Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
   
Karma: +197/-195
Posts: 3,662
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2008, 08:40:44 PM » |
|
One thing I've never understood is why more people don't make use of passive solar for heat. I understand that at the present, panels to generate electricity for a single house are expensive, but it's not so expensive for heat. Besides systems to heat water, I'm surprised that more houses don't have skylight windows. The fact that people aren't using the existing capabilities more than they are makes me question how eager they will be to use new technology. Well, I think houses are being built with A LOT of windows nowadays, but you're right, few are located on the ceiling. We have a small one which takes in the sun as it sets in the front yard. It can be quite warm where the light hits. In fact, it destroyed a couch we had in our living room because of how much light was coming through. I too fail to see why sky lights aren't in greater circulation. Tracking the sun isn't that great of an obstacle. Computers can direct motors to keep optimal angles. There are just too many places for things like motors, gears and hydrolic equipment to break down... all of which most likely costs a fortune to replace/repair. It's interesting that you mention the maintenance issue though. I do some work for a wind developer, and I've been surprised at how much opposition there is to wind turbines. The low maintenance requirements of modern turbines is actually a liability to developers. One of the many gripes I hear about wind farms is that they don't bring enough jobs with them. Is it true it has greater start-up cost too? Delaware is having a big issue with an off-shore wind developer (Blue Water Wind) and the state power distributer (Delmarva Power) and each one has even gotten radio ads slinging mud at the other. It's really kind of embarassing... TBH, I'm curious what the objection will be when solar becomes economically feasible (it's impossible to generate power without pissing someone off). Think of all the blinded birds falling to earth from the glare. You keep those industrial solar generation facilities away from our ornithological society bird sanctuaries! NIMBY!
From a business perspective, my thoughts are that cost of maintenance would be worth it compared to how much money could be made, and that this will prove more true with the passing of time. I would like to get solar panels for our house. We're in the sun's path the whole day and the front of our roof points right to the west. But alas... it's not my house and my dad is too lazy to look into it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune. - Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back. - Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
illy
Hero Member
   
Karma: +87/-104
Posts: 895
illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2008, 09:09:49 PM » |
|
We have found people that see it as making money. We are years away from turning a profit, but investors do not seem to be difficult to find. And they seem to be willing to take the long view. And to be honest, a job in a green company like this is a very good thing right now!
Cheers to that. Energy is in high demand, so I see energy related work as good job security. I do some work for coal companies too, I'm not opposed to it, but I really like being able to play a role (even if it's a small one) in the development of renewable energy. Abraxas: Wind farms have enormous startup costs, but that is typical for pretty much any energy project. As I understand it, wind is pretty heavily subsidized but you have to get the project going first. It takes years to get everything together. I know it can cost millions without even considering the cost of the turbines, but I don't know specifics or the totality of the cost. I couldn't really tell you how it stacks up against other forms of generation. What's the beef between the wind company and the power distributor? Does the wind developer want a T-line run out to the project area that Delmarva doesn't want to install? I know that they can bring up some pretty controversial issues. I attended a public hearing on turbines, and people raised every issue under the sun. I heard a realtor accuse the "greedy wind developer who just wants to exploit our natural resources for profit" of threatening his profits by bringing property values down. Very ironic.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it - Rugged Man - Give it Up
|
|
|
|
Pond Scum
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: May 16, 2008, 09:10:09 PM » |
|
One thing I've never understood is why more people don't make use of passive solar for heat. I understand that at the present, panels to generate electricity for a single house are expensive, but it's not so expensive for heat. Besides systems to heat water, I'm surprised that more houses don't have skylight windows. The fact that people aren't using the existing capabilities more than they are makes me question how eager they will be to use new technology. Well, I think houses are being built with A LOT of windows nowadays, but you're right, few are located on the ceiling. We have a small one which takes in the sun as it sets in the front yard. It can be quite warm where the light hits. In fact, it destroyed a couch we had in our living room because of how much light was coming through. I too fail to see why sky lights aren't in greater circulation. Tracking the sun isn't that great of an obstacle. Computers can direct motors to keep optimal angles. There are just too many places for things like motors, gears and hydrolic equipment to break down... all of which most likely costs a fortune to replace/repair. It's interesting that you mention the maintenance issue though. I do some work for a wind developer, and I've been surprised at how much opposition there is to wind turbines. The low maintenance requirements of modern turbines is actually a liability to developers. One of the many gripes I hear about wind farms is that they don't bring enough jobs with them. Is it true it has greater start-up cost too? Delaware is having a big issue with an off-shore wind developer (Blue Water Wind) and the state power distributer (Delmarva Power) and each one has even gotten radio ads slinging mud at the other. It's really kind of embarassing... TBH, I'm curious what the objection will be when solar becomes economically feasible (it's impossible to generate power without pissing someone off). Think of all the blinded birds falling to earth from the glare. You keep those industrial solar generation facilities away from our ornithological society bird sanctuaries! NIMBY!
From a business perspective, my thoughts are that cost of maintenance would be worth it compared to how much money could be made, and that this will prove more true with the passing of time. I would like to get solar panels for our house. We're in the sun's path the whole day and the front of our roof points right to the west. But alas... it's not my house and my dad is too lazy to look into it. Abraxas, Don't be in too big a hurry for solar. Wait and see if SUNRGI's claims are going to pan out. If they do, it will only be a couple of years before their new technology comes to fruition, baring any unforseen complications. As to wind, yes the start up costs are not cheap, but there are also new inovations in wind turbines which are being developed. You should be hearing about some of these new wind turbine technologies in the very near future.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pond Scum
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: May 16, 2008, 09:13:40 PM » |
|
Sorry, I kind of forgot about this.
One of the main draw backs to any concentrator like this, is that in order for them to work you need to track the sun. In 2 axis. So mechanically it is very costly and elaborate. Maintenance intensive also. Not good really for individual installations, but maybe for a utility. Our focus is much different. It is for very simple cheap, durable cells that you install on-site. They will be integrated into building materials. I personally think that the wave of the future is to generate your power right where you use it. It is already shifting towards this in a lot of European markets.
Got a link? I want to read more.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Biker Dude
A TRUE Liberal!
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
   
