Technocrat
Full Member
 
Karma: +27/-149
Posts: 149
Soviet Technate
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2007, 04:47:27 PM » |
|
I see lots of posters behaving like that. Namely, the Christian who calls everyone morons. I don't see his posts being modified.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In Soviet Tetris blocks drop you!
|
|
|
|
daedalus 2.0
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: October 18, 2007, 05:23:31 PM » |
|
Agnostic/Christian Encyclopaedia of Tactics Entry 2:
2. When curbstomped and spanked like lil' bitches, they will try to claim atheists are "fundamentalists" or "evangelical," ...
So eloquent. I didn't " try to claim atheists are ...evangelical". I did claim that some atheists are evangelical. You seem to have difficulty comprehending the terms you read. Do fix that problem for next time. Yes, you claimed that SOME atheists are evangelical - the ones - as he points out that "When curbstomped and spanked like lil' bitches, they will try to claim atheists are "fundamentalists" or "evangelical," ..." You simply missed his point.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"SUCK IT, JESUS!\\\\" Kathy Griffin \"Hitler burns Anne Frank for a day, and it\'s Evil. God burns Anne Frank for eternity, and it\'s Just.\"Anon
|
|
|
targo88
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
   
Karma: +40/-18
Posts: 589
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: October 18, 2007, 05:32:07 PM » |
|
I see lots of posters behaving like that. Namely, the Christian who calls everyone morons. I don't see his posts being modified.
FYI Baldar is not a Christian.... so how about you tell me which one it is
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Technocrat
Full Member
 
Karma: +27/-149
Posts: 149
Soviet Technate
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: October 18, 2007, 06:09:35 PM » |
|
Whatever balderdash is, it's a nitpick. He does it fairly consistently.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
In Soviet Tetris blocks drop you!
|
|
|
Jericoacoara
Hero Member
   
Karma: +68/-11
Posts: 895
Fortaleza IAP 1.0
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: October 18, 2007, 06:51:54 PM » |
|
Whatever balderdash is, it's a nitpick. He does it fairly consistently.
You didn't direct your fury, anger and profanity at Baldar though. You directed it at all agnostics,all christians, as well as all the people who posted on this thread in good faith. You can make a point strongly without the use of profanity and coarse language, yes? I know you can, I have seen you do it before 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The greatest tragedy is for a person to die with the music still within them.
|
|
|
Jericoacoara
Hero Member
   
Karma: +68/-11
Posts: 895
Fortaleza IAP 1.0
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: October 19, 2007, 12:37:48 AM » |
|
No offence Barnes, but I must admit I have seen classier and better taste avatars in my time.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The greatest tragedy is for a person to die with the music still within them.
|
|
|
Delta Nine
Full Member
 
Karma: +21/-125
Posts: 130
The Rapture? I'm not worried. Santa will save me.
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: October 19, 2007, 07:09:59 AM » |
|
It is difficult to say that anyone can be absolutely certain but recognizing uncertainty is nowhere near the same as being agnostic. It is a phony argument.
So my takeaway from the responses is that many atheists see the contradictions between their beliefs/conclusions and the process they claim they use to form them. So they conflate it with the neutral position to try to hide the fact that they do form beliefs.
It would be funny if you were as hard on yourself as you are on us. You make up excuses for your own silly beliefs and then you go on to tell us what we believe to make your own irrational believes seem rational. You are a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Baldar
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: October 19, 2007, 07:38:22 AM » |
|
God forbid anyone have an openmind.  So now self proclaimed atheists are telling everyone else what their views "should" be. The telling point, of someone who has a weak philosophy or a strong one, is whether or not they can sell their point of view without the desperate need to attack someone else's. I once had an evangelical come up to me and explain why my "looking for the truth" is ridiculous since it was "right there". He tended to show how my belief system and views were ridiculous and childish. And then he finished by stating that his was the only way. So I allowed him his say and asked him to leave. I had another evangelical who said absolutely nothing about what I thought or believed in, other than applauding the fact that I was looking and trying to live my life along the same lines as my philosophy. He said he and his family were very happy being born again christians and they enjoyed sharing their glad message. And so on... It was rare that I am impressed by such sincerity. The atheists most active on this board are like those evangelical christians who denigrate other religions claiming theirs is the only way (its not bad to claim yours is the only way, it is bad however to denigrate others who aren't as convinced as you are). I don't consider them worthy of the same level of respect for their actions.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 09:05:01 AM by Baldar »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Reasoned Faith
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: October 19, 2007, 08:48:32 AM » |
|
Wasn't it delta nine who has admitted several times that his brain was wired to reject the idea there is a God? Am I remembering this right?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Technocrat
Full Member
 
