IAP Political Forum
August 19, 2008, 06:44:29 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Default theme has been changed, and everyone reset due to some problems with posts disappearing after submitting.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Is this legal?  (Read 322 times)
illhumanoddity
Full Member
***

Karma: +25/-8
Posts: 177



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2007, 03:13:30 PM »

It's a simple matter of public health.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syphilis

You can always live together as "common law" if you do not wish to be granted benefits of state by simply complying with the rules of state.

Syphilis is not spread through exchanging vows or signing documents at the court house. To my reasoning, you'd be much more likely to catch syphilis from someone you weren't planning on marrying. I just don't see how the state having these rules is going to prevent the spread of syphilis, when it has no influence over how syphilis is spread.
Logged

I mean what did you think, my agenda was to freestyle, smile
get paid to smoke weed, grab the mic and spoon feed?

 -- Atmosphere, \\"Rhyme Slayers\\"
Patton
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +97/-116
Posts: 1,508


NObama '08


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2007, 06:43:02 PM »

It's a simple matter of public health.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syphilis

You can always live together as "common law" if you do not wish to be granted benefits of state by simply complying with the rules of state.

Syphilis is not spread through exchanging vows or signing documents at the court house. To my reasoning, you'd be much more likely to catch syphilis from someone you weren't planning on marrying. I just don't see how the state having these rules is going to prevent the spread of syphilis, when it has no influence over how syphilis is spread.

This may be a holdover from a time where when a woman got pregnant, the man would marry her...I think (if I recall correctly) that the issue with syphilis was not necessarily to protect the adults, but to protect a fetus from conginital syphilis....definitely from a long time ago, in a galaxy far away...

(That last part was for McFranklin)
Logged

“Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.”

No 2nd Pelosi/Reid/Obama Congress
illhumanoddity
Full Member
***

Karma: +25/-8
Posts: 177



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: September 18, 2007, 07:32:42 PM »

It's a simple matter of public health.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syphilis

You can always live together as "common law" if you do not wish to be granted benefits of state by simply complying with the rules of state.

Syphilis is not spread through exchanging vows or signing documents at the court house. To my reasoning, you'd be much more likely to catch syphilis from someone you weren't planning on marrying. I just don't see how the state having these rules is going to prevent the spread of syphilis, when it has no influence over how syphilis is spread.

This may be a holdover from a time where when a woman got pregnant, the man would marry her...I think (if I recall correctly) that the issue with syphilis was not necessarily to protect the adults, but to protect a fetus from conginital syphilis....definitely from a long time ago, in a galaxy far away...

(That last part was for McFranklin)

Ok, that does make sense, but I doubt it would be effective today.
Logged

I mean what did you think, my agenda was to freestyle, smile
get paid to smoke weed, grab the mic and spoon feed?

 -- Atmosphere, \\"Rhyme Slayers\\"
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 24 queries.