Karma: +148/-113
Posts: 1,886
Live to Ride, Ride to Live
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: May 16, 2008, 09:16:16 PM » |
|
I don't have a specific link, not right now. A lot of this came from conversations at work. But I can see next week what I can come up with if you have a specific area you are interested in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Who will watch the watchers?A vote for McCain is a traitorous vote for the destruction of our way of life as we know it.
|
|
|
|
Pond Scum
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2008, 09:38:39 PM » |
|
I don't have a specific link, not right now. A lot of this came from conversations at work. But I can see next week what I can come up with if you have a specific area you are interested in.
I am interested in ALL new information on Solar energy production. Of course, for right now I was interested in the INTEGRATION of solar cells with building materials. I know I could find this, but thought that since you are in the industry, you could save me some time. I have talked to many people about alternative energy, for almost 30 years. I always knew it's day would come, but it is tough when the masses are brainwashed into believing there is NO ALTERNATIVE TO FOSSIL FUELS WHICH IS ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE. This sentiment was drilled into the heads of the masses and made for many difficult conversations. Now, with logical advances in technology, this group of people is getting smaller by the day. I have talked with a couple of people about the solar plant near Las Vegas and have had 2 of them tell me that it is a horrible waste of money. After a little reading, I sort of agree, unless the panels can be replaced by some collector that's considerably more efficient, like the one I started this thread about. If the panels can be replaced by some that are more efficient, then the money spent on all the motors and mirrors won't have been wasted. I totally agree with you about on site production. The problems with the power grid and losses in transmission are the main reasons why on site production is so much more practical, as you know, which is why I am interested in the integration of solar cells with building materials. thanks.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 16, 2008, 09:51:29 PM by Pond Scum »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
   
