Right now I  really can't tell if McCain made a right decision in choosing Palin mind you all I'm not against Palin.   Well, honest to goodness,right now I  really can't tell which i would side with, but i am leaning towards obama for some reason,why? Because the GOP base is not even warming up to mccain (of course, i could be wrong) and even though it's still early in the game, this just proves to show how we see our candidates to-date. i know i will get burned for this, but i think CcCain is a warmonger. i get the impression that he doesn't care to what happens to our troops in the middle east and the other parts of the world.  Furthermore, the Presidential campaign TV ads is getting a little nasty, if you happen to see the "McCain's New TV Ad on Obama's 'Celebrity' like Britney Spears and Paris Hilton and The Democratic TV Ad on McCain: Are We Better Off?" videos being  clash in  Well, sooner or later you knew it had to start! The media is begging for it and the people want to see some fight in their candidates. So here ya go...and I am sure this is only the beginning. So, if I'm going to ask this question, which one is more believable in http://clashorama.com/index.php?id=191 ?

She actually, posed for Vogue magazine cover , last December of 2007.

Vogue is so down to Earth. Really speaks to the common people not that elitist Hollywood crowd.

Reaganite got it 50% right. McCain doesn't hate the troops.

On the other hand, Machievelli nailed it.

Here's an insight into the keen strategic thinking of Sarah Palin, possibly a heartbeat away from being Commander in Chief of the most powerful nation on Earth. This is from two weeks ago:


It's as though she was channeling Dan Quayle.

Oh, Patton! What were you saying about how important experience is???

Fun fact: McCain is 23 years older than the state of Alaska.

Experience is important and when the #2 has more executive experience than the #1, someone's camp should be nervous.

Not that the "liberal media" is going to point this out, but  Sarah Palin could not get through her first speech as a VP nominee without telling a lie:

Anchorage Daily News, 10/5/06: Palin Said She Supported The So-Called "Bridge To Nowhere," But Was Concerned Money "Flow" Was "Going to Slow":

As for the infamous 'bridges to nowhere,' MacDonald asked if the candidates would forge ahead with the proposed Knik Arm crossing between Anchorage and Point MacKenzie and Ketchikan's Gravina Island bridge. Each has received more than $90 million in federal funding and drew nationwide attacks as being unnecessary and expensive. He also asked if they support building an access road from Juneau toward -- but not completely connecting to -- Skagway and Haines. 'I do support the infrastructure projects that are on tap here in the state of Alaska that our congressional delegations worked hard for,' Palin said. She said the projects link communities and create jobs. Still, Palin warned that the flow of federal money into the state for such projects is going to slow...



MSNBC, 8/29/08 Palin: "I Told Congress 'Thanks But No Thanks' On That Bridge To Nowhere":

During her speech in Dayton, Ohio, after being introduced as McCain's running mate, Palin said, "I told Congress 'thanks but no thanks' on that bridge to nowhere. If our state wanted a bridge, I said, 'we'd build it ourselves.'

http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/


Sarah, Sarah, Sarah. You certainly do fit the Republican mold...

But experience can't be important, can it? Otherwise, Palin is an absurd choice to be a heartbeat behind the oldest nominee in history. Are you saying that McCain made an absurd choice? What are you suggesting about McCain's judgment? What does this say about McCain's claim that he 'puts the country first' before politics?

Meanwhile, how does Palin stand on the issues? We already know that she doesn't believe in modern science.

Taxes:
Palin exploded her state's coffers by imposing a windfall profits tax on the oil companies exactly like the proposal Barack Obama has made and John McCain has attacked.

The War in Iraq:
In an interview with Alaska Business Monthly shortly after she took office in 2007, Palin was asked about the upcoming surge. She said she hadn't thought about it. "I've been so focused on state government, I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq," she said. (salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/08/29/palin_iraq/index.html)
Hey Patton! Did you get that one? What about that experience argument now?

Social issues:
Abortion (should be banned for anything other than saving the life of the mother), stem cell research (opposed), physician-assisted suicide (opposed), creationism (should be discussed in schools), state health benefits for same-sex partners (opposed, and supports a constitutional amendment to bar them).

Environment:
Under her leadership, Alaska has sued the federal governent for considering listing the Polar Bear as a threatened species even though global warming threatens its very existence.

Fiscal responsibility:
Politico's Glenn Thrush on spending: Palin, who portrays herself as a fiscal conservative, racked up nearly $20 million in long-term debt as mayor of the tiny town of Wasilla — that amounts to $3,000 per resident. She argues that the debt was needed to fund improvements.

Sounds like she fits right in.

Sir, you can post from whatever source you care to, but the cold hard fact is, she has MORE experience than Obama.

Period.

There is no need to go any further because it's not debatable. Now, if you want to the break down #2 as being 'unqualified', then how can you, with a straight face, say Obama is?