Thank you for your help.
Without the people voting the system doesn't work and can for example lead that a minority of the people can basically decide what is happening in a country.
I don't fear this unless the minority organizes itself, which I don't see happening.
Second some people claim it is because some of our ancestors died/suffered/protested we have been given the right to determine what is right instead of a certain Despot. Basicly not voting would men for them the ignoring of the sacrifice some people took.
This is not how I view my (USA) founding father's actions, I see them as an example that even once government has gone too far it is not too late to change it. There is some room here for a duty to posterity but I'd be hard pressed to turn that into a specific duty to vote.
Thirdly, one I heard recently, if you don't vote you basically demonstrate you don't care how your country is driven and basicly you don't have the right to complain either. (Strange thinking, but it has some logic).
hmm I'm not sure how either of these imply a duty to vote.
Finally some people could want you to vote when there is basicly no choice so it seems that a certain candidate has a larger support of the people then he actually has. Last one would happen in a more rigged democracy.
I think this implies a duty the other way.
gommi; I have opinions, but I'm not sure why you should say it's bad for me not to use them to effect government.
OswaldTheOsprey; I don't understand voting as hygiene.
Dormouse; my question is not whether people have voted about the duty, it's a question of how I should vote in such a contest.