IAP Political Forum
December 01, 2008, 09:00:19 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Default theme has been changed, and everyone reset due to some problems with posts disappearing after submitting.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Iran is an opportunity, not a target  (Read 3431 times)
Fredledingue
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +30/-31
Posts: 868



View Profile
« Reply #135 on: June 09, 2008, 11:24:39 AM »

Techincally speaking by Iran becoming a nuclear if that's the case it won't change the balance of power but it will change the monopoly status that Israel has enjoyed for many years. That's what is at stake not the 24/7 scare stories about Iran's threat of nuclear weapon. btw it's 'persian gulf' not 'persic gulf'.

The translation is wrong and he never said he will "wipe Israel off the map". I hate the guy not for what he has said but for the promises he has made about economy and hasn't delivered. Like any other politicians really.

Indeed this is the question that many iraninas ask themselves what is Ahmadienejad doing with these high oil prices? The fact is the sanctions are taking their toll on ordinary iranians. Their concern is not the dirty games of politics but their prosperity. He is unpopular but if one had a choice between Ahmadienejad and the constant rhetorics and threats of an attack by the USrael the tendency is to chose the former.

What "nuclear" monopoly Israel enjoyed? Israel is not the only nuclear power in the world. That's BS.
If israel has nukes it's because muslims let it have nukes. Not a single muslim country has spent a single petro-dollar to watch Israel's nuclear program like the West is doing now with Iran. They couldn't care less.
They couldn't care less because they know Israel is a treath to no one.

Iranians understand that their regime is totaly corrupt and run by nutheads but that there is nothing they can do because between radical islamists and ultra-radical islamists there isn't realy a democratic choice.

The sanction don't hurt "ordinary civilians". Very few ordinary civilians use devices for the nuclear or aerospace industry which are subject of sanctions. Iran was a poor country long before the first sanctions.

Had Iran built a nuclear power plant (one that cannot produce bomb grade plutonium of course), they would have cheaper electricity and could export more oil.
Instead of that, they built useless centrifuges... and still have to burn oil at $135 a barrel to produce electricity.

More insane than that, you die. :x
Logged

Dr. Zoidberg is jewish (and an important AIPAC donator!)

kactus
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-29
Posts: 238


View Profile
« Reply #136 on: June 09, 2008, 12:14:02 PM »


What "nuclear" monopoly Israel enjoyed? Israel is not the only nuclear power in the world. That's BS.

Never said "in the world" Fred. Don't make up words I never said!!! Of course there are other nuclear powers in the world.

Quote
Iranians understand that their regime is totaly corrupt and run by nutheads but that there is nothing they can do because between radical islamists and ultra-radical islamists there isn't realy a democratic choice.

Simple better be ruled by radicals than getting attacked by another country.

Quote
The sanction don't hurt "ordinary civilians".

How do you know?

Quote
Very few ordinary civilians use devices for the nuclear or aerospace industry which are subject of sanctions.

That is utter nonesense! The airplanes are almost 30 years old because US barred manufacturers for giving spare parts. These are passenger planes we are talking about ffs.

Quote
Had Iran built a nuclear power plant (one that cannot produce bomb grade plutonium of course), they would have cheaper electricity and could export more oil.

Talk is cheap. Show me the evidence first that Iran has nuclear bomb.

Quote
Instead of that, they built useless centrifuges... and still have to burn oil at $135 a barrel to produce electricity.

More insane than that, you die. :x

It is no one's god damn business to tell them how they should live their lives. But of course Fred this is not about Iran this is about your frustration for paying higher prices for petrol here in Europe.
Logged
Fredledingue
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +30/-31
Posts: 868



View Profile
« Reply #137 on: June 09, 2008, 03:24:06 PM »

What "nuclear" monopoly Israel enjoyed? Israel is not the only nuclear power in the world. That's BS.
Never said "in the world" Fred. Don't make up words I never said!!! Of course there are other nuclear powers in the world.

Well, so what's the point? No nuclear power has nuclear monoply unless you select only the non-nuclear nations around it to define the "region" in question.
My point is that if Iran become a nuclear power it will have nuclear monopoly as well since non of its neighbor and potential foes would own nukes.

Quote
Quote
Iranians understand that their regime is totaly corrupt and run by nutheads but that there is nothing they can do because between radical islamists and ultra-radical islamists there isn't realy a democratic choice.
Simple better be ruled by radicals than getting attacked by another country.

Well, actualy they will be ruled by radical AND attacked by another country. Better being ruled by moderate and not be attacked, don't you think?

