|
Dog Face 11B
|
 |
« on: October 29, 2007, 08:11:33 AM » |
|
CommentsTerrorists: Vote Hillary; Kill Rudy
by Deroy Murdock
Senator Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is gaining fans, even on the West Bank.
“I hope Hillary is elected in order to have the occasion to carry out all the promises she is giving regarding Iraq,” said Ala Senakreh, West Bank chief of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a Palestinian terror group. “President Clinton wanted to give the Palestinians 98 percent of the West Bank territories. I hope Hillary will move a step forward and will give the Palestinians all their rights.”
Senakreh and other top Islamo-fascists want Hillary in the Oval Office. These mass murders also have “gone negative.” They want GOP contender Rudy Giuliani dead.
“We see Hillary and other candidates are competing on who will withdraw from Iraq,” said Abu Jihad of Al Aqsa’s Nablus unit. “This is a moment of glory for the revolutionary movements in the Arab world…”
Al Aqsa’s Nasser Abu Aziz, considered it “very good” that there are “voices like Hillary and others who are now attacking the Iraq invasion.”
Islamic Jihad’s Abu Ayman felt “emboldened” by Clinton’s demands that America retreat from Iraq. He said: “It is clear that it is the resistance operations of the mujahideen that have brought about these calls for withdrawal.”
All Americans must vote Democrat,” insisted Jihad Jaara, an exiled Al Aqsa agent who commanded 2002’s siege of Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity.
Since 1995, these terrorists’ organizations have killed an estimated 162 and wounded 368 others in Israel. Aaron Klein, an Orthodox Jew who is WorldNetDaily.com’s Jerusalem Bureau Chief, interviewed some three dozen leading Muslim fanatics, including those quoted here. His new book, “Schmoozing with Terrorists,” details these chilling encounters with violent Islamic extremists in Israel’s Palestinian territories.
Why do these hardened butchers have a soft spot for Hillary Clinton? Perhaps because the New York Democrat is soft on terrorism.
*Clinton rejects robustly interrogating terrorists even in “ticking time bomb” scenarios. In a September 26 Democratic debate, she said: “It cannot be American policy, period.”
*Clinton opposes the U.S. Terrorist Surveillance Program, calling it “a secret program that spies on Americans.”
*Clinton voted against military tribunals for terror suspects, including al-Qaeda detainees.
*Clinton has zigzagged on Iraq. In autumn 2002, she voted for Operation Iraqi Freedom. Last January 18, she told PBS: “I think the timetable still remains problematic” for leaving Iraq. But on February 17, she stated: “It’s time to say the redeployment should start in 90 days…”
Meanwhile, Clinton’s campaign has not responded to my request to list her counterterrorist accomplishments.
These terrorists’ love for Hillary mirrors their hatred for her leading GOP rival, Rudy Giuliani.
“If I had the occasion to meet him I would hurt him,” said Ramadan Adassi, a West Bank Al Aqsa leader. “For the sake of the American people, Giuliani shouldn’t be elected.”
“Giuliani doesn’t deserve to live or even to be mentioned,” said Al Aqsa’s Ala Senakreh. “He hates Palestinians and we hate him.”
Al Aqsa’s Abu Hamed said Giuliani “can hate Arafat and the Palestinians, but he knows that nobody is hated in the world more than his leadership, his party, his president, and his Zionist friends.”
Why the hard feelings? Perhaps because Giuliani has snipped terrorists’ bomb wires for 31 years.
*Mayor Giuliani’s NYPD officers in July 1997 arrested two Palestinians with Jordanian passports and five pipe-bombs. They were convicted of immigration fraud and plotting to blast Brooklyn’s Atlantic Avenue subway station.
*As New York City’s U.S. Attorney, Giuliani attempted in 1988 to close the Palestine Liberation Organization’s United Nations observer mission under the 1987 Anti-Terrorism Act.
*In 1986, Giuliani targeted an anti-Castro group responsible for two murders and 25 bombings. Giuliani secured guilty pleas from three Omega 7 members who conspired to kill Cuba’s U.N. ambassador in 1980 and blow up its Manhattan consulate in 1979.
*Giuliani represented the Justice Department on President Gerald Ford’s Cabinet Committee to Combat Terrorism in 1976.
“I don’t believe Americans should base their votes entirely on what the terrorists think,” Aaron Klein says from Jerusalem, “but it’s certainly telling that our enemies are rooting for the Democrats, particularly Hillary.”
