History Channel Admits Anthrax Attacks an Inside Job

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdamOzrfZI0&eurl=http://www.infowars.com/articles/terror/anthrax_attacks_history_channel_admits_inside_job.htm

"There are 89 different types of Antrax but each one has its own kind of trail.  This one led DIRECTLY back to our own defense establishment."

"... the official government investigation was a sham."

"What we are dealing with here is an INSIDE JOB with a real insider that has secrets that NOBODY wants to get out."

"The bacterium that killed Robert Stevens and eventually infected 7 of his collegues was identifid as the AIMES STRAIN, a strain long favored by and under the near TOTAL CONTROL of the US SPY DEFENSE PROGRAM."

Now, are you people going to tell me that the History Channel is lying about this?

And let's see, who were the victims of this attack?  Two Senators that were critical of the Patriot Act, and a journalist that recently posted pictures of the Bush twins falling over each other drunk off their ass, who was also critical of the Patriot Act.  You know the Act that has allowed the executive branch UNFETTERED access to virtually every aspect of the private lives of AMERICAN CITIZENS including their phone calls, e-mails, banking transactions, credit card purchases, warrentless spying, warrantless searches, and a whole host of CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS, some of which are being criminally and civily investigated RIGHT NOW!!!

Wanna know why we have never caught these MURDERERS or why the media doesn't give a sh-t enough to even mention these attacks anymore?  How about the statements made by almost every single member of this Administration and many of their wives, that we have NOT had a terrorist attack since 9/11?  They keep forgetting about this attack.  OBVIOUSLY a terror attack, but never mentioned anywhere by anyone in any media.  Now you know why!!!

FreeinTX

Are you trying to say that the Anthrax Attacks were NOT terrorist related?  Are you trying to say that these Anthrax Attacks were NOT a terror attack?

"We haven't had a terror attack since 9/11."  How many times have you heard that statement?  And when they make that statement to a reporter, how many times have you heard that reporter ask about the anthrax attacks?

The "media" is covering for the MILITARY INUSTRIAL COMPLEX that controls not only the "media" but high ranking politicians on BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE!!!!

F-ck sake man, NBC is OWNED by one of the largest defense contractors in the world.  Do you think they are going to tell you about a defense contractor scandal?  Be open, fair, balanced, and act like REAL journalists and tell us all about the military infiltration of our political system by the people that sign their paycheck?

The number 1 reason stated in the Operation Norwood documents as to why the operation could NOT be carried out successfully AGAINST the American people, was because the military, and it's complex did NOT have enough control over the media, and that their operation would be exposed.  President Kennedy gave a speech all about the military and it's complex and their desire to take control of the media to facilitate an escilation of thier shadow control of our government.  A speech that played a HUGE ROLE in his assassination according to E. Howard Hunt in his DEATHBED CONFESSION.  Dwight Eisenhower even warned us about the intent of the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.

Now, they have publically MURDERED someone, and have used terrorist tactics to attack OUR COUNTRY, and you want to minimize that by making this out to simply be about Bush.  Why is that?  Don't you care that CRIMINAL ELEMENTS INSIDE OUR GOVERNMENT are murdering people at their leisure for political gain and to pass laws allowing them further control over our lives?   Why is it, somehow, okay with you that politicians get envelopes filled with military industrial complex anthrax when they decide to oppose laws that BLATENTLY VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION, STRIP US OF OUR RIGHTS, and allow this complex UNFETTERED ACCESS INTO OUR LIVES?  How is that the "American way?"

FreeinTX

Of course they were. I completely reject the notion that we attacked ourselves. No evidence has surfaced to even suggest that.

(BTW, if you believe the US government is responsible for the anthrax attacks then it wouldn't be a terrorist attack. Would it?)


Lots of times. The Anthrax attacks started within a week after 9/11 and IMO they were done by the same people.

We have not had a major terrorist attack inside the US since 9/11. Does that sound better to you?


Plenty of times after the anthrax attacks and when developments in the case were made public.

So far, you are the only one I know of who thinks we attacked ourselves with anthrax.

First of all, I did NOT say we attacked ourselves.  Don't paraphase me so incorrectly.  I said that CRIMINAL ELEMENTS INSIDE OUR GOVERNMENT attacked us.  INSIDE OUR GOVERNMENT = INSIDE JOB

As for no evidence?  Are you serious?  Did you watch the video?  Did you read my initial post at all?

Let's try again.


How is that NOT evidence to suggest that our own defense establishment attacked us?  The only people in the world with access to the strain of Anthrax that was used, were members of our defense establishment.  But you are going to try and insist that there is no evidence to "suggest" that?  Why would you even think such a thing.  That is evidence that DIRECTLY, "suggests," that.


Again, I did NOT say the US government is responsible, I said CRIMINAL ELEMENTS INSIDE OUR GOVERNMENT attacked us.  And yes, if CRIMINAL ELEMENTS INSIDE OUR GOVERNMENT use terrorist tactics to influence policy or "terrorize" a countries people, then it would DEEFINITLY be a terrorist attack.


