IAP Political Forum
January 08, 2009, 06:48:04 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Default theme has been changed, and everyone reset due to some problems with posts disappearing after submitting.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Palin Requests Millions in Wasteful Earmarks  (Read 575 times)
ryan77
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +63/-95
Posts: 403


View Profile
« on: September 02, 2008, 09:55:25 AM »

Having not even been elected President yet, McCain has already began keeping his oft-repeated campaign promise to make famous those reponsible for wasteful earmarks for pet projects that waste American taxpayers money by making one of the biggest fans of earmarks and one of the wasters of taxpayers' money his own Vice-Presidential candidate.

Yep, he has certainly made Palin famous - a woman who has secured millions upon millions of dollars in earmarks for her po-dunk Alaskan town of 6,7000 despite only been in a office a couple of years as the following story in today's Washington Post outlines:   


Quote
Palin's Small Alaska Town Secured Big Federal Funds

ST. PAUL, Minn., Sept. 1 -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town of 6,700 residents while she was its mayor, according to an analysis by an independent government watchdog group.

There was $500,000 for a youth shelter, $1.9 million for a transportation hub, $900,000 for sewer repairs, and $15 million for a rail project -- all intended to benefit Palin's town, Wasilla, located about 45 miles north of Anchorage.

In introducing Palin as his running mate on Friday, Sen. John McCain cast her as a compatriot in his battle against wasteful federal spending. McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, hailed Palin as a politician "with an outstanding reputation for standing up to special interests and entrenched bureaucracies -- someone who has fought against corruption and the failed policies of the past, someone who's stopped government from wasting taxpayers' money."

McCain's crusade against earmarks -- federal spending sought by members of Congress to benefit specific projects -- has been a hallmark of his campaign. He has said earmarks are wasteful and are often inserted into bills with little oversight, sometimes by a single powerful lawmaker.

Palin has also railed against earmarks, touting her opposition to a $223 million bridge in the state as a prime credential for the vice presidential nomination. "As governor, I've stood up to the old politics-as-usual, to the special interests, to the lobbyists, the big oil companies, and the good-ol'-boy network," she said Friday.

As mayor of Wasilla, however, Palin oversaw the hiring of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, an Anchorage-based law firm with close ties to Alaska's most senior Republicans: Rep. Don Young and Sen. Ted Stevens, who was indicted in July on charges of accepting illegal gifts. The Wasilla account was handled by the former chief of staff to Stevens, Steven W. Silver, who is a partner in the firm.

Palin was elected mayor of Wasilla in 1996 on a campaign theme of "a time for change." According to a review of congressional spending by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group in Washington, Wasilla did not receive any federal earmarks in the first few years of Palin's tenure.

Senate records show that Silver's firm began working for Palin in early 2000, just as federal money began flowing.

In fiscal 2000, Wasilla received a $1 million earmark, tucked into a transportation appropriations bill, for a rail and bus project in the town. And in the winter of 2000, Palin appeared before congressional appropriations committees to seek earmarks, according to a report in the Anchorage Daily News.

Palin and the Wasilla City Council increased Silver's fee from $24,000 to $36,000 a year by 2001, Senate records show.

Soon after, the city benefited from additional earmarks: $500,000 for a mental health center, $500,000 for the purchase of federal land and $450,000 to rehabilitate an agricultural processing facility. Then there was the $15 million rail project, intended to connect Wasilla with the town of Girdwood, where Stevens has a house.

The Washington trip is now an annual event for Wasilla officials.

In fiscal year 2002, Wasilla took in $6.1 million in earmarks -- about $1,000 in federal money for every resident. By contrast, Boise, Idaho -- which has more than 190,000 residents -- received $6.9 million in earmarks in fiscal 2008.

All told, Wasilla benefited from $26.9 million in earmarks in Palin's final four years in office.

"She certainly wasn't shy about putting the old-boy network to use to bring home millions of dollars," said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense. "She's a little more savvy to the ways of Washington than she's let on."

Silver, reached by phone at his Vienna home, declined to comment. Wasilla's town offices were closed Monday for the Labor Day holiday.

Maria Comella, Palin's campaign spokeswoman, said Palin sought the Wasilla earmarks because she was "working in the best interests of Alaska, working within the confines of the current system."

Palin became a staunch reform advocate after her 2003 appointment to the state's Oil and Gas Commission. She accused another commissioner -- Alaska Republican Party Chairman Randy Ruedrich -- of raising campaign contributions from industries he was regulating. "She realized that the environment around her was no longer what it once was, and elected officials were abusing their power," Comella said.

Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, used to secure earmarks for public nonprofits in Illinois, but he announced last year that he would no longer seek earmarks for any entity. Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), Obama's running mate, co-sponsored $85.6 million in earmarks for 2008, according to one study.