Karma: +27/-149
Posts: 149
Soviet Technate
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: October 19, 2007, 10:19:37 AM » |
|
The problem Balder's bullshit notion about open-mindedness is that he's so open-minded, his brain's fallen rought out his head.
He's attempting to paint it as closed-minded not to believe in magical faerietales, and "open-minded" if you do. This is, yet again, a typical tactic used by Christians and Agnosticis alike. It's similar to how Fox News calls everyone "extreme" when they oppose them, regardless if they are wrong or right. Case in point: Richard Dawkins. Incredibly intelligent, lucid, and informed man. Because he's passionate about his correct position, he's "extreme" just like Mullahs. Yea, bullshit. They are abusing the concept of toleration and extending it to ideas that are blately false, nonsense. Just saying it's bullshit is tantamount to prejudice and discrimination nowadays, which is absurd. This successfully puts YOu on the defensive while taking the attention away from them and their bogus claims.
This coincides with the tactic of redefining what you are so they can better strawman you.
Another example is how the word "liberal" is a dirty word today. they have successfully used pavlovian pyschology to make people associate "bad" with something just the opposite. Christians are attempting to attack atheism via the same method.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 10:26:56 AM by Technocrat »
|
Logged
|
In Soviet Tetris blocks drop you!
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: October 19, 2007, 11:35:25 AM » |
|
No offence Barnes, but I must admit I have seen classier and better taste avatars in my time.
I like it. i can live out my homoerotic sadomasochistic Jesus fantasies. </deliberateoffensiveness>
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
|
Baldar
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: October 19, 2007, 12:01:54 PM » |
|
The problem Balder's bullshit notion about open-mindedness is that he's so open-minded, his brain's fallen rought out his head.
He's attempting to paint it as closed-minded not to believe in magical faerietales, and "open-minded" if you do. This is, yet again, a typical tactic used by Christians and Agnosticis alike. It's similar to how Fox News calls everyone "extreme" when they oppose them, regardless if they are wrong or right. Case in point: Richard Dawkins. Incredibly intelligent, lucid, and informed man. Because he's passionate about his correct position, he's "extreme" just like Mullahs. Yea, bullshit. They are abusing the concept of toleration and extending it to ideas that are blately false, nonsense. Just saying it's bullshit is tantamount to prejudice and discrimination nowadays, which is absurd. This successfully puts YOu on the defensive while taking the attention away from them and their bogus claims.
This coincides with the tactic of redefining what you are so they can better strawman you.
Another example is how the word "liberal" is a dirty word today. they have successfully used pavlovian pyschology to make people associate "bad" with something just the opposite. Christians are attempting to attack atheism via the same method.
You see there is where you are both crass and ignorant.. I don't care what you believe, I don't attack the idea of being an atheist. I don't believe in it, but you poor benighted fool, I am not a christian either. Or anything for that matter, I am still looking. You guys seem are the bigots who attack religion and toleration and then whine when someone calls you on it. Your mindset is he one in which crosses are burned, as well as books and people are turned to ash. Intellectually, nothing better than pitiful trailer trash when you attack people because of their belief systems and cannot even or a second extol to anyone your own system and why you think its great, that is without denigrating the other side. It reflects the base stupidity that you inculcate into your own belief system.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Technocrat
Full Member
 
Karma: +27/-149
Posts: 149
Soviet Technate
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: October 19, 2007, 12:14:05 PM » |
|
You think it's bigoted to express the fact that religious people are deluded and that their beliefs are bullshit. That's wrong, especially when you are in a discussion about it or when people go out of their way to talk, brag about it to you. If you are going to discuss and bring up the topic, then your ideas are free game, pal. This isn't a koom-bai-ya scout camp, but a debate board. I don't need to respect anyone's religious beliefs. IN fact, that's one problem with today's society: we pander to the religious and treat them with kid gloves.
Believing in a magical being who has a personal relationship with you, yet only YOU can hear him, ought to be mocked. It's patently stupid. That's not bigoted. It's not worthy of respect. The only difference between Scientology and Christianity is that one has been around longer. They are both just as fucking stupid. Religion has too much power today for how retarded it really is. We give it artificial toleration and respect when, in reality, it ought to be ruthlessly attacked when it rears up in public.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 19, 2007, 12:19:48 PM by Technocrat »
|
Logged
|
In Soviet Tetris blocks drop you!
|
|
|
Delta Nine
Full Member
 
Karma: +21/-125
Posts: 130
The Rapture? I'm not worried. Santa will save me.
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: October 19, 2007, 12:26:07 PM » |
|
You think it's bigoted to express the fact that religious people are deluded and that their beliefs are bullshit. That's wrong, especially when you are in a discussion about it or when people go out of their way to talk, brag about it to you. If you are going to discuss and bring up the topic, then your ideas are free game, pal. This isn't a koom-bai-ya scout camp, but a debate board. I don't need to respect anyone's religious beliefs. IN fact, that's one problem with today's society: we pander to the religious and treat them with kid gloves.
Believing in a magical being who has a personal relationship with you, yet only YOU can hear him, ought to be mocked. It's patently stupid. That's not bigoted. It's not worthy of respect. The only difference between Scientology and Christianity is that one has been around longer. They are both just as fucking stupid. Religion has too much power today for how retarded it really is. We give it artificial toleration and respect when, in reality, it ought to be ruthlessly attacked when it rears up in public.
Amen!!! Brutha!! My thoughts exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Baldar
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: October 19, 2007, 05:49:46 PM » |
|
You think it's bigoted to express the fact that religious people are deluded and that their beliefs are bullshit. That's wrong, especially when you are in a discussion about it or when people go out of their way to talk, brag about it to you. If you are going to discuss and bring up the topic, then your ideas are free game, pal. This isn't a koom-bai-ya scout camp, but a debate board. I don't need to respect anyone's religious beliefs. IN fact, that's one problem with today's society: we pander to the religious and treat them with kid gloves.
Believing in a magical being who has a personal relationship with you, yet only YOU can hear him, ought to be mocked. It's patently stupid. That's not bigoted. It's not worthy of respect. The only difference between Scientology and Christianity is that one has been around longer. They are both just as fucking stupid. Religion has too much power today for how retarded it really is. We give it artificial toleration and respect when, in reality, it ought to be ruthlessly attacked when it rears up in public.
Personally bigots like you are deluded, full of bullshit, should be mocked (and often are), patently stupid, retarded and you ought to be ruthlessly attacked. Did I pretty much get it all? One part is interesting. especially when you are in a discussion about it or when people go out of their way to talk, brag about it to you. If you are going to discuss and bring up the topic, then your ideas are free game, pal Seems like we have someone with inadequacy feelings here. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|