Bush is probably paid by the weapon industry. Like the corrupt Olmert. What a dream for this industry when the receivers of their dirty money are opening the new killing fields in Iran.

Israel also lobbied hard for the war against Iraq. We all see the distraous outcome now.

Christians have a long traditions for killing heathens. During history hundreds of millions have been killed. In America, Africa, Asia, the Middle East. What kind of perverse religious practice is this?

The question you have to ask yourself is what purpose does Israel serve the US for US to make so many sacrifices in the name of christianity by going to a war and fight someone else's war? Israel receives more aid from the U.S. than any other country in ME milirtarily. Ever since the end of Cold War, Israel has had no real use for US's strategic purposes and in fact, US's conditional support for them without tying aid to their behavior, combined with them maintaining the longest illegal military occupation in modern history (going on 40 years now) in violation of international law has made US the main target for terrorism.

So what that I am not a US citizen? Neither are you!

Anti what? Those videos are there for people to watch and form their own opinion. No one else seems to be crying about it. wtf is your problem?

It's obvious you are trying to distort the subject by trolling this thread and make this a personal attack on me.

If you have comments to add regarding the article do so until then keep the miserable creature comments to yourself! No one asked you for it!

The link that I removed was your favourite one! It was the one that said Ahamdienejad never said Israel must be "wiped off the map". What has this got to do with contantly blaming Israel only Prophet can enlighten us


Anyway, I don't think there's anything that I would disagree with the author of the above article. Does that make me anti israeli? no. But I am certainly against the zionist policies and US's undeniable support of them. 

I really feel sorry for people like you if you think that whoever expresses an opinion that is contrary to your way of thinking is a radical.
The author of the above article is not a supporter of theocracy in Iran. If you read his article, you would obviously be able to see that he is advocating for a policy that can lead to regime change in Iran. He is just not in support of the kind of anti-iraninan attitude that people like yourselves are constantly repeating the same falsified rhetorics about.

It amazes me that people like yourself do this kind of distortion often to crush any voice of opposition to your ideologies at the expense of any rationality in their arguments. It is lame and is getting old.

Yup a bunch of drivel as expected!
I have nothng more to say to you. There's no hope for you!