IAP Political Forum
December 02, 2008, 04:43:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the new "IAP 2.0" -- please re-register before continuing to post.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Poll
Question: Should Israel re-invade Gaza strip so Fatah can gain control over there?
Yes, Fatah are pussies and only Israel can bring them to power - 0 (0%)
No, Israel would stuck there like they did in Lebanon which will make situation even worse - 2 (33.3%)
Yes, brave Palestinian fighters will kill any occupant like great Hezballah did during latest Lebanese-Israeli conflict - 0 (0%)
No, Iran will use major conflict to trigger Hezballah and Syria to simulatneously attack Israel like they wanted to during latest Lebanese-Israeli conflict - 0 (0%)
No, it will cause death on both sides and no progress will be made utill both put weapons aside and talk under pressure of international community - 3 (50%)
No, Jews got hidden plan to overtake Gaza strip to build there settlements and the last they care is about Fatah - 0 (0%)
Yes, even if Israel won't stop rocketing of South Israel and Fatah won't gain full power in Gaza strip Hamas and Jihad will be deadly bitten and this is worth to try - 1 (16.7%)
Total Voters: 6

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 9   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Should Israel re-invade Gaza strip so Fatah can gai ncontrol over there?  (Read 4590 times)
realityman
Full Member
***

Karma: +26/-10
Posts: 204


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: June 19, 2008, 12:13:01 PM »


Well, obviously they just couldn't be bothered with storing them.

lol   Grin  Good point... Monthly rentals at "Public Storage" may be over what Hamas budgetted  Wink
Logged
realityman
Full Member
***

Karma: +26/-10
Posts: 204


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: June 24, 2008, 06:50:11 AM »

So are you going out on a limb and say THIS TIME THE CEASEFIRE WILL LAST "IamMe"??
Yes.

WELL... Who would have guessed  Wink (??), but the ceasefire doesn't appear to be going so well....

Quote
Rockets hit Israel, which says truce broken
By AMY TEIBEL, Associated Press Writer
June 24, 2008

 JERUSALEM - Palestinian militants on Tuesday fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel, the first such attack since a cease-fire between Israel and Gaza militants took effect last week.....
 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/israel_palestinians;_ylt=AgpqqNLBm88CNYNNCnYpd6MUvioA

Quote
Gaza truce shaken as four Qassams slam into west Negev 
 By Avi Issacharoff , Haaretz Correspondent and The Associated Press   

Four Qassam rockets fired from Gaza struck Sderot and the surrounding area Tuesday afternoon, further imperiling a brittle truce declared six days ago.
 
.....Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the Qassam salvo. Gaza's Hamas rulers issued a statement saying that they were still committed to the cease-fire with Israel, despite the small militant group's obvious violation of its terms.

Late on Monday night, Palestinians fired a mortar shell at the Negev, in the first such strike since a cease-fire went into effect in the Gaza Strip last week.

Meanwhile, Israel Defense Forces troops operating in the West Bank city of Nablus killed two Palestinian militants early Tuesday morning. .....

...According to the IDF, Abu Rali was planning an attack on Israel. Troops discovered ammunition, explosives and rifles in his apartment.

In a statement released from the West Bank following the raid, Islamic Jihad said that "the reprisal for this noble blood will be in the depths of the Zionist entity, God willing."

An Egyptian-brokered cease-fire agreement was struck between Israel and Hamas last week, but the deal extends to the Gaza Strip only, leaving the IDF free to operate in the West Bank.

...Also on Tuesday, Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, a London-based Arabic-language daily, quoted Prime Minister Ehud Olmert as saying that if the smuggling of weapons into Gaza does not cease, Israel will consider the cease-fire agreement violated, and will be forced to respond militarily. Hamas has said it will not stop smuggling weapons.  
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/995738.html

As I previously said, only a few days ago... This "ceasefire" is an example of where history leads me to be skeptical... VERY skeptical... This is certainly not the first "ceasefire"... Hamas likes ceasefires because it generally allows their militant operatives to freely wonder the streets without fear of being arrested or targetting by Israel...Each time before, Hamas used the "quiet" to "quietly" re-arm, reorganize, and strengthen it's resolve to terrorize Israel...  Hamas has agreed to ceasefires in the past, but has yet to hint at ever being willing to recognize Israel's right to exist, or ever agreeing to permanent peace with Israel... "Ceasefires" by nature are temporary.   COULD this time, finally, be different?  SURE... But I also believe it would be very premature to believe so or to be more than simply "hopeful".


