|
IamMe
|
 |
« on: October 22, 2007, 11:31:51 AM » |
|
Certain people (Baldar) have suggested that I and the other atheists here are bigots. This is something I am actually worried about. I don't want to be a bigot, I don't consider myself one.
So, am I a bigot?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
|
Baldar
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2007, 11:34:22 AM » |
|
Certain people (Baldar) have suggested that I and the other atheists here are bigots. This is something I am actually worried about. I don't want to be a bigot, I don't consider myself one.
So, am I a bigot?
Some atheists are bigots, most atheists aren't bigots. Bigots are those who denigrate others without being able to extol their own virtues. Has a bigot ever recognized himself as being one? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2007, 11:38:02 AM » |
|
Who voted "Who are you?"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2007, 11:40:50 AM » |
|
Certain people (Baldar) have suggested that I and the other atheists here are bigots. This is something I am actually worried about. I don't want to be a bigot, I don't consider myself one.
So, am I a bigot?
Some atheists are bigots, most atheists aren't bigots. Bigots are those who denigrate others without being able to extol their own virtues. That's an odd definition. Has a bigot ever recognized himself as being one?
I actually thought of that as I was posting the thread. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
Patton
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +105/-139
Posts: 1,826
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2007, 11:47:34 AM » |
|
Threads like this leave one open to severe criticism.
If this turns into a flame-fest it will be promptly Infernoed at worst, Lobby at best.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best; it removes all that is base. All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood
-George S. Patton
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2007, 11:55:00 AM » |
|
Threads like this leave one open to severe criticism.
That's the idea. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
targo88
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +40/-18
Posts: 589
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2007, 12:07:50 PM » |
|
A bigot is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of opinions, lifestyles, or identities differing from his or her own. mmmmmmmmm I wouldn't say that is completely you |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jesus is my pilot
Full Member
Karma: +62/-15
Posts: 108
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2007, 05:36:30 AM » |
|
I've read enough of your posts to know you are a religious bigot. On the bright side, at least you aren't as bad as Barney or D9. Also, we are all bigots in some way to some degree. /shrug. You asked.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Follow me, and you will not walk in darkness. -Jesus Christ
|
|
|
|
zukiphile
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2007, 06:03:38 AM » |
|
So, am I a bigot?
To a degree, yes. I base my response not on your religious conclusions, but that you have maintained a degree of intolerance despite not having worked past some odd ideas about religion. That said there are bigotries and then there are bigotries. I don't find you particularly strident or guilty of the chronically poor behaviour for which the board is becoming known. Beside which, I'm sure some of your best friends are theists. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The Genius
Shoes and socks removed,
Ahk tries to count syllables
But can\'t write haiku.
\\"...fuck off dickless.\\" -Ahkenaten
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Patere legem, quam ipse tulisti.
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 23, 2007, 10:39:16 AM » |
|
I've read enough of your posts to know you are a religious bigot.
How did you come to that conclusion? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2007, 10:41:45 AM » |
|
you have maintained a degree of intolerance despite not having worked past some odd ideas about religion.
What do you mean? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
|
zukiphile
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2007, 12:15:36 PM » |
|
What do you mean?
In our conversations, you've exhibited a category error or special pleading in which physical evidence is demanded for demonstration of theological or non-materialistic ideas. Arguing an error isn't bigotry, but maintaining an enthusiasm for it may be. I don't have the sense that your sentiments toward religion are neutral. Am I wrong? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The Genius
Shoes and socks removed,
Ahk tries to count syllables
But can\'t write haiku.
\\"...fuck off dickless.\\" -Ahkenaten
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Patere legem, quam ipse tulisti.
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2007, 12:33:52 PM » |
|
What do you mean?
In our conversations, you've exhibited a category error or special pleading in which physical evidence is demanded for demonstration of theological or non-materialistic ideas. Arguing an error isn't bigotry, but maintaining an enthusiasm for it may be. I don't see it as either. If no physical evidence exists how can we conclude that the object (God) exists? I don't have the sense that your sentiments toward religion are neutral. Am I wrong?
No. Are yours? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
|
zukiphile
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2007, 12:43:10 PM » |
|
What do you mean?
In our conversations, you've exhibited a category error or special pleading in which physical evidence is demanded for demonstration of theological or non-materialistic ideas. Arguing an error isn't bigotry, but maintaining an enthusiasm for it may be. I don't see it as either. If no physical evidence exists how can we conclude that the object (God) exists? The same way you might conclude that materialism is a valid position, by thinking about it and constructing a position that explains it. Is this question beyond the scope of your thread? I don't have the sense that your sentiments toward religion are neutral. Am I wrong?
No. Are yours? Yes. A religious concept is neither categorically correct nor incorrect simply because it is religous. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 23, 2007, 12:49:29 PM by zukiphile »
|
Logged
|
The Genius
Shoes and socks removed,
Ahk tries to count syllables
But can\'t write haiku.
\\"...fuck off dickless.\\" -Ahkenaten
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Patere legem, quam ipse tulisti.
|
|
|
|
IamMe
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2007, 12:48:30 PM » |
|
What do you mean?
In our conversations, you've exhibited a category error or special pleading in which physical evidence is demanded for demonstration of theological or non-materialistic ideas. Arguing an error isn't bigotry, but maintaining an enthusiasm for it may be. I don't see it as either. If no physical evidence exists how can we conclude that the object (God) exists? The same way you might conclude that materialism is a valid position, by thinking about it and constructing a position that explains it. Is this question beyond the scope of your thread? Not at all. I don't have the sense that your sentiments toward religion are neutral. Am I wrong?
No. Are yours? Yes. A religious concept is neither categorically correct or incorrect simply because it is religous. I never said anything like that. It just happens that most religious concept lack any evidentiary support. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell
If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
|
|
|
|
Poll
