IAP Political Forum
October 14, 2008, 07:48:22 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Support IAP -- join "High Society" with less fuss. Click "paid subscriptions" from your profile.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Venezuela from a venezuelan perspective.  (Read 890 times)
Masterkoki
Newbie
*

Karma: +1/-0
Posts: 34



View Profile WWW
« on: April 02, 2008, 05:45:04 AM »

Since this is my first post I think I'm going to introduce myself first.

My name is Guillermo, I'm an English teacher from Caracas, Venezuela. I don't have any political affiliations although I sympathize with liberal social democrats.

First of all I hate my president.... That being said let's talk about Venezuela. Venezuela is an upside down country. We have one of the best higher education systems in the world (the best in Latin America) and a below average for highschool education. Cars are expensive to buy but gasoline is cheaper than dirt, about $0.85 to fill a gas tank. Size does not determine the cost of a home, but rather location. Nobody pays income taxes if they make less than Bs. 47,000 (about $20,000) a year. In the last 7 years the country has being run by a so called "socialist" named Hugo Chavez, yet most of the wealth belongs to a few like in any capitalist nation. By statistics we should be a rich country but we have higher poverty rates every year.

We use to be a very united people. Race, class, background and political views were never an issue before Chavez. Now we are divided to an almost perfect 50% pro Chavez and 50% anti-Chavez. That 50% that supports him are the less educated, the lower income classes and South American immigrants.
One would say it's a miracle he's still popular after almost eight years of things deteriorating. Well, you just have to drive around Caracas and see why.
It's like a chapter from George Orwell's 1984. Chavez's face at every corner. "Achievements" of the government printed everywhere with propagandist slogans like "Chavez es El Pueblo"(Chavez is the people). He's the "BIG BROTHER" of the common man so if he is attacked his subjects will respond in rage.
This has not been done overnight though. He has systematically filled peoples heart with hatred towards an enemy to have a common purpose which makes the people follow him like cattle.
The best example would be his bashing at president Bush. When you see pro-government marches or pro-government spokepersons saying that the fault of all our problems is "Bush and his imperialist-oligarchs goons". Of course they would never publically say that 70% of the oil we sell goes to the United States at $100+ a barrel.
The only way to attack Chavez is attacking his managerial abilities and not the man. I try to change minds every time I can to "unwash" brains and make people see the truth behind almighty Chavez.

I hope everyone in this community realizes that Venezuelans are not the problem, it is this man is jeopardizing the future of this wonderful beautiful country.   
 
Logged
gommi
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +26/-27
Posts: 341



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2008, 06:17:39 PM »

Thank you for contributing.

Quote
Venezuela is an upside down country. We have one of the best higher education systems in the world (the best in Latin America) and a below average for highschool education. Cars are expensive to buy but gasoline is cheaper than dirt, about $0.85 to fill a gas tank. Size does not determine the cost of a home, but rather location.
Could you perhaps elaborate on the quality of life in Venezuela? You state that poverty is constantly increasing, though what is this exactly attributed to?

Chavez proudly declares himself to be a Socialist, though how extensive are his social policies? Does he redistribute wealth effectively, and if so is this benefiting the people at all? Thanks.
Logged

__Committed IAPer since 2004__
Comrade Joe
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-9
Posts: 27



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2008, 08:40:07 PM »

First of all I hate my president....

That is a pity, i wish i could trade leaders with you.
That being said let's talk about Venezuela. Venezuela is an upside down country. We have one of the best higher education systems in the world (the best in Latin America) and a below average for highschool education. Cars are expensive to buy but gasoline is cheaper than dirt, about $0.85 to fill a gas tank. Size does not determine the cost of a home, but rather location. Nobody pays income taxes if they make less than Bs. 47,000 (about $20,000) a year. In the last 7 years the country has being run by a so called "socialist" named Hugo Chavez, yet most of the wealth belongs to a few like in any capitalist nation. By statistics we should be a rich country but we have higher poverty rates every year.
  By what statistics should Venezuela be a rich country ? Certainly not by GDP.  Although that is being rectified by the Chavez government who had overseen 15 successive quarters of economic growth, at last time of checking.

But Venezuela could have been a rich country by now, had it not been for the pre Chavez era.  An era that saw a greater decline in the economy than experienced by most of Africa. That is the harsh reallity - rampant capitalism and elitist political domination destroyed your country.  Luckily President Chavez is rebuilding it and regaining national independance.
Quote from:
From 1970-1998 per capita income in Venezuela fell by 35 percent.[2] This is the worst economic decline in the region and one of the worst in the world -- much worse even than what happened to Africa during this period.

