IAP Political Forum
August 29, 2008, 11:25:13 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the new "IAP 2.0" -- please re-register before continuing to post.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Prison Overcrowding or Michael Moore  (Read 5877 times)
bringbackwigs
Professional Post-Whore
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +137/-183
Posts: 2,960


Please refrain from taking my posts seriously


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2007, 07:27:30 PM »

Handouts? Give me a break.

I don't like the government getting involved in things as much as the next guy, but when we're talking about the physical well being of the country, it's a different thing. The cures and vaccines and treatments and so forth were invented for the good of everybody, not the highest bidder. These things, which keep our society alive and thriving, shouldn't have a price tag on it.
Logged

In religion and politics, people\\'s beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination. - Mark Twain

Totino
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +104/-129
Posts: 1,269



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2007, 09:47:48 PM »

Rofl. The highest bidder? Cures have NOTHING to do with who gets healthcare. Want the government to fund those types of deals? I'm ALL FOR IT...

This is about universal healthcare. Want healthcare? Be smart. Go to school. Get a job that provides healthcare. Get a job that offers healthcare. I'm a 19 year old kid who has a job that offers healthcare with a HS degree. Gimmie a break wigs.

Universal healthcare. Welfare. It's all handouts. They don't solve anything. You have generations of people who have been living off welfare. It's ridiculous.

And further more you need your head checked if you want the GOVERNMENT taking care of your healthcare.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2007, 09:55:17 PM by Totino » Logged

All creations, including god, originate in the mind
bringbackwigs
Professional Post-Whore
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +137/-183
Posts: 2,960


Please refrain from taking my posts seriously


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2007, 10:51:38 PM »

Quote
Want healthcare? Be smart.

Wow. I mean, WOW.
Logged

In religion and politics, people\\'s beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination. - Mark Twain

Ahkenaten
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +104/-132
Posts: 1,300


Professor of Angular Mil and Applied Narcotics


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: September 28, 2007, 11:56:03 PM »

1. Compromise. Make it four strikes. Or is the issue married to the whole baseball motif? I have no idea.


2. One of the major challenges to universal health care in North America is population dispersal. If everyone has a right to the same level of access to the same level of health care then this has to be available everywhere, whether you have 100 people per square km or 10. Denser population centers always have access to the better care. This is a hurdle for North America. Even so I think it's doable.


Canada's health care system is ok, but it is on of the worst performers in the spectrum. I contend one of the major obstacles is population dispersal. To wit:

Population density persons per KM European examples:
Spain.............80.87
Belgium...........342.79
Germany...........236.02
United Kingdom..250.88
Switzerland.......189.19
France.............106.

With numbers like those most people could count on being pretty close to a major urban center. This means if they need to be transported, for example, by road or air, it will be less expensive. If they need specialized treatment, it is closer. Also supplying, maintaining rural medical centers becomes easier too.

North America in contrast:

Canada...........3.64
United States....32.57




Just sayin',
Ahk
« Last Edit: September 29, 2007, 12:06:32 AM by Ahkenaten » Logged


Rule #1: Always know WHEN to get the #### out of Dodge.
Rule #2: Always know HOW to get the #### out of Dodge.

Major Zee Lee
Forum cat lover
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +64/-169
Posts: 566


Kooks not allowed in (Secret meeting is next door)


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2007, 01:41:08 AM »

A question for Totino:

Why you American pay 250% MORE to get LESS health care, and feel like you're very smart? That always amazes me... Huh?

(That the wealthy claim with a full mouth that the price of failure to earn must be paid with health and/or life, doesn't shocks me the least... aristocrates aux lanternes!)



BTW, Akh, I don't doubt that population idspersal is a problem. Here we also have got dispersal populations and this causes some trouble, but I would like to point another meaningful difference: doctors per population. Here in my piece of land, Catalonia, we got 340 doctors per 100,000 population, and yet there's a shortage of doctors which we're compensating with foreign doctors, usually from Latin America and Eastern Europe. Spain's average is slightly lower, but anyway they're miles ahead of Northern America.

Let's compare physicians per population and expenditure per population, Spain versus Northern America:

In Spain, there are 330 physicians per 100,000 inhabitants.
In the USA, 256 per 100,000
In Canada, 214 per 100,000
In Mexico, 198 per 100,000

Health care expense in Spain is of 1,853 $ (PPP) per citizen
In the USA, 5,771 $
In Canada, 2,989 $
In Mexico, 582 $

In Spain, health care as percentage of GDP is 5.5% (public health care) and 2.2% (private health care), totalling 7.7% of GDP.
In the USa, it's 6.8%, 8.4%, total 15.2% of GDP
In Canada, it's 6.9%, 3%, total 9.9% of GDP
In Mexico, it's 2.9%, 3.3%, total 6.2% of GDP

Now, wouldn't that point out a problem? Namely, a proficency problem? Huh?

