cb_brooklyn
Newbie
Karma: +0/-4
Posts: 7
|
 |
« on: May 19, 2008, 06:10:35 PM » |
|
A new groundbreaking paper by former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Dr Judy Wood, on Hurricane Erin on 9/11 has been published on her personal website: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/A press release by Andrew Johnson regarding this paper has been published as well: New Study by former Professor Examines Hurricane Erin on 9/11/01Dr. Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering, has posted a new study which highlights the possible links between events on 9/11 and the occurrence in the Atlantic ocean of Hurricane Erin. continued...http://www.prlog.org/10073301-new-study-by-former-professor-examines-hurricane-erin-on-9-11-01.html
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +216/-216
Posts: 4,190
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2008, 11:42:28 PM » |
|
This is garbage.
"The preponderance of this evidence points to the use of one or more Directed Energy Weapons in the destruction of the WTC buildings."
- the article
DEWs? Like rail guns?
How did they ever hide the necessary hardware for such large bank of extremely high capacitence capaciters? How did they get over the rail heating issue? How did they find substances for the armature that DIDN'T spot weld themselves to the rails due to the extreme current (and resulting heat)?
I'm not a qualified engineer, but I know something about rail guns considering the Navy is investing MILLIONS into research to try and put one on the DD-X... even though they haven't been able to get one of sufficient fire power to work in the lab without destroying itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
Biker Dude
A TRUE Liberal!
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +157/-117
Posts: 2,142
Live to Ride, Ride to Live
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2008, 04:09:38 AM » |
|
This is garbage.
"The preponderance of this evidence points to the use of one or more Directed Energy Weapons in the destruction of the WTC buildings."
- the article
DEWs? Like rail guns?
More like particle weapons, laser beams, that type of stuff Abraxas. Which makes it even more absurd. And I've been all over this with this kook. Facts don't faze him. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Who will watch the watchers?Now that it is over, what are we going to talk about? |
|
|
|
Reaganite
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2008, 05:17:12 AM » |
|
hahahaha... hahahahha...
lol....
Thanks, I like to start my day off with a laugh!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You get what you pay for America... Welcome to the Obamanation.....
|
|
|
|
freethinker
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2008, 05:43:53 AM » |
|
hahahaha... hahahahha...
lol....
Thanks, I like to start my day off with a laugh!!
This is rather humorous...it goes to show how some people might believe anything when their government is less than forthcoming. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes we can ...and now we will...
|
|
|
|
neue regel
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2008, 05:57:10 AM » |
|
This is rather humorous...it goes to show how some people might believe anything when their government is less than forthcoming. Less than forthcoming? That's the excuse for concocting nutty conspiracy theories? We KNOW Bush has been less than forthcoming, though. Has he ever once blamed Clinton for sitting around for 8 years doing nothing? Even once? Why didn't Bush send his AG after Sandy Burgler? What did that administration have to hide? Why is Bush protecting them? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Reaganite
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2008, 06:53:14 AM » |
|
you have to forgive free... he wil believe ANYTHING when it comes to 9/11... Even Deathrays...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You get what you pay for America... Welcome to the Obamanation.....
|
|
|
Toaster
Hero Member
Karma: +53/-129
Posts: 741
Burnin' for you
|
|
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2008, 11:10:37 AM » |
|
It is obvious to anyone who looks that Bush is an evil robot - his use of weather control and death rays ought not to surprise any thinking person.
And by thinking person, I mean utter and complete nutjob.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DISCUSSION, n.
A method of confirming others in their errors.
The Devil\\'s Dictionary
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +216/-216
Posts: 4,190
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
|
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2008, 11:19:19 AM » |
|
you have to forgive free... he wil believe ANYTHING when it comes to 9/11... Even Deathrays...
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
freethinker
|
|
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2008, 03:04:01 PM » |
|
you have to forgive free... he wil believe ANYTHING when it comes to 9/11... Even Deathrays...
Bonzo Bonzo Bonzo, There you go again... I was AGREEING with you that anyone buying that claptrap about weather altering death rays is indeed laughable. I went on to note that the reason why people may believe insane crap like this maybe because after being lied to (the truth not forthcoming) about so many things (WMDs ,noo-que-lure threats, war not for oil etc.etc.) they may believe that EVERYTHING is a lie and they may latch onto any crazy idea that comes along. None of you have ever heard me condone,expouse or give credit to ANY conspiracy theory about 911 ...other than of course that Osama and the other Saudis planned the hijacking and suicide mission against the US. You are amazing in your quickness to accuse. And neue flying into a rant about Bush protecting Clinton and Sandy Berger??? WTF?? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes we can ...and now we will...
|
|
|
|
neue regel
|
|
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2008, 03:08:09 PM » |
|
And neue flying into a rant about Bush protecting Clinton and Sandy Berger??? WTF?? I was agreeing with you. The truth HAS NOT come out regarding 9/11. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
freethinker
|
|
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2008, 03:36:30 PM » |
|
Whats you learned theory new rule??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes we can ...and now we will...
|
|
|
|
neue regel
|
|
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2008, 04:12:55 PM » |
|
Whats you learned theory new rule?? ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
freethinker
|
|
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2008, 07:01:08 PM » |
|
Whats you learned theory new rule?? ? Surely if you are convinced that the truth about 911 has not come out you have some educated guess as to what is being witheld. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes we can ...and now we will...
|
|
|
|
neue regel
|
|
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2008, 04:21:27 AM » |
|
Surely if you are convinced that the truth about 911 has not come out you have some educated guess as to what is being witheld. I think involvement from certain countries could have been withheld as to not destroy necessary relations with those countries. Bush wasn't interested in getting into the Berger thing and allowed Clinton save face. Not sure why that is. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
