2112, the link links to a video with footage of aftershocks in Chile...

Yup, thats the chilean eartquake too.   Really creepy huh?  The ghost must be in the net, proving he exosts by hiding all the evidence - a historical singularity, no less.  Ask reasoned faith to explain it.

Damn you CNN Video!

Have I fallen asleep and awoken in the Dark Ages? Ghosts, witches in Africa, gods in biology, Vampire hunters in PA, demon possessions in France,...
come on people! I don't need to see the video to know it isn't a ghost. what is more likely? a ghost is REALLY caught on camera (this time, unlike the millions of other times) or one of the hundreds of other reasonable explanations?

No, Biker... if you feel like claiming it was a ghost, prove your claim. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim, and extraordianry claims require extraordinary proof.

What I saw was a blue, out of focus object moving across the lens. Probably was caught close to the objective (maybe the camera is protected from weather inside a "fishbowl" case?), and probably the thing was being randomly blown by an air stream entering the (speculated) fishbowl case.

Anyway if someone claims it was something supernatural, I am on tenterhooks to know their evidence...

How about a car light reflecting off a window, how about a hoax (its been known to happen), or maybe it was a blue demon from the ice world Logidoep.

BD, ask yourself: "what conditions has made this camera, above all others, pick up the image of a ghost? Why do you feel the need to go to the most improbable case before ruling out all the others?  If all the other images of ghosts were hoaxs, or explained (and as far as I know all the major ones have been analyzed), then that means there is no evidence of ghosts (especially considering the ghost hunters use equipment that isn't designed to find ghosts - they use Radio Shack crap that makes a noise when you move it, or picks up the heat/cold on the wall beyond where they are pointing.)


Case in point, one ghost hunter said he found a cool spot, and when studied skeptically, they found out he was pointing his device at a cold water pipe (the machine picks up radiant heat).

Either way, there are no outstanding mysteries - only new ones. the score is: Science 1,000,000's vs superstition 0.

If you want to believe, go ahead. Beleive in Big Foot, Nessie, pixies, demons, gods, vampires - all those things that you can't prove they don't exist because they DON'T EXIST. Because there isn't evidence for them - unless you want to use RF's logic and claim that the existence of garlic is evidence for the existence of Vampires.  Or, that toadstool rings are evidence of fairies.  Or, chills in the body are evidence that a cat has walked over your future grave. Or that a claim of a virgin birth is evidence of god.

Superstition is a powerful tool - for tools.  Don't be manipulated.

Nope, I am oddly proud that I didn't.