« Last Edit: June 24, 2008, 09:40:03 AM by realityman » Logged
realityman
Full Member
***

Karma: +26/-10
Posts: 204


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: June 26, 2008, 05:48:00 AM »

So are you going out on a limb and say THIS TIME THE CEASEFIRE WILL LAST "IamMe"??
Yes.

OOOOPS

Hamas violates ceasefire again... Who would have guessed  Wink that the violence wouldn't stop, but instead of being "claimed" by Hamas, it would be claimed by the "other" terrorist groups instead (as with other previous ceasefires)... And who would have guessed that they'd attempt to blame their (Palestinian) violations on Israel and attempt to change the terms of the ceasefire AFTER terms were already agreed to....

Hamas stating they will "enforce the truce", but not confront militants from other groups who violate the deal.... GEE, what a surprise.  Wink

Quote
Rocket hits Israel, second violation of Gaza truce
By AMY TEIBEL, Associated Press Writer
June 26, 2008
 
JERUSALEM - Gaza militants fired a rocket into southern Israel on Thursday, causing no injuries but undermining a shaky, week-old truce meant to halt a violent cycle of attacks and harsh Israeli reprisals.
 
It was the second breach of the Egyptian-mediated truce by Palestinian militants. The Israeli military office said the rocket landed in an open field on a communal farm.

The Israeli government had no immediate response to the latest rocket fire, but security officials said Defense Minister Ehud Barak convened a meeting of security officials to decide how to respond....

....Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for the past year, has said it will enforce the truce, but not confront militants from other groups who violate the deal.

The Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, a violent group linked to the rival Fatah movement, claimed responsibility for Thursday's attack. In a text message sent to reporters, it said "the truce must include the West Bank and all sorts of aggression must stop."....

.....The Gaza cease-fire is meant to avert an Israeli invasion of the territory, which Israel evacuated in 2005 after a 38-year military occupation.

Attacks on southern Israel from Gaza increased after the Israeli withdrawal and stepped up further after Hamas violently overran Gaza.

Since the Hamas takeover, more than 400 Palestinians, including dozens of civilians, and seven Israelis have been killed in tit-for-tat fighting....

http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Jun26/0,4670,IsraelPalestinians,00.html
« Last Edit: June 26, 2008, 08:07:44 AM by realityman » Logged
IamMe
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +39/-126
Posts: 1,271



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: June 26, 2008, 12:23:42 PM »

There's no need to be triumphalist.
Logged

\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell

If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
realityman
Full Member
***

Karma: +26/-10
Posts: 204


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: June 26, 2008, 01:00:37 PM »

There's no need to be triumphalist.

Not intended (well, maybe a little bit...lol) , my apologies Smiley ... And technically the ceasefire is still in effect (supposedly)....

I'm actually trying to humorously EXPOSE the pattern of Hamas... And more importantly trying to document the actions/reactions, the placing of blame, and the "telling" quotes from leadership along the way.   This way, IF this ceasefire ultimately fails, we can backtrack and see the progression of what actually happened leading up to the failure, as opposed to how it would or will be portrayed OR "blamed" by the "various agendas"....

As I previously said: This "ceasefire" is an example of where history leads me to be skeptical... VERY skeptical... This is certainly not the first "ceasefire"... Hamas likes ceasefires because it generally allows their militant operatives to freely wonder the streets without fear of being arrested or targetting by Israel...Each time before, Hamas used the "quiet" to "quietly" re-arm, reorganize, and strengthen it's resolve to terrorize Israel...  Hamas has agreed to ceasefires in the past, but has yet to hint at ever being willing to recognize Israel's right to exist, or ever agreeing to permanent peace with Israel... "Ceasefires" by nature are temporary.  COULD this time, finally, be different?  SURE... But I also believe it would be very premature to believe so or to be more than simply "hopeful".

PERHAPS, down the road we'll be able to look back at the chain of events (up to now, and to come) and recognize patterns of behaviors and statements... This way when/if Hamas wants or calls for ceasefires in the future and attempts label or blame Israel for being skeptical or not giving them everything they want or trusting their words, motives will be more clear.


Logged
realityman
Full Member
***

Karma: +26/-10
Posts: 204


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: July 03, 2008, 08:15:24 AM »

In the interests of further documenting the "cease fire" for future review.

Quote
Qassam hits Negev, sixth since start of Gaza truce 
 By Reuters
July 3, 2008
 
Militants in the Gaza Strip fired a Qassam rocket the western Negev on Thursday, putting further strain on a fragile ceasefire deal in the Hamas-controlled territory.

An Israel Defense Forces spokesman said the rocket hit an open field near the Gaza border town of Sderot and caused no casualties.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the rocket fire, the sixth such attack since an Egyptian-brokered truce took effect on June 19.
 
