I have had this conversation with you a million times UT.

Its all to do with what can be proven or can't be.

What I mean is that 85% of your posts from here come from race hate sites(iamthewitness, jew watch, radio islam, etc) which are just hate sites set up purely to distribute anti semitic propoganda around the net. You go there and spam 2-3 article a day from there without even checking it. You hope that no one checks the source and just accept it as fact, but if they challenge you on it, you just google something on it, and bluff it out using your techniques of diversion, changing what people say or editing your prior posts as if you had correctly sourced it from the start.

The trouble with these sites is that the majority of information is unchecked. Iamthewitness, jew watch, don't check or validate the information they are getting it. They just print it as fact. The sources they get it from, Rense, Aztlan etc, don't check it either.

So from there, you get lies or mass exagerrations going around the internet.

Some anonymous person from a supposed safehouse in New Zealand emails some story about being kidnapped by the mossad for passports, it is printed onto some garbage conspiracy site and you post it as fact.

Iamthewitness runs a rubbish story about jews eating babies from a fraud I Shamir, and you post it here as fact.

So, that is the snapshot of the reliability of your information, where it comes from and how you post it.

Everyone else uses media outlets for their information. Yes, it may be biased and there is no guarantee that is 100% accurate, but the difference between media outlets and your source, is that they check, double check and triple check the information and verify the sources. Because if they don't, they can be sued.

So, back to your question, that is what I mean by dubious. They come from race hate sites and they are unchecked.

Bingo.

YOU are dishonest Untouchables, in all manner of ways.

This is the fourth time I have asked you this question, and still you havn't answered.

You said(on more than one occassion)


And I have asked you four times


How about being honest and answering the question? 

Crap. They collect unsubstantiated anti semitic ramblings from anywhere on the net; other anti semitic sites, conspriacy sites, anywhere. And you spam it on to forums without even checking whether it is accurate or not.

What percentage of stuff from Iamthewitness and jew watch come from legitimate news sources? If it is more than 10% I would be surprised. It wouldn't surprise me if it was closer to 2%- 5%.

Why you skip my other points/questions?

Abraxas, you are a good guy, and I agree with most of your posts---I think it would be useless to enter in debate with you.

My oh my, just dropped by to read awhile to check out how thing are going on IAP and it seems the same old discussion continues, but without much change other than the candidate of discussion for the day.

Interestingly, reading on Haaretz earlier, the real GOP presumptive candidate appears to believe Obama isn't supportive enough of Israel and it is asserted McCain plans to use that should Obama be the Democratic candidate. But is this just one more factor where McCain's claim won't hold water?  While on the other hand there are criticisms against Obama accusing others of being xenophobic. Posters will need to read for both columns, but I assume there are some who might.

Last update - 15:50 29/02/2008         

When McCain and Obama face off, Israel may find itself in the eye of the storm

By Shmuel Rosner, Haaretz Correspondent
Tags: U.S. Elections, Iraq, Obama
The Republican contender is counting on the American voters' hatred for anything that reeks of defeat.

Republican contender John McCain's campaign team is preparing files with incriminating information about Democratic candidate Barack Obama. McCain's advisers are eagerly looking forward to the great debate between these two candidates.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/959362.html


Stop Calling Me A Jew! Barack Obama and the Politics of Xenophobia           
Written by Remi Kanazi      
Saturday, 01 March 2008
by Remi Kanazi

Barack Obama is not a Jew. He was not raised a Jew, has never been a Jew, and is a committed Christian. Nor has Obama ever prayed in a temple. According to a CNN reporter that is referenced on Obama’s website, Indonesian yeshivas (including the one Obama attended) are not radical yeshivas—unlike the ones in Israel and Brooklyn. Obama is so not Jewish, that even his Jewish stepfather, wasn’t really a Jew. Obama has stated that his stepfather had a “skeptical bent, a man who saw religion as not particularly useful in the practical business of making one’s way in the world.” Obama’s stepfather grew up in Indonesia, a country with the largest Jewish population in the world. To be exactly clear, visit Obama’s page.

http://atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/3496/81/

Does any of this actually make a big difference in the current campaigns most especially considering that IMHO, Nader means little to either?