Quote
Quote
Very few ordinary civilians use devices for the nuclear or aerospace industry which are subject of sanctions.
That is utter nonesense! The airplanes are almost 30 years old because US barred manufacturers for giving spare parts. These are passenger planes we are talking about ffs.

I don't know about airline issues but it seems that they should be able to keep their fleet fit for international flights. Maybe leasing or using foreign copanies.

The point is that current UN sanctions don't affect basic products like food, medecine or stuffs that everubody use.
It had little affect on the economy in general so far. I think it's who who told me that despite sanction their economy grew by x% this year and that business contract were up (or was it Peisthanatos?).

Quote
Quote
Had Iran built a nuclear power plant (one that cannot produce bomb grade plutonium of course), they would have cheaper electricity and could export more oil.
Talk is cheap. Show me the evidence first that Iran has nuclear bomb.
...
Quote
Quote
Instead of that, they built useless centrifuges... and still have to burn oil at $135 a barrel to produce electricity.

More insane than that, you die. :x

It is no one's god damn business to tell them how they should live their lives. But of course Fred this is not about Iran this is about your frustration for paying higher prices for petrol here in Europe.

Caktus, Iran is claimimg that their goal is to produce electricity in order to export more oil. I can only abound in their sens except that everything they did so far went against that goal.

If they wanted to build nuclear power plant to produce electricity, they could ask Russia or France to build a classic pwer plant and have it running without any problem since such a plant would not be able to produce bomb grade plutonium under any circumstance. It's technologicaly impossible with reactors in such plant.

That would have cost much much less than the huge centrifuge chains they build underground. And these plant would up and running smoothly for years already by now.
Even better: They had such a project with Russia but it was postponed or stopped (nobody is realy sure) since Iran didn't have enough money to pay the russians (of course they spent everything in bunkers, tunels and centrifuges). At least that's the official reason. The real reason could be that the russians stopped the project under international pressure.
And if that was not patethic enough, despite their huge investment in uranium enrichement, they still planned to buy nuclear fuel from Russia several years for the Busher power plant!

Good that Ahmy (who is never afraid of ridicule) told us that "Iran won't step back one iota from their right to nuclear energy". Because every step they took were huge leap backward.
Logged

Dr. Zoidberg is jewish (and an important AIPAC donator!)

kactus
Full Member
***

Karma: +6/-29
Posts: 238


View Profile
« Reply #138 on: June 10, 2008, 12:54:59 PM »

Quote from: Fredledingue
Well, so what's the point?

That was merely my response to the point you made earlier when you said Israel is not the only nuclear power.

Quote
No nuclear power has nuclear monoply unless you select only the non-nuclear nations around it to define the "region" in question.

Exactly the only thing is Fred the country here concerned which is Israel never was part of NPT yet they have the nuclear status. And I don't want to start the whole argument that Israel is in a hostile neighbourhood and has arab foes....

Quote
My point is that if Iran become a nuclear power it will have nuclear monopoly as well since non of its neighbor and potential foes would own nukes.

Iran is part of NPT and does not have nuclear weapon to date contrary to speculation. Some arabs like saudis may not like iranians but they hate jews even more.

Quote
Well, actualy they will be ruled by radical AND attacked by another country. Better being ruled by moderate and not be attacked, don't you think?

Well the mullahs have ruled for nearly 30 years in Iran after the revolution in 1979 and the west didn't seem much to care about what they do to their people. The radicalism seem mainly to have materialised after the west found out about their nuclear program right after the Iraq war. Presidential election in March 2009 may exactly give the chance for a more moderate government to be elected. So yes it is worth giving that chance.

Quote from: kactus
Very few ordinary civilians use devices for the nuclear or aerospace industry which are subject of sanctions.
That is utter nonesense! The airplanes are almost 30 years old because US barred manufacturers for giving spare parts. These are passenger planes we are talking about ffs.
[/quote]

Quote from: Fredledingue
I don't know about airline issues but it seems that they should be able to keep their fleet fit for international flights. Maybe leasing or using foreign copanies.

Foreign companies do have flights to Iran. The question is why should there be sacntions on spare parts of domestic airplanes that are pretty out of standard and jeopordise the lives of ordinary people travelling abroad? Us has imposed these sanctions for much longer than the whole nuclear issue started. Why? Are you telling me when iraninas will get the spare parts they will use it for nuclear devices.  Huh?

Quote
The point is that current UN sanctions don't affect basic products like food, medecine or stuffs that everubody use.
It had little affect on the economy in general so far. I think it's who who told me that despite sanction their economy grew by x% this year and that business contract were up (or was it Peisthanatos?).