Israel will close its border crossings with Gaza on Friday in response to the attack, an Israeli official said

"Because of the rockets being fired today, the crossings will be closed tomorrow," said Peter Lerner, a defense official...

....The crossings were closed on Tuesday following a similar rocket attack. They reopened on Wednesday...
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/998735.html

It's a safe bet to assume Hamas won't be proudly claiming responsibility... 2 of the other major terrorist groups have already taken their turns at claiming responsibility (as normally happens during cease fires)...

A Palestinian on a Bulldozer Rampage yesterday reportedly killed 3 and injured 40+ others in Jerusalem.  But so far this appear to have been an individual acting on his own, though I've seen reports indicated terrorist groups (Hezbollah being one, a group calling themselves the Imad Mughnieh unit of the Brigades of the Liberators of the Galilee" being another") having attempted to proudly claim responsibility... While Abbas of course condemned the action, Hamas leadership excused it calling it"the natural result of continuing Israeli agression against our people in the West Bank and occupied Jerusalem"....
Logged
mdma
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +9/-33
Posts: 431



View Profile
« Reply #51 on: July 03, 2008, 08:43:25 AM »

realityman, which exact brings us back to the topic of re-occupation of Gaza just this time with more legitimation.
Moreover Israel shown that Hamas cannot control others as well as other fractions cannot control Hamas.

Important lesson from that is that neither of Palestinians/Arabs want peace but to screw each other by killing more Jews.


Now where 'i have Jewish husband' is ? In Iran having a tea party with kactus?
Logged

notin
realityman
Full Member
***

Karma: +26/-10
Posts: 204


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: July 03, 2008, 02:33:46 PM »

realityman, which exact brings us back to the topic of re-occupation of Gaza just this time with more legitimation.
Moreover Israel shown that Hamas cannot control others as well as other fractions cannot control Hamas.

Important lesson from that is that neither of Palestinians/Arabs want peace but to screw each other by killing more Jews....

You're correct... And a re-occupation of Gaza may ultimately be the only option to stop Hamas and their Kassams.... Certainly Fatah/Abbas isn't going to do it, and has already demonstrated their lack of authority over Hamas by losing control of Gaza to them... And should this current cease fire go the way of so many others before, Israel is certainly not going to sit around while Kassams continue to rain down on them... Certainly a re-occupation of Gaza isn't a desired option, but it may become necessary.. Meanwhile we can hold out hope that this cease fire amounts to something more, however unlikely that might be.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2008, 02:35:48 PM by realityman » Logged
IamMe
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +39/-126
Posts: 1,271



View Profile
« Reply #53 on: July 03, 2008, 02:49:04 PM »

realityman, which exact brings us back to the topic of re-occupation of Gaza just this time with more legitimation.
Moreover Israel shown that Hamas cannot control others as well as other fractions cannot control Hamas.

Important lesson from that is that neither of Palestinians/Arabs want peace but to screw each other by killing more Jews....

You're correct... And a re-occupation of Gaza may ultimately be the only option to stop Hamas and their Kassams.... Certainly Fatah/Abbas isn't going to do it, and has already demonstrated their lack of authority over Hamas by losing control of Gaza to them... And should this current cease fire go the way of so many others before, Israel is certainly not going to sit around while Kassams continue to rain down on them... Certainly a re-occupation of Gaza isn't a desired option, but it may become necessary.. Meanwhile we can hold out hope that this cease fire amounts to something more, however unlikely that might be.

An occupation would be OK in the short term if Israel could do it without murdering a bunch of innocent people. But they have never done that and have no intention of doing so. Israel punishes the Palestinians for voting for Hamas, and everyone knows it.
Logged

\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell

If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
Cass
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +23/-62
Posts: 656



View Profile
« Reply #54 on: July 03, 2008, 05:06:24 PM »

realityman, which exact brings us back to the topic of re-occupation of Gaza just this time with more legitimation.
Moreover Israel shown that Hamas cannot control others as well as other fractions cannot control Hamas.

Important lesson from that is that neither of Palestinians/Arabs want peace but to screw each other by killing more Jews....

You're correct... And a re-occupation of Gaza may ultimately be the only option to stop Hamas and their Kassams.... Certainly Fatah/Abbas isn't going to do it, and has already demonstrated their lack of authority over Hamas by losing control of Gaza to them... And should this current cease fire go the way of so many others before, Israel is certainly not going to sit around while Kassams continue to rain down on them... Certainly a re-occupation of Gaza isn't a desired option, but it may become necessary.. Meanwhile we can hold out hope that this cease fire amounts to something more, however unlikely that might be.