Karma: +197/-195
Posts: 3,662
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2008, 09:45:51 PM » |
|
Wind farms have enormous startup costs, but that is typical for pretty much any energy project. As I understand it, wind is pretty heavily subsidized but you have to get the project going first. It takes years to get everything together. I know it can cost millions without even considering the cost of the turbines, but I don't know specifics or the totality of the cost. I couldn't really tell you how it stacks up against other forms of generation. Right. I knew they were all pretty expensive, but I was curious if there was one that was less expensive then the others. What's the beef between the wind company and the power distributor? Does the wind developer want a T-line run out to the project area that Delmarva doesn't want to install? They are demanding that Delmarva Power carry their energy but Delmarva wants to get cheaper (they say) wind power from out of state. Part of Blue Water Wind's argument is that it secures jobs here... but you mentioned their low maintnence costs... so I wonder how truthful that concept is... Either way, the state legislature is pretty split and part of me sides with the power company cause I don't think any company should be mandated to carry a certain form of power, especially by government (if they intervene). But the other part of me doesn't like that Delmarva Power has a monopoly on energy in Delaware... but we're a small state, so I guess I can't really expect much competition. So I guess I'm as split as our politicians are. I know that they can bring up some pretty controversial issues. I attended a public hearing on turbines, and people raised every issue under the sun. I heard a realtor accuse the "greedy wind developer who just wants to exploit our natural resources for profit" of threatening his profits by bringing property values down. Very ironic.
lol That. Is. Hysterical. People laughed him out of the room, right? All in all, alternative energy is a topic that is invading just about EVERY industry - even naval engineering. They're experimenting with sails and massive kites to lower the costs of ships coming into shore. It's a pervasive market and I laugh at all the idiots who think "going green" is expensive. It's a massive, virtually untapped R&D power house (pardon the pun).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune. - Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back. - Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
Pond Scum
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2008, 09:55:36 PM » |
|
Wow, within 2 minutes of my last post my power went out. I just lit a bunch of candles and I am sitting mostly in the dark. Now I know why I love my laptop and my wireless card. Too bad my battery sucks and only lasts an hour. Oh well, I am due for a new laptop soon, so I can tough it out till then. It's not even raining here, but I lost power. Still don't know how many people have been affected. Kinda funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Biker Dude
A TRUE Liberal!
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
   
Karma: +148/-113
Posts: 1,886
Live to Ride, Ride to Live
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2008, 10:00:48 PM » |
|
No problem. I will be happy to see what I can come up with through work and share it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Who will watch the watchers?A vote for McCain is a traitorous vote for the destruction of our way of life as we know it.
|
|
|
illy
Hero Member
   
Karma: +87/-104
Posts: 895
illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2008, 10:17:12 PM » |
|
Wind farms have enormous startup costs, but that is typical for pretty much any energy project. As I understand it, wind is pretty heavily subsidized but you have to get the project going first. It takes years to get everything together. I know it can cost millions without even considering the cost of the turbines, but I don't know specifics or the totality of the cost. I couldn't really tell you how it stacks up against other forms of generation. Right. I knew they were all pretty expensive, but I was curious if there was one that was less expensive then the others. What's the beef between the wind company and the power distributor? Does the wind developer want a T-line run out to the project area that Delmarva doesn't want to install? They are demanding that Delmarva Power carry their energy but Delmarva wants to get cheaper (they say) wind power from out of state. Part of Blue Water Wind's argument is that it secures jobs here... but you mentioned their low maintnence costs... so I wonder how truthful that concept is... Either way, the state legislature is pretty split and part of me sides with the power company cause I don't think any company should be mandated to carry a certain form of power, especially by government (if they intervene). But the other part of me doesn't like that Delmarva Power has a monopoly on energy in Delaware... but we're a small state, so I guess I can't really expect much competition. So I guess I'm as split as our politicians are. I know that they can bring up some pretty controversial issues. I attended a public hearing on turbines, and people raised every issue under the sun. I heard a realtor accuse the "greedy wind developer who just wants to exploit our natural resources for profit" of threatening his profits by bringing property values down. Very ironic.
lol That. Is. Hysterical. People laughed him out of the room, right? All in all, alternative energy is a topic that is invading just about EVERY industry - even naval engineering. They're experimenting with sails and massive kites to lower the costs of ships coming into shore. It's a pervasive market and I laugh at all the idiots who think "going green" is expensive. It's a massive, virtually untapped R&D power house (pardon the pun). No, the realtor's statements were met with thunderous applause. People really hate wind farms around here. Real big bat enthusiasts too. I had no idea how concerned the people around here were about the migratory routes of bats (and neither did they until someone told them that windmills kill bats). It didn't help that the wind developer's spokesman was about as dull as a rock. And truthfully, the developer really does want to exploit our resources for profit (I can't really think of any other reason someone would invest all that money in a wind project). I won't lie about it, I think wind developers do tend to misrepresent the magnitude of negative effects from turbines. IMO, the effects really aren't that bad if good regulations are in place, but turbines can be a nuisance if they're too close to dwellings. Still, some of the propaganda against them is ridiculous, and we've got to get wattage from somewhere. The hearing was shameful. A mob mentality ruled and no-one from the pro-wind side could get a word in edgewise without someone interrupting with crude shouting. The moderators of the hearing had to tell the audience to quite down several times. I got fed up and ended leaving halfway through.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it - Rugged Man - Give it Up
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
   