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/1148

We use to be a very united people. Race, class, background and political views were never an issue before Chavez. Now we are divided to an almost perfect 50% pro Chavez and 50% anti-Chavez. That 50% that supports him are the less educated, the lower income classes and South American immigrants.
The idea of being a united people is an emotional appeal that is not backed up by statistical analysis.  Of course you live in Venezuela and so people will more likely accept your emotional rhetoric than mine, but i have spoken to and saw through the media Venezuelans who tell a very different story.  They say that before Chavez, yes there was unity, but unity among the educated, political class only.  The poor were not part of this homogenous group, but were rather cast aside from society, helpless and apathetic.

Quote from:
For those who haven’t kept track, Chavez has actually revitalized Venezuela’s democracy. In the pre-Chavez era, although Venezuela was hailed as a bastion of Latin American democracy, the truth was it was only a democracy for the elite. Without a power-sharing agreement signed at Punto Fijo in 1958, Venezuela’s key parties in the 20th Century might have devolved into violence like their Colombian neighbors. But in effect, that political pact disenfranchised much of the Venezuelan electorate, which since 1998 has looked to Chavez for answers. The vote on the constitutional reforms could be a signal that Chavez has pushed Venezuela as far as it wants to go toward socialism. Or it could just be that voters are tired. 

http://ivorytowerz.blogspot.com/2007/12/chavez-loses-in-venezuela-so-has.html

I also have to challenge the idea that there is a 50% split pro and anti Chavez.  If this were true Chavez wouldnt have the won the 2006 presedential election by a massive 3.1 million votes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Venezuela#2006_Presidential_election

One would say it's a miracle he's still popular after almost eight years of things deteriorating. Well, you just have to drive around Caracas and see why.

But things havent deteriorated, have they ?  Not only has poverty decreased in terms of cash incomes, but services have undoubtedly improved, have they not ?


In terms of cash income, poverty has fallen by 17%, a success in anyones books, surely. 

Quote from:
In Venezuela, since 2003 a series of programs have been established to provide health care for the poor, subsidized food, as well as increased access to education. For example, an estimated 14.5 million people, or 54% percent of the population, now receives free health care through the Barrio Adentro program.14 An estimated 40 to 47 percent of the population (around 10.7 to 12.5 million people) buys subsidized food through the Mercal program, at discounts averaging 41 to 44 percent.15 A May 2006 report16 by Datanalisis, a survey research firm associated with the opposition in Venezuela, found that Mercal represented 47.3 percent share of total sales in the food distribution market in March 2006, compared to 34.7 percent in October 2005.17

Access to free health care is a major improvement in the lives of the poor, and one that does not show up in the standard measure of poverty. It is not possible to adjust the poverty rate in a way that fully accounts for this change. For example, we could estimate the value of the health services provided free to the poor and add that to their income. However, the value of these services is so large relative to the poverty threshold that this method would move the vast majority of poor people over the poverty line.

Another way to incorporate the value of health care services to the poor is to take an estimate of what they would be spending out-of-pocket on health care if it were not provided by the government. This method vastly understates the value of these services to the poor, since in the absence of government provision many poor people simply go without needed health care, and therefore their out-of-pocket spending does not represent their actual health care needs.

http://www.rethinkvenezuela.com/downloads/ceprpov.htm

It's like a chapter from George Orwell's 1984. Chavez's face at every corner. "Achievements" of the government printed everywhere with propagandist slogans like "Chavez es El Pueblo"(Chavez is the people). He's the "BIG BROTHER" of the common man so if he is attacked his subjects will respond in rage.

But when 90% of the media runs hate campaigns against the government of course the government is going to run its own propaganda campiagn.  This happens all over the world - even in countries in which the private media backs the government.  In Venezuela it is so important the government tries to get its message across when it fights against a media  who attempt to overthrow democracy and install their own capitalist dictatorship.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5832390545689805144

Quote from:
Never even in Latin American history has the media been so directly involved in a political coup. Venezuela’s ’hate media’ controls 95% of the airwaves and has a near-monopoly over newsprint, and it played a major part in the failed attempt to overthrow the president, Hugo Chávez, in April. Although tensions in the country could easily spill into civil war, the media is still directly encouraging dissident elements to overthrow the democratically elected president - if necessary by force.

http://mondediplo.com/2002/08/10venezuela


This has not been done overnight though. He has systematically filled peoples heart with hatred towards an enemy to have a common purpose which makes the people follow him like cattle.
The best example would be his bashing at president Bush. When you see pro-government marches or pro-government spokepersons saying that the fault of all our problems is "Bush and his imperialist-oligarchs goons". Of course they would never publically say that 70% of the oil we sell goes to the United States at $100+ a barrel.
The only way to attack Chavez is attacking his managerial abilities and not the man. I try to change minds every time I can to "unwash" brains and make people see the truth behind almighty Chavez.

And why should he not tell the truth about the enemy.  The oligarchs brought 35 years of recession - the statistics do not lie.  And the empire is an enemy, not only of Venezuela but of humanity. George Bush and the US empire are hated all over the world, not only in Venezuela.  I am British, possibly America's greatest friend, and capitalists also, but i can assure you, if there was an election here between Chavez and Bush, Chavez would win hands down. 

