IAP Political Forum
November 22, 2008, 04:57:20 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Default theme has been changed, and everyone reset due to some problems with posts disappearing after submitting.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Obama WINS Wisconsin  (Read 419 times)
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +212/-207
Posts: 4,065


"You do not speak for the rest"


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2008, 10:38:26 PM »

Is he?

From 2000

"The tax plan announced on Jan. 11 by Sen. John McCain would provide little or no benefit to the three-fifths of taxpayers who earn less than $39,000 a year; it also offers little to the one percent of taxpayers who make more than $319,000. Instead:

- More than half of McCain's proposed tax cuts would go to taxpayers making between $65,000 and $130,000 a year, a group that includes 15% of all taxpayers.

- Most of the rest of McCain's tax cuts would be divided between the 20 percent of taxpayers making between $39,000 and $65,000 (who get 21% of the cuts) and the 4 percent of taxpayers making from $130,000 to $319,000 (who get 19%).

- Overall, the McCain plan would cut taxes by about $500 billion over ten years."



I don't know why we're arguing, Reaganite. We both hate the guy. The only difference is I see Obama as the least dangerous where as you think the world's going to end cause a Democrat got elected.

I tolerated one Democrat (Bill Clinton) and it went alright. A Republican (George Bush) comes in and makes a series of choices I completely and utterly disagree with (ranging from education to immigration to foreign policy to the economy) and I wanna try something different.

I didn't get Ron Paul like I voted for, so I'll go with the guy I think is most tolerable as president.

See, unlike you, when I disagree with someone, I do so based on policy. It takes real effort to find a Republican you don't like and you're almost willing to oppose that person based on fact... but if you see a (D) next to their name they simply aren't whorth your time. You're never even willing to discuss a Democrat without frothing at the mouth.

You're a real disgrace, Reaganite, you know that?
Logged

Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky

... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
lucky
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +19/-26
Posts: 300


you have been exposed!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2008, 10:42:58 PM »

Quote
damnit McCain..... just offer universal healthcare


not his thing. Why would he be concerned with healthcare? His voters stand on philosophy "life is jungle, your health is your problem, everyone fights for himself, - except when we come to the army to discharge negative energy by the bliss of togetherness and killing bad people, after which we go back to the jungle."

Quote
i have a huge problem with obama's church


yea, that's extremely worrysome, very disturbing, the guy might be a secret Islamist or even a closet atheist. But then again, soul slavation is your personal problem, just like healthcare.

Quote
his wifes comments.

outrageous. U;re supposed to be proud of your country from day one no matter what. That's the basis to choose the president, the pride history. No one beats McCain on pride. The guy was proud of his country before he was born. Gotta respect that.

1st im talking about his christian church. did you not know he was a christian?  Roll Eyes
i dont like that he follows the Trinity United Church & Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.

2nd if i heard right she said this is the 1st time she has ever been proud of her country. if you dont find that disturbing then..... well then i guess im not suprised your sticking up for her.

this is the 1st post ive ever read from you but my 1st impression is that you an........ lets say unique
Logged

http://logan1.myminicity.com/

help my lil city grow
Peisithanatos
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +28/-51
Posts: 450



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2008, 10:57:30 PM »

Quote
By 2010 this country will most likely be in a full blow recession and quite possibly a depression.


then tell me how Europe stays afloat. Europe has free universal healthcare. That means you come to a clinic without any "insurance", any "eligibility", any medical history that allows them to turn you down, you just get your treatment, I mean that's pure GULAG, that's Stalinism, Red Terror, by the American measure that's pure evil, extreme ultra-left, Pol Pot, KGB. They also have free university. And in France, u practically can't fire employees. Lots of subsidized housing. And they have strikes every afternoon, demanding higher and higher and higher wages. Teachers, postmen, drivers. By your prediction, Europe must be as dead as Karl Marx. But they don't have recession. Depression let alone.
Logged

a big pile of bs covered with a thick layer of sugar
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +212/-207
Posts: 4,065


"You do not speak for the rest"


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2008, 11:01:01 PM »

then tell me how Europe stays afloat.

First guess: high taxes.
Logged

Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky

... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
And Justice For All
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +16/-8
Posts: 311



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2008, 11:30:01 PM »

Now all he needs to do is win Texas and it's pretty much over as far as momentum going in his direction. But like I have said I won't get my hopes up because seeing is believing when it comes to politics and this superdelegate process .
Logged

Alright Clanton, you called down the thunder well now you got it! The cowboys are finished, you understand me? I see a red sash I kill a man wearing it. So run you Kurr. You tell em Im coming and hells coming with me you hear. Hells coming with me!

