker of two combatants wrong, if indeed they are. Enough to know it's not racist to reveal what anyone who spends 10 days in Palestine will see for themselves. Say whatever you like. No one disagrees that Hamas asked for this retaliation. No one disagrees that when it comes to this tit-for-tat with rockets Hamas has "started it". The only ones who do are dishonest and need to ignore the reality. Ahk
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: war crimes: 350 dead in Gaza!
|
on: December 30, 2008, 12:55:35 PM
|
really absurd and senseless arguments to justify massacres of whole citizens israeli mediatic propaganda is snivelling theirs 2 deaths, and what ?
2 deaths against 380 in Palestinian side!
Rhetoric won't help you here. The argument that Isreal deserves these rocket attacks, that they are justified and that Isreali should just sit there and be attacked is what is absurd and senseless. 2 deaths against 380 in Palestinian side! You must ignore who shot the rockets first before you can make sense of this in your own mind. Answer that. Answer why did Hamas start their rocket campaign mere hours after the ceasefire ended? What was there to gain by lobbing rockets in there? Why do they set up their imprompt rockets right in the middle of housing projects? Near schools? Knowoing full well they will be hit? Please justify that. Absurd is ignoring that these "warcrimes" conventions go both ways. Absurd is ignoring the the provication. Absurd is ignoring Hamas. No other nation would put up with it either and you do not possess the courage or sincerity to condemn the rocket attacks and recognize them for what they are - a concerted effort to dare Isreal into retaliating so they can play their propaganda on people like you and justify their own cowardly violence. Your credability has been shot in 3 posts flat. Congratulations. The proudest thing to be over there is the mother of a martyr. You really believe theat's "justified"? You really believe they are the ones who want "peace"? Your "movement" loses steam every time Hamas spits on the opportunities given. Whatever. You are absolutely unable to see the truth i can tell right away you're one of those people that will ignore their crap and just yammer on and on and on about "the other side". Palestinans will die and die and die forever until they wake up and take responsability for themselves. Hamas brings it to their door everytime. Ahk
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: war crimes: 350 dead in Gaza!
|
on: December 30, 2008, 10:24:14 AM
|
Shouting war crimes doesn't make it so. Hamas would be charged with war crimes too: raining bombs and munitions against civilain population for the purest motive of terrorising them. Convienently for Hamas they aren't a "state" and "don't count". The 18 months of Israel's chokehold on the Gaza Strip was bound to incite rocket attacks. Oh really? There was no 'choke hold' during the cease fire. How long did we go after the cease fire ended before Hamas started firing the rockets again? But none of the rocket attacks warranted an attack as indiscriminate and bloody as this. Says a person who doesn't have to live with the sirens and random death. Sorry - the Isreal=war crimes mentality is losing ground. You should really consider the very real and rational reasons for that IMO. Being an underdog likewise does not = "victim". Bottom line is there was no excuse for the rockets, firing the rockets were supposed to incite Isreal into attacking, so at the end of the day the people to blame for all this death is Hamas and the mentality they foster. Ahk
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: A Terrorist's perspective on the "ceasefire"
|
on: December 30, 2008, 10:13:52 AM
|
I can't really see Israel having a whole lot of choices Yep. When the West looks over there we see dead civilians and Isreali tanks. IMO, most of us formulate an emotional opinion from there based on the imagined rightousness of the Palastinian underdog. We see this huge military might raining down on "poor native peoples". But what does Isreal see when she looks out at the world? She sees something even Cuba doesn't see: every single nation that borders with her, and for that matter practically every nation that borders those nations constantly claiming desire for their demise. If I was Isreali I would spend a lot of my waking hours nervious. Hamas cries peace one moment then "we'll never give up until Isreal is gone" the next. I think the outside influence does more harm than good right now. We need to show goodwill and a desire for peace, but we need to make sure that the hands of regional and international actors are more constrained when it comes with the details of peace (and war). I think you're right. One side has to 'lose' and then negociate peace without any safety net provided by the UN, etc. They both need to know there are no longer any parents in the room so fight it out but end it already. Palestinians aren't going anywhere. Gaza has been their home forever. Isrealis aren't going anywhere. Their archeological, historical claim is rightous as well and they've fought to stay. Both sides need to accept that the other isn't going anywhere. Ahk
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
Political Discussions / Middle East / Re: A Terrorist's perspective on the "ceasefire"
|
on: December 30, 2008, 08:21:22 AM
|
Does this surprise anyone? I see no end in sight to this sort of thing because the world spends too much energy ripping Israel and not enough energy telling Hamas that it is responsible for its own ruin. Every second we spend bashing Israel gives Hamas implicit legitimacy. I'm not suggesting Israel can do no wrong - far from it. Hear Hear! And any time someone even timidly points out that reality they are condemned as nazi-"neocon"-Bush-bots. I've had enough. These parties are only more at odds with each other than before, and our meddling is just dragging it on. Ignore them, come back in 25 or 30 years and see if any progress has been made. That's been my opinion for years. It's not all Hamas's fault - a conflict lasting this long, it's almost impossible to be just the fault of one -- but yes, the truth is they are they only ones who want to keep the violence going. They are the only ones who thrive on it. They launch the rockets. They recieve the counter attacks. Martyr the predicatble casualties and use that pain and anger to legitimize their existance...and most of this all comes down to simple male-dominated stubborness on their part. Isreal neutered the Arabs 50 years ago and they've never recovered since. It is truely one of the more pathetic conflicts of history imo. Ahk
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
Assistance and Feedback / The Inferno / Re: On this date in Bush History...
|
on: December 21, 2008, 11:29:45 AM
|
If you find anything, anything at all, that is not true in these posts, please point them out. That''s not the point. You're simply using this site to spam from another site and we don't allow that. Most forums don't. Trashed. Long over due probably. Ahk
|
|
|
|
|