Karma: +197/-195
Posts: 3,662
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: May 16, 2008, 10:41:54 PM » |
|
And I thought IAP got rancourous sometimes...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune. - Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back. - Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
Pond Scum
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: May 17, 2008, 01:44:35 AM » |
|
I was not aware of the dangers to bat populations form wind turbines. Thanks for posting that. I do believe it would be prudent to try to place wind farms in areas where they will do the least harm to birds and bats. Birds and bats are already declining at alarming rates, it is only common sense to try to avoid this. I find ti strange that more experiments aren't being done to try to scare off birds and bats from the turbines. Blinking lights, or certain sounds, or smells near the turbines might help reduce mortality rates near turbines, I am perplexed why I can't find much info on any experiments like this. Most people know bats help the enrionment, not just in polination and fertilization, but also in helping keep down insect populations, especially mosquitos, since they are active at night, when bats feed. This recent article claims that........ Davis acknowledged that turbines can kill birds and bats, but said new wind park designs introduced for economic reasons have reduced the risk by reducing turbine speeds, building towers without open areas that attract nesting birds and spacing turbines further apart.http://www.timesleader.com/news/20080510_10wind_ART.htmlSome quick reading lead me to this piece...... That toll may not seem like much. But even such small glass kills can add up to big trouble, believes ornithologist Daniel Klem of Muhlenberg College, in Allentown, Pennsylvania. Between 100 million and 1 billion birds die in glass collisions every year in North America alone, Klem estimates. At the very least, that's an average of one bird a year slamming into each of the roughly 100 million homes, apartment buildings, office towers, schools, and storefronts that dot the American landscape. "Glass is one of the world's great bird killers," rivaled only by habitat destruction and perhaps cats, says the blunt-spoken, 57-year-old ornithologist.I had no idea the death toll from glass was so high. This is a great recent article on some of the ways to reduce bird kilss from collisions with windows..... http://audubonmagazine.org/features0403/alert.htmlHopefully someone will really work on how to reduce bird and bat mortality for wind turbines. Between loss of habitat, pollution, cats, collisions with man made structures, birds/bats do not need any more challenges to their survival.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
illy
Hero Member
   
Karma: +87/-104
Posts: 895
illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: May 17, 2008, 09:27:01 AM » |
|
As I understand it, the problem, at least with bats, is that they fly along mountain ridges for navigation. Ridges are also the obvious choice for a place to put turbines. The problem with the speed, is that the blades are so long that even a slow rotation means the end of the blades are still moving very fast. There are going to be some bird and bat casualties.
It's good that there is opposition to wind farms, not because I don't want to see them built, but because it will force them to be built more responsibly. There are people around here mapping out bat populations, and factors like this definitely should be considered when looking at sites for wind projects.
I get the sense though, that many of the people who talk about bats are really more concerned about the potential affect on their property values and aesthetics, as the bats are usually mentioned after these other issues.
My take on it is that until we get solar off the ground, there really is no way to generate energy that doesn't have some kind of consequences. Even once we get solar going, someone will find a problem with it. Compared to a surface mining or coal burning operation, the effects of windmills are negligible.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it - Rugged Man - Give it Up
|
|
|
|
Pond Scum
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: May 17, 2008, 09:48:57 PM » |
|
As I understand it, the problem, at least with bats, is that they fly along mountain ridges for navigation. Ridges are also the obvious choice for a place to put turbines. The problem with the speed, is that the blades are so long that even a slow rotation means the end of the blades are still moving very fast. There are going to be some bird and bat casualties.
It's good that there is opposition to wind farms, not because I don't want to see them built, but because it will force them to be built more responsibly. There are people around here mapping out bat populations, and factors like this definitely should be considered when looking at sites for wind projects.
I get the sense though, that many of the people who talk about bats are really more concerned about the potential affect on their property values and aesthetics, as the bats are usually mentioned after these other issues.
My take on it is that until we get solar off the ground, there really is no way to generate energy that doesn't have some kind of consequences. Even once we get solar going, someone will find a problem with it. Compared to a surface mining or coal burning operation, the effects of windmills are negligible.
I have been a big proponent of wind power most of my life, but with the bird and bat figures, I am starting to reconsider. Unless much is done to reduce bird and bat mortality rates, I will not be a huge wind supporter. Hopefully there will not be any major drawbacks to solar. The rate of recent extinctions is of great concern to me. I believe it should be of great concern to everyone. In my opinion, we are in danger of breaking the food chain. If that actually happens, we will not only see mass extinctions of species, we will mass starvation of people like has never been seen before.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|