IAP Political Forum
November 20, 2008, 07:02:42 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the new "IAP 2.0" -- please re-register before continuing to post.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: MASSIVE Voter Fraud ADMITTED by NH clerk!!!!  (Read 344 times)
FreeinTX
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-50
Posts: 527


View Profile
« on: January 10, 2008, 07:28:29 AM »

That's right, NH has been caught fixing the votes.

Is this Fraud??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY

Sourced from the BOSTON GLOBE and the ASSOCIATED PRESS!!!!

Also,

Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H.

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=655

Quote
According to a post this evening on the Ron Paul Forums, vote fraud occurred in Sutton, New Hampshire:

Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???

Originally Posted by sstjean View Post
This was posted to ronpaul-801 tonight: “This town numbers are wrong wrong wrong on this map. I am from Sutton originally and my parents and one aunt all voted for Ron Paul today and Sutton says 0. So this is wrong. This is a town that had 20 people counting the ballots and I have no reason to believe that they cheated. Small town and I was born and raised there. The real numbers will come in by morning. The electronic machines in the big towns are the ones we have to worry about.”

81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as “Premier”). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say “but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by hand!”

But they’re not.
[/color] They’re counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004, where two election officials were convicted of rigging their recount….

In short, the stage was set by Diebold and Republican operatives to rig yet another election, as the above first-hand account seems to indicate.

And the township of Sutton ADMITTED to the vote mess-up;

New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Find-Freedom.htm?At=028740&From=News

Quote
The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.

Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.

Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?

"The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.

"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.

"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."

With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.

The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.

If you don't like prison planet and don't know how to use Google;

New Hampshire Vote fraud confirmed: Ron Paul votes not counted
http://www.product-reviews.net/2008/01/09/new-hampshire-vote-fraud-confirmed-ron-paul-votes-not-counted/

Emergency Call to Help Ron Paul VoteWatch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkmmNft0g3Q

WILL RON PAUL AUTHORIZE AN AUDIT OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PRIMARY?
http://newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd335.htm

Quote
Iowa was a dismal affair with Dr. Paul allegedly coming in fifth place with 10%. As I wrote in my last column, in several counties in Iowa, Dr. Paul pulled in 35%, 14%, 15%, 21% and several with 12% of the vote. Of course, that didn't make the "news" on any cable or "mainstream" network. I didn't believe the final count because I know better. The machines are in control and the powerful elites who rule our lives intend to install their new puppet in the White House regardless of what we the people want.

I found these comments particularly disturbing in Condit's recounting of events: "3. Right after the hour radio show, -- so many irate Iowans called the Iowa GOP headquarters demanding to know why they were using the discredited Diebold machines, that the Iowa GOP made an appeal to the Ron Paul paid staff in Iowa to send out an email asking Ron Paul supporters to quit calling GOP headquarters! The email, sent out by RP paid staff member, Jeff Frazee, to Ron Paul supporters was nasty; it told them to “Stop it”, regarding any more calls to the political thugs at Iowa GOP Headquarters. He also said that the RP paid staff was doing everything they could to insure a fair count, which was a blatant falsehood, as they did nothing but support the Iowa GOP in their unconscionable, secret count of the votes (behind police guard)." (Regarding the Diebold Machines, please see my last column because it contains links to many items on the corrupt Diebold machines.)

And from Black Box . ORG, the makers of the HBO Documentary of Vote Fraud, "Hacking Democracy," about the problems in NH covering all the topics listed;

1-7-08: Silvestro the Cat & New Hamps...
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/71200.html?1199904311
Quote
Silvestro IS the New Hampshire chain of custody
RARE VIDEO FOOTAGE
VOTING MACHINE CHECKUP
WE THINK IT DOESN'T TAKE THAT LONG
NEW HAMPSHIRE HASN'T UPGRADED SYSTEM SECURITY
IN FACT, NEW HAMPSHIRE HAS NOT IMPLEMENTED MITIGATIONS FOR KNOWN RISKS
CONTROL OVER THE "BRAINS" OF THE MACHINE: ACCESS TO THE CHIP


And this shows that when the votes were hand counted on the 19% of the state, RON PAUL beats GHOUL-iani!!! but when the computers count the votes he loses 2%;

2008 New Hampshire State Primary Results
http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php

And according to these DIEBOLD BLACK BOX VOTING MACHINES, HITLERY Clinton was able to over come a 13% deficit in polls taken the evening before, and beat out Barrack O'Bama, by 3%.  That's a 16% swing to a candidate that voted for the 75% unpopular War, and voted for the 85% unpopular Patriot Act, twice.  Can you say B-LLSH-T?

