Even after he was sentenced Monday to more than 10 years in jail for using a fake identity to gain access to classified information about military tactics and strategy in Iraq, a U.S. Army contract translator remains a mystery to U.S. authorities.

A former contract translator, whose true identity is unknown to the U.S. government, is set to spend more than 10 years in prison for posessing classified documents and using a fake identity to gain U.S. citizenship. At left is a picture taken from his computer during a search of his Brooklyn, N.Y. apartment and shown at his trial.
(Courtesy US Justice Department )More than a year after the suspect pleaded guilty, no one in the government can confirm his identity.

The case raises serious questions about the vetting of military contractors. How does someone who makes up an identity get a job as a contract translator working for the U.S. military? Even more troubling: How does someone like that get secret and top secret security clearances?

And what type of controls do U.S. officials have for protecting documents after the man was able to download sensitive files, remove document copies and photograph a classified map?

The convicted defendant, who had been living in Brooklyn, N.Y., applied for and received U.S. citizenship.

He lied to achieve that goal, so the court issued an order for that citizenship to be stripped. Even though he was given citizenship, the U.S. government says it is not certain of his true name.

A Justice Department press release issued this week said the man's "true identity is still unknown" but said he "goes by various names including Abdulhakeem Nour, Abu Hakim, Noureddine Malki, Almaliki Nour, and Almalik Nour Eddin."


The man referred to by the government as "Nour" applied for a translator position with the L-3 Titan Corp. in August 2003. L-3 provides translation services for U.S. military personnel in Iraq.

He was assigned to an intelligence group in the 82nd Airborne Division of the U.S. Army at Al Taqqadam Air Base.

The government said he downloaded a classified document and took hard copies of several other classified documents.

"The documents detail the 82nd Airborne's mission in Iraq in regard to insurgent activity, such as coordinates of insurgent locations upon which the U.S. Army was preparing to fire in January 2004, and U.S. Army plans for protecting Sunni Iraqis traveling on their pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, in late January 2004," a Justice Department statement says.

The lesson here is that if you hire a mercenary ...that's exactly what you get ...a mercenary.
 He will do your bidding today because you paid him last. That tells nothing of who he will work for tomorrow if the price is right.
 There is nothing noble or trustworthy about a free lance warrior.

No, a responsible free market would never deal with the company that did this and they would fail.

The problem is we're not following through the second part.

The military industrial complex is made up of about 6 major companies with various sub-contractors under them, which makes a free market impossible. It's basically a monopoly.


But more to the point, Congress ISN'T doing a good job of watching who they do business and continue to do business with and MILLIONS (probably BILLIONS) are being lost because of it.

IIRC, there was a vote recently about contractors in Iraq. I don't remember what it was exactly, but I thought it changed the procedure of acquiring them... or maybe I'm wrong? Anyone know?

In these situations an oligopoly (I believe that was the word you were hunting for) is not only possible, but quite probable.  It's a natural consequence of a free market in an area where there are necessarily few competitors(in this case, ironically enough, the restraint on competition seems to be for security reasons).