The Palin earmarks came when Stevens was chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee and Young was a senior member of the House transportation committee.

In hiring Silver, Wasilla found someone who was a member of each lawmaker's inner circle. Silver has donated at least $11,400 to Stevens's political committees and $10,000 to Young's reelection committee in the past decade, according to Federal Election Commission records.

Sliver's firm employed Stevens's son, Ben Stevens, in the late 1990s as a federal lobbyist, according to multiple media accounts. Ben Stevens was not listed on lobbying disclosure forms as having worked on Wasilla earmarks.

The firm became ensnared in the wide-ranging federal investigation of corruption by Alaska Republican officials. Federal agents reviewed records about its other municipal clients, as well as fishing companies represented by Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh that were close to Ben Stevens.

The investigation has increasingly focused on Veco, a now-defunct energy services company whose chief executive, Bill Allen Jr., pleaded guilty in May 2007 to bribing Alaska officials.

Ted Stevens is awaiting trial on charges that he accepted more than $250,000 in unreported gifts from Allen. Ben Stevens, who has not been charged, has been identified in court documents as having accepted more than $240,000 in consulting payments in exchange for legislative favors while he served in the state Senate.

A Veco executive testified last year in a criminal trial that Allen had ordered him to arrange annual fundraisers for Young. The congressman has not been charged with any crimes.

After becoming governor, Palin became a critic of Young and the Stevenses. She endorsed Young's opponent in a Republican primary last week that is still too close to call, and last year she demanded Ben Stevens's resignation as Alaska's member of the Republican National Committee. She has also criticized Ted Stevens.

In addition, Palin has reversed course on at least one major earmark: After initially supporting the $223 million bridge, which was to connect the town of Ketchikan with a remote island, she reversed course last year and canceled the project because of cost overruns. Critics have dubbed the project the "Bridge to Nowhere."

But her administration remains eager for many other earmarks.

In February, Palin's office sent Sen. Stevens a 70-page memo outlining almost $200 million worth of new funding requests for Alaska.




Logged
Patton
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +113/-147
Posts: 1,953



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2008, 01:34:27 PM »

In February, Palin's office sent Sen. Stevens a 70-page memo outlining almost $200 million worth of new funding requests for Alaska.


Do you know the nature of these $200 million in earmarks?

She is a Governer...if the state wants or needs something it's own sources of revenue cannot acquire...seems she is left requesting the funds from the Fed.

So...I'm guessing Baracks $740 million in earmarks are just peachy?

Senator Barack Obama on Thursday released a list of $740 million in earmarked spending requests that he had made over the last three years...

NYTimes
Logged

Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best; it removes all that is base. All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood

-George S. Patton
And Justice For All
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +16/-8
Posts: 331



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2008, 02:53:09 PM »

Ouch there goes McCains no earmark stradegy. He won't have anything left by November at this rate.
Logged

Alright Clanton, you called down the thunder well now you got it! The cowboys are finished, you understand me? I see a red sash I kill a man wearing it. So run you Kurr. You tell em Im coming and hells coming with me you hear. Hells coming with me!

-Wyatt Earp
gommi
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +28/-29
Posts: 385



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2008, 03:55:37 PM »

So...I'm guessing Baracks $740 million in earmarks are just peachy?
Obama never campaigned on the promise of reducing wasteful government spending. In Palin's situation, she is being a hypocrite.
Logged

\"Ideological and moral confusion are signs of a higher consciousness\".

__IAPer since 2004__
And Justice For All
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +16/-8
Posts: 331



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2008, 04:22:46 PM »

So is McCain for choosing a canidate who supports so many earmarks.
Logged

Alright Clanton, you called down the thunder well now you got it! The cowboys are finished, you understand me? I see a red sash I kill a man wearing it. So run you Kurr. You tell em Im coming and hells coming with me you hear. Hells coming with me!

-Wyatt Earp
illy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +112/-105
Posts: 1,106


illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2008, 06:29:03 PM »

Most of the projects drawing the funding sound like good uses of money.

IMO, earmarks, though they can be (and often are) wasteful have a connotation more negative than they deserve. They should be transparent, so people are aware of who's spending what, but I'm not for any political witch-hunts.

My biggest problem with this is that the money should have been coming more (much more) from the state government than the federal government. I might think differently on the matter if AK government was poor, but it's not.


This is a classic case of passing the buck (invoice) on. The AK government wants to pass the cost on to the rest of us, so that it can cut state taxes. It's just the federal treasury (read: federal debt) anyway, so who's counting?
Logged

Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening
Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him
Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him
Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it -
Rugged Man - Give it Up
Reaganite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +20/-650
Posts: 1,526



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2008, 09:18:14 PM »

how much per resident was sent to washington by wasilla residents in taxes?

