Delta Nine
Full Member
Karma: +21/-125
Posts: 130
The Rapture? I'm not worried. Santa will save me.
|
 |
« on: September 15, 2007, 10:46:54 PM » |
|
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118978549183327730.html?mod=googlenews_wsjGreenspan blasts Bush and the republicans and praises Clinton! This is going to be great to watch in the coming week. I wonder if the republicans will try to smear their hero? I guess their plans for a Greenspan statue will have to go on hold. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
neorealist
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +32/-27
Posts: 836
Mod of further light
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2007, 10:52:21 PM » |
|
it sounds like to me he has said something bad about everyone D9...although he did say something positive about everyone....except GWB
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2007, 12:20:07 AM » |
|
Remember his hero is Ayn Rand.  OswaldTheOsprey |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Urbi et Orbi
|
|
|
neorealist
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +32/-27
Posts: 836
Mod of further light
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2007, 12:35:00 AM » |
|
Remember his hero is Ayn Rand. OswaldTheOsprey why the mad face oswald |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
freethinker
|
|
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2007, 12:39:59 AM » |
|
No evil emoticon it just ain't Oswald without it!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
NO Third Term For Bush
|
|
|
|
freethinker
|
|
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2007, 12:43:35 AM » |
|
I love the server speed . I hope it lasts.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
NO Third Term For Bush
|
|
|
Patton
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +97/-131
Posts: 1,626
NObama '08
|
|
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2007, 04:48:03 AM » |
|
I love the server speed . I hope it lasts.
One of the reasons for the move. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.”
No 2nd Pelosi/Reid/Obama Congress
|
|
|
|
gommi
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2007, 07:28:00 AM » |
|
Remember his hero is Ayn Rand. Indeed, which is why he considers himself a libertarian, and like all libertarians he criticizes virtually all fiscal spending conducted by any party. Ron Paul is an appropriate candidate for him. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
__Committed IAPer since 2004__
|
|
|
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152
|
|
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2007, 07:46:21 AM » |
|
Remember his hero is Ayn Rand. Indeed, which is why he considers himself a libertarian, and like all libertarians he criticizes virtually all fiscal spending conducted by any party. Ron Paul is an appropriate candidate for him. I believe his candidate is Clinton. OswaldTheOsprey |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Urbi et Orbi
|
|
|
|
gommi
|
|
« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2007, 07:53:26 AM » |
|
I believe his candidate is Clinton. Bizarre. If Republican spending is too high for his preferences, why would he support a Democratic candidate who intends to increase funding for public services? It makes you wonder if he is deranged. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 16, 2007, 07:58:08 AM by gommi »
|
Logged
|
__Committed IAPer since 2004__
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +197/-195
Posts: 3,662
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
|
« Reply #10 on: September 16, 2007, 09:22:01 AM » |
|
I believe his candidate is Clinton. Bizarre. If Republican spending is too high for his preferences, why would he support a Democratic candidate who intends to increase funding for public services? It makes you wonder if he is deranged. Well, you're under the impression Ron Paul is a Republican because he is actually a Republican. Can you tell me where an anti-choice, pro second ammendment, pro small government, anti tax increase Democrat is supposed to fit in? He's a "Conservative"... and sice the Republicans are (or atleast they preach to be) the party of Conservative values, he joined up with them. Regardless, this is going off topic. Does anyone plan on buying the book? I'm totally stupid when it comes to economics, but I might get it anyway. It sounds enlightening. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 16, 2007, 09:28:30 AM » |
|
I believe his candidate is Clinton. Bizarre. If Republican spending is too high for his preferences, why would he support a Democratic candidate who intends to increase funding for public services? It makes you wonder if he is deranged. Indeed. Deranged yet with such power! OswaldTheOsprey |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Urbi et Orbi
|
|
|
|
micfranklin
|
|
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2007, 10:51:05 AM » |
|
Bush just can't catch a break from being blasted, can he? Oh well it's most likely well-deserved.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +197/-195
Posts: 3,662
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
|
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2007, 11:34:57 AM » |
|
Greenspan isn't partisan like Moore or Culter.
If Greenspan has something to say it's usually whorth listening to, I think. Whether you agree or not is irrelevent.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
ChrisXP
Guest
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2007, 12:04:11 PM » |
|
Greenspan blasts Bush and the republicans and praises Clinton! This is going to be great to watch in the coming week. I wonder if the republicans will try to smear their hero? I guess their plans for a Greenspan statue will have to go on hold. Greenspan is a fiscal conservative, and will break with Neo-Cons on fiscal matters. This is nothing new, and in keeping with idealogy. Fiscal conservatives have always criticized the Bush Administration over that issue, even in 2003. Their problem was not having the backbone to stand up to Bush on principle, and today they have to lick their wounds. I broke with the whole Bush sentiments back in 2004, mainly due to the blindness of conservatives who spitted on every old conservative ideal (the party being taken over by bonafide "ex" socialists and outright communists). I could never imagine the keepers of the Republic becoming New Era Stalinists (to support random wars for idealogy and oppress their own country to KGB standards), yet these folks are so dumb and blind to actually see they became the socialists/communists they claim to despise. Now it's time for them to reflect. Greenspan, like Carter's provoking criticism of Israeli policies, I hope will open a healthy debate to fix this runaway trainwreck of radicals operating governments, before it destabilizes the entire world. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