And what if the oil didnt get sold to the US, what do you think would happen ?  Another coup, that is the answer.
I hope everyone in this community realizes that Venezuelans are not the problem, it is this man is jeopardizing the future of this wonderful beautiful country.   

Venezuelans are not the problem, Chavez is not the problem.  People all over the world love the Venezuelan people, precisely because they elected Chavez.  The problem is the empire, the problem is capitalism ad the oligarchs, all the oligarchs and capitalists of the world, not only Venezuela's.

They are the only enemies Venezuela has.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2008, 09:37:06 PM by Comrade Joe » Logged
Ahkenaten
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +129/-135
Posts: 1,588


Professor of Angular Mil and Applied Narcotics


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2008, 05:19:37 AM »

Welcome to the forum Comrade Joe

Quote
And what if the oil didnt get sold to the US, what do you think would happen ?  Another coup, that is the answer.

No. They'd just buy it elsewhere.
I have a question: if they aren't going to sell it to the Americans who are they going to sell it too? They certainly can't not sell it. Not with all the arms Chavez is buying.
Oil is a malleable resource. Example: Venezuela is selling X amount of oil to the US. They decide they don't want to sell to the US any longer, (one really has to wonder about the practicality of that idea), okay. So who do they sell to? They notice Japan buying oil from country 'XYZ' and they say "hey we can cut you a better deal". Okay now they are selling to Japan for less money than they were selling to the US and now what? Well we still have country 'XYZ' that Japan was buying the oil from, so they are down one buyer and the US is down one supplier. Doesn't take much to see exactly what would happen. When the dust settles all that's changed is that Venezuela would be selling their oil cheaper than before.

This is why it wasn't all just poppycock when people were scratching their heads as to why he would threaten to not sell to the US any longer. Most understood it for the shallow tough-talk it was and as much as Chavez tried to paint a picture locally of Americans in a panic over it to make him look tough, well no, not really. It hardly woke anyone up. No one took him seriously and that wasn;t just propaganda or posturing.

So no: Venezuela does not sell oil to the US because they're scared of a coup if they don't. The idea doesn't make sense from the get-go.

Quote
The problem is the empire, the problem is capitalism ad the oligarchs, all the oligarchs and capitalists of the world, not only Venezuela's.

Care to elaborate on that? Be precise please. Capitalists of the world? Empire? You must be talking about China right? Japan? Russia? France? Help me out here. There's a reason capitalism is 4000 years old and it's not because everybody's stupid.




(p.s. don't make the mistake of assuming I'm an American)
Ahk
« Last Edit: April 03, 2008, 05:45:29 AM by Ahkenaten » Logged

Are ju-jubes anti-semetic?
Masterkoki
Newbie
*

Karma: +1/-0
Posts: 34



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2008, 07:11:39 AM »

Gommi.
Thanks for your reply.

Let me answer a question with another question. Can you tell me about the quality of life in the US?
You see, Venezuela is practically a one-product economy Oil, which makes up about 90% of our income. PDVSA is a state owned company that has absolute contro over the exploration, exploitation and commercialization of Venezuelan Oil. Whenever you hear someone saying "he/she is a PDVSA executive" we are talking about a VERY rich person... putting aside the fact that directives who opposed Chavez were publically fired in his TV show Aló Presidente and replaced by friends loyal to him who didn't have experiance in the oil business, the salary of the workers of PDVSA is pretty much the same as any worker from the public or private sector.
About a year ago, a proposal of an opposition candidate was to give every working venezuelan an equal percentage of the surplus from oil sells, an idea I personally think it's ridiculous. Obviously a surplus should be reinvested wisely or be put into social projects, and it does! but the quality of projects are not representative of the vast quantity of money that this surplus is.
And the "missions" as they are called (yes, now everything has a military theme) are questionable at best about their contribution to social development.
On the other hand, the private sector, responsable for more than 80% of the jobs in this country is shrinking everyday. Everyday, you can see on the newspaper a new company that leaves the country and going to other South American Countries or out of the continent. Even POLAR industries are moving, the largest private company in Venezuela, which had more than 100 years of history. This is making job practically impossible to find.
So that leaves the common young Venezuelan 2 options: informal economy or crime. Informal economy has being pounded in the last 2 years severily hammered by the government since vendors don't pay taxes ( and don't want to), so they sell their products illegally without permit. The police, knowing they need to feed their families, do not act except when the national guard arrives at the streets where the informal vendors sell their merchandise.
So you have VERY rich and VERY poor people living a few kilometers apart from each other, that is if they actually have a house to live. Sounds familiar?... yes, it is the same pattern of the typical capitalist society. Quality of life is determined by who you know in the government. Anybody who has the chance leaves the country to find a better future.  I hope this gives you an idea of what goes on here...