Also whats listed dont sound like Wasteful earmarks really..

and 26 million vs 700+ million is a big differance.

Do you think the Obama campaign wants to take on this subject?
Logged

You get what you pay for America... Welcome to the Obamanation.....
neorealist
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +35/-33
Posts: 1,154


Mod of further light


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2008, 12:02:35 AM »

So...I'm guessing Baracks $740 million in earmarks are just peachy?
Obama never campaigned on the promise of reducing wasteful government spending. In Palin's situation, she is being a hypocrite.

c'mon gommi....they are all hypocrites.  You don't reach that level of politics with out some degree of hypocrisy and backstabbing.
Logged

The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on. - Robert Bloch
jpn of Seattle
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +243/-234
Posts: 2,093



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2008, 06:36:43 AM »

So is McCain for choosing a canidate who supports so many earmarks.

Once again, it's the hypocrisy. In her introduction after being chosen by McCain, she chose to trumpet her valiant fight against government pork, using the "Bridge to Nowhere" as an example. But as we've seen, her "fight against pork" is not at all what she claimed it was.
Logged

What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
Patton
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +113/-147
Posts: 1,953



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 03, 2008, 07:50:15 AM »

Theres always Baracks $740 million to boast about....and just what happened with the $110 million earmark Barack got for the University of Chicago and terrorist Bill Ayers again?

Annenberg Challenge or something like that?
Logged

Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best; it removes all that is base. All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood

-George S. Patton
ryan77
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +63/-95
Posts: 403


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2008, 09:33:13 AM »

Theres always Baracks $740 million to boast about....and just what happened with the $110 million earmark Barack got for the University of Chicago and terrorist Bill Ayers again?

Annenberg Challenge or something like that?

Barack Obama has not, and is not, campaigning on the promise to eradicate earmarks. Duh - wake up. There's a slight difference. Secondly, the article not only points out the astounding hypocrisy of the McCain campaign, it also proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Palin....

1. Is tits deep in with the "Good Ol' Boys" establishment of Washington she claims to fight against.

2. Is more than happy to piss away millions upon millions of American taxpayer dollars for pet projects that only benefit herself and the little po-dunk Alaskan town she's the mayor of while claiming to be a champion of fiscal conservativeness.

3. Is awash in corruption charges herself and political bedfellows with some of the most corrupt lobbyists & politicians in Alaska also awash in criminal corruption charges while claiming to be a "reformer" coming to change the ways of Washington.


And I understand individuals like yourself get most of your political education from people like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, but you should really check your facts before you spout off about something you heard on Conservative talk radio. Barack Obama was exactly 8 years old when Bill Ayers and the Weatherman were active. To suggest a connection between the two only shows the depth of your ignorance about the matter.   
Logged
ryan77
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +63/-95
Posts: 403


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2008, 09:39:03 AM »

In February, Palin's office sent Sen. Stevens a 70-page memo outlining almost $200 million worth of new funding requests for Alaska.


Do you know the nature of these $200 million in earmarks?

She is a Governer...if the state wants or needs something it's own sources of revenue cannot acquire...seems she is left requesting the funds from the Fed.

So...I'm guessing Baracks $740 million in earmarks are just peachy?

Senator Barack Obama on Thursday released a list of $740 million in earmarked spending requests that he had made over the last three years...

NYTimes


But wait a minute! But wait a minute! Uh Uh Uh...Barack Obama does it too. Nu-uh - Barack Obama does it too. Mommy Mommy!!!!

Typical 3-year-old Republican response. How about ditching the tu quoque arguments and trying, if you can, to defend John McCain's decision to select an grossly inexperienced champion of wasteful earmarks as his running mate while building his entire campaign around the principals of experience and elminating earmarks and other wasteful government spending. Give that a try, if possible.   
Logged
Reaganite
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +20/-650
Posts: 1,526



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2008, 09:49:03 AM »

In February, Palin's office sent Sen. Stevens a 70-page memo outlining almost $200 million worth of new funding requests for Alaska.


Do you know the nature of these $200 million in earmarks?

She is a Governer...if the state wants or needs something it's own sources of revenue cannot acquire...seems she is left requesting the funds from the Fed.

So...I'm guessing Baracks $740 million in earmarks are just peachy?

Senator Barack Obama on Thursday released a list of $740 million in earmarked spending requests that he had made over the last three years...

NYTimes


But wait a minute! But wait a minute! Uh Uh Uh...Barack Obama does it too. Nu-uh - Barack Obama does it too. Mommy Mommy!!!!