As the War on Terror continues, Americans should study our foes’ political preferences -- and then pull the lever the other way. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sorry Dog Face 11B, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
Racist comments
Really BBW? Show me where I said one racist comment. But I can show you where a mod at this board has and nothing was done about it.
|
|
|
|
jpn of Seattle
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2007, 08:15:49 AM » |
|
Do you ever provide links to your sources? Or is it too embarrassing to do so? From the article: *Clinton rejects robustly interrogating terrorists even in “ticking time bomb” scenarios. In a September 26 Democratic debate, she said: “It cannot be American policy, period.”
*Clinton opposes the U.S. Terrorist Surveillance Program, calling it “a secret program that spies on Americans.”
*Clinton voted against military tribunals for terror suspects, including al-Qaeda detainees. All excellent reasons for voting for Clinton. She would actually support the rule of law in America. What a novel idea. As for Giuliani anticipating terrorist action in America, he didn't even ensure his firefighters could communicate effectively: Instead of being the best-prepared city, New York's lack of unified command, as well as the breakdown of communications between the police and fire departments, fell far short of the efforts at the Pentagon that day, as later established by the 9/11 Commission and NIST reports. When the 280,000-member International Association of Fire Fighters recently released a powerful video assailing Giuliani for sticking firefighters with the same radios that "we knew didn't work" in the 1993 attack, the presidential campaign attacked the union. "This is an organization that supported John Kerry for president in 2004," Giuliani aide Tony Carbonetti said. "So it's no shock that they're out there going after a credible Republican." While the IAFF did endorse Kerry, the Uniformed Firefighters of Greater New York, whose president starred in the video, endorsed Bush. Its former president, Tom Von Essen—currently a member of Giuliani Partners—was the fire commissioner on 9/11 precisely because the union had played such a pivotal role in initially electing Giuliani.
In the end, firefighters had to rely exclusively on their radios, and the inability of the Giuliani administration to find a replacement for the radios that malfunctioned in 1993 left them unable to talk to each other, even about getting out of a tower on the verge of collapse.
The mayor had also done nothing to make the radios interoperable—which would have enabled the police and firefighters to communicate across departmental lines—despite having received a 1995 federal waiver granting the city the additional radio frequencies to make that possible. That meant the fire chiefs had no idea that police helicopters had anticipated the partial collapse of both towers long before they fell.
It's not just the radios and the OEM: Giuliani never forced the police and fire departments to abide by clear command-and-control protocols that squarely put one service in charge of the other during specified emergencies. Though he collected $250 million in tax surcharges on phone use to improve the 911 system, he diverted this emergency funding for other uses, and the 911 dispatchers were an utter disaster that day, telling victims to stay where they were long after the fire chiefs had ordered an evacuation, which potentially sealed the fates of hundreds. And, despite the transparent lessons of 1993, Giuliani never established any protocols for rooftop or elevator rescues in high-rises, or even a strategy for bringing the impaired and injured out—all costly failings on 9/11. sourceI wonder if the sources quoted in the Dog's article were using reverse psychology, knowing that saying they support Clinton over Giulian would make it harder for Clinton? One can certainly see why they would perfer incompetent, "Let's invade Iran now" Giuliani. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 29, 2007, 08:33:07 AM by jpn of Seattle »
|
Logged
|
What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
|
|
|
|
neue regel
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2007, 08:24:12 AM » |
|
A vote for Hillary is a vote for terrorism...straight from terrorist's mouth I don't believe that and I don't think the rhetoric should go in that direction...at all. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ahkenaten
Forum Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +136/-136
Posts: 1,665
Professor of Angular Mil and Applied Narcotics
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 29, 2007, 08:25:43 AM » |
|
comes from here: http://www.hillaryproject.com/It doesn't get more bull than that site. Fact is this is just a load of crap...same load they dumped on Kerry. So what? Who cares what you "think" "Islamofascists" are saying? All of a sudden it's time to take their side? To start treating what they say with credence? Osama siad he loved Bush and that invading iraq is more than he ever coulda dreamed. So if Hiliry is a terrorist because some nobody Imam says shes they approve, what does that make Bush since the Grand Poobah of Terrorists endorses his administration? Ahk |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gkferris
Newbie
Karma: +4/-9
Posts: 47
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2007, 08:28:10 AM » |
|
So, when Al Quaeda tells us that the reasons they attack us is that they're mad about sanctions against Arab children, US troops in their holy cities, and support of Israeli actions against Palestinian civilians, they're lying and they hate our freedom, but when they endorse a Democrat, they're being dead honest?