Comrad Joe

Thank you for yoour post.

You are right, I should have started my post saying I hate my president, Mr. Bush and his friends and all leaders who profit from the toiling their subjects.

Why would a country like Venezuela NOT be rich? im not an economist but oil rich countries with the exeption of Nigeria are in a much better situation than Venezuela.
And YES you are right! Venezuela steady has had economic growth for the last 3 years. Of course the government will announce this in a celebrating tone, but they will not announce that inflation duplicates such growth. So there's your first misinformative piece of government manipulation of the truth.

Quote
But Venezuela could have been a rich country by now, had it not been for the pre Chavez era.  An era that saw a greater decline in the economy than experienced by most of Africa. That is the harsh reallity - rampant capitalism and elitist political domination destroyed your country.  Luckily President Chavez is rebuilding it and regaining national independance.

The pre-Chavez era as you call it was terrible! oil prices were low and production was high so we were not receiving a fair share in my opinion. But it was a time when every five years everything changed with the comming of another president. Reforms, plans and project were made. Of course they never worked... but  poverty grew at the rate of the population growth, poor people were not "created". Independence was gained in 1824 and Oil independence was gained in the mid 70's oil nationlization by Carlos Andres Perez, the guy Chavez tried to topple in his second term in 1992. He's dying by the way...poor old fart.
Venezuelas new infrastructure since Chavez is decaying by the way. A school and a hospital just crumbled a few weeks ago for lack of planification. 

Looking at your comments and your data I just knew a second before looking at your link it was from goverment controlled press.
In 2002 we had 5 open broadcast channels with news coverage. 2 of them (RCTV and GLOBOVISION) were openly oppossing the government, another 2 (VENEVISION and TELEVEN) were somewhat balanced and the state-run channel was openly pro government. I can't tell you about radio stations since i don't listen much radio. After the failed coup in april 2002, VENEVISON and TELEVEN became anti goverment for 8 months or so, an then, out of the blue they were sold and changed their directive, and now they are pro-government. 7 new channels are now on open broadcast: Avila, CatiaTV, La Tele, Tves, AN TV and 2 others (can't remember the name now). All of them pro-goverment. Of the 2 others RCTV and GLOBOVISION, the first had not it's first broadcasting permit renewed so it had to leave, and the second is being threatened by the government. Additional press is released every day but it is pro-governmet and of course government-controlled.
Is there a Media war? YES!... and Chavez has the upper hand. in VTV the state own TV station, the news segment never says something bad happened in Caracas. No one gets killed, there are no anti-governmet marches, no protests. He criticizes the opposition media for what then?, for opposing him?, because it's not because it is bigger than his own media. Newspapers ar the same story: 4 or 5 oppositionist and honestly I stopped counting after 30 pro-goverment newspapers.
Personally I am sick of seeing Chavez's ugly head outside my window that says "Con Chavez todos somos Venezuela" (With Chavez, we all are Venezuela). Caracas is looking more and more like the beautiful city of Havana, with pictures of Fidel's and Che's faces everywhere.

I guess I support Chavez's claim that Bush is the Devil, but don't use an imperialist, oligarch foreign government to unite your followeres. Use a common motivation of national spirit that makes everybody follow the common goal of making the country grow, making progress, educate everyone on being a gret member of society.
But instead we get "The US wants to destroy us", or " Bush is the cause of our crisis".
I hope they don't ban me for this but that is plain BULLSHIT.
Yes Bush is a terrible hum... animal but he is not the cause of our problems.

Im sorry Comrade Joe to have to argue with you so pointedly but I mus say one last thing. The title of my post was clear in a deeper way, if you don't live here, you don't know what you're saying.
 

To Ahkenaten:
Oil CAN'T be sold to other countries on the short run because there would have to refineries to be built in other countries to use venezuelan oil. Petroleum from different parts require customized refineries. It takes years to modify them and the cost... you don't wanna know.

You are right, the US doesn't really care much if they have to buy more from Mexico or take more from Iraq.
But it is not going to be the same for us if we stop selling to the US, even if the price soars to $200 we still can't make do with the US not buying.
Logged
Comrade Joe
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-9
Posts: 27



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2008, 07:18:15 AM »

Welcome to the forum Comrade Joe
  Hello, thank you for the welcome.

No. They'd just buy it elsewhere.
I have a question: if they aren't going to sell it to the Americans who are they going to sell it too? They certainly can't not sell it. Not with all the arms Chavez is buying.
Oil is a malleable resource. Example: Venezuela is selling X amount of oil to the US. They decide they don't want to sell to the US any longer, (one really has to wonder about the practicality of that idea), okay. So who do they sell to? They notice Japan buying oil from country 'XYZ' and they say "hey we can cut you a better deal". Okay now they are selling to Japan for less money than they were selling to the US and now what? Well we still have country 'XYZ' that Japan was buying the oil from, so they are down one buyer and the US is down one supplier. Doesn't take much to see exactly what would happen. When the dust settles all that's changed is that Venezuela would be selling their oil cheaper than before.