It affects the price of petrol and there's a direct correlation to price of food. It is exactly as the result of sanctions that it has taken its toll on ordinary iranian burt there's very little coverage in the news.

Quote
Caktus, Iran is claimimg that their goal is to produce electricity in order to export more oil. I can only abound in their sens except that everything they did so far went against that goal.

Fred...this is not as simple as you put it. You put yourself in their (iranian) position. When you see US troops on either side of your border. Label Iran as part of axis of evil for war against terror, position missles defence shield in Azerbaijan, US fleets in the persian gulf, constant weekly rhetorics by USrael that they will attack Iran, wouldn't you be worried? You will have all the amunition possible to defend yourself even and I repeat this even if that's a bluff. It's All Politics!

Oil reserves are not here to last and that's exactly what iraninas are doing as was originally intended to produce an alternative source of energy.


Quote
If they wanted to build nuclear power plant to produce electricity, they could ask Russia or France to build a classic pwer plant and have it running without any problem since such a plant would not be able to produce bomb grade plutonium under any circumstance. It's technologicaly impossible with reactors in such plant.

That would have cost much much less than the huge centrifuge chains they build underground. And these plant would up and running smoothly for years already by now.
Even better: They had such a project with Russia but it was postponed or stopped (nobody is realy sure) since Iran didn't have enough money to pay the russians (of course they spent everything in bunkers, tunels and centrifuges). At least that's the official reason. The real reason could be that the russians stopped the project under international pressure.
And if that was not patethic enough, despite their huge investment in uranium enrichement, they still planned to buy nuclear fuel from Russia several years for the Busher power plant!

OK if you think that is pathetic then why are you so concerned. It's their business to resolve the issue with the russians.

Quote
Good that Ahmy (who is never afraid of ridicule) told us that "Iran won't step back one iota from their right to nuclear energy". Because every step they took were huge leap backward.

To be honest given the current circumstances and the current threats by the USrael to attack Iran I don't blame them to say what ever they say.
Logged
Fredledingue
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +30/-31
Posts: 868



View Profile
« Reply #139 on: June 11, 2008, 12:48:21 PM »

Quote from: Fredledingue
Well, so what's the point?
That was merely my response to the point you made earlier when you said Israel is not the only nuclear power.

So, as you see, there is no point in arguing wether or not Israel has some monopoly or not...

Quote
Quote
No nuclear power has nuclear monoply unless you select only the non-nuclear nations around it to define the "region" in question.
Exactly the only thing is Fred the country here concerned which is Israel never was part of NPT yet they have the nuclear status. And I don't want to start the whole argument that Israel is in a hostile neighbourhood and has arab foes....

No, I see that you don't want to.

Quote
Quote
My point is that if Iran become a nuclear power it will have nuclear monopoly as well since non of its neighbor and potential foes would own nukes.
Iran is part of NPT and does not have nuclear weapon to date contrary to speculation. Some arabs like saudis may not like iranians but they hate jews even more.

I was talking in the future tense. And the west is not going to stay iddle because it's "speculation".

Saudis may hate jews more than Iranians but Israelis have no oil and are no rival in the region of oil.
Wars are not make out of cultural hatred. It's more political as you said.
Canadians hate Yankees, it doesn't mean they will make war on the US.

Quote
Quote
Well, actualy they will be ruled by radical AND attacked by another country. Better being ruled by moderate and not be attacked, don't you think?
Well the mullahs have ruled for nearly 30 years in Iran after the revolution in 1979 and the west didn't seem much to care about what they do to their people. The radicalism seem mainly to have materialised after the west found out about their nuclear program right after the Iraq war. Presidential election in March 2009 may exactly give the chance for a more moderate government to be elected. So yes it is worth giving that chance.

Iran has been radical since Ayatholah Kahmeyni took power with his Islamic Revolution.
So i don't know what you are talking about.

Quote from: kactus
Quote from: Fredledingue
Quote from: kactus
Quote from: Fredledingue
Very few ordinary civilians use devices for the nuclear or aerospace industry which are subject of sanctions.
That is utter nonesense! The airplanes are almost 30 years old because US barred manufacturers for giving spare parts. These are passenger planes we are talking about ffs.
I don't know about airline issues but it seems that they should be able to keep their fleet fit for international flights. Maybe leasing or using foreign copanies.
Foreign companies do have flights to Iran. The question is why should there be sacntions on spare parts of domestic airplanes that are pretty out of standard and jeopordise the lives of ordinary people travelling abroad? Us has imposed these sanctions for much longer than the whole nuclear issue started. Why? Are you telling me when iraninas will get the spare parts they will use it for nuclear devices.  Huh?

