We talk about al Qaeda in Iraq and you talk about No Fly zones --- nothing to do with it.
While you talk about milk. Sorry Ahk, the only reason I mention no fly zones was to dismiss your misunderstood and admittedly erred argument. This post now has moved on, I posted two more links to the struggle in Afghanistan. You're still beating this dead horse cause I corrected you. You didn't like it, we move on.
You claim al Qaeda is on the ropes
Your anger now includes being disingenuous. These words can never be attributed to me. On the ropes and big gains against are hardly comparable, your continued milk mentality is puzzling.
and you know this because Osama made a call to arms to Muslims towards Iraq.
He and Zawahiri, and many jihadist foreign interests all began to focus on Iraq. They saw a chance for an American defeat and withdrawl much like Vietnam. Our own Senators such as Kennedy and Reid started mirroring the same rhetorical cowardice. Tactics used in Iraq became so extreme and brutal it unleashed a backlash by Sunni tribal leaders. The call to arms by OBL and al-Qaeda's actual behavior and focus on Iraq is why I know this, Ahk. And, I actually f'n pay attention....Ahk!
From that you extrapolate that he has 'sent all his resources to Iraq'.
"All" his resources to Iraq...is NOT what I said, you are so easily dismissed. You put words in people's mouths, you're clearly so disingenuous here, it's not even about the topic anymore. I get the feeling you're desperately trying to find some fault in my argument as yours is in shambles.
Again, nothing to do with it and nothing there that remotely proves anything. It's a stretch to say it even implies anything.
Reality..is what I'm pointing right at. AQI began to send resources and effort to Iraq this cannot be denied. Both he and Zawahiri and Zarqawi, many of them realized a self-determining Iraq cannot become a reality, it's the anti-thesis of their jihad.
Do you ever drag your ass on the carpet as well?
Is there really any reason for this to continue? Honestly?
Yes, I do drag my ass on the carpet, pee outdoors, I have nasty fangs, the bite much worse than the bark and I do stick my head out the car window every once in awhile. I attack life and where turned away, I attack in a different direction. I'm always in a good mood, love my belly scratched and if I could get away with it....there are some women I'd like to shove my nose into and inhale. Why?
It's clear you have no idea what a debate is
Crushing your erred argument is not what a debate is about?
, what constitutes 'proof' or 'evidence' of something, and anyone who claims to be 'dominating' arguments here has never been anything but dominated themselves in 'real life'.
Know alot about whether someone has been "dominated" all their life, huh?
Please and once again.....is there any reason for this?
So you agree that when you were called stupid after calling others stupid and you complained and nothing happened --that's the point you decided moderation was 'subjective'. Glad we agree.
Actually..the dickless and vulgarity I found distasteful. And so I'll stand corrected here. I should not have used the word stupid, I'll withdraw that as being evidence of subjectivity. The vulgar language and continued rants and words like "dickless", I feel, are useless on these forums. One, you have no idea. Two, it's childish. And my question was...if blatant racism or discrimination offends and gets you banned....obviously blatantly vulgar words or statements and referring to someone as dickless is approved. I find that somewhat subjective, I merely mentioned it, you don't care.
Let's move on?