This is why it wasn't all just poppycock when people were scratching their heads as to why he would threaten to not sell to the US any longer. Most understood it for the shallow tough-talk it was and as much as Chavez tried to paint a picture locally of Americans in a panic over it to make him look tough, well no, not really. It hardly woke anyone up. No one took him seriously and that wasn;t just propaganda or posturing.


I can accept your argument.  But i do doubt whether the US could have found the same quality of soil elsewhere.  Venezuela has reserves of what i will have to call the good oil, as i cant remember what it is called lol.  Is it light oil, perhaps.

The only other issue i may raise is that Venezuela may be willing to hurt itself a little to hurt the US.  It is quite feesible that they would do further bartering as they have done with Cuba and Argentiina.  I'm sure these countries and more would happily up their oil consumption for the right deal - exchangin even more medical experise and personnel, and exporting more food in Argentina's case.

In this way, the US couldnt simply find another supplier, there would be no space in the market to occupy.

Tere is also the issue of do the refineries exist to allow the US to just find another supplier on a whim ?

I will have to check my sources to see and remember what the Chavez line is on this.


Care to elaborate on that? Be precise please. Capitalists of the world? Empire? You must be talking about China right? Japan? Russia? France? Help me out here. There's a reason capitalism is 4000 years old and it's not because everybody's stupid.

(p.s. don't make the mistake of assuming I'm an American)
Ahk

The US capitalist Empire

"As long as imperialism exists, it will, by definition, exert its domination over other countries. Today that domination is called neocolonialism".  - Ernesto Che Guevara

That is what the US practices.  That is what Iraq is all about, expanding the empire.  They take over countries by invasion, coups and propaganda wars.   They install dictators like pinochet and puppet Presidents who pander to their economic desire.  That is what is "great" about neocolonialism, and makes it look different from imperialism - you get a national to control the country for you.  You dont need to directly  control it, as the British did. You just keep your military there in reserve, just in case.  And the US military is in over 130 of the worlds countries.

Neocolonialism is the means of reaching the end, of US hegemony.

Logged
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2008, 07:45:42 AM »

Welcome aboard Comrade Joe! The empire has been growing at least since the Mexican War of 1846. Every war since has been at the behest of international bankers like J.P. Morgan. The House of Morgan continues its slippery actions to this day.

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
Ahkenaten
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +129/-135
Posts: 1,588


Professor of Angular Mil and Applied Narcotics


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2008, 08:19:13 AM »

Quote
The only other issue i may raise is that Venezuela may be willing to hurt itself a little to hurt the US.  It is quite feesible that they would do further bartering as they have done with Cuba and Argentiina.  I'm sure these countries and more would happily up their oil consumption for the right deal - exchangin even more medical experise and personnel, and exporting more food in Argentina's case.

In this way, the US couldnt simply find another supplier, there would be no space in the market to occupy.

I don't see how. Like I say the market is sewn up. You lose something here and opportunity only arrises over there. The only 'new' factor is new deposits of oil. What I'm describing is akin to having five nuts in a row. Re-arranging them into a circle doesn't change the number of nuts, know what I mean?

While we're at it, do you feel that 'hurting yourself to hurt the US' is a mature or reasonable leadership principle?

Quote
Tere is also the issue of do the refineries exist to allow the US to just find another supplier on a whim ?
Happens all the time. Besides they aren't finding another supplier 'on a whim' right? According to our hypothetical example they are being forced to change because someoen is refusing to sell to them. Hasn;t anything to do with their 'whim'. Just sayin'.

Quote
That is what the US practices.  That is what Iraq is all about, expanding the empire.  They take over countries by invasion, coups and propaganda wars.   They install dictators like pinochet and puppet Presidents who pander to their economic desire.  That is what is "great" about neocolonialism, and makes it look different from imperialism - you get a national to control the country for you.  You dont need to directly  control it, as the British did. You just keep your military there in reserve, just in case.  And the US military is in over 130 of the worlds countries.

Yes but the reason the US military is in Germany for example has nothing to do with some plan about taking them or the world over. It was simply to counter the Soviets. This is one of many examples as to why the US military is in another part of the world but it really has nothing to do with empire and in fact is a costly detriment to them overall. Another example would be Korea. Nothing but a money pit for them. To forget about the Cold War and the miserable condition of Europe after the second world war - to discount this historical reality and concentrate on a claim of "neocolonialism" to explain US foreign troop deployments is less than accurate.

Have we made comparrisons with other nations before we declared the USA as an empire? Try France.


Quote
That is what is "great" about neocolonialism, and makes it look different from imperialism

Why is that great? What's wrong with Imperialism? Many will claim that it is the empire in question that invade/destroys and makes slaves of other nations but the only reason empires last long enough to be called Empires is because their vassel states profit or are made secure by them. It is not until the these vassel states have "grown up" that they no longer need their empire and then sue for independence. Herod was a 'puppet' King of the Romans, but if it weren't for the Romans there'd be no Israel today.

