Abraxas wrote:cybert wrote:Geez, calm down. I get it, you hate Obama, but what are you so upset about?
I don't hate Obama. I am dissapointed I voted for him... but that's not what's got me upset. What's got me upset is that polls, put out by biased sources, reflect only what that source wants reflected.
Yes, they do, but that doesn't mean that most polls are put out by biased sources. Is this a biased source? Biased toward whom? It is put out by FOX. I posted it here because I thought it amusing that a FOX poll showed a rise in Obama's numbers from the last FOX poll. You not only have bought the political dogma that polls don't matter but you have no sense of humor either.
Abraxas wrote:Even more upsetting is that you think this is a story. What's got me upset is I'm not allowed to disagree with Obama or Democrats unless, according to you, I harbor some kind of "hate" for them.
Don't be so melodramatic.
Abraxas wrote:cybert wrote:You know this is very old to be commenting about it now. We've had this "polls don't mean anything" discussion before and is total political dogma that polls mean nothing. Politicians who say that are liars and know it. They spend thousands, millions on pollsters and polls for a reason, you know? Nobody spends millions of difficult to come-by campaign dollars on meaningless crap. You go ahead and keep buying the BS about meaningless polls if you want to, but I'm not much for BS myself.
Considering most of those scientific polls, which are specific to a region or a particular voting bloc, have a margin of error near 3%... remind me again why this poll showing an increase of 4% is even worth mentioning?
Because it was an increase over the last one. Never mind, you just go back and listen to your politicians that say polls don't matter. That is where that dogma comes from, you know, politicians, not anyone else.
Hell is a place where there is no reason.