-Wyatt Earp
Reaganite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +19/-568
Posts: 1,470



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 20, 2008, 01:00:45 AM »

Is he?

From 2000

"The tax plan announced on Jan. 11 by Sen. John McCain would provide little or no benefit to the three-fifths of taxpayers who earn less than $39,000 a year; it also offers little to the one percent of taxpayers who make more than $319,000. Instead:

- More than half of McCain's proposed tax cuts would go to taxpayers making between $65,000 and $130,000 a year, a group that includes 15% of all taxpayers.

- Most of the rest of McCain's tax cuts would be divided between the 20 percent of taxpayers making between $39,000 and $65,000 (who get 21% of the cuts) and the 4 percent of taxpayers making from $130,000 to $319,000 (who get 19%).

- Overall, the McCain plan would cut taxes by about $500 billion over ten years."



I don't know why we're arguing, Reaganite. We both hate the guy. The only difference is I see Obama as the least dangerous where as you think the world's going to end cause a Democrat got elected.

I tolerated one Democrat (Bill Clinton) and it went alright. A Republican (George Bush) comes in and makes a series of choices I completely and utterly disagree with (ranging from education to immigration to foreign policy to the economy) and I wanna try something different.

I didn't get Ron Paul like I voted for, so I'll go with the guy I think is most tolerable as president.

See, unlike you, when I disagree with someone, I do so based on policy. It takes real effort to find a Republican you don't like and you're almost willing to oppose that person based on fact... but if you see a (D) next to their name they simply aren't whorth your time. You're never even willing to discuss a Democrat without frothing at the mouth.

You're a real disgrace, Reaganite, you know that?

Thanks you just proved that mccain is a liar cool... MCCAIN VOTED AGAINTS BUSH TAX CUTS....

I dont think the world will end with Obama as president but I do belive it will be the death of liberalism and the democratic party.

I dont oppose Obama as much as I oppose his handlers, but you seem to think he is the guy that will change america into a bastion of liberalism which is what I guess you want.

Logged

You get what you pay for America... Welcome to the Obamanation.....
neue regel
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +61/-272
Posts: 1,794



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 20, 2008, 05:40:22 AM »

When one considers the aspirations of Bush coming into office, the case could be made that HE was the 'change candidate.' He was proposing radical change to SS and education before they were squashed by special interests.

He didn't have the 'hope' part down, though.
Logged
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +212/-207
Posts: 4,065


"You do not speak for the rest"


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 20, 2008, 06:51:26 AM »

Thanks you just proved that mccain is a liar cool... MCCAIN VOTED AGAINTS BUSH TAX CUTS....

No, actually I proved my point that he likes tax cuts... sometimes.

Again, I wasn't going to vote for him anyway. I don't like his policy decisions. The on again-off again issue with tax cuts is only a piece of this.

Quote from: Reaganite
I dont think the world will end with Obama as president but I do belive it will be the death of liberalism and the democratic party.

You're entiteled the opinion.

Quote from: Reaganite
I dont oppose Obama as much as I oppose his handlers, but you seem to think he is the guy that will change america into a bastion of liberalism which is what I guess you want.

You're so stupid it blows my mind.

Tell me where I said ANYTHING like that. For the love of God, actually fucking PROVE something, you degenerate, tin hat-wearing psycho bat.
Logged

Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky

... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
micfranklin
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-79
Posts: 1,264


Jak is still not pleased...


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: February 20, 2008, 07:11:24 AM »

When one considers the aspirations of Bush coming into office, the case could be made that HE was the 'change candidate.' He was proposing radical change to SS and education before they were squashed by special interests.

He didn't have the 'hope' part down, though.

Pretty much but the thing is that to the average person Bush didn't have that race factor for himself and he had his daddy do the same job years earlier.
Logged



Perrin
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +80/-94
Posts: 1,839



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: February 20, 2008, 08:31:53 AM »

Quote
damnit McCain..... just offer universal healthcare


not his thing. Why would he be concerned with healthcare? His voters stand on philosophy "life is jungle, your health is your problem, everyone fights for himself, - except when we come to the army to discharge negative energy by the bliss of togetherness and killing bad people, after which we go back to the jungle."

Quote
i have a huge problem with obama's church


yea, that's extremely worrysome, very disturbing, the guy might be a secret Islamist or even a closet atheist. But then again, soul slavation is your personal problem, just like healthcare.

Quote
his wifes comments.


outrageous. U;re supposed to be proud of your country from day one no matter what. That's the basis to choose the president, the pride history. No one beats McCain on pride. The guy was proud of his country before he was born. Gotta respect that.

