Patton is confusing the difference between candidates that are religious, and candidates that have religious policies.
I am not confused.
I mentioned nothing of their policies.
How does an Atheists intellectually deal with the religion of a Presidential candidate?Basically an atheists MUST support, in MOST ALL cases a Christian, to run the country. As demonstrated repeatedly on this forum...the contempt, vitriol, sense of superiority and in some cases outright hatred that some atheists direct toward Christians, I find it intresting those same people will go to GREAT lenghths to defend these "demented"..."stupid"..."unintelligent" individuals....I attemted to describe this earlier:
Some atheists will enthusiatically endorse, support and contribute to the campaigns...place the candidates high on pedestals...how they are "good for the country"..all the while saving their vocal and written intolerance and vitriol against God and religion for us regular folks who can't change anything...and all the while praising their candidate...who very well could change things and the same atheists WILL NOT speak publically or loudly about their candidates faith in God.First off it is nearly impossible for a candidate to be "officially" anything but a Christian in modern politics. How many non-Christians are running for office now? 1, a deist(Gravel). For whatever reason being a Christian is essentially a test of a candidates "Americanity". This is because of the illusion that many Americans hold of our country. America is NOT founded on Christianity, but many believe it is.
So...I guess this country is run by and supported by a bunch of idiots.
We, like all Americans, pick the best choice we can based upon the myriad of corrupt politicians whos real intentions are always hidden.
You will get no arguement from me here.