So, men in caves, came over to America, learned how to fly planes into building AND penetrated the deepest ranks of our military industrial complex to gain access to weapons grade Anthrax specifically the AIMES strain of Anthrax, and mailed to the two Senators who were in opposition to the Patriot Act?  Do you really believe that B-LLSH-T?  How do you think Muslim extremists came into possession of a US DEFENSE ESTABLISHMENT WEAPONIZED ANTHRAX?  How can you possibly believe that is possible, feasible, or even reasonable and rational?


What?  The Anthrax attack was a major terrorist attack.  But having our politicians at least acknowledge that there has been a terrorist attack in this country post 9/11 would be better than what they are doing now, which is pretending it never happened.  Even if you somehow think that your statement is better, what do you think about CRIMINAL ELEMENTS INSIDE OUR GOVERMENT killing people in a terrorist attack inside this country.  What do you think abot a media that has completely ignored a terrprist attack inside this country?  We covered the disappearance of Natalie Holloway for over a month. 


Way to take that out of context.  My question was how many times have you heard a reporter respond to the statements made by politicians who claim that we have not been attacked since 9/11?  How many times has a reporter said in responce to the politicians statement, "Uhh sir, what about the anthrax attack?"

As for developments, that's not true.  You heard about the attack.  You got a "possibly linked to Al-CIA'da," statement, and then NOTHING.  So you though, "Ohh it must have been Al-CIA'da," which is why you belive that now, DESPITE evidence "suggesting" that it was CRIMINAL ELEMENTS INSIDE OUR DEFENSE ESTABLISHMENT.


I am?  NEWSFLASH, I don't work for the History Channel.  And if you would just click the link I posted in the initial post, you would watch SEVERAL people, tell you that THEY think CRIMINAL ELEMENTS WITHIN OUR GOVERNMENT attacked us.  How odd that people would defend the criminals in this case.

FreeinTX

Maybe so. The only thing about that theory I can't square is that the intended targets, the people who the envelopes were addressed to, were in the media and in politics and not those that actually became ill or died.

If they intended to kill a particular USPS employee or Congressional mail clerk they sure picked a strange way of doing it.

They had no way to ensure the individuals targeted would come into contact with the tainted envelopes.

But of course the case is unsolved and we may never know who is responsible.

Ron, what your missing, is that it was a threat as much as it was an attack.

"Look Senator Lehey, Senator Daschile, stop opposing the Patriot Act, or we're gonna kill you."

"Look media man, stop trying to embarass this administration or we're gonna kill you."

Just like, "Angel is next," during 9/11.  "Mr. President, if you don't go along with 9/11, YOUR NEXT!!!"

And you better believe they all got the hint.

Daschile and Lehey stopped opposing the Patriot Act, and Bush played along.  And you better believe the media thinks twice every time they even consider printing critical articles against the establishment.

FreeinTX

Our controls on anthrax are less secure than our controls on plutonium, and people steal our plutonium. (Where do you think the Israelis got the info and materials for their nukes?)

Nothing is unstealable. Any lock can be picked, any security can be overcome.

The only safety is the grace.

No, that is NOT true. 

Weaponized AIMES STRAIN ANTHRAX is, by far, more secure than nuclear INFORMATION, and probably more secure than plutonium materials.  Having plutonium and the info needed to enrich it, is not enough to kill anyone, nor is it that difficult to obtain anywhere in the world given enough money and access.  Notice you mention ISRAELI spy's.  It's the Israeli's or the Chineese we always catch spying and stealing info and materials.  Massive money, massive influence, and intelligence level access to materials and information resulted in thefts of government secrets and materials but they then don't turn around and attack us and our politicians with the info and materials.  They take it back to their country and use it to develop their own weapons. 

But AIMES STRAIN WEAPONIZED ANTHRAX will kill you dead right on the spot.  Now, even if it was stolen, why don't we know about it?  Why haven't we been informed that this strain of anthrax had been comprmised?  Why did the Bush Administration go on Anthrax two weeks prior to the attack?  If it was spy's that did it, which countries hold enough influence and access to get a hold of this stuff?  And why aren't we investigating them?

Yes, every lock can be picked, but the idea of, "some guy," breaking into a Anthrax weapons lab and stealing this stuff, then using it to attack politicians and journalists here in the US, isn't plausible.  It is certainly possible that foreign governments and their spy's could access this, given enough money, infuence and access to this stuff.  If it was Israeli or Chinese spy's, well, that's certainly more plausible, but the idea that they used it against two US politicians and a US journalists and NOT just stealing it back to their country for their own development, is where this scenario breaks apart.  If spy's did it, they wouldn't attack us with it, they would study it.

So, "some guy," who would use it to attack people he wants to murder can't do it because he doesn't have the money, influence, or the access to the material to do it.

And, while a foreign countries spy's might have the money, influence, and access to the materials, they wouldn't use it to kill people, they would use it to further the development of their own weaponized anthrax.

So, that leaves the people who have access to it becasue the are allowed access to it.  The defnse establishment.  Therefore, INSIDE JOB.

FreeinTX