IAP Political Forum
October 06, 2008, 03:50:49 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Default theme has been changed, and everyone reset due to some problems with posts disappearing after submitting.
 
   Home   Blog Forum   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Digg This!
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Solar Power  (Read 1176 times)
illy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +94/-105
Posts: 958


illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2007, 10:29:25 PM »

negatory...I still stand by my original statement that innovation will improve efficiency, as it is/has/and will continue to do for the tech industry.

I agree with this, and if we had put anywhere near the resources into improving solar efficiency as into developing and using petroleum, I think we would have much better solar now.

I think I might need to write a few emails soon.



Thats sounds pretty cool with your coworkers car Biker.
Logged

Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening
Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him
Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him
Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it -
Rugged Man - Give it Up
illy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +94/-105
Posts: 958


illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2007, 10:45:07 PM »

I also like the idea of solar furnaces and solar thermal power.

The idea operates on the same principle as Archimedes death ray, a series of mirrors each adjusted to reflect sunlight to the same spot.



Solar 2 power project in the Mojave Desert.






PS10 Solar Power Tower Near Seville, Spain
Logged

Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening
Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him
Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him
Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it -
Rugged Man - Give it Up
allpoints
Full Member
***

Karma: +24/-2
Posts: 214


I don't care if it rains or freezes...


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2007, 03:26:20 PM »

negatory...I still stand by my original statement that innovation will improve efficiency, as it is/has/and will continue to do for the tech industry.

While I agree with you in principle, I think seeing solar power efficiencies as following Moore's Law is a bit sanguine. I think there are many, many people who would like to come up with the "key" to unlock cheap solar, but they haven't hit on it so far.  There's lots of $$ available for directed research in solar power. If someone came up with the means to double current efficiencies and lower costs in one fell swoop, they'd be worldwide superstars on the order of Salk, or Bell.
I don't think kicking in a little more funding or tax breaks will move things along much faster. The motivation is already there.

Organization and directed effort is what made the space program doable in the 60s. I think it would take something along those lines to make maximum progress toward the goal.

That requires selling it to the public like Kennedy sold the Space Program. Very little chance of that happening any time soon...


Logged

slide
illy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +94/-105
Posts: 958


illerino if youre not into the whole brevity thing


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2007, 08:10:55 PM »

If only we could get into a solar race with Iran.
Logged

Ammunition spitting is him, is it, you listening
Littering written, it\\'s in slippers, get the rebel in him
Sticking it with sinners, sizzlin\\' rhythm, verbally hit him
Did he did it, or did he didn\\'t, admit it -
Rugged Man - Give it Up
Wiglaf
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +17/-10
Posts: 260



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 28, 2007, 02:52:13 AM »

I also like the idea of solar furnaces and solar thermal power.

The idea operates on the same principle as Archimedes death ray, a series of mirrors each adjusted to reflect sunlight to the same spot.



Solar 2 power project in the Mojave Desert.
I've driven past this plant many times.
Logged

. . . sometimes it seems that one has to lean into the wind to stand straight.
James Welch Winter in the Blood

Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution,no law, no court can even do much to save it.
Judge Learned Hand
Fredledingue
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +29/-30
Posts: 852



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 08, 2008, 11:47:57 AM »

There is also the concept of wind tower aka solar chemney which look promising for a stable electric power production.

Quote
What is a Solar Tower A Solar Tower uses the power of the sun and the fact that heat rises to generate zero emission electricity. Sunlight heats the air at the base of very tall tower which then rises and turns an electricity generating turbine. With a very tall tower the updraft effect sucks the heated air even more rapidly upwards increasing the amount of electricity which can be generated.

At ground level a wide air-tight transparent collector is constructed covering a wide area of land to capture as much of the sun's energy as possible using the greenhouse effect. The air in the collector heats up and rises up through the tall chimney built in its centre turning the turbines located near the base of the chimney. The collector stays warm throughout the night enabling significant amounts of electricity to be generated even when it is dark.

Air at 30 degrees Celcius at the edge of the collector is heated up to around 70 degrees Celcius at the centre. The temperature differential between the top and bottom of the tower results in an updraft velocity of around 15 metres per second which means that maintenance crews can do their work without requiring generator down time.

A 50kW prototype solar tower (pictured above) was constructed in Spain way back in 1982. This plant 150km south of Madrid had an 800 foot diameter collector and a 600 foot tall 33 foot wide tower. Over the next seven years the solar tower operated for 15,000 hours during which time enormous amounts of tests were undertaken. It proved possible to run the power plant automatically with just one supervisor required, and the concept was proven to be a very reliable means of generating clean electricity.

It was also found that by using heat storage units within the collector space, it is possible to store energy so that electricity can be generated during peak demand - an advantage over traditional photovoltaic solar panel electricity generation. Shutter doors at the top of the collector can be opened and closed automatically to keep or release the stored heat energy. The ground under the glass collector is covered with a heat absorbant membrane to help store energy and make 24-hour operation possible.

Here is a miniature created by students
source
source



Here is a prototype built in Spain 25 years ago (the idea is not new)


Here is an australian project: The tallest construction ever.

source

Logged

Dr. Zoidberg is jewish (and an important AIPAC donator!)

Abraxas
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +205/-201
Posts: 3,880


"You do not speak for the rest"


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 08, 2008, 09:06:18 PM »

Sorry, but is there anything about cost? I skimmed the sources but didn't see a figure.
Logged

Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like its from Neptune.
- Noam Chomsky

... you can almost see the high water mark - that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.
- Hunter S. Thompson
Major Zee Lee
Forum cat lover
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +64/-169
Posts: 566


Kooks not allowed in (Secret meeting is next door)


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 09, 2008, 03:12:51 AM »

Sorry, but is there anything about cost? I skimmed the sources but didn't see a figure.

They say the Australian solar tower has an estimated cost of 670 million $, whereas a coal power plant with equal output would cost 440 million $. Anyway the estimate cost includes that the tower is a prototype and there's a lot of development costs atached to it (would be the tallest structure ever); further towers would be cheaper to build. Also the cost of coal plant is for construction cost only, and does not account for the cost of its environmental footprint.
Logged

Do not take life too seriously; nobody lives to tell.
Fredledingue
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +29/-30
Posts: 852



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2008, 11:10:40 AM »

Nor do they count for coal consumption.

The solar chemney is a relatively simple structure with no high tech or hazardous technology.

What is amazing is that one such tower works in Spain for 25 years and no one thought of using it on a larger scale.

Well, maybe they waited for some global warming for efficiency reasons.
Logged

Dr. Zoidberg is jewish (and an important AIPAC donator!)

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.117 seconds with 25 queries.