Now in Iowa, I, PERSONALLY, watched some nonesence at the Iowa Caucas, right there on C-SPAN 2.  If caused me to fire off this e-mail.

Quote
I was watching the Republican caucus on CSPAN2 and on of the gentlemen at the check-in table, was going down the line TO PEOPLE HE KNEW, and giving them what he called, "curbside check-in."

If he recognized someone in line, if knew that person was registered and if he knew what, "ward," that person voted in, then he would give that person his ballot, allow that person to avoid waiting in the check-in line, and allow that person to enter the caucus without initialling next to their own name. 

He recogized a man named, "Ron," and another man named, "Russ," however, when one other gentleman said he knew what ward he was in and knew he was registered, the man doing the "curbside check-in," did NOT recognize him, instead he just went from,"Ron," to, "Russ," and paid no attention to the third gentleman.

Before handing the two men their ballot, he scribbled quickly in his notepad (far to fast to actually write a name), and said that HE would sign THEIR initials on the check-in sheet.  After handing them their ballot he told them to go on ahead in.

First, I just noticed his wearing a Mitt Rimney sticker on one lapel and a cross on the other, but then it became obvious that he was one of the people in charge of the caucus.  Not just a volunteer helping people sign in, but one of the organizers.  Turns out, he was JOHN WERDEN, Carroll, Iowa Republican Caucus Chairman!!!

Now, I don't know if he actually signed the people's initials at all, because he went straight from handing out "curbside check-in" ballots, to starting the caucus.

The check-ins occured at 7:29 cst by my DVR.

Thought you might like to know.

FreeinTX

Now, I hope you will ALL do your part to DEMAND a hand re-count of the ballots in New Hampshire., especially the Barrack supporters.  However, even if your guy or gal won in New Hampshire, the idea that votes were not counted, or counted incorrctly is an afront to our WAY OF LIFE, to OUR COUNTRY, and OUR FREEDOM.  They are stealing the elections, and you know it.  We must put a stop to this INJUSTICE!!!!  We've caught them in Sutton, cheating Ron Paul of 31 votes.  That has been ADMITTED.  How many other votes were NOT counted or counted incorrectly?  The ONLY way to know for sure is to RE-COUNT the ballots by hand. 

F-CK the DIEBOLD machines.

Vote Fraud Expert Warns Of New Hampshire Chicanery
Key vulnerabilities of Diebold machine identified within ten minutes by programmer
http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/vote_fraud_expert_warns_of_nh_chicanery.htm

HACKED IN TEN MINUTES!!!!

Silvestro the cat / NH voting (More:see Hacking Democracy)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs&eurl=http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/vote_fraud_expert_warns_of_nh_chicanery.htm

Watch them hack the EXACT MACHINE used in the NH elections RIGHT THERE ON CNN's camera;

Lou Dobbs Diebold Voting Machine hacking Fraud Treason
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=261IlYmisyE&eurl=http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/vote_fraud_expert_warns_of_nh_chicanery.htm


FreeinTX
Logged
FreeinTX
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +24/-50
Posts: 527


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2008, 08:01:43 AM »

Republican New Hampshire Primary results
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/

Quote
NOTE: Due to a formatting error, some of the columns of this chart appeared mislabeled in some users' browsers Wednesday morning. They are now correctly labeled. The data appearing on the map was not affected.

Not affected?  The numbers changed.

FreeinTX
Logged
Toaster
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-129
Posts: 741


Burnin' for you


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2008, 08:29:24 AM »

http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php

Curious.
Logged

DISCUSSION, n.
A method of confirming others in their errors.
 

The Devil\\'s Dictionary
neue regel
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +61/-272
Posts: 1,791



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2008, 09:17:08 AM »

The republican vote matched the early polls almost perfectly. The democratic vote was off 15%.

I thought that might be were this was going.
Logged
daedalus 2.0
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-397
Posts: 1,145



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2008, 10:04:01 PM »

Voter fraud is soooo last election! Roll Eyes laugh
Logged

\\\\"SUCK IT, JESUS!\\\\" Kathy Griffin
\"Hitler burns Anne Frank for a day, and it\'s Evil.
God burns Anne Frank for eternity, and it\'s Just.\"Anon
Retro Fit
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-37
Posts: 802


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2008, 11:09:15 PM »

Quote
Voter fraud is soooo last election!

  I hope you meant this as a joke.
  There are few things about how our government operates that have the ability to irritate me more then their refusal to insure the will of the people is addressed by insuring our votes are tabulated and reported accurately.  Their refusal to remove corruptible tabulating machines and the companies that distribute them from our polling process is an act of the highest treason.  It negates the very foundation of our system of government.  Insuring fair elections has to be first on the list of necessary changes above and beyond all others.  And yet, I have no idea how to initiate such a change.
Logged
Pond Scum
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +41/-38
Posts: 591


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2008, 02:36:50 AM »

Voter fraud is soooo last election! Roll Eyes laugh

Ya know, you have to laugh about this stuff, because the people just don't care.

