No, read my words again.  Because Dawkins has not offered any test so it is indetermined.  There is a difference between a hypothesis that is valid from a scientific standpoint and one that has been shown to be likely true.

Um, how about plants and animals?

Everything has had its origin from natural processes until you can provide proof that some other process exists.  Its the only thing that makes sense, not your Cartoon Universe.

Good luck showing magic, or supernaturalism as you call it, exists!

When you begin with a prior commitment to the absurdly unsupportable notion of materialism, statements like yours are expected.  There are natural causes and there is design.  Design explains the observable world much better because when we look at the natural world we find elements of design throughout it.  We also observe design, in action, building the same kinds of elements over and over again.

RF, name ONE thing your Deusigner has positively created - that you can prove to a scientific level.

As support for Materialism, we will tell you the billions of things that material mechanisms are responsible for - proven to be responsible for, such as mountain building, lightning, planets orbits, electricity, magnetism, gravity, waves, light, heat, sound, texture, evolution, tides, many psychoses, cancer, many rashes and bruises, heart attacks, anurisms, atheletes foot, dust mites, allergies, weak and strong nuclear forces, nuclear bombs, nuclear energy, automatic door closers, fire extinguishers, cars AND buses, planes, trains and Vespa scooters, windsurfers, submarines, sofas, books, intelligence, caps, speakers, extension cords, bamboo flooring, videos and cds, dvds, internet, rivers, volcanoes, streams, trees, bunnies, whales, paper, brains, arteries, hearts and knees, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, siltation, cirques, morains, swales, valleys, knolls, crystals, uranium, lead, copper, and iron, rubber, chocolate, pollen, pears and bears, chalk, marble, quartz, etc....

Need I go on?  All of these things, you will agree, are dependent upon material and material mechanisms.

Now, name ONE thing that you can show that your Deusigner did - actually show - and not simply assert.

RF, cars were designed by humans - material entities - and cars are based on a myriad of material properties.

You appeal now to the BB? The unknown?

Has it sunk through yet? Have you realized that you only have an Argument from Ignorance?

I am not asking you to name something that we don't know what caused it - I am challenging you and your God to name ONE thing that you can show "He" designed.

So far you have given me NOTHING.

Still nothing, RF.  You are just asserting again without evidence.

You have made hundreds of clims all based on your presuppositionalism. I am offering you a chance to show that there is something other than convoluted theistic reasoning behind it - like actual evidence.

For example, here is one thing that would convince me if your religion was true.

Let me pick a mountain - any old mountain - and you move it.  See how evidence works?  I predict the mountain won't move, but your religion claims it will.  (Of course you will appeal to it being metaphorical. Every time something can actually be tested you must appeal to some other "reason".)

Still waiting.