Why is it a problem? If a plane is not safely fit for flying, it should stay on the ground.
If domestic Iranian airlines are carrying passengers knowing that the plane could crash, it's their fault if it does.

I haven't heard of any plane crash caused by "a made-in-USA missing part" anyway.

Quote
Quote
The point is that current UN sanctions don't affect basic products like food, medecine or stuffs that everubody use.
It had little affect on the economy in general so far. I think it's who who told me that despite sanction their economy grew by x% this year and that business contract were up (or was it Peisthanatos?).
It affects the price of petrol and there's a direct correlation to price of food. It is exactly as the result of sanctions that it has taken its toll on ordinary iranian burt there's very little coverage in the news.

The sanctions don't affect the price of oil. Talks of war do.
The sanctions don't disrupt Iranian oil exports.

Quote
Quote
Caktus, Iran is claimimg that their goal is to produce electricity in order to export more oil. I can only abound in their sens except that everything they did so far went against that goal.
Fred...this is not as simple as you put it. You put yourself in their (iranian) position. When you see US troops on either side of your border. Label Iran as part of axis of evil for war against terror, position missles defence shield in Azerbaijan, US fleets in the persian gulf, constant weekly rhetorics by USrael that they will attack Iran, wouldn't you be worried? You will have all the amunition possible to defend yourself even and I repeat this even if that's a bluff. It's All Politics!

I agree. Iran should have invested more money in conventional defense systems instead of wasting money on centrifuges which will never give enough material for bomb before american zionist crusaders invade their holly land.

On top of that Iran shuldn't do the very single thing that will accelerate the so much feared USrael attack on them.

Not only do they fail to produce electricity, but they failed to get proper defense of their territory and uselessly rise the risk of war upon themselves.

If I was the Iranians, and if I was thinking that the US is encircling my country for an invasion, the last thing I would do would be to offer on a silver plate an internationaly aproved reason to do so.

Quote
Quote
If they wanted to build nuclear power plant to produce electricity, they could ask Russia or France to build a classic pwer plant and have it running without any problem since such a plant would not be able to produce bomb grade plutonium under any circumstance. It's technologicaly impossible with reactors in such plant.

That would have cost much much less than the huge centrifuge chains they build underground. And these plant would up and running smoothly for years already by now.
Even better: They had such a project with Russia but it was postponed or stopped (nobody is realy sure) since Iran didn't have enough money to pay the russians (of course they spent everything in bunkers, tunels and centrifuges). At least that's the official reason. The real reason could be that the russians stopped the project under international pressure.
And if that was not patethic enough, despite their huge investment in uranium enrichement, they still planned to buy nuclear fuel from Russia several years for the Busher power plant!
OK if you think that is pathetic then why are you so concerned. It's their business to resolve the issue with the russians.


It's worrying because it shows how irrational and obsessed with nuclear power they are. Even if it's for bluff.
Maybe it will never hurts me personaly, but it's scary to see that.

Quote
Quote
Good that Ahmy (who is never afraid of ridicule) told us that "Iran won't step back one iota from their right to nuclear energy". Because every step they took were huge leap backward.
To be honest given the current circumstances and the current threats by the USrael to attack Iran I don't blame them to say what ever they say.

That's calling escalating tensions. Ahmy championed on this game since he is president.
Sorry but they shouldn't have built top secret undergroud nuclear labs and factories at the first time.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2008, 01:03:47 PM by Fredledingue » Logged

Dr. Zoidberg is jewish (and an important AIPAC donator!)

Terry Mathis
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +57/-92
Posts: 1,239


Goulburn NSW Australia Dual Australian/U.S.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #140 on: June 11, 2008, 03:16:57 PM »



Iran is NOT a signatory to the NPT and the IAEA just released a report saying Iran was not transparent in all of its nuclear programs.
Logged

Quote
Its not what they say that bothers me, its what they say that just aint so that does !
- Will Rogers
Quote
So that we may end the oppression wrought by our own hands.
- Shulman
CharlesMartel
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +3/-79
Posts: 362



View Profile
« Reply #141 on: June 11, 2008, 07:09:20 PM »

The IAEA huh? No doubt Iran is petrified.
Logged
Terry Mathis
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +57/-92
Posts: 1,239


Goulburn NSW Australia Dual Australian/U.S.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #142 on: June 11, 2008, 10:16:56 PM »

The IAEA huh? No doubt Iran is petrified.


No doubt.  Roll Eyes
Logged

Quote
Its not what they say that bothers me, its what they say that just aint so that does !
- Will Rogers
Quote
So that we may end the oppression wrought by our own hands.
- Shulman
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.149 seconds with 27 queries.