religions are bunch of ppl who do certain things based on their beliefs (not just metaphysical but much more general) while ppl like daedalus 2.0 who ridicule religion and try to convert to their beliefs. To me its what religion about,,, GOD never been a part of any religion,,, GOD been used to hide plans of those who wrote religions books and taught religion.
Jane, I appreciate your comments. I also am against atheism becoming a religion. I am for people forming groups of like interests and talking about things that are of a common thread. Its a difficult line to draw.
For example, I love many things, the history of the Bible, logic mythology, etc are just a few things that I enjoy. I don't know of any group, though, that agrees with all the same things I do, and in a way, I don't have set beliefs.
I am still discovering. I am often made out to be a bad guy because I have broached the subject, and have talked about the true beginnings of Xianity, or shown the problems with the logic of Theism. To some people this seems like an attack, but I look at it as an opportunity to get the record straight.
As you are, I too am against religion. I see no good that can come of it that can't be achieved from other ways. I have no intention of making atheism, my atheism, or my "theories" as established dogma.
I welcome any one who can correct me, but I would warn them to be rigorous in their scholarship and be honest. There is no shame in questioning authority, especially with facts and logic. While you have taken a swipe at me for being some militant atheist, I notice you have little to say about the topic other than to claim that religion is bad and so would an atheist one be bad as well.
Of course, I could counter that to suggest atheism could be a religion is like mentioning anarchy and then discussing further political aspects of it. That is, atheism doesn't have dogma and can't be a religion (Secular Humanism, or the like could be vaguely called one I suppose).
But I appreciate you point, and its fine. I do note, however, that it is sad that the only one talking about the actual/real history of the most impotant religion in the history of the world is a non-believer. Or maybe that's not ironic. Maybe this is exactly what we need.
Honest appraisal from an outsider. After all, I have no preconcieved ideas of what we should find out about Xianity (or other religions), but I think being honest and rigorous is a good place to start.