An occupation would be OK in the short term if Israel could do it without murdering a bunch of innocent people. But they have never done that and have no intention of doing so. Israel punishes the Palestinians for voting for Hamas, and everyone knows it.


IamMe, I tend to wonder if much of this would come to a more realistic end if there was any hope of ending the outside influences of both
other Arab nations, but most especially that of the U.S. ?  While this question continues to remain with only a short period with no missiles
fired by Hamas, my personal frustration as a U.S. citizen remains the interference of my nation which has hardly been a positive one.  It is not just Israel who punishes the Palestinians, but the U.S. since they provided financial support for Abbas and Fatah and the didn't manage to achieve the desired result in the election.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2008, 05:08:05 PM by Cass » Logged

\\"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dream shall never die.\\"  Edward Kennedy, U.S.
Senator

The old lion of the Senate, though a lion in winter, has lived to do more for this nation than John or Bobby though
who knows what life would be like now had they lived.
realityman
Full Member
***

Karma: +26/-10
Posts: 204


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: July 03, 2008, 05:31:54 PM »

.... It is not just Israel who punishes the Palestinians, but the U.S. since they provided financial support for Abbas and Fatah and the didn't manage to achieve the desired result in the election.

The election speaks loudly toward what the Palestinian people think..., And this explains why they never seem to miss and opportunity to miss an opportunity for peace.  In the US, if you elect the Ku Klux Klan, YOU GET the Ku Klux Klan.... Maybe this logic doesn't apply in Palestine (??)

The Covenant of Hamas... The founding documentation detailing the agenda, goals, and modus operandi of this group the people of Palestine elected:

Quote
"Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it"

The Islamic Resistance Movement is a distinguished Palestinian movement, whose allegiance is to Allah, and whose way of life is Islam. It strives to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine...

Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/hamas.htm

And some more recent public statements:

Quote
"Hamas will not change a single word in its covenant" – Mahmoud Zahar, January 25, 2006

Quote
"We will not betray promises we made to God to continue the path of Jihad and resistance until the liberation of Palestine, all of Palestine. . . So be assured doctor Ayman, and all those who love Palestine like yourself, that Hamas is still the group you knew when it was founded and it will never abandon its path."

(Hamas statement in response to criticism by Al-Qaeda's Ayman al-Zawahri, March 12, 2007)

Quote
"Even if the blockade continues a lot longer, we still won't recognize Israel,"
Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, June 2008
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1212659721687&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
« Last Edit: July 03, 2008, 06:13:30 PM by realityman » Logged
Cass
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +23/-62
Posts: 656



View Profile
« Reply #56 on: July 03, 2008, 08:11:12 PM »

And? realityman?  Should that change my opinion, clearly stated, regarding interference by my nation in both the election when Hamas was legitimately elected and the negative aspects related to it by the current Administration and those who at this point make the relevant decisions by the U.S.?   

From the article from the Jerusalem Post you chose to post, there is also this.

"Referring to the explosion in Gaza earlier Thursday in which four people were killed, and for which Israel denied responsibly, Haniyeh said, "The daily Zionist aggression proves that the Israelis cannot implement the large-scale operation that they are talking about."

Nevertheless, Haniyeh said he believed Gazans must exercise caution, since "under the constant threat of a large-scale operation, the Israeli army is carrying out attacks in which many civilians are killed."

Regarding Egyptian efforts to broker a truce in Gaza, Haniyeh said that a cease-fire was not a Hamas request but was proposed by the US and Israel. "The Palestinians are not begging for calm," he said. "The Israelis are concerned that things will end like they did with Hizbullah and they understand that Hamas is not an organization made up of a few cells, but one with many wings and with a deep hold on land and on the Palestinian public."

The Hamas prime minister went on to say that the movement would not disappear. "Those who will disappear are the Israeli leaders who want Hamas to disappear, like [former prime minister Ariel] Sharon and [Prime Minister Ehud] Olmert...whoever replaces him will also disappear but we will continue to exist."

My opinion doesn't change from thread to thread, regardless of your conflicting opinion.  From Terry Mathis thread: "Neither is guilt free and neither is totally complicit."

Olmert, in particular, has a lot on his personal plate in the process of threatening Iran, the possible agreements with Syria and it will be very difficult politically for him to hold
office trying to satisfy a variety of Israeli factions.  Will, as he has threatened, a massive incursion into Gaza be the case? I don't know, but I strongly suspect he no longer holds the power to respond to all the threats he continues to put forward in the process of continuing to try to CYA himself. 