Now, if Survivor was taken off the air, then there might be a problem. Otherwise, no one really gives a crap. As long as people can still live in a decent house, drive a decent car, pay their bills and still go on vacation once, or twice a year, everything is hunky dory.

Until we hit a rough economic time, people just aren't that interested. How does it affect them? Will they have to give up their cell phones, or their cable t.v.? Will they not be able to go on vacation?

I am disgusted by this information, most of which I only skimmed, because I know this has been going on for a long time, only it is getting worse, that's all. People didn't care then and they don't care now, except for a few people who usually can be found spending a lot of time on the internet, since that's where well informed people go for information.

I know it is frustrating when it seems no one cares, but there is a small number of people who do care and that number is slowly increasing every year. The sad part is though that I truly believe we need to fall on hard times before people will really take an interest in almost any important issue. I mean really, we are short 40 trillion dollars on all current obligations for the next 40 years. We have the Comptroller General telling us that we are screwed unless we start making tough choices right now, yet no politicians will even talk about our 40 trillion dollar shortfall.

Voter fraud is out of control, which was pretty obvious last election, especially for people like me who live in Ohio. There are countless stories about it in the past and I expect this election to be a real doosey.

But do you ever hear people talk about it? I mean I talk to different people every day, about tons of topics. I overhear people every day discussing many, many topics. Funny how I don't recall anyone talking about voter fraud, except for a few weeks during the last election. That was it. Let's move on to the new issue of the week.

Global warming, Monica Lewinski, elian gonzalez, Lacey Peterson, gay marriage, as well as the even worse dribble about celebrities. All these stories stole the news. It's like, nothing else matters except these stories. They crammed these stories down our throats and we liked it.

I think the entire country has ADD and we are simply not able to focus on what is important.

Logged
Toaster
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-129
Posts: 741


Burnin' for you


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2008, 03:14:09 AM »

WHAT?!?!?!

SURVIVOR!?!?!
Logged

DISCUSSION, n.
A method of confirming others in their errors.
 

The Devil\\'s Dictionary
Retro Fit
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-37
Posts: 802


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2008, 04:19:24 AM »

  Thats what I like about you, Pond Scum....Your the grand optimist.   But, you are absolutely right.  HBO did a documentary on election fraud....
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4463776866669054201

 Fraud was proven against Diebold and yet...we still buy their voting systems.
Logged
Toaster
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-129
Posts: 741


Burnin' for you


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2008, 05:16:38 AM »

Kucinich is asking for a recount (which he has to pay for.)

Wouldn't it be nice if the winners demanded a recount out of respect for the Democratic process?
Logged

DISCUSSION, n.
A method of confirming others in their errors.
 

The Devil\\'s Dictionary
Perrin
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-94
Posts: 1,839



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2008, 06:24:41 AM »

The odd thing is that in order to make sure the people's voices are heard in regard to the voting machine is to vote.  No way that could go wrong Shocked
Logged

A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.

In America, anyone can be president. That\\\'s one of the risks you take.
Toaster
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-129
Posts: 741


Burnin' for you


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2008, 06:46:46 AM »

Kucinich is asking for (and has to pay for) a recount.

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Kucinich+says+he'll+ask+for+recount&articleId=b1f935f2-1fea-4689-a0fc-ecc2e32e016d
Logged

DISCUSSION, n.
A method of confirming others in their errors.
 

The Devil\\'s Dictionary
Perrin
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-94
Posts: 1,839



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2008, 08:13:20 AM »


Um, you said that already though I thank you for the link.  I also agree, it would be nice if once the winner would say they want a recount to ensure the democratic process was upheld.
Logged

A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.

In America, anyone can be president. That\\\'s one of the risks you take.
Reaganite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +19/-565
Posts: 1,467



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2008, 11:22:41 AM »

What I find funny is people that support Ron Paul because of his stance on Iraq would be very suprised by what else he stands for and would never vote for him if Iraq was not an issue.

I think he would be an ok President but he is a little off mentally.
Logged

You get what you pay for America... Welcome to the Obamanation.....
Perrin
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-94
Posts: 1,839



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2008, 11:41:08 AM »

Says the man with a Reagan Avatar

If you are curious about Ron Paul's position here is a helpful link

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-arch.html
Logged

A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.

In America, anyone can be president. That\\\'s one of the risks you take.
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.048 seconds with 26 queries.