IAP Political Forum
November 23, 2008, 08:51:47 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Support IAP -- join "High Society" with less fuss. Click "paid subscriptions" from your profile.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Zero-Zero Office Building  (Read 502 times)
Opmod
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-64
Posts: 729



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2007, 12:37:54 PM »

I am only tangentially aware of the Green movement in Architecture even though I have a Bachelors in Environmental Planning, Public Policy and Law, and a Masters in Architecture.

I have been involved in High-End Residential for most of my career and unfortunately the majority of clients couldn't give a rats ass about saving energy.  In fact, given the choice they would rather pay extra for a hideous, endangered, high-energy content stone from Botswana than a beautiful, local stone, or wood, etc...


One client did, however, look into Geothermal, but the life cycle cost didn't make sense. By the time it would start to save money it would have aged to a point of needing to be replaced.  The client decided against it, even though he could have reduced his carbon foot print.  His house, btw, was his summer home on Long Island. His new $16M, 13,000 SF summer home (which, if I may say so myself, is stunning. Wink)

Now this IS a surprise. With as disgustingly liberal as your are Daed, I would have figured you designed houses for little old ladies who couldn't afford to pay.
Logged

\\\"Something witty\\\" Some self impotant blowhard
daedalus 2.0
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-397
Posts: 1,145



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 30, 2007, 08:21:26 PM »

(...)
What's od is that solar cells have been around for a long time. I don't understand why the price hasn't dropped.

It has dropped, largely as a function of production. But production still is too small due to demand still too small. Something is wrong in a technolgoy that, 30 years after hitting the market, still can grow 24% in a year.

Solar cells need a huge, massive project that boosts them. Not such project is in screen, and selling their product in 4 sqqare meter packages barely is a business. The fact is, iy's a good technology for houses, but it won't work in apartment buildings until proficency grows. An apartments building only haves so much roof surface and solar energy is so cattered and solar cells are so few efficent that there's no way to supply more than common areas.

Meanwhile, there's some promising alternate energies with outputs that are plain frightening. What they call "blue energy" (reverse electrodyalisis with ion-selective membranes) produces about 1 megawatt per cubic meter of salt water per second...

I just read the wiki article on it. Very interesting.
Logged

\\\\"SUCK IT, JESUS!\\\\" Kathy Griffin
\"Hitler burns Anne Frank for a day, and it\'s Evil.
God burns Anne Frank for eternity, and it\'s Just.\"Anon
chovy
Founder aka "Boss"
Forum Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +22/-15
Posts: 462


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: November 09, 2007, 09:36:37 PM »

been hearing a lot about this lately, "Green is cool" type of stuff on tv, radio, print.

Cisco has a new "telepresence" video conference (basically a 65" plasma tv w/ video conferencing) that is "green". I'm sure its only green because powering two or more conference rooms w/ 65" plasma and uber-band internet access is only about half as much as flying them over
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.148 seconds with 26 queries.