more than proved my self too many times
can't recall u proving one goddam thing. Sorry, memory problems.
I am right. You are wrong.
your profundities are irreplaceable, i will always remember your debunking of the Chechen claims to nativity and your masterful exegis of Karachi street crime as the underlying cause of anti-NATO activities.
You're so dishonest.
it's just that facts change once I mention them.
you and i have already agreed that the Taliban started with the ISI
i was the only one on "this side" of the forum who said that ISI was behind Tal, that anti-Soviet mujaheddeen were NOT Tal, that US didn't have direct role in shoring Tal up. That's not enough for you, u demand laser-sharp border and monocausal explanations.
Yes ISI was behind Tal, and YES Tal was popular in the torn-apart country(among Pashtus). Yes Pak used Tal, AND YES Tal was indigenous Afghan Pashtu movement. Yes ISI was a factor, AND YES there were strong local factors in T's success. No US didn't create Qaeda, BUT YES the environment in which Qaeda was conceieved was funded, supported and eulogized by the US. Can't handle grey color? Can't handle that life is ambiguous, slightly more complicated than good boys vs. bad boys?
Right here you are lying to us when you propose this cherry-picked half-quote, quote sans link
1. "cherry-picked". BS. The quotes I gave are the main thrust of his interview. 2. "half-quote". They are complete quotes, inasmuch as the overall meaning. 3. "sans link". The link is right there at the end. Who's lying? I think u r.
we all know how notorious you
all the people know,.. we the people, we won't let me bullshit us, we all are victims of my rampant hypocrisy. Power to the people. One nation united. Divided we fall.
The Taliban ARE illegitimate and that's all there is to it.
as u say, chief. Bad people are evil, that's all there is to it. Every Pashto in every village says that. U have proven that many times. Your thing works here just fine. It kind of doesn't really work over there on the ground, but that's cos the Toronto twits keep screwing things up.
mixed with ISI from the very beginning. It is not a secret or a debate.
i kind of said very same thing to u like two years ago. Catching up fast.
Even though I HIGHLIGHTED the words "
Another group -- which is led by foreign interests" in the interview, u accuse me of lying, cherry=picking, taking out of context. U're totally ruined, dude. I come out of my way to specifically emphasize that freaking YES there was and is that "group -- which is led by foreign interests", fully acknowledging external role. It's just that for u THIS group just MUST be the ONLY group. U can't accept that there are OTHER groups in the resistance. The external factor must be the ONLY factor, - or else your sweet coherence is trashed.
And so, having cited that there is a "group -- which is led by foreign interests", i give u Karzai's official's statement that "The third group is genuine Afghans who lost their way in different circumstances throughout history....all people are not Al-Qaeda, [or] Islamic fundamentalists, [or] genuine Taliban. There are people who just want to play a role in Afghan politics and they want to play this role through violent means.""
aint working for u. There is one evil, and that's all there is to it. U're so rite, i/m so rawn. Let's see how it works on the ground though,