It's obvious that population dispersal is a problem, but having 35% less physicians, surely this doens't helps out. Also doesn't helps that even having this few physicians (I guess also it haves less medical hardware), the system is quite more expensive.

Something doesn't rules. Huh?

(Just a note... an internist in Spain's public health care haves a salary of between 72,000 and 84,000 euros per year. That's about 100,000 to 117,000 $ per year. In the USA, internist's earnings range between 175,000 and 300,000 $. SS hires the best internists and actually most internists prefer working in public health care too, which is telling about private health care in Spain...)
« Last Edit: September 29, 2007, 01:56:56 AM by Major Zee Lee » Logged

Do not take life too seriously; nobody lives to tell.
Totino
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +104/-129
Posts: 1,269



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2007, 07:18:26 AM »

Doctors per person proves absolutely nothing. It doesn't even take into account quality of health care, wait time, etc, etc.

Same with cost.

We get less? Again, Canadians are coming to the US because of our BETTER healthcare.
Logged

All creations, including god, originate in the mind
cat_fta
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-45
Posts: 101



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: October 01, 2007, 05:25:18 PM »

The problem with disbelieve in Universal Health Care by some americans (still there are a few bunch like theese), is that they like to pay more for something they believe is better quality.

Same when you got a membership at Costco, it makes you feel more important than others. In the end you spend more, because you buy a huge package, but you will throw away the leftovers after a while, because will get bad in your fridge, but hell no, you are a special member at Costco, not too many people can afford to do that.

How do you define quality in health care though?
That the doctor takes you in half an hour as opposed to 2 or 3 hours? Or maybe that you can see a specialist in 1 week as opposed to 2 months?

All I can say is that I used myself the Canadian health care and my family too, in a few occasions. And if it wasn't universal I would have been banckrupt now, paying for the rest of my life. As compared to U.S.: yes you have a little more money in your pockets because of lower taxes, you can buy a few more packs of cigarettes Cheesy every month, but you piece of shit don't dare to get sick, or for God's sake don't get an accident, because you can be left to die like a small piglet you are.

This is good health care? I think this is called selfishness and lack of respect and dignity for your fellow human being.
They always talk in America how precious human life is, I dare to challenge anyone that this is just BS, you mean how precious rich people's life is?
Logged

Freedom just for us, not for all.
Democracy is OK as long as is my way.
Cabrini Green
Full Member
***

Karma: +12/-59
Posts: 136



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: October 01, 2007, 05:56:50 PM »

Why shouldn't healthcare have to be earned? That isn't a human right. It's simply a want.
Wow... perfect example of someone who has absolutley no idea what it's like to live below the poverty line and have no helath insurance. You're telling me that a little kid who is sick, has no health insurance can't see a doctor because he hasn't earned it. The rich don't want to give up their luxuries at the expense of their own people.
Logged

\"Do you really believe if we replace a bunch of corporate Republicans with a bunch of corporate Democrats, that anything meaningful is going to change? This has to stop. It\'s that simple.\"
cat_fta
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-45
Posts: 101



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: October 01, 2007, 06:49:48 PM »

Doctors per person proves absolutely nothing. It doesn't even take into account quality of health care, wait time, etc, etc.

Same with cost.

We get less? Again, Canadians are coming to the US because of our BETTER healthcare.

They go there because they have money to throw and because they think they are too precious species.
As I said, if you have a little patience, you will get your fix here in Canada, free of charge.
Logged

Freedom just for us, not for all.
Democracy is OK as long as is my way.
cat_fta
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-45
Posts: 101



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: October 01, 2007, 07:12:03 PM »

Looking from other perspective, think about the following: Canadian government, naturally, wants it's people as healthy as possible, because they pay big bucks for their health, so you can bet they have the best interest not to poison you, or conduct some freaky experiment on population.
Am I implying that U.S. govt may have done this in the past or will they do it?
I don't know, I cannot prove this, but I don't feel good about that. Freaky, eh?

