IAP Political Forum
December 01, 2008, 03:23:07 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Support IAP -- join "High Society" with less fuss. Click "paid subscriptions" from your profile.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The American Dollar  (Read 709 times)
jpn of Seattle
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +241/-233
Posts: 2,021



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 20, 2007, 07:06:56 PM »

Here's a follow-up to Krugman's article, three posts up:

Followup: Great comments. A few general thoughts:
1. A fair number of commentators are skeptical about whether a weak dollar really increases exports and reduces imports. There is room to worry about how big those effects are, but the direction is quite clear. Over the past year real exports are up about 10 percent, a lot faster than overall growth, while real imports are up only about 2 percent, slower than overall growth; all this is presumably the effect of the weak dollar, and there’s probably a lot more to come. Overall, the improving trade picture added about 1 percent to the economy’s growth rate, which is modest but significant.
2. When people wonder why anyone would invest in the US without a rise in interest rates, you have to make the distinction between a falling dollar and a fallen dollar. If the dollar gets really weak, investors will see US assets as a bargain, and flock here even without higher rates. The question is how far the dollar has to fall to make that happen, and whether the Fed can let that big a fall happen.
(same source, with followup added at bottom).
Logged

What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
jpn of Seattle
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +241/-233
Posts: 2,021



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 26, 2007, 09:23:22 PM »

1. It appears that the dollar crisis has arrived:
Quote
Meanwhile, on the dollar front
I missed this — it’s a week old — but still quite a quote:
Quote
Bottom line: private demand for US financial assets has disappeared. In emerging market terms, the US has experienced a sudden stop.
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/setser/227482

“Sudden stop” is a term of art — it refers to crises, like those that occurred in various developing countries, in which the supply of foreign capital suddenly dried up — sometimes with catastrophic economic results.
That’s not likely to happen to the US — we don’t have the “balance-sheet currency-denomination mismatch that was rampant in Argentina before the 2002 crisis” — in other words, our foreign debt is in dollars, so a plunge in the dollar doesn’t cause an explosion of debt. Also, for now the sudden stop is only in private funds: foreign central banks are still buying dollars.
But it’s still sort of unnerving to see the long-awaited dollar crisis starting to unfold.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/26/meanwhile-on-the-dollar-front/

2. So, what does this mean?

Concerns about a dollar crisis can be divided into two questions:

Will there be a plunge in the dollar?
Will this plunge have nasty macroeconomic consequences?

The answer to the first question depends on whether there is investor myopia, a
failure to take into account the requirement that the dollar eventually fall enough to
stabilize US external debt at a feasible level. Although it is always dangerous to
second-guess markets, the data do seem to suggest such myopia: it is hard to reconcile
the willingness of investors to hold dollar assets with a very small premium in real interest
rates with the apparent necessity for fairly rapid dollar decline to contain growing
foreign debt. The various rationales and rationalizations for the US current account
deficit that have been advanced in recent years do not seem to help us avoid the conclusion
that investors are not taking the need for future dollar decline into account.

So it seems likely that there will be a Wile E. Coyote moment when investors
realize that the dollar’s value doesn’t make sense, and that value plunges.
The case for believing that a dollar plunge will do great harm is much less secure.
In the medium run, the economy can trade off lower domestic demand, mainly the result
of a fall in real housing prices, for higher net exports, the result of dollar depreciation.

Any economic contraction in the short run will be the result of differences in adjustment
speeds, with the fall in domestic demand outpacing the rise in net exports.
The United States in 2007 isn’t Argentina in 2001: although there is a very good
case that the dollar will decline sharply, nothing in the data points to an Argentinestyle
economic implosion when that happens. Still, this probably won’t be fun.
http://www.economic-policy.org/article1.asp?src=bpl&aid=183&iid=51&vid=22&id=
« Last Edit: November 26, 2007, 09:48:00 PM by jpn of Seattle » Logged

What you got is everything-and I mean everything—run by the political arm. It’s the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis. --John DiIulio, former White House official
Fredledingue
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +30/-31
Posts: 868



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2007, 01:07:23 PM »

I don't think the dollar will drop that sharply again.
Once troops are being removed from Iraq and military spendings are reduced, its influence on the inflation will be less.
Logged

Dr. Zoidberg is jewish (and an important AIPAC donator!)

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 26 queries.