I read what you wrote in the other thread about Scottish independence. So I have to ask: did the Scots not profit from being part of the British empire? Did India not profit form it until they decided they didnt need it? Then again they sued for independence.

This process is older than sin. We can bring constant example from every century for the last 3000 years.  Tiny poor nation that was sitting around just waiting to be destroyed (in some cases by something as little as a bad storm or a single drought) gets taken over by a regional 'empire'. It's inclusion in a much larger trade system and its sudden ability to claim military protection it never in 1000 years would've had before the empire in question took it over, so now it survives without invasion and grows in a protected environment....until one day it grows strong enough to sue for independence. In the meantime the overall level of war among these nations is much lower than if you had many nations more equal in power competeing for resources.

Empries, and capitalism for that matter, have supressed more wars than they have caused. Pax Romana, Pax Britanica, etc. So Chevez can claim "Evil Empire" until he's blue in the face, just like they did in ancient Jerusalem, but it seems obvious to me his threat to not take their money was hollow.


Ahk
« Last Edit: April 03, 2008, 08:56:19 AM by Ahkenaten » Logged

Are ju-jubes anti-semetic?
Comrade Joe
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-9
Posts: 27



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2008, 02:32:28 PM »

Why would a country like Venezuela NOT be rich? im not an economist but oil rich countries with the exeption of Nigeria are in a much better situation than Venezuela.
And YES you are right! Venezuela steady has had economic growth for the last 3 years. Of course the government will announce this in a celebrating tone, but they will not announce that inflation duplicates such growth. So there's your first misinformative piece of government manipulation of the truth.

I already gave a good reason why Venezuela is not rich - 35 years of recession !  35 years of oligarchs stealing the nations wealth.  Now that is changing.  Now Venezuela gets richer by the day, that is under President Chavez guidance.

The pre-Chavez era as you call it was terrible! oil prices were low and production was high so we were not receiving a fair share in my opinion. But it was a time when every five years everything changed with the comming of another president. Reforms, plans and project were made. Of course they never worked... but  poverty grew at the rate of the population growth, poor people were not "created". Independence was gained in 1824 and Oil independence was gained in the mid 70's oil nationlization by Carlos Andres Perez, the guy Chavez tried to topple in his second term in 1992. He's dying by the way...poor old fart.
Venezuelas new infrastructure since Chavez is decaying by the way. A school and a hospital just crumbled a few weeks ago for lack of planification. 
Give the government a break.  They cant fix everything right away.  They have limited resources to work with, infact relatively little capital.  That being as a result of 35 years of recession.  Not everything will improve right away.

Looking at your comments and your data I just knew a second before looking at your link it was from goverment controlled press.


Which of my posts relied upon government media.  I know for a fact at least 3 of my sources are independant private sources - so you cant just cast them aside - they are valid sources.  I havent researched who put the others together, so please tell me which is government sources.

In 2002 we had 5 open broadcast channels with news coverage. 2 of them (RCTV and GLOBOVISION) were openly oppossing the government, another 2 (VENEVISION and TELEVEN) were somewhat balanced and the state-run channel was openly pro government. I can't tell you about radio stations since i don't listen much radio. After the failed coup in april 2002, VENEVISON and TELEVEN became anti goverment for 8 months or so, an then, out of the blue they were sold and changed their directive, and now they are pro-government. 7 new channels are now on open broadcast: Avila, CatiaTV, La Tele, Tves, AN TV and 2 others (can't remember the name now). All of them pro-goverment. Of the 2 others RCTV and GLOBOVISION, the first had not it's first broadcasting permit renewed so it had to leave, and the second is being threatened by the government. Additional press is released every day but it is pro-governmet and of course government-controlled.

Is there a Media war? YES!... and Chavez has the upper hand. in VTV the state own TV station, the news segment never says something bad happened in Caracas. No one gets killed, there are no anti-governmet marches, no protests. He criticizes the opposition media for what then?, for opposing him?, because it's not because it is bigger than his own media. Newspapers ar the same story: 4 or 5 oppositionist and honestly I stopped counting after 30 pro-goverment newspapers.
Personally I am sick of seeing Chavez's ugly head outside my window that says "Con Chavez todos somos Venezuela" (With Chavez, we all are Venezuela). Caracas is looking more and more like the beautiful city of Havana, with pictures of Fidel's and Che's faces everywhere.