I don't know if the statement made by  Haniyeh was correct or a bluff.  Unlike you, I admit I don't honestly know as I do not claim as you do with all your so-called "moral certainty" to know what the ultimate results will be.  Is it all just continued "sabre rattling" or reality? Guess at some point we'll discover one way or the other. But either way, once more innocents will die in the process. Nothing new in that is there? 
« Last Edit: July 03, 2008, 08:14:09 PM by Cass » Logged

\\"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dream shall never die.\\"  Edward Kennedy, U.S.
Senator

The old lion of the Senate, though a lion in winter, has lived to do more for this nation than John or Bobby though
who knows what life would be like now had they lived.
realityman
Full Member
***

Karma: +26/-10
Posts: 204


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: July 04, 2008, 05:47:11 AM »

And? realityman?  Should that change my opinion, ...

I don't expect you "Cass" to be able to look beyond what you want to see at this point... Clearly my words weren't intended to change YOUR opinion (nor that of "IamMe" or "Moshe" before you), but to expose to the forum (those who might not be aware of who/what Hamas is) to exactly who Hamas is and what they represent.... And the fact that the Palestinian people voted and elected this group into power...

As I stated: ....
Quote from: realityman
The election speaks loudly toward what the Palestinian people think..., And this explains why they never seem to miss and opportunity to miss an opportunity for peace.  In the US, if you elect the Ku Klux Klan, YOU GET the Ku Klux Klan....Maybe this logic doesn't apply in Palestine (??)

The Palestinian people elected them, seemingly expressing what agenda they (as a group/people) support... Should they now be surprised that the best they get are cease fires and temporary solutions which never seem to last??  The obvious answer, to those who take the time to educate themselves on who and what Hamas stand for, should be NO.

I then preceded to post excerpts from the "Covenant of Hamas", and quotes from Hamas leaders clearly indicating that the ideals of the Covenant (1988) are the same ideals "valued" by Hamas today...

The topic is "Should Israel re-invade the Gaza strip so Fatah can gain control over there"... Being that Fatah lost control of Gaza to Hamas and shows no signs of being able or willing to take that control back, people who choose to form "educated and rational opinions" on the issue should be aware of who Hamas is and what they stand for.

As I previously stated in response to "mdma":
Quote
You're correct... And a re-occupation of Gaza may ultimately be the only option to stop Hamas and their Kassams.... Certainly Fatah/Abbas isn't going to do it, and has already demonstrated their lack of authority over Hamas by losing control of Gaza to them... And should this current cease fire go the way of so many others before, Israel is certainly not going to sit around while Kassams continue to rain down on them... Certainly a re-occupation of Gaza isn't a desired option, but it may become necessary.. Meanwhile we can hold out hope that this cease fire amounts to something more, however unlikely that might be.

And WHY "Cass" do I believe it's unlikely??  The answer is because of WHO and WHAT Hamas is (which I shared with the forum above)...

DO YOU "Cass" believe it's "likely" that this cease fire holds??  IF SO, In light of who Hamas is, and what their goals are, I'd be interested in knowing WHY and/or WHAT evidence/logic leads you to this conclusion.

« Last Edit: July 04, 2008, 06:13:58 AM by realityman » Logged
mdma
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +9/-33
Posts: 431



View Profile
« Reply #58 on: July 04, 2008, 07:38:57 AM »

An occupation would be OK in the short term if Israel could do it without murdering a bunch of innocent people.

Occupy to send them flowers you say? I would happily attend with flowers to their funeral.

But they have never done that and have no intention of doing so. Israel punishes the Palestinians for voting for Hamas, and everyone knows it.

Israel pushes Palestinians in general otherwise there would not be a place called Israel by now.
Arabs are happily killing each other instead of having proper government that can communicate with Israeli government. Who am I to interrupt those innocent victims of blood thirsty Jews.
Logged

notin
Cass
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +23/-62
Posts: 656



View Profile
« Reply #59 on: July 04, 2008, 10:36:20 AM »

Happy Independence Day, realityman!  In the U.S. we celebrate the day the rather radical document, primarily provided to us by Thomas Jefferson, was adopted by the Continental Congress. In some ways, other than the fealty to Islam, not all that different to the Hamas Charter of 1988. And even in some ways resembles the new Constitution of the Islamic State of Iraq. Two groups of Semitic peoples, but with different religious beliefs just over sixty years ago based on an edict from the United Nations,
had that territory divided and the
Logged

\\"The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dream shall never die.\\"  Edward Kennedy, U.S.
Senator

The old lion of the Senate, though a lion in winter, has lived to do more for this nation than John or Bobby though
who knows what life would be like now had they lived.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 9   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.231 seconds with 29 queries.