IAP Political Forum
December 03, 2008, 06:54:13 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Default theme has been changed, and everyone reset due to some problems with posts disappearing after submitting.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Dangers of Cinema, Kubrick, Stone & More...  (Read 225 times)
2112
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +19/-15
Posts: 258



View Profile
« on: October 25, 2007, 02:42:23 PM »

Ahkenaten's signature has hastened my bringing up this topic. I had already planned it with the release of Stanley Kubrick's movies on HD this week. It is:

Quote
What we were after now was the old surprise visit. That was always a real kick and good for laughs and lashings of the old ultraviolence.

It's a line from the movie A Clockwork Orange, a film which unfortunately inspired so many violent copycat acts that Kubrick disowned it. This movie is the main reason that young boys go out and attack homeless men.

Oliver Stone's Natural Born Killers has also inspired acts of violence. And my guess is that David Fincher's Fight Club has, as well, the way I always hear people talk about it.

I don't think there's anything wrong with the movies, I just think that young people filled with testosterone and little brain power take from them the most entirely wrong messages. I think it's important to have a dialogue about that to hopefully spread the messages behind the movies so that some other young person does not go around ruining their lives and the lives of others over copying what they saw in a cool movie.
Logged
bringbackwigs
Professional Post-Whore
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +156/-183
Posts: 3,103


Please refrain from taking my posts seriously


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2007, 02:46:21 PM »

Quote
This movie is the main reason that young boys go out and attack homeless men.

/reading.
Logged

In religion and politics, people\\\\\\\\\'s beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination. - Mark Twain

Biker Dude
A TRUE Liberal!
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +156/-117
Posts: 2,103


Live to Ride, Ride to Live


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2007, 02:52:48 PM »

If a person does ANYTHING just because they saw it in a movie, there should be a bounty on their head, as they should be removed from the gene pool ASAP.
Logged



Who will watch the watchers?

Now that it is over, what are we going to talk about?
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2007, 03:54:46 PM »

They were probably inclined towards violence anyway. One doubts that a movie could turn a sweet kindly young lad into a raging sadist. Should priests and ministers who rant against abortion be blamed when a clinic is bombed?

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
Ahkenaten
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +136/-136
Posts: 1,666


Professor of Angular Mil and Applied Narcotics


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2007, 03:55:30 PM »

I have to admit I've always hated how Clockwork Orange goes out of it's way to make a hero out of Alex and then further seals the message by having everything work out for him in the end.

The book is not exactly like that. This is much more a 'world-gone-wrong' with Alex being the oldest of his Drugies at 15, the rapes are of 10-year old virgins and the whole scene is much uglier than the rock&roll approach in the film. Naturally he couldnt use especially young people in the roles.

Further, at the end of the film Alex is 'cured' of the treatment that stopped his violent impulses, by a return of his violent impulses, but in the book while he does suffer physical attacks if these thoughts happen, he also sincerely experiences an epiphany of how he has hurt others and how his former drugies are damned around him. The book ends with him willfully changing and sticking with it, looking forward to bringing a child into the world and 'raising it right'.

The message of the movie is you can't stop people's nature and what's so bad about Alex anyways?

The message of the book is how cruel and inhuman society is becoming on every level from the ground to the state ( - the drugies also end up as police? the doctors and politicians don't care about victims or criminals they care about their careers - ), that and, also as above, that you can't force a true change in a persons nature BUT all can be redeemed if willing, and if willing all can change their own nature.

I see a big difference in those messages. So consider how many have seen the film and how many have read the book....


Ahk
« Last Edit: October 25, 2007, 04:06:09 PM by Ahkenaten » Logged
2112
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +19/-15
Posts: 258



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2007, 05:59:43 AM »

The book is not exactly like that. This is much more a 'world-gone-wrong' with Alex being the oldest of his Drugies at 15, the rapes are of 10-year old virgins and the whole scene is much uglier than the rock&roll approach in the film. Naturally he couldnt use especially young people in the roles.

I somewhat disagree, from the film I really get the impression that it is also a world-gone-wrong with gangs that lack empathy, but you're right about the age difference. Two movies with violence and children that I have always thought were very close to the theme in A Clockwork Orange and that actually do use children are Kids and Bully. I appreciate your opinion on the book and movie.

I don't think that people watch this movie and go out and commit crimes because of it. I think already disaffected young people get their ideas from movies, TV, the Media, and anything influential and then you read about them in the news. The appeal of Natural Born Killers was enough to influence a young couple to shoot random victims along an Oklahoma highway in 1995. I think anymore if a young man beats up a homeless person it's not necessarily because of ACO anymore, because they see it on the news, on Youtube.

But aside from that, it has always been 'cool' to be into these violent movies. The Godfather, Scarface, just think of a movie you're not ashamed to be really into and most likely it has some ultraviolence in it. My guess is that the violence is a form of protection from the various evils of the world, and that if you can commit it, you are in essense surviving by protecting yourself from the forces that threaten to destroy you. We live in a society that frowns upon violence except as a last resort for defense, so we need to see it in these movies, to feel that rush that only violence can bring. And at the same time, were we to actually commit it, we then have to struggle with our own consience afterward. This is just a guess, as I haven't committed violence or ever killed anyone, but my guess is that whether or not you intend it, you will have to consciously struggle after it's happened.


Logged
allpoints
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-2
Posts: 214


I don't care if it rains or freezes...


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2007, 06:14:05 PM »

John Dillinger and Pretty Boy Floyd were heroes among people who never saw a movie and attended church regularly...So was Jessie James.

Kubrick and Stone are (and were) artists.
Natural Born Killers was a great work of art examining society, the media, the individual W2P, and our fascination with blood and circuses.
Watch it on mushrooms like Stone intended and then rate it as a work of art. One of the most brilliant movies ever made, IMHO.

Clockwork Orange is Kubrick's socio/political commentary of our graceless modern age through the nihilism of young men as a focal point of society's ills. (It's also a treatise on Master vs Slave morality, but that's more subjective...)


The Fight Club is another testosterone based look at the urge to destroy the self while recovering a Freudian Self Image stolen by society. "Our fathers were our first models for God" "The IKEA Nesting Instinct"


In all these movies, the violence is the subject, or at least part of the subject. In all these movies, the violence is highly stylized and adds to the message of the art. In all three films, the audience is brought into the picture as taxpayer, random victim, media consumer, fellow fighter...Both works lay some of the blame for the violence at the audience's (Society's) feet. They are all cautionary morality tales....

This movie is the main reason that young boys go out and attack homeless men.

Why did they do it before the movie was made?

The will toward violence that these movies describe is not some new thought these movies created. It's been with us as long as young men. Most large societies have historically channeled a lot of that energy into military, construction, or other state service, but it's a natural human trait.


Clockwork Orange, Fight Club, and NBK all make very strong artistic statements about violence and nihilism in modern society through the eyes of young men.
Just like Full Metal Jacket and Platoon, they are loaded with illuminating messages against the violence they portray.






« Last Edit: October 30, 2007, 08:10:19 PM by allpoints » Logged

slide
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.07 seconds with 26 queries.