IAP Political Forum
December 01, 2008, 03:24:06 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Default theme has been changed, and everyone reset due to some problems with posts disappearing after submitting.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Secular Fundamendalists?  (Read 1045 times)
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #45 on: November 22, 2007, 06:27:37 PM »

What I favor is Social Fascism. Under this system, nationalization would replace capitalism. The Motherland would furnish its citizenry with basic necessities in return for work and security. There would be massive programs of public works (hospitals, schools, roads, parks etc.). The foreign policy would be strictly non-interventionist and isolationist. Persons not loyal to the Motherland would be forced to leave-no concentration camps. There would be eugenics from which would come future leadership. There would be religious freedom, but no religious interference with the running of the Motherland. How is that?

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
illy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +106/-105
Posts: 1,061


illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: November 22, 2007, 07:35:41 PM »

Are we talking centralized control or decentralized control?

Different sectors would be different, but generally what do you have in mind.



My view is that ideally workers should have control on a local level over production. The current situation is not ideal, IMO, but I think state centralization of control is a step in the wrong direction.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2007, 07:37:14 PM by illy » Logged

Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening
Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him
Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him
Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it -
Rugged Man - Give it Up
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #47 on: November 22, 2007, 08:19:35 PM »

Are we talking centralized control or decentralized control?

Different sectors would be different, but generally what do you have in mind.



My view is that ideally workers should have control on a local level over production. The current situation is not ideal, IMO, but I think state centralization of control is a step in the wrong direction.

Perhaps for some. However, others may choose such a course to prevent the abuses inherent in multinationals and international high finance.

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
IamMe
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +39/-126
Posts: 1,271



View Profile
« Reply #48 on: November 24, 2007, 11:50:34 AM »

Persons not loyal to the Motherland would be forced to leave-no concentration camps.

So the government of the state can deport it's political opponents?
Logged

\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell

If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
illy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +106/-105
Posts: 1,061


illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: November 24, 2007, 11:59:04 AM »

Are we talking centralized control or decentralized control?

Different sectors would be different, but generally what do you have in mind.



My view is that ideally workers should have control on a local level over production. The current situation is not ideal, IMO, but I think state centralization of control is a step in the wrong direction.

Perhaps for some. However, others may choose such a course to prevent the abuses inherent in multinationals and international high finance.

OswaldTheOsprey

I would agree that abuse is inherent in business. Anything that will help the bottom line is inherent in business. Still, what reason do we have to believe that more centralized control will be any more effective at combating the abuses? We already have a lot of regulations that are largely ignored when it comes to enforcement. Regulation tends to come under the influence of those being regulated, IMO, further centralization of control does not answer how this would be prevented.

Your idea is interesting, but how do you know that the same fools pulling strings currently wouldn't find a way to convert their power to the new system?
Logged

Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening
Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him
Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him
Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it -
Rugged Man - Give it Up
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: November 24, 2007, 08:59:59 PM »

Persons not loyal to the Motherland would be forced to leave-no concentration camps.

So the government of the state can deport it's political opponents?

Of course.

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
tadpol
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +27/-19
Posts: 291



View Profile
« Reply #51 on: November 25, 2007, 01:37:12 AM »

"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions."

I'm curious how you answer Mr. Madison's concerns. Who watches the watchers?
Logged
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #52 on: November 25, 2007, 09:26:15 AM »

"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions."

I'm curious how you answer Mr. Madison's concerns. Who watches the watchers?

All of the Motherland watches the watchers.

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
IamMe
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +39/-126
Posts: 1,271



View Profile
« Reply #53 on: November 25, 2007, 01:50:08 PM »

"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions."

I'm curious how you answer Mr. Madison's concerns. Who watches the watchers?

All of the Motherland watches the watchers.

OswaldTheOsprey

This is fascism we're talking about not democracy. It doesn't matter how much 'the motherland'  Roll Eyes watches the watchers - if they don't like what's happening there's fuck all they can do about it.
Logged

\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell

If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #54 on: November 25, 2007, 01:58:52 PM »

"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions."

I'm curious how you answer Mr. Madison's concerns. Who watches the watchers?

All of the Motherland watches the watchers.

OswaldTheOsprey

This is fascism we're talking about not democracy. It doesn't matter how much 'the motherland'  Roll Eyes watches the watchers - if they don't like what's happening there's fuck all they can do about it.

I am a Social Fascist and I detest democracy.

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
IamMe
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +39/-126
Posts: 1,271



View Profile
« Reply #55 on: November 25, 2007, 02:03:48 PM »

"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions."

I'm curious how you answer Mr. Madison's concerns. Who watches the watchers?

All of the Motherland watches the watchers.

OswaldTheOsprey

This is fascism we're talking about not democracy. It doesn't matter how much 'the motherland'  Roll Eyes watches the watchers - if they don't like what's happening there's fuck all they can do about it.

I am a Social Fascist and I detest democracy.

OswaldTheOsprey

I understand that. Now could you address the question?

What's the point in "watching the watchers" if there's fuck all you can do about any of it?
Logged

\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell

If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
IamMe
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +39/-126
Posts: 1,271



View Profile
« Reply #56 on: November 25, 2007, 02:06:04 PM »

Persons not loyal to the Motherland would be forced to leave-no concentration camps.

So the government of the state can deport it's political opponents?

Of course.

OswaldTheOsprey

And you don't see why that is a bad thing?
Logged

\\\\"Anarchism is the ideal to which all societies should approximate\\\\" - Bertrand Russell

If you strike me down I shall become more dead than you can ever imagine.
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #57 on: November 25, 2007, 02:29:15 PM »

"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions."

I'm curious how you answer Mr. Madison's concerns. Who watches the watchers?

All of the Motherland watches the watchers.

OswaldTheOsprey

This is fascism we're talking about not democracy. It doesn't matter how much 'the motherland'  Roll Eyes watches the watchers - if they don't like what's happening there's fuck all they can do about it.

I am a Social Fascist and I detest democracy.

OswaldTheOsprey

I understand that. Now could you address the question?

What's the point in "watching the watchers" if there's fuck all you can do about any of it?

What's the point of continuing in corrupt capitalism and democracy? So we can have more senseless and evil wars, more Clintons and Bushes?

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
daedalus 2.0
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-397
Posts: 1,145



View Profile
« Reply #58 on: November 26, 2007, 08:41:48 AM »

So, we don't have to live in a Fascist State?

Ironically, it sounds like we are in a Fascist State, so why would you complain? You have what you want!
Logged

\\\\"SUCK IT, JESUS!\\\\" Kathy Griffin
\"Hitler burns Anne Frank for a day, and it\'s Evil.
God burns Anne Frank for eternity, and it\'s Just.\"Anon
OswaldTheOsprey
High Society
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +100/-123
Posts: 9,152



View Profile
« Reply #59 on: November 26, 2007, 09:50:52 AM »

So, we don't have to live in a Fascist State?

Ironically, it sounds like we are in a Fascist State, so why would you complain? You have what you want!

We do not live in a fascist state. We live in a land of selfishness and nihilism.

OswaldTheOsprey
Logged

Urbi et Orbi
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.195 seconds with 26 queries.