Seriously, every time I log on here I'm just hoping that Major Burns here has posted something new for me to enjoy.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 29, 2007, 08:32:42 AM by gkferris »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Totino
High Society
Hero Member
Karma: +105/-133
Posts: 1,354
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2007, 08:29:20 AM » |
|
Do you ever provide links to your sources? Or is it too embarrassing to do so? From the article: *Clinton rejects robustly interrogating terrorists even in “ticking time bomb” scenarios. In a September 26 Democratic debate, she said: “It cannot be American policy, period.”
You'll wish she did when we have another attack that could of been prevented.... I'm not sure if what dogface posted is legit. But the author Deroy Murdock seems to be credible... Look him up. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 29, 2007, 08:32:15 AM by Totino »
|
Logged
|
 \\\"Since you\\\'re going to loose everything anyway when you die, you might as well get rid of it now\\\" \\\"All creations, including god, originate in the mind\\\" |
|
|
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2007, 08:30:13 AM » |
|
Stupid article and stupid post.
OswaldTheOsprey
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Urbi et Orbi
|
|
|
|
neue regel
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2007, 08:32:23 AM » |
|
Clinton rejects robustly interrogating terrorists even in “ticking time bomb” scenarios. In a September 26 Democratic debate, she said: “It cannot be American policy, period.” There is a big difference when it's YOUR behind in the big chair. She CAN'T know what she'd do until faced with the real situation. That's why it's so easy to pick Bush apart because none of us are responsible for the weight of our decisions. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
neue regel
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2007, 09:01:32 AM » |
|
I'll take it a step further...I think it will be BETTER for Hillary to get elected because once she is able to evaluate the situation in the ME, she'll see that Bush was largely right with more than he's gotten credit and she'll continue down that path.
The cherry will be that, as a Dem, she'll get a pass from the media and the world at large who will celebrate her brilliance.
Could be a win/win...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paincake
Newbie
Karma: +1/-1
Posts: 16
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2007, 09:12:20 AM » |
|
Since 1995, these terrorists’ organizations have killed an estimated 162 and wounded 368 others in Israel
While even one death is too much I'd have to say that for an organization built on killing.. only killing 1.22 people per month is, well...
Doesn't organized crime kill more than that?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Karma: +212/-207
Posts: 4,098
"You do not speak for the rest"
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2007, 09:38:32 AM » |
|
Why is it convienient to believe terrorists now?
THEY'RE TERRORISTS!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky
... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
Totino
High Society
Hero Member
Karma: +105/-133
Posts: 1,354
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2007, 10:09:59 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
\\\"Since you\\\'re going to loose everything anyway when you die, you might as well get rid of it now\\\" \\\"All creations, including god, originate in the mind\\\" |
|
|
|
Dog Face 11B
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2007, 10:36:01 AM » |
|
Funny how some of you say dont believe terrorist because they are terrorist are the first to believe why they are terrorists.
You guys have repeated the same reasons straight from the mouths of terrorists.
Because we are in Iraq
Because we support Israel
Because our policies in the ME
Because the US is the great satan
All straight from the mouths of terrorists yet you guys lap it up like a dog. Then when faced with why they want Americans to vote for someone that will pull US forces out of the ME, what they want, you are the first ones to stick your head in your ass and say why believe what they have to say. FOOLS
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sorry Dog Face 11B, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
Racist comments
Really BBW? Show me where I said one racist comment. But I can show you where a mod at this board has and nothing was done about it.
|
|
|
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2007, 10:41:24 AM » |
|
Funny how some of you say dont believe terrorist because they are terrorist are the first to believe why they are terrorists.
You guys have repeated the same reasons straight from the mouths of terrorists.
Because we are in Iraq
Because we support Israel
Because our policies in the ME
Because the US is the great satan
All straight from the mouths of terrorists yet you guys lap it up like a dog. Then when faced with why they want Americans to vote for someone that will pull US forces out of the ME, what they want, you are the first ones to stick your head in your ass and say why believe what they have to say. FOOLS
Perhaps you are right. Perhaps being in Iraq, supporting Israel and our mideast policies have caused us to be hated. Perhaps we should, as Ron Paul suggests, take a good hard look at these policies. Perhaps we have been the FOOLS you speak of. OswaldTheOsprey |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Urbi et Orbi
|
|
|
|