Typical 3-year-old Republican response. How about ditching the tu quoque arguments and trying, if you can, to defend John McCain's decision to select an grossly inexperienced champion of wasteful earmarks as his running mate while building his entire campaign around the principals of experience and elminating earmarks and other wasteful government spending. Give that a try, if possible.   

As a MAYOR/GOVERNER (executive work) its her job to get money back from taxes the residents of each state sends to the feds. 

So you are against building a hospital? How is that wasteful spending?

Logged

You get what you pay for America... Welcome to the Obamanation.....
ryan77
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +63/-95
Posts: 403


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2008, 10:14:09 AM »

Quote
She is a Governer...if the state wants or needs something it's own sources of revenue cannot acquire...seems she is left requesting the funds from the Fed.

Oh yes, I'm sorry, I forgot it was a year or two ago she was the Mayor of her po-dunk Alaskan town. Now she is the governor of a po-dunk state with fewer residents living in the entire state than the single town of Kansas City, MO.

And seems like you and Palin both could benefit from a short education on the difference between "wants" and "needs". $1 million of federal taxpayer money to build a public bus system in a town with only 6,000 people is a want, not a need. $15 million of federal taxpayer money to build a rail system connecting the town of Wasilla, AK (population = 6,700) where Palin works to the town of Girdwood, AK (population = 1,700) where Palin lives is MOST DEFINITELY a want and not a need.



Quote
As a MAYOR/GOVERNER (executive work) its her job to get money back from taxes the residents of each state sends to the feds. 


Well she has most certainly accomplished that. At nearly $30,000,000 in wasteful earmarks secured for a town with only 6,000 or so residents I would say she has gotten 100% of any and all of their money back from the finds and quite a bit of yours and mine as well.

Quote
So you are against building a hospital? How is that wasteful spending?

You must be referring to the $500,000 she secured for a "Mental Health Center" for the residents of the huge metropolis of Wasilla, AK. First, I am not quite sure a mental health center and a Hospital are the same thing. Secondly, while I am sure the 5 or 6 residents living in Wasilla that are in need of mental health facilities appreciate the half-million dollar facility, I am not sure this is the best use of taxpayer dollars. 

Logged
Patton
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +113/-147
Posts: 1,953



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: September 03, 2008, 10:25:18 AM »

Nice to see the highschool debate team showed up.

Still nipping away at the BOTTOM of the ticket?   (Yawn)....OK then....

Barack Obama has not, and is not, campaigning on the promise to eradicate earmarks.

So I guess he supports them...raising taxes and promoting pork like $740 million....that $11o million went where again? You never answered......

Quote
Is more than happy to piss away millions upon millions of American taxpayer dollars for pet projects that only benefit (constituents)

What politician doesn't?

Obama?  Biden?

 Roll Eyes

Quote
Barack Obama was exactly 8 years old when Bill Ayers and the Weatherman were active. To suggest a connection between the two only shows the depth of your ignorance about the matter.  

It's not me bub:

Three days earlier, the New York Sun had reported some additional details:

As an Illinois state senator in 2001, Mr. Obama accepted a $200 contribution from William Ayers, a founding member of the group that bombed the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon during the 1970s.

Mr. Ayers wrote a memoir, "Fugitive Days," published in 2001, and on the day of the September 11 terrorist attacks, he was quoted by the New York Times as saying: "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough."

He and Mr. Obama served together on the nine-member board of the Woods Fund, a Chicago nonprofit, for three years beginning in 1999, and they have also appeared jointly on two academic panels, one in 1997 and another in 2001. Mr. Ayers, who was never convicted in the Weather Underground bombings, is now a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago.


..............

Who else made the connection:

Hillary Clinton wasn't buying Obama's attempt to dodge the implications of Obama's freindship with a terrorist. Here's what she added:

SEN. CLINTON: Well, I think that is a fair general statement, but I also believe that Senator Obama served on a board with Mr. Ayers for a period of time, the Woods Foundation, which was a paid directorship position.

And if I'm not mistaken, that relationship with Mr. Ayers on this board continued after 9/11 and after his reported comments, which were deeply hurtful to people in New York, and I would hope to every American, because they were published on 9/11 and he said that he was just sorry they hadn't done more. And what they did was set bombs and in some instances people died. So it is -- you know, I think it is, again, an issue that people will be asking about. And I have no doubt -- I know Senator Obama's a good man and I respect him greatly but I think that this is an issue that certainly the Republicans will be raising.


............

Since Hillary mentioned Ayers......How did Obama's real "executive experience" with the $110 million Obama/Ayers/UIC Annenberg Challenge work out?
Logged

Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best; it removes all that is base. All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood

-George S. Patton
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.11 seconds with 26 queries.