Are you just stupid? Or do you lie to cover up your stupidity? For God's sake man, do you even bother to read what you cite?? After this post, I'm done with you're lying posts.
Let's look at your unending garbage:
You spineless little liar. Now lets sum up your lies in this thread so far:
1. You lied when you said you have never denied that some of the responsible of the crimes of the cultural revolution have been tried and punished.
2. You continue to lie when you now suddenly again claim that noone has been tried and punished. Even an idiot like you should understand the following simple sentences
(snippet ouf of wikipedia this time):
The Gang of Four was an extreme left-wing political group of Communist Party of China leaders in the People's Republic of China, led by Madame Mao Jiang Qing, who were arrested and removed from their positions in 1976, following the death of Mao Zedong, and were primarily blamed for the events of the Cultural Revolution.
You stupid bastard. Did you read the article? The weren't arrested and tried for causing the deaths of tens of millions of people -- they were arrested and tried as political payback for being on the losing side of political contest for power within the ruling dictatorship. Since I've already embarrassed you by citing your sources, you'll be used to being bitchslapped yet again when I cite the exact same source that contradicts what you claim it purports to say:
It is now officially claimed by the Chinese communist party that Mao in his last year turned against Jiang Qing and her associates, and that after his death on 9 September 1976, they attempted to seize power (the same allegation made against Lin Biao in 1971). Even decades later, it is impossible to know the full truth of these events.
It does appear that their influence was in decline before Mao's death: when Zhou Enlai died in January 1976, he was succeeded not by one of the radicals but by the unknown Hua Guofeng. In April 1976, Hua was officially appointed Premier of the State Council. Upon Mao's death Hua was named Communist Party chairman as well.
The "Gang" had arranged for Deng Xiaoping's purge in April 1976 (however, he would return and by 1978 become the real power of the Party). They hoped that the key military leaders Wang Dongxing and Chen Xilian would support them, but it seems that Hua won the Army over to his side. On 6 October 1976, Hua had the four leading radicals and a number of their lesser associates arrested. A massive media campaign was then launched against them, dubbing them the Gang of Four and blaming them for all the excesses of the Cultural Revolution.
You stupid dolt. It was a political purge. Nothing more. Your own sources confirm that. You are a liar. Again.
3. You lied when you said that I have labelled the current chinese government as criminals. Such statements are for morons like you and Jim McCafferty, don't try and ascribe those to me, idiot.
Because slaughtering thousands of people in the street in Tiananmen Square is such a noble thing to do.
4. You continue to lie when you say that the geneva convention does not prohibit the use of nuclear weapons against civilians. A nuclear weapon is incapable of distinguishing between civilians and military targets, and is therefore by definition illegal to use according to international law.
NO, you dim-witted knuckle-dragging troglodyte. You claimed it was in contravention to the Geneva Conventions.
A claim you still have not proven.
Since you are obvious quite dim, I will explain this to you. You claimed X. I dispute your claim. It is not my obligation to prove it up. You have the obligation to cite the text within the Geneva Convention that bans the use of military weapons. Cite the exact chapter and section.
But you can't. That's why you dodge. It's why you continue to sidestep. It's why you fail.
Because the Geneva Conventions do not prohibit the use of the atomic bombs, as in Japan.
You fail. And you only compound you're many, explicit failures by lying over the top of them. You're a poor logiciain; and a worse advocate.
The use of nuclear weapons has been ruled to be against the following International laws and conventions:
* Declaration of St. Petersburg, 1868, because unnecessary suffering would be caused and there would be no avoidance or minimising of incidental loss of civilian life; Hague Convention, 1907, because unnecessary suffering would be caused and there would be no guarantee of the inviolability of neutral nations;
You're so stupid, this is too easy. Have you ever read the Declaration of St. Petersburg? Here's what it says:
The Contracting Parties engage mutually to renounce, in case of war among themselves, the employment by their military or naval troops of any projectile of a weight below 400 grammes, which is either explosive or charged with fulminating or inflammable substances.
They will invite all the States which have not taken part in the deliberations of the International Military Commission assembled at St. Petersburg by sending Delegates thereto, to accede to the present engagement.
This engagement is compulsory only upon the Contracting or Acceding Parties thereto in case of war between two or more of themselves; it is not applicable to non-Contracting Parties, or Parties who shall not have acceded to it.
It will also cease to be compulsory from the moment when, in a war between Contracting or Acceding Parties, a non-Contracting Party or a non-Acceding Party shall join one of the belligerents.
The Contracting or Acceding Parties reserve to themselves to come hereafter to an understanding whenever a precise proposition shall be drawn up in view of future improvements which science may effect in the armament of troops, in order to maintain the principles which they have established, and to conciliate the necessities of war with the laws of humanity.
Done at St. Petersburg, 29 November (11 December) 1868.
So moron, as you can see, it DOES NOT apply to the use of atomic weapons. Moreover, the US never signed it. God, you're stupid. Even if it did apply, we never agreed to it.
The Hague Conventions address naval mines, etc. Even the Geneva Protocol added to the Hague Convention only applied to biological and chemical weapons. Atomic weapons were not addressed.
Do you read? You must have the comprehension level of a small child? Are you older than, say, 10 years old? Do you not understand words? Seriously, I doubt you've ever graduated high school. I'm actually coming around to feeling pity for you, more than anything.
* Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, because long-lasting radioactive contamination would interfere with innocent people's right to life and health;
* Geneva Conventions, 1949, because protection of the wounded, sick, the infirm, expectant mothers, civilian hospitals and health workers would not be ensured;
* The Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions, 1977, because there would be massive incidental losses of civilian lives and widespread, long-term and severe damage to the environment.
The Geneva Convention Protocol 1977 prohibits attacks on civilians and methods of warfare which are intended, or may be anticipated, to cause widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment. (Article 35)
Thus the use of nuclear weapons agains civilians is clearly against the Geneva conventions of 1949 as well as 1977.
Hey MORON: NEWSFLASH: 1945 IS BEFORE 1948, 1949 AND 1977.
5. You lied when you say the geneva convention exclusively deals with the treatment of prisoners of war.
6. You lie when you say the use of terror bombing strategies against civilians does not constitue a war crime.
Nope. Until you cite the section of the Geneva Conventions that say otherwise, you sir, are the liar.
Still waiting for the evidence....if it was so evident, why can't you post it... Hmmm...
It's obvious why you won't. It's because you can't. Liar.
