IAP Political Forum
November 22, 2008, 12:57:32 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Support IAP -- join "High Society" with less fuss. Click "paid subscriptions" from your profile.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: There is no reason to vote for John McCain  (Read 366 times)
corpuscollossus
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-3
Posts: 32


View Profile
« on: October 09, 2008, 10:57:04 PM »

Admittedly weak on the economy, but don't ask him, ask economists:



He's got a horrible temper

the evidence
Partisan, but the testimony is 90% GOP

He's old, he's a warmonger, his VP pick is hilarious (this sums it up nicely)

Fortunately, most americans see that there's no reason to vote for John McCain:





Anyway, here's a game - anyone that comes up with a reason (a real reason for, not an 'Obama's a marxist/black panther/perv') I'll provide 5  reasons not to. Who wants to play?
Logged
neorealist
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-33
Posts: 1,106


Mod of further light


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2008, 11:18:20 PM »

CC How the hell R U?


good to see you back Smiley  Are you still in the UAE these days?  I was trying to contact you last fall....I'll have to PM you about it.
Logged

The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on. - Robert Bloch
corpuscollossus
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-3
Posts: 32


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 09, 2008, 11:45:18 PM »

yes i am. i'll start a lobby thread i guess
Logged
JFree89
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-27
Posts: 147



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2008, 11:51:26 PM »

Ill play the game.

McCain has more experience in politics then Obama. GO !
Logged
corpuscollossus
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-3
Posts: 32


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2008, 01:37:36 AM »

Ill play the game.

McCain has more experience in politics then Obama. GO !

Thank you JFree89 and welcome to the game. You make a fine point. As a counterpoint to that, let's look at the total experience on both bills in a top political position.

Reason 1
John McCain has been a senator since 1986 (24th most senior senator)
Barack Obama has been a senator since 2004
Joe Biden has been a senator since 1972 and is the 6th most senior senator in the senate (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seniority_in_the_United_States_Senate)
Sarah Palin has been a governor for 1 year and 9 months

So if the metric is simply length of time spent, the Obama/Biden ticket far exceeds the McCain/Palin ticket in terms of experience. We could go into specific experience in each role, and experience outside of those roles, but lets leave it there for Reason 1.

Reason 2
Age. McCain will be 72 years and 67 days old when (if) inaugurated. Statistically, that gives him less than a 1 in 3 chance of surviving two terms in office. This doesn't factor in things like his battle with potentially lethal skin cancer or the possibility of age related dementia or alzheimers, which brings me to...

Reason 3
Sarah Palin is laughably unqualified for the presidency. Serving on the Wasilla city coucil and 20 months as governor is one side of it, but it's more the massive gaps in her training and understanding that the Couric interviews demonstrated that prove it.

Reason 4
Was horribly misguided about Iraq, saying that the iraqis would greet the US as liberators (link

Reason 5
His main advisor on the economy is Phil Gramm, who by authoring the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, undid protections put in place by the Glass-Steagall Act to prevent repetitions of the Great Depression. Many economists and lawmakers are pointing to this as key to the current economic crisis.
Logged
JFree89
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-27
Posts: 147



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2008, 01:48:58 AM »

All good points .
One question about number 4, what was Obama's view on the invasion of Iraq in 2003/2004. I know the democrats supported it but did he ?
Logged
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +212/-207
Posts: 4,065


"You do not speak for the rest"


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2008, 04:30:20 AM »

All good points .
One question about number 4, what was Obama's view on the invasion of Iraq in 2003/2004. I know the democrats supported it but did he ?

Obama wasn't in the Senate then, but he made his opinion quite clear.

Quote from: Obama - circa 2002
What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.

What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Roves to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income – to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression.

That’s what I’m opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.

THE REST

You have to admit... not bad for someone who hadn't even taken office yet.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2008, 04:33:09 AM by Abraxas » Logged

Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky

... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
JFree89
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-27
Posts: 147



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2008, 04:58:58 AM »

Credit where credit is due. Too call that before the war started is gutsy and in the end its fairly accurate.
Logged
corpuscollossus
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-3
Posts: 32


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2008, 10:30:05 PM »

hmm, by the looks of this thread, even republicans agree: there is absolutely no reason to vote for john mccain
Logged
JFree89
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-27
Posts: 147



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2008, 03:45:48 AM »

He's military accomplishments compared to Obama.
Logged
jpn of Seattle
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +241/-233
Posts: 2,012



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 11, 2008, 07:49:37 AM »

I'll play. Obama's health care proposal is far superior to McCain's health care proposal. (This may call for a separate thread topic if we want to debate it).
« Last Edit: October 11, 2008, 07:52:11 AM by jpn of Seattle » Logged

What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
jpn of Seattle
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +241/-233
Posts: 2,012



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 11, 2008, 07:51:18 AM »

He's military accomplishments compared to Obama.

One point for McCain.