I will just add a few words about the water you drink in U.S. I've been travelling so far to a bunch of different states: NY, MN, IL, FL, CA, NB, TN. The tap water stinks, I felt yaky even to shower, but had no choice. Long live the bottled water companies.
Yes, you can purchase an expensive filtration system, but why the hell shall I do that, after I paid taxes to my government, or this goes in sync with the american mind mentality, that drinking water is something you have to earn ?
Logged

Freedom just for us, not for all.
Democracy is OK as long as is my way.
Totino
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +104/-129
Posts: 1,269



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: October 01, 2007, 07:53:31 PM »

Why shouldn't healthcare have to be earned? That isn't a human right. It's simply a want.
Wow... perfect example of someone who has absolutley no idea what it's like to live below the poverty line and have no helath insurance. You're telling me that a little kid who is sick, has no health insurance can't see a doctor because he hasn't earned it. The rich don't want to give up their luxuries at the expense of their own people.
.....
Mate I pay out of my own pocket for health insurance. I work full time and go to school full time. You act as though I'm rich. Sadly, it just isn't the case. Grow up with the OFFBASE personal attacks.

Furthermore, I wouldn't be oppossed to healthcare for children. Afterall, why should they suffer because of good for nothing parents? But sweeping unviversal healthcare is bullocks.

Don't assume. It makes an ass out of you and me.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2007, 08:01:24 PM by Totino » Logged

All creations, including god, originate in the mind
tadpol
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +27/-19
Posts: 291



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: October 01, 2007, 07:56:00 PM »

Most medical problems worth seeing a doctor about get worse if untreated. So more time before treatment --> more treatment needed per person--> fewer people treated. medicine delayed is medicine denied.

I think that general practitioners, emergency rooms, and specialists are very different kinds of care and that treating them the same is not wise. I'm for nationalized emergency rooms on the principle that folk have a right to live. I'm for subsidized gp's on the theory that health is important, but not really a right. And I'm for free market specialists, in that I have no interest in paying for complicated procedures for strangers.

More to the point I think it's a bad plan for the US to imitate Europe, being different is where we get our power from.
Logged
Totino
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +104/-129
Posts: 1,269



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: October 01, 2007, 07:57:40 PM »

Doctors per person proves absolutely nothing. It doesn't even take into account quality of health care, wait time, etc, etc.

Same with cost.

We get less? Again, Canadians are coming to the US because of our BETTER healthcare.

They go there because they have money to throw and because they think they are too precious species.
As I said, if you have a little patience, you will get your fix here in Canada, free of charge.
They go there because our health care is superior to yours. Haha, free of charge? Yeah because it isn't like you pay for that out of your taxes... Oh wait, yes you do.

Patience? People die because they don't get healthcare quick enough. Death and disease don't say "Oh he hasn't seen a doctor yet, let's hold off on killing him for a bit". You're crazy.

And tadpol raises a good point about untreated issues.
Logged

All creations, including god, originate in the mind
thief
Full Member
***

Karma: +13/-6
Posts: 133



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: October 01, 2007, 08:42:26 PM »

I am also in favor of a very limited form of national health care by limited I mean free health care to poor kids and free emergency room care, in principle(I am frightened of what might happen to ERs like here in California). I would like to couple that with mandatory health insurance and mandating employers offer health insurance. Thats more of a kind of compromise plan I have been working in my head.
Logged

Marines or Martyrs-- Who Do You Think Will Get The Virgins?
Cabrini Green
Full Member
***

Karma: +12/-59
Posts: 136



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: October 01, 2007, 10:34:38 PM »

Why shouldn't healthcare have to be earned? That isn't a human right. It's simply a want.
Wow... perfect example of someone who has absolutley no idea what it's like to live below the poverty line and have no helath insurance. You're telling me that a little kid who is sick, has no health insurance can't see a doctor because he hasn't earned it. The rich don't want to give up their luxuries at the expense of their own people.
.....
Mate I pay out of my own pocket for health insurance. I work full time and go to school full time. You act as though I'm rich. Sadly, it just isn't the case. Grow up with the OFFBASE personal attacks.

Furthermore, I wouldn't be oppossed to healthcare for children. Afterall, why should they suffer because of good for nothing parents? But sweeping unviversal healthcare is bullocks.

Don't assume. It makes an ass out of you and me.
I ALSO work full time and go to school full time, but I can't afford medical insurance. Do you honestly think that because kids are poor they have good for nothing parents. I would love it if you said that to my face you dumbass. My assumption was correct, also.
Logged

\"Do you really believe if we replace a bunch of corporate Republicans with a bunch of corporate Democrats, that anything meaningful is going to change? This has to stop. It\'s that simple.\"
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 25 queries.