It seems to me that all it takes for you to call someone pro chavez is to be neutral.  Televen is neutral is it not ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Televen#Criticism

Again i will re-post this link, i hope you read it, and please feel free to challenge it.

http://mondediplo.com/2002/08/10venezuela


And Venezuela is a democracy, you have to get re-elected.  If you have a popular leader why not maximise their appeal by using their picture Huh? That is the name of the game in politics - you have to win voters however you can.
I guess I support Chavez's claim that Bush is the Devil, but don't use an imperialist, oligarch foreign government to unite your followeres. Use a common motivation of national spirit that makes everybody follow the common goal of making the country grow, making progress, educate everyone on being a gret member of society.
But instead we get "The US wants to destroy us", or " Bush is the cause of our crisis".
I hope they don't ban me for this but that is plain BULLSHIT.
Yes Bush is a terrible hum... animal but he is not the cause of our problems..
The US is a very real threat to Venezuela, you must remember the coup.  You must know of the coup in Chile, in Guatemala, the invasion, terrorism and espionage in Cuba.  It would be irresponsible of a government to not raise the very real threat with the public.  He does no different from governments all over the world - they talk about the threat, be it real or not - at least Chavez talks about a real threat.

If you want to see fear being put into the people come to Britain, were all politicians speak of is the threat from islam, terrorists, immigrants, asylum seekers, Iran, the Russians, the Chinese.  Our politicians invent a threat.  The threat you face is very real.
Im sorry Comrade Joe to have to argue with you so pointedly but I mus say one last thing. The title of my post was clear in a deeper way, if you don't live here, you don't know what you're saying.
 

Well i am also sorry, sorry that you now look desperate.  You have been faced with cold hard facts, you have been shown solid statistical analysis, and rather than refute it, because you cannot - it is irrefutable, you resort to emotional rhetoric.  If what you said were true, that you cant have any knowledge of a state without living in it, then no one could criticise nazi germany - could they ?  After all, none of us lived there !  What we do is use statistics and sources and make an analysis.  I have provided a solid analysis and it seems to me you do not like it, because it shows your rhetoric up.

And remember this, you are not the only Venezuelan, your opinion is nopt reflective of public opinion.  For every one of you there are two Chavistas.  And i myself have spooken to Venezuelans who fall into that bracket.  They are the majority - i put my faith in them, not the oligarchs and capitalist sympathisers.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2008, 02:34:30 PM by Comrade Joe » Logged
gommi
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +26/-27
Posts: 341



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2008, 07:44:29 PM »

Quote
Everyday, you can see on the newspaper a new company that leaves the country and going to other South American Countries or out of the continent. Even POLAR industries are moving, the largest private company in Venezuela, which had more than 100 years of history. This is making job practically impossible to find.
Given how these established companies are leaving the country, does this suggest that entrepreneurs are also unable to create new businesses? Are there truly no employment opportunities?

Also, as a school teacher you are employed by the government, correct? If so, do you feel that the nation's public education system is adequate?
« Last Edit: April 03, 2008, 07:46:57 PM by gommi » Logged

__Committed IAPer since 2004__
Comrade Joe
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-9
Posts: 27



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2008, 08:47:25 PM »

Here is some of the real economic results the Chavez government have overseen.

Quote from:
The average growth rate for non-oil economy was 17.8%.  All non-oil sectors demonstrated "significant growth", with a particularly strong showing in construction (32.1%), financial institutions and insurance (26.6%), transportation and warehousing, (26.4%) commerce and repair services (25.5%), and manufacturing and industry (25.4%).  Mining (11.8%), communications (10.2%), and electricity and water (6.9%) also registered notable growth rates.  The private sector grew 18.6% and the public sector grew 11.0%. 

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/948
« Last Edit: April 03, 2008, 08:51:08 PM by Comrade Joe » Logged
gommi
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +26/-27
Posts: 341



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2008, 05:17:05 AM »

Quote
The average growth rate for non-oil economy was 17.8%.  All non-oil sectors demonstrated "significant growth", with a particularly strong showing in construction (32.1%), financial institutions and insurance (26.6%), transportation and warehousing, (26.4%) commerce and repair services (25.5%), and manufacturing and industry (25.4%).  Mining (11.8%), communications (10.2%), and electricity and water (6.9%) also registered notable growth rates.  The private sector grew 18.6% and the public sector grew 11.0%.
How do you reconcile this information with Masterkoki's claims of job loss?
Logged

__Committed IAPer since 2004__
Comrade Joe
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-9
Posts: 27



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2008, 06:54:37 AM »

Quote
The average growth rate for non-oil economy was 17.8%.  All non-oil sectors demonstrated "significant growth", with a particularly strong showing in construction (32.1%), financial institutions and insurance (26.6%), transportation and warehousing, (26.4%) commerce and repair services (25.5%), and manufacturing and industry (25.4%).  Mining (11.8%), communications (10.2%), and electricity and water (6.9%) also registered notable growth rates.  The private sector grew 18.6% and the public sector grew 11.0%.
How do you reconcile this information with Masterkoki's claims of job loss?