Back at you: Obama's impressive (to say the least) accademic record in contrast to McCain's.
Logged

What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
corpuscollossus
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-3
Posts: 32


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2008, 08:15:33 AM »

well for some reason my big ass reply to JFree89 got deleted twice. here it is again without the linked sources:

thank you jfree. he has had some considerable military accomplishments:

Reason 1
McCain graduated 494 out of 498 in his naval airforce class in Annapolis - if it weren't for his Admiral father and truly heroic grandfather, he would never have been allowed to fly - a point that would have spared the Navy millions of dollars, as mccain ended up crashing five airplanes. Since becoming a politician, John McCain has not had a single navy airman from his generation come out to publicly support him - virtually unheard of among the tight-knit military set.

Reason 2
How heroic was mccain in captivity in Vietnam? The answer is not very. He was labelled a 'songbird' by his Vietcong captors, and received  special medical treatment once they found out he was a military elite:

“His Vietnamese capturers soon realized their POW, John Sidney McCain III, came from a well-bred line of American military elites. McCain’s father, John Jr., and grandfather, John Sr., were both full Admirals. A destroyer, the USS John S. McCain, is named after both of them. While his son was held captive in Hanoi, John McCain Jr., from 1968 to 1972, was the Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Pacific Command; Admiral McCain was in charge of all US forces in the Pacific including those fighting in Vietnam. ..The Admiral’s bad boy was used to special treatment and his captors knew that. They were working him.For his part, McCain acknowledges that the Vietnamese rushed him to a hospital, but denies he was given any “special medical treatment.” However….two weeks into his stay at the Vietnamese hospital, the Hanoi press began quoting him. It was not “name rank and serial number, or kill me,” as specified by the military code of conduct. McCain divulged specific military information: he gave the name of the aircraft carrier on which he was based, the number of US pilots that had been lost, the number of aircraft in his flight formation, as well as information about the location of rescue ships…
On the other hand, according to one source, McCain’s collaboration may have had very real consequences. Retired Army Colonel Earl Hopper, a veteran of World War II, Korea and Vietnam, contends that the information that McCain divulged classified information North Vietnam used to hone their air defense system…McCain told his North Vietnamese captors, “highly classified information, the most important of which was the package routes, which were routes used to bomb North Vietnam. He gave in detail the altitude they were flying, the direction, if they made a turn… he gave them what primary targets the United States was interested in.” Hopper contends that the information McCain provided allowed the North Vietnamese to adjust their air-defenses. As result, Hopper claims, the US lost sixty percent more aircraft and in 1968, “called off the bombing of North Vietnam, because of the information McCain had given to them.”

Reason 3
McCain's voting record for veterans stinks. Here's what McCain said:

As President, I will do everything in my power to ensure that those who serve today and those who have served in the past have access to the highest quality health, mental health and rehabilitative care in the world. The disgrace of Walter Reed must not be forgotten. … Whatever our commitments to veterans cost, we will keep them, as you have kept every commitment to us. The honor of a great nation is at stake.

Here's how he voted:

Not only has he refused to support the 21st Century GI Bill, which the Veterans of Foreign Wars endorsed last June, he has consistently voted against increasing funding for the Veterans’ Administration, which oversees all medical care for veterans:

Voted AGAINST an amendment providing $20 billion to the VA’s medical facilities.

Voted AGAINST providing $430 million to the VA for outpatient care “and treatment for veterans,” one of only 13 senators to do so.

Voted AGAINST increasing VA funding by $1.5 billion by closing corporate loopholes.

Voted AGAINST increasing VA funding by $1.8 billion by ending “abusive tax loopholes.”

Reason 4
McCain was against torture before he was for it. On 3 October 05, he introduced the McCain Detainee Amendment to the Defense Appropriations bill. The United States Senate voted 90-9 to pass the amendment, prohibiting inhumane treatment of prisoners, including prisoners at Gitmo, by limiting interrogation to methods detailed in the military's Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation. McCain then embraced the Military Commissions Act of October 2006, which vastly broadened the definitions of what constituted torture and stripped POWs of their habeus corpus rights.McCain's then voted against the Intelligence Authorization Act of 2008, which would have prevented the intelligence agencies from torturing 'threats'. McCain bizarrely stated during the debate that while he opposed torture, he wasn't going to hold the intelligence agencies to the same standards as the military.

Reason 5
McCain visits a Market in Baghdad, then lies on numerous occasions about it, and it leads to the death of 21 shopkeepers the following day:

McCain: "There are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods today."
McCain: "General Petraeus goes out there [Iraq] almost everyday in an unarmored Humvee." "I'm not say that they [VIPs] could go without protection. The president goes around America with protection. So I certainly didn't say that."
Reporter: "[On 26 Mar] You said there are areas in Baghdad that you can walk around freely." McCain: "Yeah, I just came from one."


Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 4.015 seconds with 26 queries.