|
jpn of Seattle
|
 |
« on: September 16, 2007, 05:58:31 PM » |
|
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
|
|
|
|
daedalus 2.0
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2007, 07:35:58 PM » |
|
No. We are along for a ride. Passangers of a Deterministic, Natural Universe. There is no goal, there is no final solution, or predetermined finish line, except as predicted by material mechanisms. The average human lives about 1000 months. Enjoy it while you can.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"SUCK IT, JESUS!\\\\" Kathy Griffin
\"Hitler burns Anne Frank for a day, and it\'s Evil.
God burns Anne Frank for eternity, and it\'s Just.\"Anon
|
|
|
neorealist
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +33/-33
Posts: 1,116
Mod of further light
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2007, 12:17:57 AM » |
|
pretty deep thread JPN. Yes, I think the universe has a purpose designed by a grand architect. I think there is an easier question that stems from you question, "what is the purpose of man?" IMO its to procreate. As far as narrowing what the purpose of the universe as a whole is, well thats.....my brain just exploded  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on. - Robert Bloch
|
|
|
Major Zee Lee
Forum cat lover
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +64/-169
Posts: 566
Kooks not allowed in (Secret meeting is next door)
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2007, 02:54:48 AM » |
|
I use to swing between feeling it's a bugger and feeling it's a gorgeous joke. So, has the universe a purpose? Who cares. If it had, we wouldn't know; if we knew, we would be wrong; if we where right, it would suck; if it didn't sucked, we wouldn't be a part of it; and if we were a part of it, it couldn't be anything else but a joke... As my new signature goes: Don't take life too seriously; nobody lives to tell...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do not take life too seriously; nobody lives to tell.
|
|
|
|
Gojira
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2007, 04:40:22 PM » |
|
What do you think?
To transcend and include for that which is old and new. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Our democracy has created an environment of indecision at times of impending crisis.
If life is easy for you, then you aint livin.
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +212/-207
Posts: 4,098
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2007, 04:54:47 PM » |
|
No purpose.
Does it need one? Is "purpose" some kind of precursor to "existence"? Does your ring finger have a purpose? What about your second toe?
Why can't something "occur" simply out of randomness?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
Philosofear
Jr. Member
Karma: +10/-10
Posts: 65
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2007, 05:15:27 PM » |
|
No purpose.
Does it need one? Is "purpose" some kind of precursor to "existence"? Does your ring finger have a purpose? What about your second toe?
Why can't something "occur" simply out of randomness?
Why can't something occur out of randomness? Well random causation is a possibility but it is totally incompatiable with the orderly and structured operation of our world. If things were random, their would be no order, no reason, just things occuring and not occuring, an inconstruable uninterpretable ridiculous paradox. Does the universe have an overriding purpose? Oh most definitely, but it is most likely self defined. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +212/-207
Posts: 4,098
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2007, 05:42:10 PM » |
|
Just because the creation is "random" does not make its function "random". If the universe's creation was random does not mean everything occuring inside it would be too. I don't see why a things function is a result of it's creation. I was born from a very controlled set of perameters but I have choice to be as controlled or uncontrolled as I want. Of course, this now begs the question whether the universe itself makes "choice". But that is going off topic. Creation does not define function. That's the point I'm trying to make. Does the universe have an overriding purpose? Oh most definitely, but it is most likely self defined. How so? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
jpn of Seattle
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2007, 08:01:46 PM » |
|
Here's a link to some deep thinkers who took a swing at the question: http://www.templeton.org/questions/purpose/I think I like Neil deGrasse Tyson's answer the best. Then Major Zee Lee's |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
|
|
|
bringbackwigs
Professional Post-Whore
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +156/-183
Posts: 3,103
Please refrain from taking my posts seriously
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2007, 09:56:05 PM » |
|
Too early in the world to tell. Get over it: you weren't born during a time where things like this can been explained. It sucks, I know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In religion and politics, people\\\\\\\\\'s beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination. - Mark Twain  |
|
|
Major Zee Lee
Forum cat lover
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +64/-169
Posts: 566
Kooks not allowed in (Secret meeting is next door)
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2007, 02:33:03 AM » |
|
Neil De Grasse's answer is good, yes. I like it too. I'm just a bit more cynical about mankind.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do not take life too seriously; nobody lives to tell.
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2007, 11:13:27 AM » |
|
No purpose.
Does it need one? Is "purpose" some kind of precursor to "existence"? Does your ring finger have a purpose? What about your second toe?
Why can't something "occur" simply out of randomness?
Why can't something occur out of randomness? Well random causation is a possibility but it is totally incompatiable with the orderly and structured operation of our world. How so? If things were random, their would be no order, no reason, just things occuring and not occuring, an inconstruable uninterpretable ridiculous paradox.
So? I know you don't like it but it could still be true. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
Totino
High Society
Hero Member
Karma: +105/-133
Posts: 1,354
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2007, 04:35:04 PM » |
|
No. We are along for a ride. Passangers of a Deterministic, Natural Universe. There is no goal, there is no final solution, or predetermined finish line, except as predicted by material mechanisms. The average human lives about 1000 months. Enjoy it while you can. I for once have to actually agree with daedalus |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 \\\"Since you\\\'re going to loose everything anyway when you die, you might as well get rid of it now\\\" \\\"All creations, including god, originate in the mind\\\" |
|
|
|
jpn of Seattle
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2007, 09:04:04 PM » |
|
Just because the creation is "random" does not make its function "random". If the universe's creation was random does not mean everything occuring inside it would be too. I don't see why a things function is a result of it's creation.
The universe is definately not random. It obeys very exact laws. Where life is concerned, the products of the evolutionary process are random. However, evolution itself is guided by natural selection, which is not a random process at all. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +212/-207
Posts: 4,098
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2007, 09:11:10 PM » |
|
Just because the creation is "random" does not make its function "random". If the universe's creation was random does not mean everything occuring inside it would be too. I don't see why a things function is a result of it's creation. The universe is definately not random. It obeys very exact laws. Where life is concerned, the products of the evolutionary process are random. However, evolution itself is guided by natural selection, which is not a random process at all. The only thing that may have been random was it's creation. Everything else follows a strict set of laws. That's what I was referring to. Perhaps the creation of the universe was the quinicential moment of entropy... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
