Great, now I have performance anxiety.



You take care as well.

Will there be make-up sex?








I'M JUST KIDDING!!!

I take that to mean Chovy?

That's fine. I'll cease further pursuit of the matter here. As far as Junior High conflict, I
suppose you're correct, a measure of maturity would help.


.....Oh, & tell Viv I'm not responding to her anymore since she hurt my feelings when she said
she was ignoring me.



Edit - but I hope she keeps up the smiting. She won't admit it, but she can't quit me.

You're right, Biker, there are two parts; this thread, & Viv's intro thread at NPB


Well, you thought things were "getting interesting" when you thought Viv was suspended for
no reason. Did it stop mattering when it was shown she actually requested that & was being
dishonest?

I know you're not thta fickle. 

"Sweets. You couldn't ignore me if you tried."



You're embarrassed for being called out on your dishonesty?

That's understandable.

Had your account been deleted, there'd be no conversation to look over.

As I said, deleting your account also deletes -all- of your posts -including- any thread you started.

Do you understand?

Either removes you from NPB, which is what you requested.

Did you actually want to stick around?



Are you sure this time?

Viv, you asked to be deleted:

http://www.npboards.com/viewtopic.php?pid=237849#p237849

Your request was granted:



Deleting your account gets rid of posts you had in the SSM discussion & makes
reading the thread a bit jumbled, so I banned you. That way, your account is
suspended but your posts remain, for continuity sake.

If you want your account deleted entirely, I will do so. If you still want to post at NPB, that's fine too.


Just don't come here & misrepresent our intentions.


Edit - Morning, Biker.

Ok, I'll address one issue as it's indicative of the problem you're having.



Note the bold portion.

Here is the thread you speak of:

http://archive.itsallpolitics.com/3-vt323.html?postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=40

The argument about the use of the word ilk starts at page 3 & ends on page 5.

Notice something conspicuously absent; JIMP & myself.
We didn't jump in and do anything. It was zuk, Raoul Duke, & Miataman.

In fact, JIMP didn't even post in that thread.

So how exactly did JIMP & myself jump in and argue the point?




I'll conclude one of two things:

1. You're purposely misleading in your comments.
2. You're simply confused about who did what.

I like to think it's 2, but your behavior here muddies the prospect.

Wow. I feel as though I've been crushed under a mighty thumb.


Which you did actually, otherwise you wouldn't have quoted me.





You are an absolute mess. Who exactly is he?
(I have signatures turned off)

Again, the only one bringing up npboards & making it an issue is you.


Since all you can do is level unsubstantiated accusations my way,
& call me a liar, I suppose it's pointless to continue.

I doubt you're actually like this in real life. The interweb is odd that way, isn't it?

Since you've decided to question my honesty, I'll approach this with all the civility it deserves.

Only an idiot would suggest that.

My comments re: JIMP reflect my reading his posts on four different forums(including this one).
"Clique" has nothing to do with it.


Since he didn't do either, I'd be curious to see an example.


Yet you felt the need to reply to me(rather lengthy replies) twice.



Loud non-stop stream of demands? Are you serious?
I don't recall you overreacting this much in the past. Perhaps you are
under some stress outside the web as you mentioned. The only one acting "loudly" is you.

This thread is a good example:
http://www.itsallpolitics.com/forum/index.php?topic=1470.0


Speaking of dishonest, I'll address this shortly.


Combine IAP 1.0 & 2.0, & you'll notice the three of us account for ~ 6,000-7000 posts.

What then constitutes membership in this community?


As I mentioned, we've spent plenty of time here, too.

Yes it's loud, dishonest, non-stop, insincere, childish, etc...

Again, bullshit. Your knee is in full blown jerk mode.

 

Well, you kept going & I didn't want to appear rude by ignoring you.
 

Now, part two...



True. One shouldn't become irrational when a forum one frequents
is criticized. Wouldn't you agree?
(I can expand on that if you like)



This is the part I wanted to address earlier:

You've accused zuk, JIMP, & myself of bringing up comparisons of IAP & npboards, more than once now.

I did a search of the forum, & the only one bringing up npboards is you.
(The one exception being Bikerdude when he asked me a direct question
& my responding to that question).

The only one making a comparison is you.

The only one making it an issue is you

(If I'm wrong, & JIMP, zuk, & myself have in fact mentioned npboards as much
as you claim, I'll retract.)


Why apologize for something that isn't true. I'm neither pleased
nor angry with what the R&P forum has become at IAP.

It wasn't my argument, it was a direct answer to Bikerdudes question.
Must you ascribe motive to everything?

False.

I never demanded barny's suspension.
Zuk didn't either, nor did JIMP.

One who makes accusations of dishonesty should check themselves prior to accusing.

The issue was addressing a comment Patton made re: forum behavior
& whether or not consistency was being applied.


There wasn't...that is until you went all froth at the mouth:
http://www.itsallpolitics.com/forum/index.php?topic=1470.0

Which is strange seeing as how you and JIMP had resolved matters somewhat on page two of this thread.

My comment notes you attacking JIMP without possibility of reply.
(the thread was locked)
 




as is your knee jerking, hyper reflexive desire to ascribe motive.

Myself?

Only spammers. That's one simple rule we follow.

Oh, that Danish pedophile showed up too. He didn't last.

There -have- been maybe two or three exceptions in NPBoards ~ 5yr history where a matter was taken to vote.


Edit, to add:


Perhaps a Nick Jr. forum would be a better place to moderate?

Less harassment, I suppose. 

Sorry, but this needs addressed...


Wow.

"This is a discussion forum" as long as discussion doesn't involve critique of the
moderating. I know, I know...it's such a difficult job. Boo fucking hoo.

I like how this rant is posted then the thread is promptly locked.

Going back to IAP 1.0, JIMP was always one of the more thoughtful, even keeled &
least likely to fly off the handle(like you just did) posters...But I suppose if most of
you could crush his thoughts with your mighty thumbs, perhaps it's best he's been given
an e-time out.

Enjoy the athiest echo-chamber the "religion & philosophy" forum becomes.



BTW, Just a reminder from the IAP forum home page:

Best of luck in that.
 


I'll be at the close-minded, tiny boys club, not banning people.

Mark

Looks like someone's been listening to JPN's call for quick relief.
$145 Billion worth of stimulus, heading your way:


http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h19_YeGzwzlmJhx42iIA7nJF0_UAD8U8DBNG0



I'm going to refuse mine.....for the greater good.




















 

Welcome to IAP 2.0.