Charlie, no rocket science needed to understand your history lesson gleaned like most of your posts by using that simple internet tool google as I have no doubt you did to choose your obscure "hero."  Your only and obvious purpose in a search for someone you could related to your other favorite crusader against the Muslim world the drunken liar and coward: Bush.

I await any proof other than BushInc and Israeli war mongering rhetoric to prove the intentions of Iraq in acquiring nuclear technology is any different than that of what Bush is now
providing to the Saudis or that Egypt is also seeking. It remains nothing, but rhetoric by a belligerant U.S. and an even more belligerent Zionist government in Israel. 

Though if Iran is seeking to create a nuclear arsenal, they are not doing so in the manner Saddam once did.  The Iranian facilities, in a variety of different locations, hardly resemble the earlier Saddam ones attacked by Israel in an illegal action that was condemned. 

This review of history might provide a bit of reality. Or for those committed Zionist and the typically ignorant Charlie, it may be a waste of even providing an article that requires the task of reading.  While some continue to assume some would condemn, but then quietly applaud an attack on Iran, they discount many changes in the balance of power internationally both militarily and economically, over the past 28 years.  The U.S. has stripped itself militarily and economically  with the preemptive invasion and occupation of Iraq. In addition, also economically where China has become both a military and economic power to be reckoned with. The USSR is gone, but Russia remains as China does as nuclear armed nations and neither have any great interest in support for Israel.  Israel though beloved by the U.S. is considered by many others as nothing, but a pariah in the ME.  Little more than a pimple on the rear of the planet that might dangerously erupt and cause a massive infection that could as the result create a planet wide nuclear confrontation rational people and nations would prefer to avoid.

http://www.americanheritage.com/places/articles/web/20060607-israel-iraq-nuclear-weapons-baghdad-saddam-hussein-alexander-haig-menachem-begin-osirak-preemptive-strike.shtml

You know what one of your problems is Chucky?
... You don't realise how powerful Israel is militarily, or its capabilities to take care of itself. Your own ignorance substantiates your lack of knowledgable  research. 

Cass, Israel will not stage a pre-emptive strike on Iran unless they feel an attack is imminent...

Ever heard of Osirak, Iraq? Mathis?

The Israelis as well, just struck in Syria.

If it wasn't for reality, Mathis, you'd actually make some sense. Seeing as reality is well........reality....you don't have the foggiest notion what you're talking about. Isreal has on many occasions against weapons facilities and human targets struck visciously and accurately and effectively at targets not an "imminent threat." It's in fact their entire doctrine. May I respectfully submit you do your homework afore slappin absolute crap up here on the glass hoping some of it sticks.

For the love of God!

Yeah Mathis......why not give us this again...this staggeringly clueless f'n statement


And then go look at EXACTLY what they did in Osirak, Iraq in 1983. And then look at the strike JUST carried out in Syria...by these same Israelis...without said "imminent" being.....imminent at all. They've a history of such first strikes without an attack being imminent! You should consider some consulting work for the Iranians, you'd convince the Mullahs Israel would never attack, huh?

You're peeing into the wind with that one, Mathis. You seem to want to join the competition for most clueless statement ever uttered. Consider yourself in the running.

Cept for my f'n history book sitting on my night stand that I actually f'n pick up and read so as I know what the f I'm talking about. Mathis.

Claiming Israel won't attack you unless an attack on Israel is imminent is both historically inaccurate and clueless. They've a long history of such pre-imminent attacks, they just f'n completed one THIS YEAR. However, you Lot down under seem to be unaware. What a great staff member you'd be for the Mullahs, Terry, you could advise and consult for Tehran. Convince them they've nothing to worry about, convince them the US nor Israel will attack. Yeah...I can see Mahmoud's face now....Americans crawling all over the place...Israelis bombing Syria and about to hop into Gaza....yeah....Mathis...yer fired. And would probably face the firing squad.

What in the world? You got great info sources down there, Gentlemen...I'm astounded and impressed. You got liberals running yer major news agencies as well, huh? That's how we roll here too, no worries.

Charles will keep you informed...let you know the next time Israel pre-imminenet attacks and sends another torpedo into your ridiculous argument.

No worries Cass. I have gradually arrived at that conclusion long ago. A bit of a mouthpiece to promote Bush really. Man I can't wait to see republican's arse kicked out in November's election.


Exactly! But don't tell that to Cognac Martel. He would probably think that the movie 300 is a correct depiction of history in the region.
Now let's see, those god damn eyeranians invented the UN charter, allowed the jews a passage to avoid the persecution (read the bible), invented the concept of post office, have one of the best mathematicians and scholars in the world, even has given the world's top scientists, businessmen and many other professions in the west including US and Iran. ffs even some of Israel's most prominent politicians are of iranian origin (actually that's not a good example but nevertheless...) It's all their fault.



Cass, some posts are not even worth a response I tend to give the poster the impression they have won the argument. Reality is different.


To be fair you have to give everyone the benefit of the doubt including Charles Chaplin.

Interpret it any way you'd like Mathis, proof is in the pudding. You haven't repeated the statement and haven't opposed the examples I gave you where Israel did attack where an attack against them wasn't imminent. Now, you don't like being torched like the marshmellow that fell into the campfire...don't say stupid sh1t. And I'll leave you be. Keep harping on in the exact 180 of reality....and I'll open my history book and make you look naive....again.

And I was thinking of visiting Australia, hopefully the hot women are this clueless cause......nevermind...I'm married:)