IAP Political Forum
December 03, 2008, 09:26:26 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Support IAP -- join "High Society" with less fuss. Click "paid subscriptions" from your profile.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
IAP Political Forum > Political Discussions > United States > McCain Makes Baghdad Stop; 8th Iraq Trip - (told ya)
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: McCain Makes Baghdad Stop; 8th Iraq Trip - (told ya)  (Read 458 times)
freethinker
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +105/-212
Posts: 2,373



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: March 20, 2008, 09:47:18 AM »
Quote from: neue regel on March 20, 2008, 08:31:48 AM
Quote
What I am endorsing is taking the time and paying attention enough to know who are the threat  and and who are not the threat.

I agree.

I think the idea Iran would let people (call them what you will) into their country to train and likely be armed only to come back and fight the US may qualify as posing a 'threat.'

So McCain was right although he labeled incorrectly.
These forces would not be a threat to US citizens if the US wasn't occupying their country.
 It doesn't matter what I will call them ...it does matter what a presidential candidate will call them.
 McCain is wrong.
Logged
Yes we can ...and now we will...
Perrin
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +80/-94
Posts: 1,840



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: March 20, 2008, 10:00:17 AM »
Quote from: freethinker on March 20, 2008, 09:47:18 AM
Quote from: neue regel on March 20, 2008, 08:31:48 AM
Quote
What I am endorsing is taking the time and paying attention enough to know who are the threat  and and who are not the threat.

I agree.

I think the idea Iran would let people (call them what you will) into their country to train and likely be armed only to come back and fight the US may qualify as posing a 'threat.'

So McCain was right although he labeled incorrectly.
These forces would not be a threat to US citizens if the US wasn't occupying their country.
 It doesn't matter what I will call them ...it does matter what a presidential candidate will call them.
 McCain is wrong.

I believe he made the same misstatement numerous time before finally being corrected by Liberman.  It does call into question his age and how well his mind is still working at the age of 72, then again, it could have just been a simple mistake.
Logged
A fanatic is one who can’t change his mind and won’t change the subject.

In America, anyone can be president. That\\\'s one of the risks you take.
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: March 20, 2008, 10:12:13 AM »
Quote from: Perrin on March 20, 2008, 10:00:17 AM
Quote from: freethinker on March 20, 2008, 09:47:18 AM
Quote from: neue regel on March 20, 2008, 08:31:48 AM
Quote
What I am endorsing is taking the time and paying attention enough to know who are the threat  and and who are not the threat.

I agree.

I think the idea Iran would let people (call them what you will) into their country to train and likely be armed only to come back and fight the US may qualify as posing a 'threat.'

So McCain was right although he labeled incorrectly.
These forces would not be a threat to US citizens if the US wasn't occupying their country.
 It doesn't matter what I will call them ...it does matter what a presidential candidate will call them.
 McCain is wrong.

I believe he made the same misstatement numerous time before finally being corrected by Liberman.  It does call into question his age and how well his mind is still working at the age of 72, then again, it could have just been a simple mistake.

It could have been his age, a simple mistake or it could be he doesn't give a damn and wants to war on all of them.

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged
Urbi et Orbi
neue regel
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +61/-272
Posts: 1,817



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: March 20, 2008, 10:15:53 AM »
Quote
These forces would not be a threat to US citizens if the US wasn't occupying their country.

What do you have to back this up? The vast majority of the population isn't taking shots at our troops. Neither do they go to Iran for training.

How can one explain this?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com 		Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.093 seconds with 26 queries.