1st im talking about his christian church. did you not know he was a christian?  Roll Eyes
i dont like that he follows the Trinity United Church & Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.

2nd if i heard right she said this is the 1st time she has ever been proud of her country. if you dont find that disturbing then..... well then i guess im not suprised your sticking up for her.

this is the 1st post ive ever read from you but my 1st impression is that you an........ lets say unique
The actual words by Michelle Obama were "for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country — and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change."

As you can see, yours omits a crucial word highlight above.  To me this is saying she has been proud of her country before, but this is the proudest she has has ever been.  True, she could of worded it better, but when your goal is to distort words, why bother to understand the meaning.

I am not saying you are trying to distort her words, I actually believe that is how you heard it.  I saw the speech and the saw the edited one that CNN showed without the word really, thought it was odd, but it does change the meaning.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2008, 08:40:29 AM by Perrin » Logged

A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.

In America, anyone can be president. That\\\'s one of the risks you take.
neue regel
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +61/-272
Posts: 1,794



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: February 20, 2008, 08:55:38 AM »

perrin, I found an unedited version and listened several times...and the truth lies somewhere in the middle, IMO.

She didn't emphasize the 'REALLY' but she did say it. I would say that by the reaction of the crowd, they were a little surprised to hear her say it. I think their first reaction was to be taken back by it.

But at the same time, I don't think she was being anti-American or vicious. At least I hope not.
Logged
neue regel
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +61/-272
Posts: 1,794



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: February 20, 2008, 09:15:07 AM »

Here are a few thoughts about the quote from my favorite collection of nutjobs at DUnderground...

Quote
We've killed a million innocents in Iraq, thousands of our own troops and did it over oil
   
Meanwhile at home we pretty much lost the vast majority of our civil liberties. Look a little closer and you'll see a Government that is not much different than the murderous evil bastards in charge in the countries you list above.

Quote
It's not that she was wrong,. but the flag waving repugs will put it on a bumper sticker

Quote
The 1980s were pretty abysmal. Outside the exciting top layer of 'how wonderful the world is' that Reagan put out and the great music and movies of the time, the country's poor took a major hit and a huge recession was abound.

The 1990s saw a time where the Republicans clearly owned the Big Dawg. Media Consolidation, NAFTA, Gay Discrimination (DOMA/Don't Ask Don't Tell), Welfare Reform, the rise of predatory lending... Plus an impeachment that damaged our party and stopped us from getting any sort of control until 2006.

Apparently, the Democrats aren't spinning it as a misstatement but that she is right.


Interesting.
Logged
Peisithanatos
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +28/-51
Posts: 450



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: February 20, 2008, 10:15:26 AM »

it looks different from under black skin. Maybe Michele Obama couldn't be proud before because of the US policy towards South Africa. Or because there had, and stil has, remained virulent but stifled racism among the Southern WHite mainstream. Maybe because there was the "WHite Flight" from the cities into the racially pure suburbs, which she took as a manifest rejection of racial intergration. Maybe because there were totally surreal grandiose military expenditures in the absense of a commeasurable threat at the whim of the military manufacturers, while people, especially blacks, were dying regularly because they were denied medical attention. Maybe. Maybe she found it hard to be proud of that.
Logged

a big pile of bs covered with a thick layer of sugar
Perrin
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +80/-94
Posts: 1,839



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: February 20, 2008, 11:04:42 AM »

perrin, I found an unedited version and listened several times...and the truth lies somewhere in the middle, IMO.

She didn't emphasize the 'REALLY' but she did say it. I would say that by the reaction of the crowd, they were a little surprised to hear her say it. I think their first reaction was to be taken back by it.

But at the same time, I don't think she was being anti-American or vicious. At least I hope not.

Either way, I don't think I will be voting for Michelle for president.   angel

On a more serious note, it is attacks like this that really bring the entire level of politics down a rung.  It seems clear to me how she meant the words in the context of her speech, but she definitely needs additional skills in knowing what will be taken out of context and used against her.  This is her "I was for it before I was against it" moment.  Lucky she isn't running for president.
Logged

A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.

In America, anyone can be president. That\\\'s one of the risks you take.
neue regel
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +61/-272
Posts: 1,794



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: February 20, 2008, 11:29:56 AM »

Quote
it is attacks like this that really bring the entire level of politics down a rung

I agree but politics have gone from real issues down to 10 second bytes. Obama has surged into the polls on nothing more than one word....'HOPE.' The marketing is brilliant. His marketing is the exact opposite of, say, Ross Perot, who buys and hour of air time to explain things.

It doesn't sell. Short words do.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.433 seconds with 26 queries.