I see... your more interested in non-conformity than you are in honesty and integrity. And even though Keith Olbermann and Al Franken tell the truth and don't lie all the time like Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly do, they are all still equally evil because they are all conformist.
It is not a matter of truth vs. lies. It is a matter of slant-Olbermann and Franken are lackeys of the Democrats and Limbaugh and O'Reilly are lackeys of the GOP. I do think they are equally evil (not to mention vain and egotistical). As to the parties, history shows us the sinister nature of both of them.
So... You are saying that not being biased is more important to you than being honest? I guess I will just have to strongly disagree.
And I would add that recent history does not show that the Democratic party is as sinister as the republican party as of late. And since we have a fundemental difference in our standards of right and wrong we will obviously not agree on this matter either.
Can I ask you a question: Why does it get under your skin so much that I don't agree with you? There are others left and right (most IAPers probably) who disagree with my various positions without becoming rabidly hysterical. Just asking.
Have I been calling you names or being rude to you somehow? I don't think so. I would say you are being overly sensitive of my criticism to be calling me rabid and hysterical.
It is not a case of bias but of independence. If you like Olbermann and Franken that is your privilege just as others have the right to like Limbaugh and O'Reilly. I merely happen to despise all four, which I might add is my privilege.
Some of us just don't see all evil as on either the right or the left.
We will just have to disagree as you said.
OswaldTheOsprey