Rhetoric rarely can be reconciled with statistics.  I know i will always trust hard facts before opinion.  That is not to say that jobs will not have been lossed.  That happens everywhere, jobs are lost for new ones to be created.  But the statistics clearly show rapid public and private sector growth.
Logged
Ahkenaten
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +129/-135
Posts: 1,588


Professor of Angular Mil and Applied Narcotics


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2008, 07:50:53 AM »

Quote
Rhetoric rarely can be reconciled with statistics.  I know i will always trust hard facts before opinion.


The difference between raw data and truth is a wide sea. Statistics lead to erroneous conclusions routinely.

Hitler was also a guy who 'fixed the economy'. Statistics from '38 would also show rapid public and private sector growth in Germany and it's not because he was a genius.



Ahk
« Last Edit: April 04, 2008, 08:01:16 AM by Ahkenaten » Logged

Are ju-jubes anti-semetic?
Masterkoki
Newbie
*

Karma: +1/-0
Posts: 34



View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: April 04, 2008, 10:36:42 AM »

Too many replies to make... so little time.

To Comrade Joe.

First of all I think you feel I am trying to scoff at what you say... on the contrary! I welcome the fact that I can talk with a pro-Chavez individual intelligently and who has argumentative replies. I think you are a breath of fresh air from many loudmouth countrymen who don't know how to talk about politics in a mature intelligent way.
But before I make the following comments I will tell you this: Though I have my own opinions, am not into politics nor have an agenda. I have never lied in my life and I never will as my father taught me, and what I am about to tell you may cause me some problems, although I find it very difficult the government can track me down.

I'm a 26-year-old father. I studied political science at UCV ( Central University of Venezuela ), one of the most prestigious Universities of the Hemisphere and yes, it's public. I practiced politics for one year and hated it. I hated everything about it. I couldn't deal with the dishonesty and crookedness of the system. So I started to work as an teacher at middleschool, and after that I taught at the UBV (Bolivarian University of Venezuela) which is a new University created by Chavez for students loyal to his revolution. A friend of a friend got me the job, you know how it works... Anyway I worked there for 2 years and I said enough, now I work in a private company. It pays better and I need the money since I have a newborn, it's not that I favor international capitalist companies.

www.venezuelanalysis.com IS government funded. The husband of my cousin works there. I'm almost positive that www.rethinkvenezuela.com is a subsidiary of PDVSA though I can't be 100% sure on that but I will ask someone who can tell me for sure.
Every Sunday the government gives data to the public through national TV and Radio Broadcast. This data is NEVER negative but... how come things are always worse and worse?... people all around me are loosing their jobs, things are more expensive everyday, crime is rampant. Me and my family were in better conditions before Chavez. I'm a middle class person I'm not a rich guy and I can't benefit from half of the government "missions" because I'm on the Tascon list (the list of people who signed petitions to revoke Chavez from his office). Also I'm not a member of the PSUV (Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela United socialist party of Venezuela ) nor did I want a membership, which was the reason I got fired from the UBV. I was in good terms with the director of the language department of the UBV but when I refused to become a member of the PSUV I got a week notice the next day. That's Venezuelan Democracy for you.

This government is FULL of crooks, and Chavez is one of them. If you look at the Venezuelan news you will see a recent article where the Chavez family bought $350.000.000 worth of land on Apure State. On a president's salary that's just impossible to buy!
As well as stealing money, he does manipulate the truth my friend, I have lived it. I have seen UBV teachers teaching lies to the students for crying out loud.
Televen by the way IS pro-Chavez although subtlety like Venevision, but they used to be SUPER ANTI CHAVEZ... I don't think they just "rectified" my friend.

Now I understand you are British and you don't elect your prime minister directly, but let's say you did. Now Brown wins by more than 50% of the votes and after about a year (presidential elections are every 6 years in Venezuela) you start to see his face everywhere!... I guess you Comrade Joe would say "wow, that's a brilliant strategy the bastard came up with" but he's no fascist for doing that. Am I right?

And yes, no one can resist believing statistics, but I'm a skeptic. I only believe my eyes that look around on the streets. I don't even believe what I see on TV or hear on the radio anymore.

Like I said. I don't deny that the US government is a real and present danger, but you can't just blame them for everything that goes wrong with this country! We don't need a common enemy, we need a common leader!

I feel embarrassed for having to argue everything you say Comrade Joe but I feel I must. In any case I'm enjoying this post!

Tu Gummy:

Jobs are almost impossible to find. You have to know contact from a given company so you can get an interview. The state tries hard enough to make new jobs, but ironically for a socialist regime most of them pay minimum wage, although it has fair benefits.
national companies are going bankrupt monthly and new foreign investment is rare. Without kickbacks nothing gets done. For every formal employee, there are 100 inforal employees.

I don't know if I'm missing a question so remind me if you want a reply for something in particular   


 

 
« Last Edit: April 04, 2008, 10:40:36 AM by Masterkoki » Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.15 seconds with 27 queries.